Getting to specifics in a general writing course - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Getting to specifics in a general writing course

Description:

History. Literature. Communication. Education. What do we ... dial caliper, cable television show. prepositional phrases. valid for a period of two years from ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Rep67
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Getting to specifics in a general writing course


1
Getting to specifics in a general writing course
  • Randi Reppen
  • Northern Arizona University

2
Multicultural writers

3
What does it mean to teach writing?
  • Raise audience awareness
  • Teach appropriate conventions
  • Write for different purposes
  • Writing to learn
  • Focus is on information NOT interpersonal!!

4
Who are we teaching?
  • Majors
  • Engineering
  • Natural Science
  • History
  • Literature
  • Communication
  • Education
  • ?????????

5
What do we teach?
  • Using and citing sources
  • Avoiding plagiarism
  • Critical thinking
  • Information packaging
  • Conventions (formatting, citations)
  • Discourse conventions

6
  • Linguistic characteristics of academic writing
  • A word about corpus linguistics

7
General characterisitcs
  • use of nominalizations
  • government, ability, demolition
  • nounnoun
  • dial caliper, cable television show
  • prepositional phrases
  • valid for a period of two years from
  • original purchase
  • Technical / specialized use of terms
  • chain

8
  • pronouns
  • I, we, you, they
  • use of passive (be past participle)
  • was discussed, is claimed

9
Active vs. Passive voice
  • Two Ecology research articles
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • From Biber, D. Conrad, S. Reppen, R. (1996)
  • Corpus linguistics Investigating language
    structure and use.
  • Cambridge Cambridge University Press

10
(No Transcript)
11
Lexical bundles
  • the nature of the
  • in the case of
  • as a result of
  • on the basis of
  • in terms of the

12
  • What about specific disciplines?

13
Engineering Natural Sciences
  • as shown in figure
  • an increase in the
  • the rate at which
  • the ratio of the
  • as a function of

14
Humanities Social Sciences
  • the fact that the
  • by the fact that
  • are likely to be
  • are more likely to

15
Frequent passive preposition constructions
  • aligned with
  • based on
  • coupled with
  • attributed to
  • subjected to.

16
Teaching how to learn
  • Strategies for looking at texts
  • Discovering disciplinary norms
  • Students as researchers
  • Look at texts for conventions
  • Look for specific linguistic features

17
Some things to look for
  • Does the article have an abstract, diagrams,
    pictures, charts, etc?
  • Are there references in the text?
  • What types of sources are presented in the
    bibliography?
  • Are there explicit research questions or
    hypotheses?
  • Does the article identify a gap in the
    literature?
  • Are there technical terms?
  • Are data presented?

18
Feedback
  • Cant fix everything at once
  • Start with big issues that impact understanding
  • Involve students text comparisons

19
Break out sessions
  • Try some of these ideas
  • Set of articles from three disciplines
  • Economics, Geology, Art
  • Nursing, Engineering, Education
  • Sheet with suggestions of things to look for
  • Plus a task

20
Selected References
  • Biber, D. 2006. University language. Amsterdam
    John Benjamins.
  • Biber, D., Conrad, S., and Reppen, R. 1998.
    Corpus linguistics Investigating language
    structure and use. Cambridge Cambridge
    University Press.
  • Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., and
    Helt, M. 2002. Speaking and writing in the
    university A multi-dimensional comparison. TESOL
    Quarterly 36, 948.
  • Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S.,
    and Finegan, E. 1999. The Longman grammar of
    spoken and written English. Harlow, Essex
    Pearson Education.
  • Biber, D., and Reppen, R. 2002. What does
    frequency have to do with grammar teaching?
    Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24,
    199208.
  • Conrad, S., and Biber, D. 2009. Real grammar A
    corpus-based approach to English. Harlow, Essex
    Pearson/Longman. 
  • Donley, K. M., and Reppen, R. 2001. Using corpus
    tools to highlight academic vocabulary in SCLT.
    TESOL Journal 10, 712.
  • Horst, M., Cobb, T. and Nicolae, I. 2005.
    Expanding academic vocabulary with an interactive
    on-line database. Language Learning and
    Technology 9 (2), 90110.
  • Hyland, K. and Milton, J. 1997. Qualification and
    certainty in L1 and L2 students writing. Journal
    of Second Language Writing 6, 183205
  • OKeefe, A., McCarthy, M., and Carter, R. 2007.
    From corpus to classroom. Cambridge Cambridge
    University Press.
  • Nesi, H., and Basturkmen, H. 2006. Lexical
    bundles and discourse signaling in academic
    lectures. International Journal of Corpus
    Linguistics 11, 283304.
  • Reppen, R. 2010. Using corpora in the language
    classroom. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
  • Robinson, M., Stoller, F., Constanza-Robinson,
    M., and Jones, J. 2008. Write like a chemist. New
    York Oxford University Press.
  • Useful online corpora and tools
  • Antconc concordance program www.antlab.sci.waseda
    .ac.jp/software.html
  • www.americancorpus.org
  • corpus.byu.edu/time/

21
Thanks!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com