Volvo Summer Workshop Track 2: Urban Transportation Physics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Volvo Summer Workshop Track 2: Urban Transportation Physics

Description:

2.Sweden - Environmental Zones. 1. Copenhagen - City Goods ... Two parts of travel time. Time to travel between stops. Time to pick up and drop off passengers ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: michae730
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Volvo Summer Workshop Track 2: Urban Transportation Physics


1
Volvo Summer Workshop Track 2 Urban
Transportation Physics
  • Carlos Daganzo

2
Outline
  • Focus
  • Mass motions in cities
  • How things work?
  • New technologies
  • New policies
  • Projects
  • BLIPS
  • Green Logistics
  • Gridlock
  • Self synchronizing buses
  • Evacuation
  • Safety

3
BLIP Concept
  • Right lane reserved for bus but open to traffic
    when bus is not near by, like IBL.
  • CMS and in-pavement lights dynamically restrict
    and allow access to lane.
  • One CMS per block
  • Rules of the road Drivers bound by CMS message
    until next CMS is reached.

Eichler and Daganzo, 2005, Bus Lanes with
Intermittent Priority Assessment and Design
4
Complexity Fades Away
Results do not rely on particulars of how the
cocoon is achieved.
One example of cocoon formation.
5
Green Logistics Implemented schemes
Category Implemented Policy
Restriction zones 1. Copenhagen - City Goods Ordinance for capacity management
Restriction zones 2.Sweden - Environmental Zones
Restriction zones 3. UK - Low Emission Zones
Restriction zones 4. Brussels Lorry dedicated routes
Clean vehicles 5. Rotterdam - Electric Vehicle City Distribution System
Clean vehicles 6. Osaka - Electric Vans
Clean vehicles 7. Zurich-Cargo Tram
Coordinated transport 8. Berlin - Goods Traffic Platform (Public Private Partnership)
Coordinated transport 9. Stockholm - logistical centre for coordinated transports
Congestion mitigation 10. Barcelona - Multiple Use Lanes on line parking information
Congestion mitigation 11. Paris, Barcelona, Rome - Night delivery schemes
Charging 12. London Congestion Charging
Charging 13. Germany - Truck Toll System
Information systems 14. New York and Vancouver - Internet Port Information Systems
Information systems 15. Tokyo Advanced Information Systems
Water use 16. Amsterdam - Floating Distribution Centre
Water use 17. Venice - Waterborne traffic management decision support system
Geroliminis and Daganzo (2005), A review of green
logistics schemes used in cities around the world
6
Water use - Coordinated transport
  • A DHL-boat sails through the canals and serves as
    base-centre for bicycle-couriers
  • reduction of 150.000 van-km / year
  • TOTAL COST 7,000

Amsterdam - Floating Distribution Centre
7
Clean vehicles
combining an efficient goods distribution concept
with the environmental impact of electric vehicle
transport
Rotterdam - ELectric vehicle CIty DIstribution
System
  • hybrid (clean and quiet) and energy efficient
    electric vehicles
  • urban distribution centre (UDC)
  • large trucks for long-distance transport to and
    from the UDC and of vans and small trucks for the
    centre.

Total Cost 1.2 million EURO
8
Conclusions
  • Promising city logistics schemes with green
    characteristics
  • Largest and fastest growing cities in the
    developing world ABSENT
  • Schemes can be combined, adapted and modified to
    be of use (HOW? Research is necessary)

9
Gridlock In Cities
  • Nikolas Geroliminis

10
Self-Stabilizing Bus Routes
  • Josh Pilachowski

11
Statement of Problem
  • Two parts of travel time
  • Time to travel between stops
  • Time to pick up and drop off passengers
  • Bus routes by their very nature are unstable
  • Demand is stochastic
  • Small variation in demand can create large
    instability over time without control
  • Queue proportional to headway
  • Increased demand? Slows bus? Larger headway?
    Increased demand
  • Decreased demand? Speeds up bus? Smaller headway?
    Decreased demand
  • Buses eventually come together and act as a
    single unit

12
Sustainability
  • Attracting Ridership
  • Minimum ridership needed to derive environmental
    benefits
  • Ridership from necessity as opposed to desire
  • Spare-the-Air days
  • Inherent Instability
  • Routes with smaller headways are more unstable
  • Smaller headways comes from higher use
  • Equity
  • Bus vs. Rail

13
Control Methods
  • Station Control
  • Holding
  • Station Skipping
  • Interstation Control
  • Speed Control
  • Traffic Signal Preemption
  • Other
  • Adding/Removing Vehicles
  • Early Turns

14
Existing Controls
  • Instability still exists
  • Not many controls to alleviate this
  • Establish slack time
  • Estimate delays on route and add a fixed amount
    to the expected trip time
  • Control points
  • Determine certain stops as control points
  • If a bus arrives at a control point ahead of
    schedule it waits there

15
Existing Controls
  • Expand on the idea of control points
  • By increasing the number of control points errors
    have less time to propagate
  • Control points require slack time built into the
    schedule
  • A bus behind schedule cannot make up lost time
    easily
  • Passengers dont like sitting on the side of the
    road
  • Station Control ? Interstation Control
  • Continuous control points become speed control

16
Speed Control
  • Dynamic stabilization
  • AVL allows buses to continually locate adjacent
    buses
  • Replace slack time with a lower cruising velocity
  • Allows buses to speed up to make up lost time
  • Buses can slow down if they get too far ahead
  • Trade off travel time for stability
  • Lower average velocity (maybe) but lower variance
  • Users have a higher cost for waiting time than
    for travel time

17
Possible Methods of Stabilization
  • Spring based stabilization
  • Springs connecting adjacent buses
  • k spring constant
  • force based on spacing or headway
  • F k(hi hi1)
  • v vt k Dt hi k Dt hi1
  • Unscheduled stabilized headways

18
Model Description
  • State Space
  • yi(t) - spacing
  • hi(t) - headway
  • Variables
  • l - demand
  • b - loss time per pax
  • vt - target speed
  • Evi(t) vt/(1vtlbhi(t))
  • Control vt replaced by vi(hi(t),hi1(t),
    yi(t),yi1(t))

19
Testing the Model
  • Simulation
  • Simple simulation
  • Moves buses according to calculated velocity
  • Picks up and drops off pax
  • Real Data
  • Faux bus route with students as bus drivers
  • Real bus route in Gothenburg, Sweden

20
Future Work
  • Additional areas of analysis and development
  • Traffic
  • Bus velocity constrained by traffic
  • Parallel Bus routes
  • Model interaction between overlapping routes?
  • Create platoons?
  • TSP/stoplights
  • Handicap passengers

21
Logistics of City Evacuation
  • Volvo Summer Workshop
  • July 24, 2006
  • Stella So

22
Immobile Car-less Challenged Car-owners
New Orleans, LA
3 weeks later
Houston, TX
23
Minimize evacuation time
  • Increase capacity
  • Contra flow
  • Alternate routes
  • Bottleneck clearance
  • Manage demand
  • Multi-modal
  • ? pax per car
  • ? shadow evacuation

24
Houston a disaster for car-owners
A Cut-Set Analysis
19 h
23 h
8 h
6 h
25
We couldve done MUCH better!
26
Road User Adaptation to Road Safety Measures
  • Presented by
  • Offer Grembek

27
Road Safety and Road Safety Measures
Generic risk factors Physical / Behavioral
No Danger
Danger
Road Safety
28
Road Safety and Road Safety Measures
Road Safety Measures (RSM)
Generic risk factors Physical / Behavioral
Engineered effect
No Danger
Danger
Road Safety
29
Road Safety and Road Safety Measures
Road Safety Measures (RSM)
Generic risk factors Physical / Behavioral
Engineered effect
Behavioral adaptation
No Danger
Danger
Road Safety
30
Behavioral Adaptation
  • What is behavioral adaptation
  • Seatbelts
  • All-red interval
  • Current theories about behavioral adaptation
  • Risk compensation theories (Wilde)
  • Potential Benefits
  • Road safety measures design and evaluation
  • Academic

31
Research Question
  • Is the effectiveness of RSM influenced by an
  • identifiable road-user behavioral adaptation?
  • Are there specific types of RSM that generate
    behavioral adaptation?
  • Are there specific conditions that generate
    behavioral adaptation?
  • Do these behavioral adaptations have a
    significant impact on the effectiveness of RSM?
  • How does the impact of these behavioral
    adaptations change over time?

32
Road Safety and Behavioral Adaptation
  • Inconsistencies in RSM and behavioral adaptation
  • Mandatory seat-belts
  • Center high mounted stoplights
  • Setbacks of using RSM studies
  • Statistical validity (confounding,
    regression-to-the-mean)
  • Insufficient data

33
The Potential of a Different Approach
  • Industrial safety and security
  • Detailed longitudinal data
  • Immediate consequences
  • Tradeoff between safety and productivity
  • Epidemiology
  • Heterogeneous study population
  • No visible benefits of compliance
  • Non-compliance due to thrill (safe-sex)
  • Portfolio theory
  • Human behavior under risk

34
Future Work
  • Carlos Daganzo

35
Future Work Data Needs
36
Transit/City Structure
Buses - Small
37
Transit/City Structure
Buses - Medium
38
Transit/City Structure
Rail - Small
39
Transit/City Structure
Rail - Large
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com