chemical sensing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

chemical sensing

Description:

... (C6H14), heptane (C7H16), octane (C8H18), ... can be ... 1 = hexane, 2 = octane, ..., m = Xane. S = c1S1 c2S2 c3S3 ... cmSm. or in matrix notation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: melsi
Learn more at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: chemical sensing


1
chemical sensing
  • linear devices

2
chemical sensing
  • introduction to chemical sensing and sensors
  • vapor detection techniques (mostly chemistry)
  • bulk detection techniques (mostly physics)
  • in general, spectroscopic techniques
  • in parallel, algorithmic approaches to
    signal-to-symbol transformation forthese sorts
    of signals

3
approaches to chemical sensing
  • identify the nuclei, e.g.,neutron-activation or
    ?-ray spectroscopy
  • identify the atoms, e.g.,flame emission
    spectroscopy
  • these are great for, e.g., prospecting for iron
    ore you might not care whether you find FeO,
    Fe2O3, Fe2S3, or any other iron compound, as long
    as it is Fe
  • but if you want to know, e.g., how a computer
    works it doesnt do you a lot of good to grind it
    up and analyze the dust for H, C, N, O, Si, Al,
    Fe, Cu, Au, Sn, Pb, etc

4
  • identify positive and negative ions of atoms,
    fragments of molecules, most small molecules,
    some big molecules, e.g., mass spectrometry
  • but there are many ways to make the same mass,
    e.g., H3COCH3 (acetone) and H3CCH2OH (ethyl
    alcohol) look the same at any practical mass
    resolution, and both look the same as NO2 and
    isotopes of Ca, Sc, Ti, and V (all atomic mass
    46) at low resolution, i.e., at high detection
    sensitivity

5
  • identify effect of molecular solubility
    (partition) between two solvents on transport
    time through a sticky pipe, e.g., gas and
    liquid chromatography
  • retention time not unique
  • concatenated techniques, e.g.,GC-MS, effective
    but slow and expensive
  • identify electric-field induced drift rate of
    molecular ions through a gas, e.g., ion mobility
    spectrometry (IMS, plasma chromatography, )
  • airport hand luggage sniffershttp//www.sensir.c
    om/Smiths/InLabSystems/IonScan/IonScan.htm

6
  • identify characteristic x-ray spectral
    attenuation of materials of particular interest
    in particular places
  • airport color x-ray machines for explosives,
    drugs
  • and probably a hundred specialized technologies
    relying on ...
  • photoelectric effect
  • speed of sound
  • infrared absorption
  • etc etc etc ... taking advantage of some unusual
    chemical or physical property of the specific
    analyte

7
  • in general, we can do quite well these days with
    complex instruments whose scale is room size or
    even desk size ... and more recently, desktop
    monitor size ...
  • but there is a demand for low-cost hand-held (or
    robot-held) equivalents
  • many are based on chemi-resistors,
    chemi-transistors, chemi-capacitors, etc
  • covered briefly on the white-board recently
  • first we will discuss laboratory chemical
    analytical instruments and how they are
    being/might be miniaturized

8
spectroscopies
9
spectroscopies
  • when a single component produces a mix of
    separable responses ...
  • example the optical spectrum of a particular
    isotope of iron (Fe)
  • electron state transitions between all possible
    energy levels of the atom (subject to some
    selection rules)
  • example the ion mass spectrum of a molecule of
    heptane (gasoline is mostly C7H16)
  • C, CH, CH2, CH3, CH3C, CH3CH, CH3CH2,
    CH3CH2C, CH3CH2CH, CH3CH2CH2, CH3CH2CH2C,
    ..., CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3

10
  • or a mixture produces a complex response for
    each component
  • can sometimes pre-separate the mixture
    components
  • gasoline ..., hexane (C6H14), heptane (C7H16),
    octane (C8H18), ... can be separated in time
    domain (e.g., gas chromatography)

(structural separation by MS)
(temporal separation by GC)
11
optical spectroscopy
12
illustrates the general principle
  • inevitable tradeoff between your ability to
    separate spectral components (resolution,
    selectivity) and your ability to detect small
    quantities (sensitivity)

13
miniaturization example
Ocean Opticsoptical spectrometeroptics and
electronicson a PC card separatelight source
(below),and fiber optic (blue)light input path
14
example VIS-NIR Diffuse Reflectance Spectrum to
Measure Fish Freshness
(probe light in and out)
(monochromator specific color light out)
15
mass spectrometry
16
mass spectrometry
  • usually a separation based on mass of positive
    ions sometimes negative ions, rarely neutrals
  • usually all the ions are accelerated to the same
    energy (and filtered to remove outliers)
  • velocity thus depends on mass v (2 W/m)1/2
  • velocity measured by time-of-flight, by
    trajectory in a magnetic field, etc, in many
    different geometries

17
  • smaller lower cost alternativequadrupole mass
    spectrometers
  • ions move under combined influence of DC and
    oscillating (RF) electric fields most orbits are
    unbounded, but for any particular mass there is a
    small region in the DC/RF amplitude plane where
    they are bounded
  • equations of motion analogous to the inverted
    pendulum
  • similar to the inverted pendulum application
    made famous as an example of fuzzy logic control

18
miniaturization example
  • argon/air/helium, 500 micron diameter rods, 3
    cm longhttp//www3.imperial.ac.uk/portal/page?_pa
    geid189,618267_dadportallive_schemaPORTALLIVE

19
chromatographies
20
gas chromatography
  • pipe coated (or packed with grains that are
    coated) with a sticky liquid (stationary
    phase)
  • inert gas (e.g., He) flows through the pipe
    (column)
  • mixture (e.g., gasoline) squirted into head
  • gas (mobile phase) carries it over the liquid
  • mixture components move at different effective
    speeds due to different equilibria between phases
  • components emerge at column tail
  • detect with a universal detector
  • or use as inlet to mass or optical spectrometer,
    etc

21
miniaturization example
  • http//eetd.llnl.gov/mtc/Instruments.html(another
    instrument fewer details link to this one
    has disappeared)

22
MANY similar techniques
  • liquid chromatography
  • liquid mobile phase, solid or liquid stationary
    phase
  • ion mobility chromatography
  • ion drift velocity through a gas under influence
    of an electric field (airport explosives detector
    principle)
  • electrophoresis
  • molecules drift through a gel under influence of
    an electric field (used in many medical tests)
  • real old fashioned chromatography
  • dye-like chemicals separated by different
    diffusion speed through a packed powder, e.g.,
    chalk stick,or soup dribble on table cloth

23
hybrid techniques
24
hybrid or tandem techniques
  • for routinely detecting and identifying any but
    the simplest chemical species, hybrid techniques
    are usually employed
  • GC MS
  • pre-concentration IMS (airport explosives)
  • multiple MS stages with collisional
    decomposition between stages
  • etc

25
LC MS with high-pressure ionizer etc
note analogy to image processingnot one magic
bullet, but a cleverchain of simple unit
operations
26
linearity
27
linearity superposition
  • all the techniques discussed today are (nearly)
    linear in several senses of the word
  • output signal linear in sample concentration
  • response to multiple components present
    simultaneously is the sum of the responses to the
    individual components separately
  • i.e., little or no cross-sensitivity
  • later we will discuss sensors where this is not
    true, e.g., solids state chemical sensors
  • like the SnO2 chemi-resistors discussed
    previously
  • if it is true then simple pattern recognition
    works

28
unraveling overlapping spectra(or signatures)
29
overlapping spectra of a mixture
  • absent separation (like GC), given the spectrum
    of a mixture, how best to unravel its components
    when the component spectra all overlap?
  • arrange your spectrum library in a rectangular
    matrix
  • S1 s11, s12, s13, ..., s1n1 hexane,
    1,2,3,...,n peak IDs
  • S2 s21, s22, s23, ..., s2n2 octane,
    1,2,3,...,n same peak IDs
  • ... etc ....
  • Sm sm1, sm2, sm3, ..., smnm Xane,
    1,2,3,...,n same peak IDs

30
  • consider the inverse problem given the
    concentrations, it is very easy to predict what
    the combined spectrum will be
  • C c1, c2, c3, ..., cm,1 hexane, 2
    octane, ..., m Xane
  • S c1S1 c2S2 c3S3 ... cmSm
  • or in matrix notations c S

31
  • if we look at exactly as many spectral peaks as
    there are components in the mixture then the
    matrix is square, and it is easy c s-1 S
  • if we have fewer peaks than components then we
    are up the creek
  • well, we can establish some constraints ...
  • if we have more spectral peaks than components
    in the mixture then what to do?
  • more peaks than components means we haveextra
    data that we can use to improve theprecision of
    our result a sensor fusion opportunity

32
pseudo-inverse method
  • the trick is to multiply both sides of the
    equation by sT
  • s c
    S(npeaks ncomponents) (ncomponents 1)
    (npeaks 1)
  • sT s
    c sTS
    (ncomponents npeaks) (npeaks ncomponents)
    (ncomponents 1) (ncomponents npeaks)
    (npeaks 1)
  • note that sTs is square, so it (generally) has
    an inverse

33
  • c (sTs)-1-sTS (ncomponents 1)
    (ncomponents ncomponents)(ncomponents
    npeaks) (npeaks 1)
  • the calculated component concentrations are
    optimal exactly the same as least squares
    fitting
  • i.e., algebraic least squares fit gives the same
    resultas matrix solution using pseudo-inverse
    formalism
  • yes, of course, there are degenerate cases where
    sTs doesnt actually have an inverse, or
    calculating it is unstable
  • then you need to use better judgement in
    deciding which peaks to use!

34
caution ...
  • c (sTs)-1sTS is the same as the optimal result
    you would get if you minimized the sum of the
    squares of the differences between the components
    of the data set S and a predicted data set S
    s c
  • ?? Sum((sc - S)i over all npeaks spectral
    peaks)d? /dcj 0 gives ncomponents simultaneous
    equations which when you solve them for c gives
    the same result as the pseudo-inverse

35
  • but (to keep the notation and discussion simple)
    Ive left out something importantas in our
    previous discussion about how to combine multiple
    measurements that have different associated
    uncertainties, you need to weight each datum by a
    reciprocal measure of its uncertainty, e.g.,
    1/?i2(in both the least-squares and the
    pseudo-inverse formulations)
  • specific ad hoc weighting schemes are often hard
    to justify with first-principles arguments

36
exercise
  • the following table shows the major peaks in the
    mass spectrum of a mixture of FC-43 and FC-70
    you can find their individual spectra at
    http//www.sisweb.com/index/referenc/mscalibr.htm
    use the EI Positive Ion ... data estimate the
    fractions of FC-43 and FC-70 in this
    mixturefirst do a quick and dirty estimate,
    then do it as precisely as you can given the data
    at your disposal do you get the best result by
    using all the data, or might it be better to
    discard, e.g., data from some of the smaller
    peaks?

37
note amu meansatomic mass units (called
daltons, by chemists and biologists) all the
peaks are normalized to the biggest one(CF3 ?
69 amu)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com