Algorithms for Geoinformatics: Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Algorithms for Geoinformatics: Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going?

Description:

We start with measured data (gravity, traveltimes, etc. ... This was our main focus so far ... Preliminary results reasonable (D. Doser, M. Baker) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: vla4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Algorithms for Geoinformatics: Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going?


1
Algorithms for GeoinformaticsWhere Do We Come
From? What Are We? Where Are We Going?
  • Vladik Kreinovich
  • University of Texas at El Paso

2
Algorithms for Geoinformatics
  • We start with measured data (gravity,
    traveltimes, etc.)
  • Preliminary data processing (duplicates,
    outliers, merging)
  • Inversion
  • Uncertainty estimation
  • Fusion of several inversion results
  • Ideally, joint inversion

3
Preliminary Data Processing
  • This was our main focus so far
  • Detecting outliers (Q. Wen, J. Beck) algorithms,
    results for gravity data
  • Detecting duplicates (R. Torres) algorithms,
    results for gravity data
  • Registering multi-spectral images
    (R. Araiza)

4
Inversion Problems
  • Takes too long many guesses are needed before
    success
  • Does not take geological knowledge into
    consideration
  • The resulting values are approximate, but what is
    the accuracy?
  • Impossible to take other data into account

5
Estimating Inversion Uncertainty
  • Preliminary results reasonable (D. Doser,
  • M. Baker)
  • In general, results qualitatively reasonable but
    quantitatively wrong (M. Averill, K. Miller,
  • J. Beck)
  • Problem we do not take geophysical knowledge
    into consideration
  • Solution take this knowledge into account

6
New Approaches to Inversion
  • For geophysically unreasobale profiles, least
    square errors are small, but individual large
  • Piece-wise smoothness instead of smoothness
  • Geophysical constraints and fuzzy
  • Faster shortest-path-type algorithms
  • Use the geologically simplest (symmetrical) model
    (R. Keller)

7
Data Fusion
  • Successful, e.g., in earthquake localization
  • Problem fusion is very problem-specific
  • Solution select fusion techniques that are
    optimal for different types of data
  • Approach take seismic and gravity data with
    wells, use wells results as benchmarks for
    different fusion techniques

8
Uncertainty Revisited
  • What is the best way to visualize uncertainty (R.
    Arrowsmith, J. Beck)?
  • How to describe expert uncertainty?
  • How to describe uncertainty of the interface
    rules (B. Ludascher, M. Ceberio, E. Saad)?
  • Probabilistic, uncertainty (I. Zaslasky)
  • Use experience of astronomers (D. Bizyaev)

9
Quo Vadis Dreams of the Future
  • What we need is integration of different
    techniques
  • We need joint inversion methods that would take
    all the data and incorporate all the geophysical
    knowledge, formal informal
  • Dialogue if a geophysicist finds something wrong
    s/he should tell the system what is wrong
  • It must automatically produce the accuracy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com