SIR, FedSSH and more to come - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

SIR, FedSSH and more to come

Description:

Using simpleSAMLphp capabilities. Metadata distribution for regional federations ... Connected to a federated account provision system ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: ssal1
Learn more at: http://www.terena.org
Category:
Tags: fedssh | sir | come | more | register

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SIR, FedSSH and more to come


1
SIR, FedSSH and more to come
2
SIRServicio de Identidad de RedIRIS
  • Provide a single entry point to digital identity
    services for the academic community
  • Multiprotocol
  • Simplify management
  • Guarantee evolution
  • Flexible
  • Compatible with any level of IdM deployment
  • Able to live in parallel with other
    infrastructures
  • http//www.rediris.es/sir/

3
The SIR Model
  • One Ring to bring
  • them all and in the
  • darkness bind them
  • In the Land of
  • Mordor where the
  • Shadows lie.

4
IdPs in SIR
  • Institutions in the RedIRIS constituency
  • Virtual organizations related to them
  • Must install a connector
  • Able to produce assertions in the PAPI v1
    protocol
  • Minimum set of attributes in the iris- schemas
  • PHP, Java (JSP Filter), Apache mod_perl, ASP,
    Sun AM, OSSO and some specific ones
  • Community process for developing new ones
  • Must register for the service
  • Accepting the conditions of use
  • Providing their metadata

5
SIR Services
  • Interconnection with SAML infrastructures
  • Access to PAPI-basedservices
  • eduGAIN BE
  • OpenID producer
  • Validation services
  • Attribute exchange
  • SAML
  • OpenID

6
SIR SAML (including eduGAIN)
  • Virtual IdP per institution
  • Using simpleSAMLphp capabilities
  • Metadata distribution for regional federations
  • Direct integration of SAML IdPs is feasible
  • Central eduGAIN BE
  • Plus virtual BEs for institutions requesting them
  • Commercial providers
  • Microsoft
  • Elsevier
  • Requests ongoing for Ovid, JSTOR, EBSCO,
  • Driven by the user institutions

7
SIR PAPI
  • Two ways for connection
  • GPoA SIR
  • Virtual AS for each institution
  • Access to the the national license on ISI WoK
  • RedIRIS inner services
  • Conferences
  • Service control panel
  • Portals
  • Proxies

8
SIR OpenID
  • Virtual producer per institution
  • Additional controls
  • Match URL with attribute values
  • Specify acceptable RPs
  • User consent for extensions related to personal
    data
  • Identifiers in whatever Spanish language
  • yo.rediris.es/soy/diego.lopez_at_rediris.es
  • jo.rediris.es/soc/diego.lopez_at_rediris.es
  • eu.rediris.es/son/diego.lopez_at_rediris.es
  • ni.rediris.es/diego.lopez_at_rediris.es/naiz
  • Simplified versions possible for OpenID2

9
SIR Some ideas for the future
  • New protocols and identity services
  • OAuth
  • Cardspace
  • COmanage
  • New applications (beyond WebSSO)
  • SSH access
  • Distributed storage
  • Attribute authorities (a-la-COManage)
  • Grid interconnection
  • SLCS
  • VOMS
  • Usage of DNIe
  • And the PEPS

10
FedSSH
  • Based on the ideas discussed byTF-EMC2 along past
    summer
  • Common public key servers are updated through
    specific SPs
  • A modified version of the SSH server able to use
    an external repository for public keys

11
Deploying FedSSH
  • Deployed as a pilot by CONFIA, the Southern
    Spanish federation
  • Applied to teaching environments
  • Connected to a federated account provision system
  • Plans to explore the applicability to storage
    services

12
Riding the Hype
  • Make the case for identity services among the
    wider user community
  • Some of the big players are behind
  • Explore direct potential applications
  • There are smart people working on this

13
Identity a-la-carte
  • Use your identity everywhere
  • Easy deployment of additional control
  • Makes it more valuable to users
  • OpenID identifiers for catch-all, low-LoA IdPs

14
Lightweight federation?
  • No changes to the basic protocol required
  • ARPs could be implemented as well
  • Simpler to deploy?
  • Easier to integrate?
  • Closer to commercial providers?

15
OAuth for auto-registration
16
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com