Interviewing in the Face of Disaster: Conducting a Survey of Hurricane Katrina Evacuees May 21, 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Interviewing in the Face of Disaster: Conducting a Survey of Hurricane Katrina Evacuees May 21, 2006

Description:

A survey of Hurricane Katrina evacuees who were housed in Houston shelters was ... Monday, August 29th, 2005: Katrina hit the northern Gulf Coast ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interviewing in the Face of Disaster: Conducting a Survey of Hurricane Katrina Evacuees May 21, 2006


1
Interviewing in the Face of DisasterConducting
a Survey of Hurricane Katrina EvacueesMay 21,
2006AAPOR Annual Conference, Montreal,
QuebecMollyann Brodie, The Henry J. Kaiser
Family FoundationClaudia Deane, The Washington
PostMelissa J. Herrmann, ICRErin Weltzien,
The Henry J. Kaiser Family FoundationLori
Robbins, ICR
2
  • A survey of Hurricane Katrina evacuees who were
    housed in Houston shelters was conducted by The
    Washington Post, The Henry J. Kaiser Family
    Foundation, and The Harvard School of Public
    Health.

The goal of the research was to represent
Hurricane Katrina evacuees in Houston.
3
  • The general issue with properly capturing this
    group of people was their unexpected mobility and
    the constant fluidity of the situation.

The solution was found through strong
communication and extreme adaptability.
4
Timeline
  • Monday, August 29th, 2005 Katrina hit the
    northern Gulf Coast
  • Thursday, September 1st, 2005 Evacuees arrive in
    Houston
  • Tuesday, September 6th, 2005 Contacted to
    perform a study
  • Erin Weltzien (KFF) arrives in
    Houston
  • Tuesday, September 6th -Thursday September 8th,
    2005
  • Developed plan for the study hired local
    Houston in-person interviewers
  • Wednesday, September 7th, 2005
  • Lori Robbins (ICR) arrives in Houston
  • Friday, September 9th, 2005
  • Questionnaire was final and Briefed/trained
    interviewers
  • Saturday, September 10th through Monday,
    September 12th, 2005 Field period    
  • Tuesday, September 13th, 2005
  • Data is delivered and Erin and Lori depart from
    Houston
  • Friday, September 16th, 2005 Article Published
    in The Washington Post

5
General Planning
  • Needed to hire field interviewers that could make
    it into the area without any trouble
  • Hired a higher proportion of African-American
    interviewers
  • Decided against offering incentives, for the
    protection of the interviewers and respondents
  • Needed IRB approval in order to interview these
    respondents

6
General Planning
  • Worked with 30 interviewers
  • Set ground rules for interviewing
  • Always ask permission
  • No pressure or recontact if they refuse
  • Assure respondents that their answers are
    anonymous
  • Try to minimize disruption of the lives of
    individuals in the shelter or their schedules
  • Respect privacy

7
There were three main steps in our process
  • Gaining access to the large shelters
  • Sampling of the smaller shelters
  • Interviewer placement and sampling

8
Gaining Access to the Large Shelters
9
Larger Shelters
  • The large shelters were comprised of
  • The Reliant Complex encompassing the Reliant
    Stadium, Reliant Center, Reliant Astrodome and
    Reliant Arena.
  • The George Brown Convention Center

10
The Plan
  • We identified the large shelters and received
    permission from the head of the Red Cross before
    arriving in Houston.

11
What we encountered
  • Permission from top officials did not gain us
    access at the Reliant Complex or George Brown
    Convention Center.

12
The Process
  • Everyone worked on getting access
  • Rich Morin (WP) called Red Cross contacts trying
    to reach the officials running these large
    shelters
  • Erin Weltzien (KFF) followed up in-person with
    officials running the large shelters
  • A field reporter from the Washington Post spoke
    with media officials on site
  • Lori Robbins (ICR) spoke with supervisors at each
    shelter
  • Bob Blendon (HSPH) put us in contact with the
    Harvard physician who was running the Medical
    Center

13
The Result
  • We received access through the media department
    at the Reliant Complex and through the Red Cross
    and local county officials at the George Brown
    Convention Center.

14
Sampling Smaller Shelters
15
The Plan
  • A list of 17 shelters was generated based on a
    25-30 mile radius of downtown Houston. The list
    was narrowed down to ten shelters for the field,
    based on the estimated population of residents.
  • Permission from the head of Red Cross would help
    ease the burden of gaining access to smaller
    shelters.

16
What we encountered
  • Once we arrived in Houston, the reported number
    of residents at these shelters was changing
    rapidly. Evacuees were moving into more stable
    housing arrangements once they received FEMA
    money and hotel vouchers.
  • Permission from top officials did not guarantee
    access at the shelters, which were churches and
    other centers with their own leadership (i.e. not
    Red Cross people). Additionally, there were
    security concerns and problems locating shelters.

17
The Process
  • We made substitutions to our original list of 17
    to replace the shelters that were vacant or that
    we were unable to locate.
  • Lori (ICR) cajoled shelter supervisors to let us
    in in some cases, we simply showed up
    unannounced and convinced the shelter leader to
    participate.

18
The Result
  • We were able to complete interviews at 5 small
    shelters within the Houston Area.

19
Interviewer Placement and Sampling
20
The Plan
  • To ensure that we would provide as good a
    probability as possible to interview evacuees
    throughout the entire shelter facility
  • Interviewers would review the floor plan of the
    evacuee areas. This included areas where cots
    were located as well as any other rooms,
    hallways, corridors, and walkways.
  • Supervisors would divide the site into quadrants
    to provide adequate coverage to the entire
    facility and avoid clustering of interviewers.
  • The majority of the interviewers would be placed
    where the audience would be most stable cot
    area.

21
What we encountered
  • Once inside the shelters, interviewing
    arrangements at the Reliant Complex and the
    George Brown Convention Center differed
  • On the first day of interviewing inside the
    Reliant Complex, escorts were required. Many
    times these escorts were only available for an
    hour or two. When an escort had to leave, the
    interviewer had to drop off and gather a new
    escort, thus wasting time out in the field.
  • Escorts were not needed at the George Brown
    Convention Center or any of the 5 smaller
    shelters.

22
What we encountered
  • We discovered that the cot areas were largely
    empty during the daytime as people were out
    accessing services.
  • The majority of the evacuees that were in this
    area consistently were elderly people or people
    with limited mobility.

23
The Process
  • Because of difficulties gaining access to sites,
    the first day of interviewing took place outside
    the Reliant Complex both on the street and in
    the nearby shopping areas- and outside of the
    George Brown Convention Center.
  • Interview procedures were similar to our intent
  • Interviewers were stationed in various locations
    and they counted off people who passed, or groups
    of individuals sitting on grassy areas, in
    parking lots, etc.

24
The Result
  • The escort system at the Reliant Complex was
    phased out as the authorities grew more
    comfortable with our project and were assured
    that we were not pressuring residents to
    participate.

25
The Result
  • In large shelters, interviewer placement was
    constantly changing to adapt to the flow of
    residents.
  • During the day, most residents were active.
    Interviewers were stationed in hallways,
    entrances and exits, and outside.
  • Cot areas were largely vacant during the day
    except for elderly or immobile residents fewer
    interviewers were stationed there.
  • At meal times, interviewers shifted to the
    cafeteria areas.
  • Towards the evening and after school, the cot
    area would populate and interviewers shifted
    accordingly.

26
Lessons Learned
  • The cell phone is the greatest thing to happen to
    in-person research!
  • Communication is paramount in situations like
    this.
  • The interviewers were often the best sources of
    information about the daily flow of residents,
    and often had suggestions about where to station
    themselves.
  • The key to success is extreme adaptability!

27
For more information
  • Please contact
  • Melissa J. Herrmann
  • ICR
  • 484-840-4404
  • mherrmann_at_icrsurvey.com
  • Link to the full survey results Post story
  • http//www.kff.org/newsmedia/7401.cfm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com