Title: Interviewing in the Face of Disaster: Conducting a Survey of Hurricane Katrina Evacuees May 21, 2006
1Interviewing in the Face of DisasterConducting
a Survey of Hurricane Katrina EvacueesMay 21,
2006AAPOR Annual Conference, Montreal,
QuebecMollyann Brodie, The Henry J. Kaiser
Family FoundationClaudia Deane, The Washington
PostMelissa J. Herrmann, ICRErin Weltzien,
The Henry J. Kaiser Family FoundationLori
Robbins, ICR
2- A survey of Hurricane Katrina evacuees who were
housed in Houston shelters was conducted by The
Washington Post, The Henry J. Kaiser Family
Foundation, and The Harvard School of Public
Health. -
The goal of the research was to represent
Hurricane Katrina evacuees in Houston.
3- The general issue with properly capturing this
group of people was their unexpected mobility and
the constant fluidity of the situation.
The solution was found through strong
communication and extreme adaptability.
4Timeline
- Monday, August 29th, 2005 Katrina hit the
northern Gulf Coast
- Thursday, September 1st, 2005 Evacuees arrive in
Houston
- Tuesday, September 6th, 2005 Contacted to
perform a study - Erin Weltzien (KFF) arrives in
Houston
- Tuesday, September 6th -Thursday September 8th,
2005 - Developed plan for the study hired local
Houston in-person interviewers
- Wednesday, September 7th, 2005
- Lori Robbins (ICR) arrives in Houston
- Friday, September 9th, 2005
- Questionnaire was final and Briefed/trained
interviewers
- Saturday, September 10th through Monday,
September 12th, 2005 Field period
- Tuesday, September 13th, 2005
- Data is delivered and Erin and Lori depart from
Houston
- Friday, September 16th, 2005 Article Published
in The Washington Post
5General Planning
- Needed to hire field interviewers that could make
it into the area without any trouble - Hired a higher proportion of African-American
interviewers - Decided against offering incentives, for the
protection of the interviewers and respondents - Needed IRB approval in order to interview these
respondents
6General Planning
- Worked with 30 interviewers
- Set ground rules for interviewing
- Always ask permission
- No pressure or recontact if they refuse
- Assure respondents that their answers are
anonymous - Try to minimize disruption of the lives of
individuals in the shelter or their schedules - Respect privacy
7There were three main steps in our process
- Gaining access to the large shelters
- Sampling of the smaller shelters
- Interviewer placement and sampling
8Gaining Access to the Large Shelters
9Larger Shelters
- The large shelters were comprised of
- The Reliant Complex encompassing the Reliant
Stadium, Reliant Center, Reliant Astrodome and
Reliant Arena.
- The George Brown Convention Center
10The Plan
- We identified the large shelters and received
permission from the head of the Red Cross before
arriving in Houston.
11What we encountered
- Permission from top officials did not gain us
access at the Reliant Complex or George Brown
Convention Center.
12The Process
- Everyone worked on getting access
- Rich Morin (WP) called Red Cross contacts trying
to reach the officials running these large
shelters
- Erin Weltzien (KFF) followed up in-person with
officials running the large shelters
- A field reporter from the Washington Post spoke
with media officials on site
- Lori Robbins (ICR) spoke with supervisors at each
shelter
- Bob Blendon (HSPH) put us in contact with the
Harvard physician who was running the Medical
Center
13The Result
- We received access through the media department
at the Reliant Complex and through the Red Cross
and local county officials at the George Brown
Convention Center.
14Sampling Smaller Shelters
15The Plan
- A list of 17 shelters was generated based on a
25-30 mile radius of downtown Houston. The list
was narrowed down to ten shelters for the field,
based on the estimated population of residents.
- Permission from the head of Red Cross would help
ease the burden of gaining access to smaller
shelters.
16What we encountered
- Once we arrived in Houston, the reported number
of residents at these shelters was changing
rapidly. Evacuees were moving into more stable
housing arrangements once they received FEMA
money and hotel vouchers.
- Permission from top officials did not guarantee
access at the shelters, which were churches and
other centers with their own leadership (i.e. not
Red Cross people). Additionally, there were
security concerns and problems locating shelters.
17The Process
- We made substitutions to our original list of 17
to replace the shelters that were vacant or that
we were unable to locate.
- Lori (ICR) cajoled shelter supervisors to let us
in in some cases, we simply showed up
unannounced and convinced the shelter leader to
participate.
18The Result
- We were able to complete interviews at 5 small
shelters within the Houston Area.
19Interviewer Placement and Sampling
20The Plan
- To ensure that we would provide as good a
probability as possible to interview evacuees
throughout the entire shelter facility
- Interviewers would review the floor plan of the
evacuee areas. This included areas where cots
were located as well as any other rooms,
hallways, corridors, and walkways.
- Supervisors would divide the site into quadrants
to provide adequate coverage to the entire
facility and avoid clustering of interviewers.
- The majority of the interviewers would be placed
where the audience would be most stable cot
area.
21What we encountered
- Once inside the shelters, interviewing
arrangements at the Reliant Complex and the
George Brown Convention Center differed
- On the first day of interviewing inside the
Reliant Complex, escorts were required. Many
times these escorts were only available for an
hour or two. When an escort had to leave, the
interviewer had to drop off and gather a new
escort, thus wasting time out in the field.
- Escorts were not needed at the George Brown
Convention Center or any of the 5 smaller
shelters.
22What we encountered
- We discovered that the cot areas were largely
empty during the daytime as people were out
accessing services.
- The majority of the evacuees that were in this
area consistently were elderly people or people
with limited mobility.
23The Process
- Because of difficulties gaining access to sites,
the first day of interviewing took place outside
the Reliant Complex both on the street and in
the nearby shopping areas- and outside of the
George Brown Convention Center.
- Interview procedures were similar to our intent
- Interviewers were stationed in various locations
and they counted off people who passed, or groups
of individuals sitting on grassy areas, in
parking lots, etc.
24The Result
- The escort system at the Reliant Complex was
phased out as the authorities grew more
comfortable with our project and were assured
that we were not pressuring residents to
participate.
25The Result
- In large shelters, interviewer placement was
constantly changing to adapt to the flow of
residents.
- During the day, most residents were active.
Interviewers were stationed in hallways,
entrances and exits, and outside.
- Cot areas were largely vacant during the day
except for elderly or immobile residents fewer
interviewers were stationed there.
- At meal times, interviewers shifted to the
cafeteria areas.
- Towards the evening and after school, the cot
area would populate and interviewers shifted
accordingly.
26Lessons Learned
- The cell phone is the greatest thing to happen to
in-person research!
- Communication is paramount in situations like
this.
- The interviewers were often the best sources of
information about the daily flow of residents,
and often had suggestions about where to station
themselves.
- The key to success is extreme adaptability!
27For more information
- Please contact
- Melissa J. Herrmann
- ICR
- 484-840-4404
- mherrmann_at_icrsurvey.com
- Link to the full survey results Post story
- http//www.kff.org/newsmedia/7401.cfm