Childrens Family Arrangements: Implications for Family and Human Resource Polices - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Childrens Family Arrangements: Implications for Family and Human Resource Polices

Description:

10 percent of poor children are in these families ... However, the overall picture of children's family arrangements by income masks ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Childrens Family Arrangements: Implications for Family and Human Resource Polices


1
Childrens Family ArrangementsImplications for
Family and Human Resource Polices
  • Ronald B. Mincy
  • Columbia University

2
Family Types
  • Married the childs biological parents are
    married and they both live with the child.
  • Divorced-Visiting the childs biological parents
    were married when she was born, but they have
    since divorced or separated.
  • Fragile-Cohabitating the childs biological
    parents are unmarried but they both live with the
    child.
  • Fragile-visiting the childs biological parents
    have never been married to each other, the child
    lives with her mother only, and her father visits
    at least once per week.
  • Single- mother the child lives with her mother
    only and her father visits infrequently or never,
    regardless of her parents current or past
    marital status.
  • Other the child lives with her biological father
    and no other adult or with at least one adult who
    is not a biological parent and has no or
    infrequent contact with a biological father.

3
The dominant family arrangements for children
(marriage and single-motherhood) show a strong
(direct and inverse) relationship to income.
4
Figure I Family Arrangements of Children by
Income
5
Fragile-visiting families are more important
low-income children
  • Even at 200 percent of the poverty line, more
    children are in fragile-visiting families than in
    cohabiting or divorced families.
  • 10 percent of poor children are in these families
  • Have we over-estimated the importance of
    single-motherhood?

6
However, the overall picture of childrens family
arrangements by income masks quite a bit of
racial, not ethnic, diversity .
7
Changes in income are strongly associated with
the fraction of white and Hispanic children in
married and single-mother families.
8
Figure IIA Family Arrangements of White Children
by Income
9
Figure IIB Family Arrangements of Hispanic
Children by Income
10
By contrast, changes in income have very little
association with the fraction of black children
in either of these family arrangements.
11
Figure IIC Family Arrangements of Black Children
by Income
12
Fragile-cohabiting and fragile-visiting families
are trivial family arrangements for white and
Hispanic children, but the latter is a vital
family arrangement for black children.
13
Family Arrangements of Poor Infants by Race
(NSAF, 1999)
14
Conclusions
  • Increases in income are associated with higher
    proportions of white and Hispanic children in
    married families and lower proportions in single
    mother families.
  • This does not necessarily establish a causal
    link.
  • This will be hotly debated during welfare
    reauthorization in the coming weeks

15
However
  • Lost in this debate is the large proportion of
    children who live is that 10 percent of children
    live in (fragile-visiting families).
  • They live with their unmarried mothers, but see
    their fathers at least once a week.
  • Over the last 30 years, policy makers have made
    great strides in raising the paternity
    establishment rates and child support payments
    for these children.
  • Except for a brief period in mid-1990s, efforts
    to sustain this visitation have been woefully
    neglected.

16
Stop Ignoring unmarried fathers
  • Human resource managers must acknowledge the
    fatherhood status of unmarried men to withhold
    child support
  • They are oblivious to other needs of these
    fathers
  • Unmarried fathers are often .
  • assigned to the most inconvenient shifts
  • expected to work weekends or long hours
  • least likely to receive wage increases because
  • these decisions are presumed to have no effects
    on their families.
  • Not so. Assuming assortative mating by income,
    these decisions could reduce
  • child care
  • adult supervision and support and
  • income available to children in the most
    vulnerable families.

17
Especially if they are Black
  • Whatever, policy makers and human resource
    managers do or fail to do with respect to
    unmarried fathers, the consequences will be most
    severe for black children.
  • If black children have any contact with their
    fathers at all, they are most likely to do so in
    fragile-visiting families.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com