Effects of Climate Change on the Hydrologic Cycle - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Effects of Climate Change on the Hydrologic Cycle

Description:

Global Change Research Act of 1990 called for determining the effects of climate ... Climate change will only make the situation worse. Climate Change Summary ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:121
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: bran88
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effects of Climate Change on the Hydrologic Cycle


1
Effects of Climate Change on the Hydrologic Cycle
  • The Future of Lake Mead

Presented by Brandon Klenzendorf CE 394K.2
Surface Water Hydrology Instructor Dr.
Maidment April 29, 2008
https//webspace.utexas.edu/jbklenz/ce394k/klenzen
dorf.ppt
2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Colorado River Basin and Lake Mead
    Characteristics
  • Climate Change Characteristics
  • Summary and Conclusions

2
3
Introduction
  • Project motivation
  • Barnett and Pierce (2008), When Will Lake Mead
    Go Dry? article attributes global warming to low
    lake levels. Is this true?!?
  • Q What do I know about climate change?
  • A Not much!
  • Problems to investigate
  • Current conditions of Colorado River Basin and
    review of literature and causes of low lake
    levels
  • Results of climate change on hydrologic cycle and
    movement of atmospheric water

3
4
Colorado River Basin (CRB)
  • Total drainage area of 243,000 mi2
  • Average annual streamflow
  • 15.1 MAF (1906-present gage values)
  • 13.5 MAF (tree ring reconstruction values)
  • 18.0 MAF (1920 allocation value)
  • Allocations governed by Law of the River
  • Allocations total 18 MAF, of which over 16 MAF is
    currently being utilized

4
Source Barnett and Pierce, 2008
5
CRB Statistics
  • 90 of streamflow generated in Upper Basin
  • 70 of streamflow generated from snow pack
  • Average annual precipitation (P) 14.0 in.
  • Average annual evaporation (E) 12.2 in.
  • Average annual runoff (P-E) 1.8 in. (13)
  • Allocations of 18.0 MAF
  • 7.5 MAF to Upper Basin
  • 7.5 MAF (1 MAF if necessary) to Lower Basin
  • 1.5 MAF to Mexico
  • Additional minor water rights
  • Negative net inflow (Outflow gt Inflow)
  • I(t) 15.1 MAF (or as low as 13.5 MAF)
  • Q(t) 16.0 MAF (increasing trend)
  • Long term failure with negative net inflow

5
6
Literature on CRB Water Supply
  • Global Change Research Act of 1990 called for
    determining the effects of climate change on
    national resources
  • Multiple studies have found that human induced
    increases in temperature of 2-4oC result in a
    runoff reduction of 10-30 over the next 30-50
    years
  • More precipitation will fall as rain instead of
    snow less snow pack earlier snow melt
    change in timing of peak flows
  • Tarboton (1995) and others examined severe
    sustained drought in CRB and found no major
    adverse impacts to various drought conditions
  • Use of general circulation models (GCMs) have
    shown increases in temperature and evaporation,
    decreases in precipitation and runoff suggest
    failure of system

6
7
Barnett and Pierce, 2008
  • Provide first estimate of when Lakes Mead and
    Powell will go dry
  • 10 chance empty by 2013 50 chance empty by
    2021
  • Causes global warming,
  • natural climate variability,
  • current operating status
  • Used water balance model
  • and Monte Carlo simulations
  • to create CDF curves for
  • multiple scenarios

7
Source Barnett and Pierce, 2008
8
Barnett and Pierce, 2008
  • Absence of climate change
  • Net inflow of -0.15 MAF in 2008
  • Net inflow of -1.15 MAF by 2060
  • CDF of system running dry based on net inflow
  • Timing of wet/dry years still allows for failure
    with zero net inflow

8
No climate change
No climate change
Climate change included
9
Climate Change Water Vapor
  • Greenhouse gases (CO2, water vapor, etc) trap
    infrared radiation emitted from the Earths
    surface
  • Increased surface infrared radiation must be
    balanced by an increase in sensible heat
    (temperature) and latent heat (evaporation)
  • Clausius-Clapeyron (CC) Equation
  • es is saturated vapor pressure
  • T is temperature
  • Lv is latent heat of vaporization
  • Rv is water vapor gas constant
  • Assumptions
  • Change in volume of evaporation equals volume of
    water vapor produced
  • Constant Lv
  • Water vapor is an ideal gas
  • External pressure doesnt affect vapor pressure

10
Climate Change Water Vapor
  • CC Equation approximated as
  • es in Pa
  • T in oC

Atmosphere can hold more water
10
Source Chow et al., 1988
11
Climate Change Runoff
  • Evaporation increases across the Earth
  • Precipitation decreases for CRB
  • Runoff (P-E) decreases for CRB
  • Current locations with low runoff will get lower
    high runoff will get higher
  • Areas of high runoff will shrink with climate
    change
  • More extreme droughts and floods

Evaporation
CRB
Runoff
CRB
Model predictions of change in runoff for double
CO2 concentrations.
Precipitation
Source Held and Soden, 2006
12
Climate Change Runoff
Average percent change in runoff volume compared
to historical conditions (1900-1970) from 12
climate models.
Source Milly et al., 2008
13
Summary
  • Colorado River Basin Summary
  • CRB reservoir system will likely fail due to
    allocations greater than streamflow
  • Main problem is recent change to negative net
    inflow due to increased water usage
  • Climate change will only make the situation worse
  • Climate Change Summary
  • Increased temperature allows atmosphere to hold
    more water vapor
  • Increased evaporation in CRB
  • Decreased runoff in CRB

13
14
Conclusion
  • Climate change will hurt the reliability of
    reservoir system in the CRB. However, the major
    problem is over allocation of the river, and this
    problem is what should be addressed.
  • Take home message Cant blame global warming for
    everything!

15
Works Cited
  • Barnett, T.P. and D.W. Pierce (2008) When Will
    Lake Mead go Dry?, Journal of Water Resources
    Research, Vol. 44, W03201.
  • Boer, G.J. (1993) Climate Change and the
    Regulation of the Surface Moisture and Energy
    Budgets, Climate Dynamics, Vol. 8, pg. 225-239.
  • Bosilovich, M.G., S.D. Schubert, and G.K. Walker
    (2005) Global Changes of the Water Cycle
    Intensity, Journal of Climate, Vol. 18, pg.
    1591-1608.
  • Chow, V.T., D.R. Maidment, and L.W. Mays (1988)
    Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, Boston,
    Massachusetts.
  • Held, I.M. and B.J. Soden (2000) Water Vapor
    Feedback and Global Warming, Annual Review of
    Energy and the Environment, Vol. 25, pg. 441-475.
  • Held, I.M. and B.J. Soden (2006) Robust
    Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global
    Warming, Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, pg.
    5686-5699.
  • Milly, P.C.D., J. Betancourt, M. Falkenmark, R.M.
    Hirsch, Z.W. Kundzewicz, D.P. Lettenmaier, and
    R.J. Stouffer (2008) Stationarity is Dead
    Whither Water Management?, Science, Vol. 319,
    pg. 573-574.
  • NASA (2003) EO Study Drought Lowers Lake Mead,
    Jesse Allen, National Aeronautics and Space
    Administration Earth Observatory, 21 February
    2008, lthttp//earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/Lake
    Mead/lake_mead.htmlgt
  • Pierrehumbert, R.T. (2002) The Hydrologic Cycle
    in Deep-Time Climate Problems, Nature, Vol. 419,
    pg. 191-198.
  • Tarboton, D.G. (1995) Hydrologic Scenarios for
    Severe Sustained Drought in the Southwestern
    United States, Water Resources Bulletin, Vol.
    31, No. 5, pg. 803-813.
  • USBR (2008) Bureau of Reclamation Lower
    Colorado Region, 5 March 2008, United States
    Department of the Interior, Bureau of
    Reclamation, lthttp//www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/
    hourly/mead-elv.htmlgt
  • Woodhouse, C.A., S.T. Gray, and D.M. Meko (2006)
    Updated Streamflow Reconstructions for the Upper
    Colorado River Basin, Water Resources Research,
    Vol. 42, W05415.
  • See http//webspace.utexas.edu/jbklenz/ce394k/Klen
    zendorfFinalReport.htm for complete list of works
    cited.

15
16
Questions?
16
17
  • This slide intentionally left blank.

18
May, 2000
18
Source NASA Earth Observatory
19
May, 2003
19
Source NASA Earth Observatory
20
20
Source NASA Earth Observatory
21
Average 18.0 MAF
Average 15.1 MAF
Average 13.5 MAF
21
Source Woodhouse et al., 2006
22
CRB Reservoir System
  • Lake Mead
  • Constructed in 1936 by Hoover Dam
  • Provides water to 8 million people in California,
    Nevada, Arizona, Mexico
  • Total storage of nearly 30 MAF, over half for
    water supply
  • Lakes Mead and Powell
  • Combined storage of 52 MAF
  • Account for 85 of total storage in CRB

22
Source Barnett and Pierce, 2008
23
Drought 1125 ft
Lake Powell Constructed
Addition of new water intake at elevation 860 ft
by 2013 (ENR, 2008)
23
Source USBR, 2008
24
CRB Allocations
  • Upper Basin at 5 MAF/yr and increasing
  • Lower Basin already at full allocation of 7.5
    MAF/yr
  • Mexico already at full allocation of 1.5 MAF/yr
  • Additional loss to evaporation of about 1.5 MAF/yr

Source Barnett and Pierce, 2008
25
  • CRB water balance model

26
Climate Change
  • 1827 Fourier said atmosphere will allow solar
    radiation to enter uninhibited but traps thermal
    radiation from the Earths surface
  • 1861 Tyndal said thermal radiation trapping is
    not due to major gases (N2 and O2) but to trace
    gases
  • Major greenhouse gases
  • CO2
  • Water vapor, H2O
  • Others (CH4, N2O)
  • Mechanisms of climate change will not be
    discussed here, only impact on hydrology

26
27
Climate Change CO2
  • CO2 concentration from 1900-1920 is 300 ppm
  • CO2 concentration at present day is 355 ppm
    (Bosilovich et al, 2005)
  • CO2 concentration to melt all permanent polar ice
    is 1200 ppm (Pierrehumbert, 2002)
  • Most climate models
  • investigate doubling of CO2
  • to roughly 700 ppm and find
  • an increase in temperature
  • of 2-4 oC

Source Maidment CE 394K.2 class notes, 2008
28
Climate Change Water Vapor
  • The atmosphere can hold more water vapor at
    higher temperatures
  • This produces more clouds which warm the surface
    in infrared (longwave, thermal) radiation but
    cool the surface in shortwave (solar) radiation
    (Boer, 1993)
  • Therefore, increased water vapor in the
    atmosphere will further act to increase surface
    temperature and evaporation
  • This will further increase atmospheric water
    vapor concentrations
  • Result possible runaway greenhouse effect

29
Climate Change CC Relation
  • Model results dont scale as the CC equation
    predicts
  • Less change in precipitation and evaporation with
    increased temperature

a6.5
29
Source Boer, 1993
30
Runaway Greenhouse
Outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) is
representative of infrared radiation and can be
modeled as a function of temperature
  • OLR of 260 W/m2
  • Point a, T276 K, low RH, low CO2
  • Point b, T288 K, high RH, low CO2
  • Point c, T330 K, high RH, high CO2
  • OLR of 300 W/m2
  • Point a, T increases by 14 K
  • Point b, T increases by 30 K
  • Water vapor feedback
  • Kombayashi-Ingersoll limit
  • How fast can a moist atmosphere loose energy by
    infrared radiation

Source Pierrehumbert, 2002
31
Climate Change Runoff
Annual average of change in runoff compared to
the global modeling average.
Source Held and Soden, 2006
32
Climate Change Runoff
  • Current precipitation trends controlled by wind
    circulation
  • These trends intensify due to climate change, so
    dry areas become drier and wet areas become wetter

Source Maidment CE 394K.2 class notes, 2008
33
General Circulations Models (GCMs)
  • Focus only on troposphere
  • Horizontal resolution of 2o to 4o latitude and
    longitude
  • Vertical resolution of 10 to 20 layers
  • Assume constant relative humidity
  • Assume constant lapse rate
  • Unable to resolve small scale phenomenon

Source Maidment CE 394K.2 class notes, 2008
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com