The FERC Review Process and The Importance of Safe Pipeline and LNG Terminal Operation

1
The FERC Review Process and The Importance of
Safe Pipeline and LNG Terminal Operation
NASFM Annual Meeting- July 8, 2005 Office of
Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
2
Who is FERC?

• Independent Regulatory Commission
• Five members
• Appointed by the
• President
• Confirmed by the
• Senate

3
Natural gas a critical source of energy and
raw material

• Vital to the US Economy
• ¼ of U.S. energy requirements
• environmental fuel of Choice and regulation
• provides about 19 of electric generation
• residential customers --60 million in 2001
• U.S. industries- over 40 of all primary energy
• Industrial consumption, up by almost 48 from
  1986 to 2001. Increase continues..
• Production U.S. lower-48 and non-Arctic Canada
  flat to declining,
• LNG and Arctic gas will become the major supply
  source, providing 20-25 of U.S. demand by 2025.
• And lastly..

4
Over 90 percent of the 185 GW of new electric
generation since June 2001 is natural gas
Source Derived from Platts POWERmap
5
Safety? How Important?

• Essential
• Prevention is Possible
• Compliance
• Design Standards Review
• No Dig Rules
• Testing and Repair Rules
• Inspection

6
FERC
Existing and Proposed North American LNG
Terminals
CONSTRUCTED A. Everett, MA 1.035 Bcfd
(Tractebel - DOMAC) B. Cove Point, MD 1.0 Bcfd
(Dominion - Cove Point LNG) C. Elba Island, GA
0.68 Bcfd (El Paso - Southern LNG) D. Lake
Charles, LA 1.0 Bcfd (Southern Union -
Trunkline LNG) E. Gulf of Mexico 0.5 Bcfd,
(Gulf Gateway Energy Bridge - Excelerate
Energy) APPROVED BY FERC 1. Lake Charles, LA
1.1 Bcfd (Southern Union - Trunkline LNG) 2.
Hackberry, LA 1.5 Bcfd, (Sempra Energy) 3.
Bahamas 0.84 Bcfd, (AES Ocean Express) 4.
Bahamas 0.83 Bcfd, (Calypso Tractebel) 5.
Freeport, TX 1.5 Bcfd, (Cheniere/Freeport
LNG Dev.) 6. Sabine, LA 2.6 Bcfd (Cheniere
LNG) 7. Elba Island, GA 0.54 Bcfd (El Paso -
Southern LNG) 8. Corpus Christi, TX 2.6 Bcfd,
(Cheniere LNG) 9. Corpus Christi, TX 1.0 Bcfd
(Vista Del Sol - ExxonMobil) 10. Fall River, MA
0.8 Bcfd, (Weaver's Cove Energy/Hess LNG) 11.
Sabine, TX 1.0 Bcfd (Golden Pass -
ExxonMobil) APPROVED BY MARAD/COAST GUARD 12.
Port Pelican 1.6 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) 13.
Louisiana Offshore 1.0 Bcfd (Gulf Landing -
Shell) CANADIAN APPROVED TERMINALS 14. St. John,
NB 1.0 Bcfd, (Canaport - Irving Oil) 15.
Point Tupper, NS 1.0 Bcf/d (Bear Head LNG -
Anadarko) MEXICAN APPROVED TERMINALS 16.
Altamira, Tamulipas 0.7 Bcfd,
(Shell/Total/Mitsui) 17. Baja California, MX
1.0 Bcfd, (Sempra Shell) 18. Baja California -
Offshore 1.4 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) PROPOSED
TO FERC 19. Long Beach, CA 0.7 Bcfd,
(Mitsubishi/ConocoPhillips - Sound Energy
Solutions) 20. Logan Township, NJ 1.2 Bcfd
(Crown Landing LNG - BP) 21. Bahamas 0.5 Bcfd,
(Seafarer - El Paso/FPL ) 22. Corpus Christi,
TX 1.0 Bcfd (Ingleside Energy - Occidental
Energy Ventures) 23. Port Arthur, TX 1.5 Bcfd
(Sempra) 24. Cove Point, MD 0.8 Bcfd
(Dominion) 25. LI Sound, NY 1.0 Bcfd
(Broadwater Energy - TransCanada/Shell) 26.
Pascagoula, MS 1.0 Bcfd (Gulf LNG Energy
LLC) 27. Bradwood, OR 1.0 Bcfd (Northern Star
LNG - Northern Star Natural Gas LLC) 28.
Pascagoula, MS 1.3 Bcfd (Casotte Landing -
ChevronTexaco) 29. Cameron, LA 3.3 Bcfd (Creole
Trail LNG - Cheniere LNG) 30. Port Lavaca, TX
1.0 Bcfd (Calhoun LNG - Gulf Coast LNG
Partners) 31. Freeport, TX 2.5 Bcfd,
(Cheniere/Freeport LNG Dev. - Expansion) PROPOSED
TO MARAD/COAST GUARD 33. California Offshore 1.5
Bcfd (Cabrillo Port - BHP Billiton) 33. So.
California Offshore 0.5 Bcfd, (Crystal
Energy) 34. Louisiana Offshore 1.0 Bcfd (Main
Pass McMoRan Exp.) 35. Gulf of Mexico 1.0 Bcfd
(Compass Port - ConocoPhillips) 36. Gulf of
Mexico 2.8 Bcfd (Pearl Crossing -
ExxonMobil) 37. Gulf of Mexico 1.5 Bcfd (Beacon
Port Clean Energy Terminal - ConocoPhillips) 38.
Offshore Boston, MA 0.4 Bcfd (Neptune LNG -
Tractebel) 39. Offshore Boston, MA 0.8 Bcfd
(Northeast Gateway - Excelerate Energy)
15
14
38
A
27
23
39
10
25
20
B
24
32
19
33
C
7
18
17
21
26
2
29
D
28
3
4
5,31
6
23
1
11
8
36
35
34
22
9
E
37
13
30
12
US Jurisdiction FERC US Coast Guard
16
As of June 30, 2005
US pipeline approved LNG terminal pending
in Bahamas
Office of Energy Projects
7
FERC
Potential North American LNG Terminals
51
50
POTENTIAL U.S. SITES IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT
SPONSORS 40. Coos Bay, OR 0.13 Bcfd, (Energy
Projects Development) 41. Somerset, MA 0.65
Bcfd (Somerset LNG) 42. California - Offshore
0.75 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) 43. Pleasant Point,
ME 0.5 Bcf/d (Quoddy Bay, LLC) 44. St. Helens,
OR 0.7 Bcfd (Port Westward LNG LLC) 45.
Galveston, TX 1.2 Bcfd (Pelican Island -
BP) 46. Philadelphia, PA 0.6 Bcfd (Freedom
Energy Center - PGW) 47. Astoria, OR 1.0 Bcfd
(Skipanon LNG - Calpine) POTENTIAL CANADIAN SITES
IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS 48. Quebec City,
QC 0.5 Bcfd (Project Rabaska - Enbridge/Gaz
Met/Gaz de France) 49. Rivière-du- Loup, QC 0.5
Bcfd (Cacouna Energy - TransCanada/PetroCanada) 50
. Kitimat, BC 0.61 Bcfd (Galveston LNG) 51.
Prince Rupert, BC 0.30 Bcfd (WestPac
Terminals) 52. Goldboro, NS 1.0 Bcfd (Keltic
Petrochemicals) POTENTIAL MEXICAN SITES
IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS 53. Lázaro
Cárdenas, MX 0.5 Bcfd (Tractebel/Repsol) 54.
Puerto Libertad, MX 1.3 Bcfd (Sonora Pacific
LNG) 55. Offshore Gulf, MX 1.0 Bcfd (Dorado -
Tidelands) 56. Manzanillo, MX 0.5 Bcfd 57.
Topolobampo, MX 0.5 Bcfd
49
48
52
43
47
44
41
40
46
42
54
45
57
55
US Jurisdiction FERC US Coast Guard
56
53
As of June 30, 2005

Office of Energy Projects
8
LNG Review Process
Notice of Application
Safety Engineering
Interventions/ Protests
Cryogenic Design Safety Review
Notice of Intent
Technical Conference
Scoping Meeting / Site Visit
Waterway Suitability Assessment
Data Requests, Analysis Agency Coordination
Issue DEIS
Waterway Suitability Report
Public Meeting / Comments
USCG Letter of Recommendation (issued
independently)
Issue FEIS
Authorization / Denial
9
Pre-Filing Process Increased Public Involvement

• More interactive NEPA/permitting process, no
  shortcuts
• Earlier, more direct interaction between FERC,
  other agencies, landowners
• Time savings realized only if we are working
  together with stakeholders
• FERC/Agency staff are advocates of the Process,
  not the Project!
• Goal of no surprises

10
Timelines Traditional vs. Pre-Filing Process
Develop Study Corridor
File At FERC
Announce Open Season
Prepare Resource Reports
Traditional - Applicant
Conduct Scoping
Issue Draft EIS
Issue Order
Issue Final EIS
Traditional - FERC
Announce Open Season
Develop Study Corridor
File At FERC
Prepare Resource Reports
NEPA Pre-Filing - Applicant
Application Complete
Approve PF Request, Conduct Scoping
Review Draft Resource Reports Prepare DEIS
Issue Draft EIS
Issue Order
Issue Final EIS
NEPA Pre-Filing - FERC
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
(months)
11
Opportunities for Public Involvement

• The FERC Process
• Issue Notice of the Application
• Project Sponsor Sends Landowner Notification
  Package
• Issue Notice of Intent to Prepare the NEPA
  Document (i.e., scoping)
• Hold Scoping Meetings

• Public Input
• File an Intervention register for e-subscription
• Contact the project sponsor w/questions,
  concerns contact FERC
• Send letters expressing concerns about
  environmental impact
• Attend scoping meetings

12
Opportunities for Public Involvement

• The FERC Process
• Issue Notice of Availability of the DEIS
• Hold Public Meetings on DEIS
• Issue a Commission Order

• Public Input
• File comments on the adequacy of DEIS
• Attend public meetings to give comments on DEIS
• Interveners can file a request for Rehearing of a
  Commission Order

13
Interagency Agreements

• Agreement for Environmental Review of Natural Gas
  Facilities
• Signed May 2002
• Signed by 10 Federal agencies with jurisdiction
  or expertise
• Establishes FERC as lead agency for environmental
  review
• Ensures early participation and cooperation
• Work with schedule set by FERC

14
Interagency Agreements

• Agreement for LNG Safety and Security
• Signed January 2004 by FERC, USCG, DOT
• Defines roles and responsibilities
• Establishes FERC as lead for environmental review
• Stresses coordination, seamless review
• Coordination continues from initial review
  through construction and operation
• Includes terminal facilities and ships

15
FERC
Onshore Facility Safety

• Compliance with 49 CFR Part 193 and NFPA
  59A
• Cryogenic Design and Technical Review Report 13
• Exclusion Zones Thermal Radiation and Flammable
  Vapor
• Seismic design review

Office of Energy Projects
16
Thermal Exclusion Zones
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
17
Flammable Vapor Exclusion Zone
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
18
FERC
Cryogenic Design Review

• Process Flow and Material Balance
• Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams
• LNG Storage Tank Design
• Hazard Detection and Emergency Shutdown Systems
• Hazard Control Fire Water, Dry Chemical,
• High Expansion Foam
• Technical Conference

Office of Energy Projects
19
FERC
Marine Traffic and Vessel Safety

• Compliance with 33 CFR Part 127
• Letter of Intent to initiate U.S. Coast Guard
  Letter of Recommendation
• June 2005 NVIC
• Marine Safety Analysis Thermal Radiation and
  Flammable Vapor Hazards
• Vessel Traffic Congestion

Office of Energy Projects
20
FERC
ABSG Report Models for CalculatingSite-Specifi
c Hazards

• Spill rates from cargo tank holes
• Spread of unconfined pool on water
• Vapor generation from spills on water
• Thermal radiation from fires
• Flammable vapor dispersion

Office of Energy Projects
21
FERC
Sandia Report Cargo Tank Breach Analysis

• Accidental breach scenario conclusions
• Groundings and low speed collisions - no cargo
  spill
• High speed collisions - 0.5 to 1.5 m2 cargo tank
  hole
• Intentional breach scenario conclusions
• Cargo tanks holes range from 2 to 12 m2
• Nominal tank hole size of 5 7 m2

Office of Energy Projects
22
FERC
Sandia Report General Hazard Analysis
Zone 1 - significant impacts to public safety /
property within 500 meters (1,640 feet) due to
thermal hazards from a fire. Zone 2
transition to less severe thermal hazard levels
to public safety / property - 500 to 1,600
meters. Zone 3 - lower public health and safety
impacts beyond 1,600 meters (5,250 feet).
Large, unignited LNG vapor cloud unlikely, but
could extend to 2,500 meters (8,200 feet).
Office of Energy Projects
23
FERC
Application of ABSG and Sandia Reports to LNG
Project Review

• Cargo hole sizes/scenarios - Sandia Report
• Site-specific hazard calculations - ABSG Report
• Risk-based management options - Sandia Report

Office of Energy Projects
24
FERC
Site-Specific HazardCalculations
LNG Release and Spread LNG Release and Spread LNG Release and Spread LNG Release and Spread LNG Release and Spread
Hole Area 0.8 meters2 5 meters2 7 meters2 12 meters2
Hole Diameter 1.0 meter 2.5 meters 3.0 meters 3.9 meters
Spill Time 94 minutes 15 minutes 10.6 minutes 6.1 minutes
Pool Fire Calculations Pool Fire Calculations Pool Fire Calculations Pool Fire Calculations Pool Fire Calculations
Maximum Pool Radius 340 feet 817 feet 935 feet 1,103 feet
Fire Duration 94 minutes 15 minutes 10.8 minutes 6.5 minutes
Distance to Distance to Distance to Distance to Distance to
1,600 BTU/ft2-hr 2,200 feet 4,340 feet 4,810 feet 5,476 feet
3,000 BTU/ft2-hr 1,710 feet 3,330 feet 3,701 feet 4,206 feet
10,000 BTU/ft2-hr 1,040 feet 1,970 feet 2,174 feet 2,459 feet
Office of Energy Projects
25
FERC
NVIC (June 14, 2005)

• Waterway Suitability Assessment (WSA)
• Validation of WSA through Port Committees
• (i.e. Area Maritime Security Committee)
• Waterway Suitability Report for DEIS
• Security Resource Requirements for DEIS
• Letter of Recommendation follows FEIS

Office of Energy Projects
26
Oversight of Construction

• Company files monthly progress reports during
  construction.
• Review of final design and changes by FERC.
• Clearances for design/construction changes by
  Director of OEP.
• Site inspections by FERC during major
  construction activity.
• Authorization to commence service from Director
  of OEP.

27
Monitoring Operations

• Reporting Requirements
• Semi-annual reports of plant activities,
  maintenance, and problems
• Immediate notification of serious accidents
• Operating Inspections
• Inspect condition of all major plant equipment
• Review plant operations maintenance
• Review changes in design operations safety
  systems
• Inspect security measures
• Update Cryogenic Design and Inspection Manual

28
Opportunities For Fire Officials

• Public Notices/Meetings
• Cryogenic Design Reviews
• NVIC
• Emergency Response Plans
• LNG Pilot Program
• Pre-Filing Consultations
• _______________________

29
FERC
Existing and Proposed North American LNG
Terminals
CONSTRUCTED A. Everett, MA 1.035 Bcfd
(Tractebel - DOMAC) B. Cove Point, MD 1.0 Bcfd
(Dominion - Cove Point LNG) C. Elba Island, GA
0.68 Bcfd (El Paso - Southern LNG) D. Lake
Charles, LA 1.0 Bcfd (Southern Union -
Trunkline LNG) E. Gulf of Mexico 0.5 Bcfd,
(Gulf Gateway Energy Bridge - Excelerate
Energy) APPROVED BY FERC 1. Lake Charles, LA
1.1 Bcfd (Southern Union - Trunkline LNG) 2.
Hackberry, LA 1.5 Bcfd, (Sempra Energy) 3.
Bahamas 0.84 Bcfd, (AES Ocean Express) 4.
Bahamas 0.83 Bcfd, (Calypso Tractebel) 5.
Freeport, TX 1.5 Bcfd, (Cheniere/Freeport
LNG Dev.) 6. Sabine, LA 2.6 Bcfd (Cheniere
LNG) 7. Elba Island, GA 0.54 Bcfd (El Paso -
Southern LNG) 8. Corpus Christi, TX 2.6 Bcfd,
(Cheniere LNG) 9. Corpus Christi, TX 1.0 Bcfd
(Vista Del Sol - ExxonMobil) 10. Fall River, MA
0.8 Bcfd, (Weaver's Cove Energy/Hess LNG) 11.
Sabine, TX 1.0 Bcfd (Golden Pass -
ExxonMobil) APPROVED BY MARAD/COAST GUARD 12.
Port Pelican 1.6 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) 13.
Louisiana Offshore 1.0 Bcfd (Gulf Landing -
Shell) CANADIAN APPROVED TERMINALS 14. St. John,
NB 1.0 Bcfd, (Canaport - Irving Oil) 15.
Point Tupper, NS 1.0 Bcf/d (Bear Head LNG -
Anadarko) MEXICAN APPROVED TERMINALS 16.
Altamira, Tamulipas 0.7 Bcfd,
(Shell/Total/Mitsui) 17. Baja California, MX
1.0 Bcfd, (Sempra Shell) 18. Baja California -
Offshore 1.4 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) PROPOSED
TO FERC 19. Long Beach, CA 0.7 Bcfd,
(Mitsubishi/ConocoPhillips - Sound Energy
Solutions) 20. Logan Township, NJ 1.2 Bcfd
(Crown Landing LNG - BP) 21. Bahamas 0.5 Bcfd,
(Seafarer - El Paso/FPL ) 22. Corpus Christi,
TX 1.0 Bcfd (Ingleside Energy - Occidental
Energy Ventures) 23. Port Arthur, TX 1.5 Bcfd
(Sempra) 24. Cove Point, MD 0.8 Bcfd
(Dominion) 25. LI Sound, NY 1.0 Bcfd
(Broadwater Energy - TransCanada/Shell) 26.
Pascagoula, MS 1.0 Bcfd (Gulf LNG Energy
LLC) 27. Bradwood, OR 1.0 Bcfd (Northern Star
LNG - Northern Star Natural Gas LLC) 28.
Pascagoula, MS 1.3 Bcfd (Casotte Landing -
ChevronTexaco) 29. Cameron, LA 3.3 Bcfd (Creole
Trail LNG - Cheniere LNG) 30. Port Lavaca, TX
1.0 Bcfd (Calhoun LNG - Gulf Coast LNG
Partners) 31. Freeport, TX 2.5 Bcfd,
(Cheniere/Freeport LNG Dev. - Expansion) PROPOSED
TO MARAD/COAST GUARD 32. California Offshore 1.5
Bcfd (Cabrillo Port - BHP Billiton) 33. So.
California Offshore 0.5 Bcfd, (Crystal
Energy) 34. Louisiana Offshore 1.0 Bcfd (Main
Pass McMoRan Exp.) 35. Gulf of Mexico 1.0 Bcfd
(Compass Port - ConocoPhillips) 36. Gulf of
Mexico 2.8 Bcfd (Pearl Crossing -
ExxonMobil) 37. Gulf of Mexico 1.5 Bcfd (Beacon
Port Clean Energy Terminal - ConocoPhillips) 38.
Offshore Boston, MA 0.4 Bcfd (Neptune LNG -
Tractebel) 39. Offshore Boston, MA 0.8 Bcfd
(Northeast Gateway - Excelerate Energy)
15
14
38
A
27
23
39
10
25
20
B
24
32
19
33
C
7
18
17
21
26
2
29
D
28
3
4
5,31
6
23
1
11
8
36
35
34
9
E
22
37
13
30
12
US Jurisdiction FERC US Coast Guard
16
As of July 1, 2005
US pipeline approved LNG terminal pending
in Bahamas
Office of Energy Projects
30
FERC
Potential North American LNG Terminals
51
50
POTENTIAL U.S. SITES IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT
SPONSORS 40. Coos Bay, OR 0.13 Bcfd, (Energy
Projects Development) 41. Somerset, MA 0.65
Bcfd (Somerset LNG) 42. California - Offshore
0.75 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) 43. Pleasant Point,
ME 0.5 Bcf/d (Quoddy Bay, LLC) 44. St. Helens,
OR 0.7 Bcfd (Port Westward LNG LLC) 45.
Galveston, TX 1.2 Bcfd (Pelican Island -
BP) 46. Philadelphia, PA 0.6 Bcfd (Freedom
Energy Center - PGW) 47. Astoria, OR 1.0 Bcfd
(Skipanon LNG - Calpine) POTENTIAL CANADIAN SITES
IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS 48. Quebec City,
QC 0.5 Bcfd (Project Rabaska - Enbridge/Gaz
Met/Gaz de France) 49. Rivière-du- Loup, QC 0.5
Bcfd (Cacouna Energy - TransCanada/PetroCanada) 50
. Kitimat, BC 0.61 Bcfd (Galveston LNG) 51.
Prince Rupert, BC 0.30 Bcfd (WestPac
Terminals) 52. Goldboro, NS 1.0 Bcfd (Keltic
Petrochemicals) POTENTIAL MEXICAN SITES
IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS 53. Lázaro
Cárdenas, MX 0.5 Bcfd (Tractebel/Repsol) 54.
Puerto Libertad, MX 1.3 Bcfd (Sonora Pacific
LNG) 55. Offshore Gulf, MX 1.0 Bcfd (Dorado -
Tidelands) 56. Manzanillo, MX 0.5 Bcfd 57.
Topolobampo, MX 0.5 Bcfd
49
48
52
43
47
44
41
40
46
42
54
45
57
55
US Jurisdiction FERC US Coast Guard
56
53
As of July 1, 2005

Office of Energy Projects
31
FERC
LNG Onshore Project Status -Approved Projects

• Applications Approved Status of
• Construction
• Trunkline, Lake Charles Expansion (CP02-60) 1
  Underway,
• Service 4th Q 05
• Sempra, Cameron LNG (CP02-374) 2 Underway,
  Amendment Authorized
• AES, Ocean Express Pipeline (CP02-90) 3
  Amendment Authorized
• Tractebel, Calypso Pipeline (CP01-409) 4
  Pending
• Freeport LNG (CP03-75) 5 Construction
  Clearance Authorized

Status as of July 1, 2005
Office of Energy Projects
32
FERC
LNG Onshore Project Status -Approved Projects

• Applications Approved Status of
• Construction
• Cheniere LNG - Sabine, LA (CP04-47) 6
  Authorized
• Southern LNG Elba Island (CP02-380) 7
  Underway
• Cheniere, Corpus Christi (CP04-37) 8
  Pending
• Vista Del Sol, Corpus Christi (CP04-395) 9
  Pending
• Weavers Cove Energy, Fall River (CP04-36) 10
  Pending
• Exxon Mobil, Golden Pass (CP04-386) 11
  Pending

Status as of July 1, 2005
Office of Energy Projects
33
FERC
Rejected LNG Onshore Projects

• Applications Rejected
• Keyspan, Providence (CP04-223)

As of July 1, 2005
Office of Energy Projects
34
Onshore LNG Project Status
FERC

• Pre-Filing
• Broadwater, LI Sound (PF05-04) 25
• Gulf Energy, Pascagoula (PF05-05) 26
• Casotte Landing, Pascagoula (PF05-09) 28
• Creole Trail, Cameron (PF05-08) 29
• Northern Star, Bradwood (PF05-10) 27

Status as of July 1, 2005
Office of Energy Projects
35
Onshore LNG Project Status
FERC

• Applications Filed
• Working on DEIS
• Sound Energy Solutions, Long Beach (PF03-6,
• CP04-58) 19
• Sempra, Port Arthur (PF04-11, CP05-83) 23
• Calhoun LNG, Port Lavaca (CP05-91) 30
• Dominion, Cove Point (PF04-15, CP05-130) 24
• Freeport Expansion (CP05-361) 31

Status as of July 1, 2005
Office of Energy Projects
36
FERC
Onshore LNG Project Status

• Applications Filed
• Working on FEIS
• BP, Crown Landing (PF04-2, CP04-411) 20
• Ingleside/Occidental, Corpus Christi (CP05-11)
  22

Status as of July 1, 2005
Office of Energy Projects
37
LNG Project Status -Associated Pipelines
FERC

• Filed at FERC
• El Paso, Seafarer (PF04-08, CP05-25) 21
• Excelerate Energy, Northeast Gateway (CP05-383)
  39
• Applications Filed
• Working on DEIS with USCG
• Freeport-McMoran, Main Pass (CP04-68) 34
• Working ON FEIS with USCG
• Conoco Phillips, Compass Port (CP04-114) 35
• Exxon Mobil, Pearl Crossing (CP04-374) 36

Status as of July 1, 2005
Office of Energy Projects
38
North East LNG Terminals
Legend Existing Terminal Approved
Terminal Proposed Terminal Pre-Filing Proposed
Terminal Filed Working on DEIS Working on
FEIS Potential Terminal
Pleasant Point, ME (43)
Everett, MA (A)
Offshore Boston - Excelerate (39)
Offshore Boston - Neptune (38)
Providence, RI Rejected
Fall River, MA (10)
Somerset, MA (41)
July 1, 2005
39
Mid-Atlantic LNG Terminals
Long Island Sound, NY (25)
Philadelphia, PA (46)
Logan Township, NJ (20)
Legend Existing Terminal Approved
Terminal Proposed Terminal Pre-Filing Proposed
Terminal Filed Working on DEIS Working on
FEIS Potential Terminal
Cove Point, MD (B/24)
July 1, 2005
40
South East LNG Terminals
Legend Existing Terminal Approved
Terminal Proposed Terminal Pre-Filing Proposed
Terminal Filed Working on DEIS Working on
FEIS Potential Terminal
Elba Island, GA (C/7)
Bahamas (3/4/21)
(Pipelines only)
July 1, 2005
41
Gulf Coast LNG Terminals
Legend Existing Terminal Approved
Terminal Proposed Terminal Pre-Filing Proposed
Terminal Filed Working on DEIS Working on
FEIS Potential Terminal
Pascagoula, MS (26/28)
Lake Charles, LA (D/1)
Port Arthur (23)
Sabine Pass, LA (6)
Cameron (29)
Golden Pass (11)
Hackberry (2)
Galveston, TX (45)
Freeport McMoran (34)
Freeport, TX (5/31)
Compass Port (35)
Port Lavaca, TX (30)
Gulf Landing (13)
Corpus Christi, TX (8)
Beacon Port (37)
Pearl Crossing (36)
Vista Del Sol (9)
Gulf Gateway (E)
Ingleside LNG (22)
Port Pelican (12)
July 1, 2005
42
Southwest LNG Terminals
Legend Existing Terminal Approved
Terminal Proposed Terminal Pre-Filing Proposed
Terminal Filed Working on DEIS Working on
FEIS Potential Terminal
Long Beach, CA (19)
California Offshore (32/33/42)
BHP Billiton (32)
Crystal Energy (33)
July 1, 2005
Chevron Texaco (42)
43
North West LNG Terminals
Legend Existing Terminal Approved
Terminal Proposed Terminal Pre-Filing Proposed
Terminal Filed Working on DEIS Working on
FEIS Potential Terminal
Astoria, OR (47)
Bradwood, OR (27)
St. Helens, OR (44)
Coos Bay, OR (40)
July 1, 2005
Office of Energy Projects
43