Distributed Loss Compensation for Low-latency On-chip Interconnects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Distributed Loss Compensation for Low-latency On-chip Interconnects

Description:

Drive each one with an ... As technology scales, on-chip latencies are increasingly ... Using distributed loss compensation with NICs leads to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: anupp1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Distributed Loss Compensation for Low-latency On-chip Interconnects


1
Distributed Loss Compensation for Low-latency
On-chip Interconnects
  • Class Presentation For
  • Advanced VLSI Design Course
  • Instructor Dr.Fakhraie
  • Presented By Fahimeh Alsadat Hoseini
  • Winter 2006
  • University of Tehran
  • Dept. Electrical and Computer Enginerring

Major Reference ISSCC 2006 / SESSION 21 /
ADVANCED CLOCKING, LOGIC AND SIGNALING TECHNIQUES
/ 21.7
2
Outline
  • Scaling trends and motivation
  • Prior work on low-latency repeater-less links by
    exploiting transmission-line behavior
  • Negative-impedance converter (NIC)
  • System architecture
  • Transmitter design
  • Receiver design
  • Measurement results
  • Summary and conclusions
  • References

3
Scaling Trends - ITRS Roadmap
  • On-chip wire delay scaling more slowly than gate
    delay.
  • Impact of scaling is worst on global wiring.

Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
4
Motivation
  • Wire delays (D) grow quadratically with wire
    length,
  • - Unacceptably great for long wires.
  • - Wire bandwidths,which are inversely
    proportional to D, degrade.
  • Latency is controlled with repeater insertion
    which allows linear scaling of delay with length.
  • Break long wires into N shorter segments
  • Drive each one with an inverter or buffer
  • Optimal number of repeaters can be determined to
    minimize delay
  • Repeaters, often inserted with CAD tools, consume
    a significant fraction of on-chip power and area
    in microprocessors.

5
Outline
  • Scaling trends and motivation
  • Prior work on low-latency repeater-less links by
    exploiting transmission-line behavior
  • Negative-impedance converter (NIC)
  • System architecture
  • Transmitter design
  • Receiver design
  • Measurement results
  • Summary and conclusions
  • References

6
Nearly speed-of-light wires
  • The time-domain solution is
  • In this case, A is a constant. Gamma, the
    propagation constant, provides information about
    the characteristics of this line. The imaginary
    part of gamma, denoted by beta, is inversely
    related to the phase velocity, and the real part
    of gamma, denoted by alpha, is the attenuation
    constant.

R. Chang ,Thesis, 2002.
7
Nearly speed-of-light wires
RC region
LC dominated region
R. Chang ,Thesis, 2002.
8
Nearly speed-of-light wires
  • Take advantage of the inductance-dominated
    high-frequency regime of on-chip interconnects
  • Peak phase velocity is speed of light in SiO2
  • Reduce low-frequency spectral components of the
    signal which introduce ISI and lag LC dominated
    response

Chang et al., JSSC, 2003.
9
Outline
  • Scaling trends and motivation
  • Prior work on low-latency repeater-less links by
    exploiting transmission-line behavior
  • Negative-impedance converter (NIC)
  • System architecture
  • Transmitter design
  • Receiver design
  • Measurement results
  • Summary and conclusions
  • References

10
Distributed Loss Compensation
  • Used in long-distance telephone network before
    the introduction of optics for long-haul
    communications
  • Clock distribution networks
  • Standing wave oscillators, O Mahony et al.,
    JSSC 2003
  • Rotary traveling-wave oscillator arrays, Wood et
    al., JSSC 2001
  • Distributed amplifiers use similar ideas to
    extend the unity-gain bandwidth

11
Negative Impedance Converter
  • Pole -gm/(2C) zero 1/(2RC)
  • Match frequency-dependent loss characteristics

Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
12
NIC Attenuation Compensation - ?
Without NICs
With NICs
Increasing R, C50 fF
Increasing R, C600 fF
  • A larger cap C increases the amount of loss
    compensation at higher frequencies
  • Negative ? leads to instability which can lead
    to excessive ringing or oscillations

Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
13
Latency Comparison
Optimally buffered link
Length14mm
Latency (ps)
NIC Link
Width (µm)
  • NIC links have lower latencies at higher widths
    due to transmission-line behavior of
    interconnects for widths gt 2 µm
  • For very small widths (large R), the interconnect
    is predominantly in the RC domain

Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
14
Power Comparison
Length14mm
Optimally buffered link
Energy (pJ/bit)
NIC Attenuation Compensation - ?
NIC Link
Width (µm)
  • Power consumed increases rapidly for widths lt 4µm
    due to the large number of NIC elements required
  • Increasing bit energy in the optimally repeated
    case is due to large number of repeaters needed
    to drive the additional C

Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
15
Outline
  • Scaling trends and motivation
  • Prior work on low-latency repeater-less links by
    exploiting transmission-line behavior
  • Negative-impedance converter (NIC)
  • System architecture
  • Transmitter design
  • Receiver design
  • Measurement results
  • Summary and conclusions
  • References

16
Test-Chip Components
Serpentine serial link
LFSR
SRAM
Driver

1.67mm
Receiver
SRAM
PLL
Error Counter
5mm
  • 3-Gbps link in 0.18-µm technology with a 1.5-GHz
    system clock
  • 17-bit LFSR for generating PRBS and an error
    counter for obtaining BER
  • Far-end and near-end waveforms obtained by
    pico-probing

Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
17
System Architecture
Data Bandwidth 2 / clock period bits/sec
Clock period 1.5 GHz
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
18
Transmitter Design
  • Driver consists of M1-2 and termination resistor
    RT
  • Predrivers use pseudo-nmos logic
  • Id sets the bias point of the NICs

Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
19
Receiver Design
70 mV far-end swing
  • Modified StrongARM latch
  • Low-swing differential receiver
  • Small aperture time for high data-rate
  • Line termination
  • N-well resistor with value of 2Zo
  • Excessive capacitive loading at receiver inputs
    can introduce ISI

Calibration Caps
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
20
Receiver Sampling-point Calibration
  • Calibration is performed at the receiver end
  • Clock skew compensation between transmitter and
    receiver
  • Link latency compensation

Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
21
Outline
  • Scaling trends and motivation
  • Prior work on low-latency repeater-less links by
    exploiting transmission-line behavior
  • Negative-impedance converter (NIC)
  • System architecture
  • Transmitter design
  • Receiver design
  • Measurement results
  • Summary and conclusions
  • References

22
Measurement Results - ?
  • ? obtained from measured S-parameters
  • The NICs cause noticeable bandwidth reduction at
    frequencies beyond 9 GHz
  • The NICs contribute towards a significant
    reduction in ? from 50 MHz to 7 GHz

Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
23
Measurement Results - ?
  • ? obtained from measured S-parameters
  • Phase velocity decreases (? increases) at high
    frequencies

Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
24
Outline
  • Prior work on low-latency repeater-less links by
    exploiting transmission-line behavior
  • Negative-impedance converter (NIC)
  • System architecture
  • Transmitter design
  • Receiver design
  • Measurement results
  • Summary and conclusions
  • References

25
Summary
Distributed loss compensation (DDR)
Optimally repeated link (DDR)
Optimally repeated link (DDR)
Throughput 3 Gbps 3 Gbps 3 Gbps
Clock frequency 1.5 GHz 1.5 GHz 1.5 GHz
Width/ Length 8 µm / 14 mm 0.3 µm / 14 mm 8 µm / 14 mm
Link-latency 12.1 ps/mm 55 ps/mm 18.6 ps/mm
Number of NICs/repeaters 7 18 5
Power consumed 0.16 pJ/bit/mm 0.17 pJ/bit/mm 0.5 pJ/bit/mm
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
26
Conclusions
  • As technology scales, on-chip latencies are
    increasingly becoming a bottleneck for on-chip
    performance
  • Optimally repeated RC delays represent latencies
    that are as much as 3 X those determined by the
    speed of light in SiO2
  • Repeaters consume a growing fraction of power and
    silicon area
  • Using distributed loss compensation with NICs
    leads to arbitrarily long links with a
    significant latency and energy/bit/mm advantage
    over optimally repeated RC links

27
References
  • A. P. Jose and K. L. Shepard, Distributed Loss
    Compensation for Low-latency On-chip
    Interconnects, IEEE International Solid-State
    Circuits Conference, 2006.
  • A. P. Jose, G. Patounakis and K. L. Shepard,
    Near Speed-of-light Onchip Interconnects using
    Pulsed Current-mode Signaling, Symp. VLSI
    Circuits, June, 2005.
  • R. T. Chang, et al, Near speed-of-light
    signaling over on-chip electrical interconnects,
    IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 38, no. 5,
    May, 2003.
  • R. Chang , Near Speed-of-Light On-Chip
    Electrical Interconnects,
  • A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT
    OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND THE COMMITTEE ON
    GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN
    PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
    DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, November 2002.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com