Improving Acute Care Access through - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 122
About This Presentation
Title:

Improving Acute Care Access through

Description:

The National Health Service, whose 50th birthday is on July 5th, can survive ... Capturing PRACTICES used day-to-day to get job done in Real-World ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 123
Provided by: clints1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improving Acute Care Access through


1
HIC 2004 Tutorial Session
Improving Acute Care Access through Web Based
Bed Management
2
Tutorial Background The Problem
1
2
3
Admission
Discharge
ED
4
LTC Beds
  • Broadly Defined Causes of Access Block
  • Increased visits to the ED
  • Limited inpatient beds
  • Added workforce strain
  • Inadequately resourced LTC

3
Tutorial Objective Innovation Solutions
Admission
Discharge
ED
Primary Care
Community Care
Residential Care
Home Care
Nursing Home
  • PathWays Project Moving Downstream to Accelerate
    Patient Flow
  • Pull patients from acute
  • 100.. utilization throughout continuum of care
  • Measure patient needs by case, clinical
    population, location
  • Establish proactive planning for the future

4
Multidisciplinary Collaboration
Dept of Health Modernization Agency
Primary Care Doctors/GPs
ED Hospital/Acute
Community Care Bed Management
Residential Care
Home Care
Nursing Homes
5
To Qualify our topic
  • Big IssuesQuick Easy Fixes?

6
Consider issues in the World today, clearly no
lack of tough challenges!
7
From policy to address Global Warming
8
..to initiatives securing Participative
Sustainable World Aid
9
From establishing well planned World Economics
10
to Cleaning Up Corporate Boardrooms!
11
From the scare of energy shortages
12
..to its impact on consumers!
13
And from Global economies vs. Global issues
14
To Emerging Markets even Submerging Markets
15
Eventspuzzling to even the most predominant
Economists of our time!

if I turn out to be particularly clear, youve
probably misunderstood what Ive said
Allan Greenspan
Big Issues NO Quick Easy Fixes
16
For Health Institutions its a bit like
Walking a Tightrope
17
Dealing with Ageing Population Demographics
18
Poor Eating Habits
19
and even Poorer Addiction Habits
20
All the while, Clients having Higher Expectations
Healthcare
21
An off the shelf Fix All solution would be
great.
22
However, no one has found one yet!
  • Hence, HICs theme in 2004 is so appropriate
  • to make a Difference!
  • CHR Strata Healths PathWays Project has made
    a significant impact Lets look at how

23
Dr. Larry OhlhauserPresident CEO, Ohlhauser
Assoc.
  • Industry Overview
  • Todays Reality
  • Project Relevance
  • Canadian Perspective

24
Mr. Howard WaldnerCOO Executive VP, CHR
  • CHR Experience
  • The Need/Purpose
  • The Decision
  • The Outcomes

25
Mr. Don SchickPresident CEO, Strata Health
  • The PPP
  • (Public Private Partnership)
  • CHR Strata Health
  • The Risks
  • The Rewards

26
PathWays Demo
  • QA Session

27
Access Waiting for Health Services
  • Dr. Larry Ohlhauser
  • President CEO
  • Ohlhauser Associates

28
Canada A Snapshot
29
Wait list management
  • Why wait lists?
  • Why manage them?
  • What are some solutions?
  • -The Alberta Experience

30
Why wait lists?
  • Waits, delays, cancellations
  • -So common in health care
  • -Assume its part of the care process
  • -Patients, providers and policy makers
  • OECD paper Hurst and Sicilian
  • -Tacking Excessive Waiting Times for Elective
    Survey 12 OECD countries
  • -Mean waiting times for elective surgery - 3
    months stretch into years

31
Why wait lists?
  • Optimizing Patient Flow
  • -Moving patients smoothly through the system
  • -IHI
  • Bottle necks
  • -Emergency rooms and admission
  • -Operating Rooms and Intensive care
  • -Inpatient to community
  • -Non interchangeable resources
  • -A system or isolated departments

32
Wait lists - why manage them?
  • The costs of delay
  • -ER and ICU is an expensive and inappropriate
    holding area
  • Parking patients awaiting transfers in ER
  • -Affects service, care and safety
  • Empty community beds block acute beds
  • -Need manage discharges
  • -Transition PathWays

33
Optimizing Patient Flow
  • Optimal patient flow supports optimal patient
    care
  • -Increased access
  • -Shorter waiting times
  • -Lower costs
  • -Better outcomes

34
Access to Health Services in Canada
  • National and provincial reports
  • -Five provincial
  • -Three national
  • Canadas First Ministers Feb 2003
  • -A new health plan
  • -Improve access
  • -Improve quality of care for all Canadians

35
Access to Health Services in Alberta
  • Premiers Advisory Council on Health
  • -Patient/customer focus
  • -Sustainability
  • -Accountability
  • -Infrastructure support
  • Its time to put the customer first
  • -Guaranteed access with in 90 days
  • -Centralized booking
  • -Posted wait times
  • -Primary Care Reform
  • -Geographic Access Standards

36
Access standards
  • Changed from guarantee to access standards
  • Working group established
  • -Principles
  • -Assumptions
  • -Selection Criteria

37
Principles
  • Patient urgency and tolerance of waiting
  • Optimize health status and outcomes
  • Best clinical evidence
  • Applied strategically
  • Patient and provider choice
  • Need for flexibility in the system
  • Improve delivery and access

38
Assumptions
  • Access targets developed for a selected services
  • Access targets determined for care paths
  • Waiting times not limited to 90 days
  • Targets may be changed or withdrawn
  • Right to chose and no preference may have
    different access times
  • Qualified professionals provide the service

39
Selected Health Services
  • Breast and prostate cancer
  • Diagnostic Imaging
  • -MRI's and CTs
  • Major joint replacements
  • Cardiac services
  • -CABG and angioplasties
  • Childrens mental health

40
Selection Criteria Development
  • Priority rating scales
  • -Availability/acceptability
  • Effects of waiting for services
  • -Availability of information to access effects
  • Clinical practice guidelines/care paths
  • -Availability to suggest maximum wait times
  • Monitoring and reporting systems
  • -Currently existing
  • Access standards
  • -Start and end definitions

41
What was found
  • Improving access for all selected services
  • Not about business as usual
  • Not about simply adding dollars
  • Improving access
  • Fundamental service delivery change
  • Probability of success
  • All services providers needed to work together on
    the approach

42
Cardiac Services
  • Findings
  • Most open heart patients waited in hospital
  • Even after being stabilized
  • The patients blocked beds on units
  • Grid lock created
  • Affected numbers of surgeries completed
  • Process
  • Engaged surgeons, cardiologist, managers

43
Cardiac Services
  • Recommendations
  • Stabilized patients be sent home
  • Intense home care
  • Anticoagulant therapy
  • Booked OR time
  • Expected outcomes
  • Increased bed capacity
  • Decreased waiting times
  • Pilot the delivery model

44
Breast Cancer Services
  • Need to decrease fragmented care
  • Delays in care pathways
  • Screening
  • Diagnosis
  • Surgical consultation and Surgery
  • Oncology consultation and treatment
  • Build on current initiatives
  • Integrated treatment program
  • Patient centered, timely, high-quality multi
    disciplinary care, seamless and integrated

45
Major Joint Replacements
  • Improving access needs more that increasing
    resources
  • Evaluate current delivery
  • Systematically redesign service model
  • Improved assessments by referring physicians
  • Improved booking services electronic
  • Create standards of care
  • Bone and Joint Institute
  • Promotion, prevention excellence in patient care
  • Research and education

46
Summary
  • Improved access
  • Involves many initiatives
  • Additional resources alone, not the answer
  • Requires service re-engineering
  • Requires involvement of all stakeholders
  • Improved access has many factors
  • A better understanding of patient needs
  • Clinical input
  • Operational research and modeling
  • Building relationships
  • IM/IT support

47
Time to Make a Difference!
  • Mr. Howard Waldner
  • Executive Vice President Chief Operating
    Officer
  • Calgary Health Region
  • Alberta, Canada

48
Canadas Health Care System
  • Funding comes from both federal and provincial
    governments
  • Policy comes form both as well
  • Federal Canada Health Act
  • Provincial Delivery
  • Ongoing dialog and challenge as to

49
Whos in Charge?!
50
Calgary Health Region
  • Largest Integrated Teaching Health Region in
    Canada
  • AUS 2.7 Billion Annual Budget
  • 23,000 staff
  • Services a Population of 1.5 M (200 sq miles)
  • Annual population growth of 3
  • debt free province oil gas!
  • 7,000 beds 2,500 acute / 4,500 Community
  • 17 hospitals, 4 urban teaching hospitals
  • 5th major hospital to open soon!

51
NHS Personal Experiences
  • Evolution Innovation go hand in hand
  • Must Make a Change to Make a Difference
  • The focus on Clinical expertise is crucial
  • Yetwe cant neglect the need for a competitive
    business model in the delivery and logistics of
    healthcare

52
The Challenge
  • The Ongoing is to Do Morewith Less!
  • The secret of success is to optimize the use of
    resources and to get.
  • The Right Client, in the Right Bed, in the Right
    Level of Care, at the Right Time

53
(No Transcript)
54
And of course, Demographics!
  • World populations are aging at a rapid rate
  • Canada 65 will almost double by 2026
  • Australia similar situation
  • Relative tax base will decline as Baby Boomers
    retire
  • Per capita health care expenditures will increase
    dramatically

55
Do We Really Need to Focus on Processor just
build Capacity!
  • Capacity is a scarce commodity that must be
    optimally planned
  • We need to grow capacity across the entire
    continuum of care, with considerations for
    socio-economic ethnic needs
  • A hit miss approach will
  • Never optimize available resources
  • Result in incorrect timing inappropriate
    clinical resource, potentially in the wrong areas
  • Will ultimately fail

56
Whats the Solution?
  • So, there is no one Fix All approach
  • Our care system will continue to grow for the
    next quarter century at a rapid pace
  • Necessity of an Action Plan is Now
  • - Not a matter of IF but rather When and When
    is NOW!
  • A successful solution with be a compilation of
    initiatives by those organization ready to make a
    difference!

57
Whats Been Accomplished to Date
  • In broad terms
  • Primary Care initiatives aid in keeping those
    patients that may not require acute care out of
    the ED.
  • Capacity is being expanded where possible

58
Patient Flow the Pull Concept
  • Our association with Don Berwicks IHI taught
  • managing flow within current resource was as
    important as building new facilities
  • Moving downstream to optimize flow would pay
    dividends at the front end with increased acute
    access
  • Pulling patients from the ED ensures
  • The entire continuum of care is bearing the
    workload
  • Patients are indeed in the right level of care
    hence will see better case management results
  • Current available resources are optimized

59
Operations Working as a Team
  • To achieve true patient flow across the continuum
    of care, we had to commit to involve the entire
    continuum of care
  • Acute / ED
  • Community Care
  • 3rd Party Venders/Providers
  • The perception that Capacity is 100 full
    being optimized - WRONG!!
  • We had 10 of our acute beds blocked with
    inappropriate patients
  • I needed proofI wanted an objective measurement
    of what was occurring in my Region!

60
What were the Options for Action?
  • RFI for Boxed Product Did not exist
  • Consultants offered to research building it!
  • Our IT could build it wrong!
  • but it was clear we needed a solution as the
    transition department just could never quite
    catch up even with added resource

61
The PPP Proposition!
  • 2000 Strata Health approached me with an idea
  • I agreed under the follow parameters
  • My investment was clinical system expertise
  • Their contribution was to build the tool
  • I would embrace the system if it worked very well
    walk briskly away if it did not!
  • With a joint MOU signed, we embarked on the
    Project vs. letting bureaucracy reign
  • A few detractors and Nay Sayers!

62
(No Transcript)
63
Innovate or Hibernate?
  • Often easier to turn away risk and avoid the fall
    out that can accompany failure
  • The Question then
  • Will our organizations dare to take decisions
    that accept risk in return for make a real
    difference to the future of healthcare?

64
Next Steps
  • With my sponsorship and my teams intellectual
    property
  • Strata Healths money and
  • CHRs risk cappedwe took a calculated risk to
    actively support the project.
  • Vapor Ware or a meaningful solution?
  • Stay tuned after our break to see the results in
    detail!

65
- Break for Tea -
  • Real Value vs. Vapor Ware?
  • OR
  • Would we make a difference?

66
Vapor Ware ?
Barb Korabek Director Home Care Services
67
Why be concerned about Vapor Ware?
  • All IT projects succeed dont they????
  • - the Real World experience program
    concept
  • - immediately understood supported at
    front-line?
  • - great reporting vs. same bad news .
    just sooner?
  • - has traction right through the
    Organization?
  • In fact, reality is.
  • OPERATIONAL SOFTWARE FAILURES ARE FREQUENT
    TEND TO BE DRAMATIC especially in Health Care

68
IT Potential to Make a Difference Massive
  • Technology innovation Front-Line
    Professionals

-Accelerate patient care excellence quality of
life -Improve front-line staff work
environment -Impact critical performance targets
of Health Region
So was our joint initiative going to
deliver. Vapourware?? Or Dramatic
Positive Change??
69
SUCCESS vs. FAILURE
  • Transition PathWays a quantitative
    qualitative success
  • WHAT DETERMINED THE PROJECTS SUCCESS?

In assessing the CHR Strata Health strategic
partnership
6 key points of learning stand out
70
1. CONFIRMATION of PRIORITY.
  • Was it important? Critical Analysis for CHR
    Strata Health
  • 1. Calgary operating performance significantly
    impacted ?
  • -Hospital Alternate Level Care days soaring.
    Bed blocks
  • -Transition Nursing work environment eroding
    hiring up
  • -Care Centre performance occupancy
    inconsistent to contracts
  • -Potentially inconsistent application of Region
    placement policy

71
Decision High Priority
72
1. CONFIRMATION of PRIORITY
  • 1. Calgary Region operating performance
    significantly impacted ?
  • 2. Economic Benefit for both partners
    achievable ?
  • -Strata Health - best practice approach to
    Transition Management
  • -Calgary Health - rapid staffing capacity
    gains
  • -Calgary Strata to benefit from CHR Reference
    site status
  • Decision mutual opportunity defined

73
1. CONFIRMATION of PRIORITY
  • 1. Calgary Region operating performance
    significantly impacted ?
  • 2. Economic Benefit for both partners
    achievable ?
  • 3. Client care experience Quality of Life
    improved ?
  • - improved privacy safeguards
  • - Consistent administration of placement policy
    for all
  • - reduced hospital delays for Right Care
    environment
  • -more streamlined admission to variety of
    Community streams
  • Decision Significant client benefits defined

74
1. CONFIRMATION of PRIORITY
  • Was it important? Critical Analysis for CHR
    Strata Health
  • Calgary Region operating performance
    significantly impacted ?
  • Economic Benefit for both partners
    achievable ?
  • Client care experience Quality of Life
    improved ?
  • Was Transition Management a priority across
    Health Region ?
  • Community Acute Operations Groups
  • Strategic Executive Team
  • Information Technology
  • Front-line Transition Professionals Nurses

75
2. Strong Executive Backing Key
  • 1. The project agreed to be high priority
  • 2. Strong Executive Sponsorship delivered
  • -Leadership created expectation of success
  • -Shared risk embraced - benefits emphasized
  • -A culture of enthusiasm shared interest
    created
  • Strong Leadership Delivered Innovation

76
  • A CONUNDRUM FOR CONFERENCE
  • WITH INNOVATION RISK

77
  • A CONUNDRUM FOR LEADERSHIP
  • WITH INNOVATION RISK
  • WITH RISK INNOVATION

Strategic Partnerships can make a difference !
78
3. Leveraging Partners Investment
  • 1. The project agreed to be high priority
  • 2. Strong Executive Sponsorship delivered
  • 3. Both partners invested in the Vision

financing
Clinical expertise
79
Each Partner Invested in the Vision
  • Strata Health
  • A partnership is not a pay us we will build
    it scenario
  • Entrepreneur must accept financial risk for
    long-term return .
  • Provision of dedicated technical change
    management expertise
  • Calgary Health Region
  • Access to seasoned clinical professionals for
    design change management
  • Delivery of the critical Pilot environment
  • Long-term financial commitment only POST
    successful pilot

80
4. Once expertise is accessedlisten to it !!
  • 1. The project agreed to be high priority
  • 2. Strong Executive Sponsorship delivered
  • 3. Both partners invested in the Vision
  • 4. Leveraged expertise via strong working group

81
Shared expertise mined within Key Committee.
  • Joint Steering Committee charged with
  • - delivery of success
  • - accountability to executive sponsors
  • - equity consistency of membership
  • (Directors - Vendor - Nurses)
  • Frequent meetings effectively built
  • - expertise rapport
  • - openness debate
  • - ownership to milestones objectives
  • - timely reporting to Executive Sponsors

82
Nurses on Steering Committee Key Force
  • Change doesnt come easily to a decades-old
    business process.
  • How was the average 46 year old Canadian nurse
    just prescribed reading glasses who may or may
    not use the internet at home.introduced to
    web-based business technology successfully?

BY INCLUDING THEM IN THE CHANGE !
83
Steering Committee Focus
  • Strata Health had to remember that successful
    software deployment has less to do with product
    than change management execution.
  • Steering Committee Focus on
  • Intensely mapping existing PROCESS
  • Becoming expert on POLICIES that guide
    process
  • Documenting PROGRAMS counted on to support
    the policy
  • Capturing PRACTICES used day-to-day to get
    job done in Real-World
  • Product - Configuration - Change Management -
    Documentation

84
A Key lesson for Vendors
  • Long-Term Success is
  • not driven by product features benefits
  • Driven by passionate change management
  • Achieved in the details of deployment execution
  • Transition PathWays success depended on

85
Deployment Learning
  • Create effective learning environments
  • use small classes dont mix topics
  • schedule well ahead of time deliver reminders
  • Ensure training atmosphere positive
  • varied skills levels guaranteed ...
    buddy-system works
  • Training room must be appropriate bright cool
  • Test and recognize achievement
  • Follow-up computer learning modules ?
  • A bit of Fun never hurts !
  • Food works 21 cheesecakes 6 pizza parties
  • candy quizzes

86
Confirm Message then Get It Out There !
  • 1. The project agreed to be high priority
  • 2. Strong Executive Sponsorship delivered
  • 3. Both partners invested in the Vision
  • 4. Leveraged expertise via strong working group
  • 5. Communicate - Communicate - Communicate

87
Were all so busy - no time to listen?!
  • Public Health Organizations Entrepreneurs
  • Different perspectives priorities
  • Different velocities of decision making
  • Dont assume dont give up dont get
    frustrated
  • open dialog around mutual milestones was the
    answer
  • Communicate across total Region
  • Region PR to hi-lite success applaud
    risk-takers

88
Calgary Health Frontlines Newspaper.
  • - Great motivator for CHR team
  • MembersHey, what Im working
  • on is important!!
  • General morale booster.Hey, I know her. Calgary
    Health is really doing cool stuff ! This is a
    great place
  • To work!
  • -Positive public communication Hey, these guys
    are making a difference for me

89
6. Finally, Promises are Fine but
Delivery is Better !
  • 1. The project agreed to be high priority
  • 2. Strong Executive Sponsorship delivered
  • 3. Both partners invested in the Vision
  • 4. Leveraged expertise via strong working group
  • 5. Communicate - Communicate - Communicate
  • 6. Delivery on Promises Breeds Culture of
    Success

90
Hold to Plan . Get it Done
  • Understand the partnership roles Strata was
    there to deliver for Calgary Health
  • LIMIT HOLD SCOPE
  • -if the development goals keep changing will
    never be met
  • -Strong Steering Committee invaluable to draft
    clear Project Charter
  • -Scope can articulately evolve through future
    Versions

NOTHING DELIVERS VAPOURWARE LIKE SCOPE CREEP
91
Nothing Breeds Success...Like Success.
  • Meeting Beating Milestones.
  • -Builds momentum
  • -Turns dissenters to cheerleaders
  • -delivers the objectiveon time on budget
  • - A GREAT EXCUSE TO CELEBRATE

92
Key steps on path to success
  • 1. The project agreed to be high priority
  • 2. Strong Executive Sponsorship delivered
  • 3. Both partners invested in the Vision
  • 4. Leveraged expertise via strong working group
  • 5. Communicate - Communicate - Communicate
  • 6. Delivery on Promises Breeds Culture of
    Success

But remember the concerns around Vapourware ?
93
Real Solutions
Barb Korabek Director Special Projects
94
From Vision to Reality through Partnership..
95
PathWays Live Demo
  • Mr. Clint Schick

96
4 Modules 1 Application
97
Transition PathwaysStreamlines the Process
98
Captures Client Needs profile Configurable to
AHS Requirement
99
Captures available Bed Resource
100
AHS Priorities establish the Matching Criteria
all in real time
101
Once Matched, the Patients Family can be
consulted prior Admission
102
Details are Time stamped, enabling Robust
Reporting
103
Match Status Intervals define the Process!
104
Reporting on Intervals just 1 way to Monitor
Performance Benchmark!
105
PathWays Log In!
  • From anywhere an internet connect can be accessed!

106
From Pilot to Practice.
The Right Client in the Right Place at the
Right Time Cared for by the Right Provider
107
Transition Pathways Deliverables
  • For the Patient/Client
  • Placement decisions reflective of policy
    preference
  • Substantive gains in patient/client privacy
    versus manual processes
  • Best Fit placements matching patient/client needs
    to available resources
  • Effective Client resource status tracking and
    controls
  • For the Health Region
  • Reduction of waitlist time from acute care to
    alternate supported living
  • Expanded acute bed access better utilizing
    existing resources
  • Easing of manual administrative process on
    frontline staff
  • Ensuring consistency objectivity within
    placement protocol
  • Building integrity in data reproducible
    processes
  • Enabling fact-based decision making via
    configurable data reporting
  • For the Facilities
  • Enhanced capacity management
  • Easing manual administration
  • Detailed report record keeping

108
PathWays Targeted Pilot Outcomes
  • Target 1 Implementation
  • All Region sites Transition ftes engaged by
    12/02
  • Alpha Trial sign-off by 05/21/02 05/21/02
    complete
  • Beta Trial sign-off by 07/21/02 07/14/02
    complete
  • CareWest Implementation by 09/15/02 09/08/02
    complete
  • Transition Coordinators by 10/01/02 10/03/02
    complete
  • Full deployment by 12/21/02 12/12/02 complete

109
PathWays Targeted Pilot Outcomes
  • Target 2 Improved Region Capacity
  • When I arrived in Calgary in 1999, 10 of our
    acute beds were blocked by patients whos acute
    episode of care was complete. These patients
    were awaiting a discharge into an appropriate
    supported community environment.
  • 2000 acute beds
  • 120 170 blocked at any one time
  • On average 7 of our total acute bed availability
  • Between 20 25 million dollars operating
  • The Outcome..today on average 1.5 of our acute
    beds are blocked (20 - 30 beds)!

110
PathWays Targeted Pilot Outcomes
  • For the comparative period APRIL thru SEPTEMBER
  • - All staff vacation requests accommodated
  • - Less relief staff utilized
  • - Placements continued despite senior staff
    vacations

Net Result 28 more client transactions
processed
111
PathWays Targeted Pilot Outcomes
  • Target 3 Improved Transition Efficiencies
  • Timelines for key bed intervals to be reduced
  • Average ALC days / client placement to be reduced
    by 10
  • CareWest utilization to achieve 98.5 or better

112
Average Days From Posted To Admitted
Admitted
Posted
Pending
Accepted
Pending Accepted
113
Acute ALC days trending downward
01/02
02/03
114
Real world snapshot Productivity gains for the
CHR in comparative Q3s
115
PathWays Targeted Pilot Outcomes
  • 8 x CareWest Centre Utilization
  • Goal 98.5
  • Oct02 99.0

116
PathWays Targeted Pilot Outcomes
  • Target 4 Improved Reporting Standards
  • Real-time access to information
  • 1) Strategic Service Planning
  • 2) Utilization Management
  • 3) Managing Service Expectations Contracts
  • Provider / Health Region

117
Calgary Health Progress to Date ...
  • LTC - Acute Admissions accelerating
  • bed turnover impacted positively across
    continuum - delivering on Region priorities
  • System productivity expanding
  • Economic Capacities growing positively
    quantitatively with expansion to RCTP - Assisted
    Living underway Palliative on the horizon
  • Vendor productivity documentation improving
  • Benefits realized by Region - Client - Vendors
  • Reports delivering highly actionable field data
    and trends
  • report formats evolving to optimize usability at
    all levels
  • Project scope expanded to include new joint
    initiatives .
  • Home Care contract care plan management
    launched - Home CareFirst
  • Acute Access and Bed Flow modeling strategy
    being explored

118
RISK - A Hair Raising Experience!!
119
Making a Differencethe future is in our hands!
120
Final call to action
"One of the true tests of leadership is the
ability to recognize a problem before it becomes
an emergency." Arnold H. Glasgow
Lets All Make a Difference and take on new
initiatives to find workable solutions to the
problems and avoid the emergencies!
121
Q A
  • Thanks for your Attention

122
CareFirst Homecare Contract Management
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com