The Rule Out Approach to Communications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 65
About This Presentation
Title:

The Rule Out Approach to Communications

Description:

Understand the scope of what constitutes a communications and learning disorder ... 1/2 million people in US have autistic spectrum disorder in some form ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 66
Provided by: JamesJM
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Rule Out Approach to Communications


1
The Rule Out Approach to Communications
Learning Disorders
  • Created by
  • James J. Messina, Ph.D.

2
ADHD, Learning Disabilities, Autism Related
Disorders
  • To Identify, Assess, and Treat Communications and
    Learning Disorders

3
Goals of Presentation
  • Understand the scope of what constitutes a
    communications and learning disorder
  • Establish the need for early identification and
    referral of children who show early warning signs
    of these disorders
  • Identify the rule outs needed to make accurate
    diagnosis intervention of these disorders

4
What are Communications and Learning Disorders?
  • They involve
  • lack of full gross fine motor coordination
  • poor motor planning
  • lack of age appropriate social interaction
  • impaired healthy self-esteem
  • speech language deficits
  • impaired perceptual functioning

5
What are Communications and Learning Disorders?
  • They are often labeled as
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
    or Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD)
  • Dyslexia or learning disabilities
  • Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Autism,
    Aspergers Disorder, Multi-systems Disorder or
    Pervasive Developmental Delay
  • Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD)

6
What is the Impact of these Disorders?
  • 15 of Americans have learning disabilities with
    many going untreated due to lack of diagnosis
  • 10 million children or approximately 1 in 5
    children in 1st through 9th grades (Cramer
    Ellis, 1996)
  • 60 of adults with severe literacy problems have
    undetected/untreated LD
  • (NALLDC, 1994)

7
What is the Impact of these Disorders? (2)
  • 35 of students with learning disabilities drop
    out of school
  • 30 of adolescents with learning disabilities
    will be arrested 3 to 5 years out of High School
    (Wagner et al, 1993)
  • Previously undetected learning disabilities have
    been found in 50 of juvenile delinquents. Once
    treated their recidivism drops to just 2
    (Lerner, 1997)

8
What is the Impact of these Disorders? (3)
  • About 3 of school-aged population has full ADHD
    symptoms and another 5-10 have partial ADHD
  • Another 15-20 of school-aged population show
    transient behaviors suggestive of ADHD
  • Boys are 3 times more likely than girls to have
    ADHD
  • Symptoms decrease with age but 30-50 of children
    still manifest symptoms into Adulthood.

9
What is the Impact of these Disorders? (4)
  • Autistic Spectrum will affect 1 in every 500 new
    births (CDC, 1997)
  • 1/2 million people in US have autistic spectrum
    disorder in some form
  • California in last 11 years experienced 1,975
    increase in PDD-NOS reported and 272 of autism
    (Waltz, 1999)
  • Autism is 4 times more prevalent in boys than
    girls

10
What is the Impact of these Disorders? (5)
  • Autism is considered the 3rd most common
    developmental disability
  • Autism alone is estimated to cost 13.3 Billion
    in the USA
  • These disorders know no racial, ethnic, or social
    boundaries
  • Family income, lifestyle, or educational levels
    do not affect the chance of these disorders
    occurrence

11
Rationale for Early Intervention of these
Disorders
  • 0-3 Brain Research tells us
  • brain development from pre-natal period to first
    three years of life is rapid extensive
  • brain development is vulnerable to environmental
    influences and is long lasting
  • environment affects both number of brain cells ,
    number of connections and ways these connections
    are wired
  • negative impact of early stress on brain function

12
Rationale for Early Intervention of these
Disorders (2)
  • The period prior to 6 years of age is critical
    period in which brain develops vision, language,
    muscle control, emotional response, reasoning
    ability
  • The brain is hungry for stimulation and with
    proper attention a disadvantaged childs IQ can
    be raised 30 points
  • Denied proper stimulation, the brain atrophies
    neural connectons wither like dying leaves
    (Hotz,1997)

13
Why Early Intervention?
  • Recent Research Indicates children with
    communications and learning disorders who are
    identified earliest and receive subsequent
    treatment intervention may have the best
    prognosis
  • Early intervention enhances growth of the
    developing cortex (neuropil) has greater effect
    given early in childs life (Greenspan Wieder
    1997) (McEachin, Smith Lovaas, 1997)

14
What to Screen for in Children 18 month to 6
years of age
  • Delays in
  • receptive expressive language
  • joint attention and enagagement
  • two way communication skills
  • imaginative play

15
What to Screen for in Children 18 month to 6
years of age (2)
  • Lack of childs ability for
  • warm, joyful relating
  • engaging in a continuous give take of emotional
    and gestural cues
  • engaging caregivers in intentional, complex
    reciprocal interactions to solve problems

16
Early Identification Screening Tools
  • Available on www.coping.org
  • Parent Developmental Questionnaire
  • UCFs Warning Signs Questionnaire
  • CHAT
  • Complete Child Developmental History
  • There are no cures but with appropriate
    structure early intervention functioning in
    later life can be enhanced (Howlin, 1997)

17
Failure of Syndrome Approach
  • Third party payers demand a label for
    reimbursement
  • Research community, driven by NIH, is fixated on
    medical model Golden Bullet approach
  • Parents often demand find comfort in label
  • Lack of robust model to identify chart levels
    of behavior and their biological, environmental
    social determinants

18
Replacement for Syndrome Approach
  • Adopt broader functional descriptions of
    childrens needs
  • Use broader eclectic intervention treatment
    options to accommodate for each childs needs
  • Treat each child as a unique individual rather
    than a child with a diagnosis
  • Fit treatment programs for children not fit
    children for these programs

19
Rule Out Approach to Assessment Treatment
  • Level 1 B - Biological State
  • Level 2 O - Original Traits
  • Level 3 L - Learned Behaviors
  • Level 4 D - Derived Behaviors

20
Purpose of Rule Out Approach
  • Investigate, evaluate, and treat the 4 levels of
    structure in each child
  • Identify underlying biological structure (level
    1)
  • Each trait and behavior be placed at its
    appropriate level (levels 2, 3, or 4)
  • Chart all significant relevant modifiers
  • Identify behaviors which are modifiable and
    potential ways to modify them

21
Level 1 Biological State
  • DNA-basic genetic structure
  • brain nervous system
  • sensory motor organs
  • immune system
  • all other biological systems

22
Level 1 Biological State Modifiers
  • Womb environment-nutrition, stress, drug
    alcohol use, diseases, antibiotics
  • Birthing process, pitocin, hypoxia
  • Food, Drink, contaminants, additives
  • Environment, air, water, noise pollution
  • Medical interventions vaccines, antibiotics

23
Biological Modifiers
  • Researchers look at modifiers which may
    exacerbate developmental functioning of children
    with communications learning disorders
  • antibiotics (Bolte, 1998)
  • abnormal sleep pattern (Patzold et al, 1998)
  • diet (Carlsson, 1998)
  • medical illness (Volkmar, 1998)
  • epilepsy (Kobayashi Murata, 1998)

24
GENETICS
  • Common belief communications and learning
    disorders are inherited it is challenging to
    find the genes involved (Folstein et al, 1998)
  • Relatives with similar disorders have been
    identified (Bailey et al, 1998)
  • Chromosome 15 and sex chromosome appear as
    promising markers (Gilberg, 1998)

25
BRAIN STRUCTURE
  • Autism found related to irregularities in
    cerebellar vermian lobules, parietal lobe,
    posterior regions of corpus callosum (Saitob
    Courchesne, 1998)
  • Neurocortical dysfunction found present in autism
    (Minshew et al, 1999)

26
BRAIN STRUCTURE
  • In ADHD glucose metabolized more actively in
    frontal area of brain (Zametkin et al, 1990)
  • PET show abnormalities related to language
    auditory perception (Muller et al, 1999)

27
NEUROTRANMITTERS
  • Levels of neurotransmitters such as serotonin
    beta-endorphin have been indicative of the
    presence of autism and other communications and
    learning disorders (Chugani et al, 1999
    Leboyer et al, 1999)

28
AUTOIMMUNITY
  • Association found between virus seriology and
    brain antibody in autism supporting hypothesis
    that a virus-induced autoimmune response may play
    a causal role in Autism (Sing, Lin Yang, 1998)

29
AUTOIMMUNITY
  • Comi et al (1999) Tested hypothesis autoimmune
    disease connection found
  • mean number of autoimmune disorders greater in
    families with autism
  • 46 had 2 or more family members with autoimmune
    disorders
  • as number of members in family with autoimmune
    disorders increased fro 1 to 3 the risk of autism
    was greater with odds ratio that increased 1.9 to
    5.5 respectively

30
AUTOIMMUNITY
  • 46 of autistic group reported having relatives
    with rheumatoid diseases compared to 26 of the
    controls
  • Most common autoimmune disorders in both groups
    were
  • Type 1 diabetes
  • adult rheumatoid arthritis
  • hypothyroidism
  • systemic lupus erythematosus

31
AUTOIMMUNITY
  • Connelly et al, 1999 found that children within
    the autistic spectrum disorders have a greater
    frequency of serum antibodies to brain
    endothelial cells which supports the possiblity
    that autoimmunity plays a role in the
    pathogenesis of language and social developmental
    abnormalities in a subset of children with these
    disorders

32
BIOLOGICAL STATE
  • All research to date comes to the prevailing view
    that many of these communications and learning
    disorders, especially autism, are caused by a
    pathophysiological process arising from the
    interaction of an early environmental insult and
    a genetic predisposition (Trottier, Srivastava,
    Walker, 1999)

33
Level 2 Original Traits
  • Functional, operating, core determinants of
    individual behavior
  • biolgically based individual differences
  • related to childs motor, sensory, reasoning, and
    affective patterns, etc.
  • may or may not be modifiable depending on
    developmental biological life cycle
  • earlier one intervenes the more likely to modify
    the original trait

34
Level 2 Original Traits
  • Visual acuity, visual/spatial processing
  • auditory acuity, auditory processing
  • sensory modulation
  • motor planning sequencing
  • kinesthetic processing
  • affective processing
  • cognitive functioning
  • memory processing

35
Level 2 Original Traits
  • Level 2 Modifiers
  • Parents, siblings, caregivers peers
  • TV, radio, games, etc.
  • tactile, auditory, visual, gustatory olfactory
    stimuli
  • interactions with therapists teachers

36
Level 3 Learned Behaviors
  • Childs Developmental Level
  • Normal coping behaviors
  • Abnormal coping behaviors

37
Level 3 Learned Behaviors
  • Speech
  • Language
  • Reading
  • Memory
  • Attention
  • Impulsivity
  • Socialization
  • Fine Motor Skills

38
Level 3 Learned Behaviors
  • Impaired Executive Functions
  • Prolongation holding evaluating events in
    working memory
  • Separation regulation of affect splitting
    facts from feeling
  • Internalization of language reflection,
    self-control, will power
  • Reconstitution break events into parts and
    reassemble into new ideas

39
Level 3 Learned Behaviors
  • Diminished executive functions leads to
  • Deficient self-regulation of behavior, mood,
    response
  • Impaired ability to organize/plan behavior over
    time
  • Inability to direct behavior toward the future
  • Diminished social effectiveness adaptability

40
Level 3 Learned Behaviors
  • Modifiers
  • parents
  • friends
  • society in form of
  • schools
  • public places
  • legal system
  • community at large etc.

41
Level 3 Learned Behaviors
  • Inappropriate interventions at this level
  • Sole use of drugs to control behavior
  • isolating child in a self-contained or locked
    facility
  • restricting child to a special needs environment
    and not including participation with typical
    children

42
Level 4 Derived Behaviors
  • Severe head banging, rocking, spinning
  • constant self-stimulation
  • physically attacking others by
  • biting
  • kicking
  • head butting
  • spitting

43
Level 4 Derived Behaviors
  • Yelling out inappropriately
  • constant seeking attention by negative behaviors
  • severe uncontrollable temper tantrums and anger
    flare ups
  • complete social withdrawal and isolation
  • lack of development of spoken language
  • constantly in motion

44
Rule Out Assessment Model
  • Level 1 - Biological State - examine brain
    structure, lesions, seizures, metaboloic
    abnormalities, immune disorders, and modifiers
  • Level 2 - Auditory, Visual Sensory
  • Level 3 - Developmental Level of Functioning if
    adaptive or abnormal
  • Level 4 - How social, familial, community and
    global environment impact

45
Level 1 Biological State Medical Evaluation
  • Good Family History
  • Childs Developmental Medical History
  • Physical neurological examination
  • Referrals for

46
Electroencephalography
  • Rule out epileptiform activity and/or epilepsy
  • Use sleep deprived prolonged overnight EEG study
    to obtain all four stages of sleep (Tuchman,
    1994, 1997 Volkmar Nelson, 1990 Tuchman et al
    1998 Chez et al, 1997)

47
Metabolic Screening Tests
  • Metabolic Lab tests are indicated with signs of
    metabolic disease e.g. lethargy, cyclic vomiting,
    failure to thrive, dysmorphic or coarse features,
    severe or profound mental retardation
  • Use to rule out rare disorders that are difficult
    to detect occur in less than 5 of children
    with these disorders

48
Metabolic Screening Tests
  • Quantitative amino acids
  • urine organic acids
  • uric acid and calcium in a 24 hr urine
  • thyroid studies
  • lactate, pyruvate and carnitine levels
  • lead levels

49
Genetic Rule out Testing
  • DNA Fragile X testing
  • High resolution cytogenetic studies
  • WARNING Parents need to be aware that absence of
    a positive genetic test does not exclude a
    genetic basis for these disorders. As ongoing
    research develops, other cytogenic tests may need
    to be included

50
Structural Neuroimaging (Brain CT or MRI)
  • To be used only if neurologic examination and EEG
    or other clinical indicators suggest a focal
    lesion (CAN 1998)

51
Functional Neuroimaging
  • The following have strong research potential but
    are not primary diagnostic evaluations of these
    disorders at this time
  • SPECT single photo emission tomography
  • PET magnetoencephalography
  • MRS magnetic resonsance spectroscopy

52
Other Rule out Laboratory Tests
  • Otitis media
  • altered immune parameters
  • allergies
  • gastrointestinal dysfunction
  • All medical testing should be directed towards
    the detection and treatment of any disorder that
    may contribute to discomfort or behavioral
    dysfunction

53
Level 2 Assessment
  • Audiological - Pediatric Specialist
  • behavioral in focus
  • pure formal tone audiometry
  • Brainstem auditory evoked potential if necessary
  • rule out processing deficits
  • rule out central nervous system abnormality

54
Level 2 Assessment
  • Opthalmological - Pediatric Specialist
  • behavioral in focus
  • pure formal visual screening
  • rule out processing deficits
  • rule out central nervous system abnormality

55
Level 2 Assessment
  • Cognitive, Speech Language, Motor, Sensory
    Motor Planning
  • Pediatric Psychologist
  • Speech Language Pathologist
  • Occupational Therapist - sensory integration
  • Physical Therapist

56
Level 3 Assessments
  • Functional Emotional Assessment Scale (FEAS)
    (Greenspan 1997)
  • Developmental Functioning
  • Observations of child with parent
  • Observation of Family and siblings
  • Observation of Child in school, natural
    environments and community
  • Educational Achievement

57
Level 4 Assessments
  • Behavioral Analysis of abnormal behaviors
  • Assessments of daily functioning in activities of
    daily living
  • Behavioral ratings done at home, school and in
    the community

58
Level 1 - Biological State Interventions
  • Anti-seizure or mood stabilizer medications
  • Immune suppression medications
  • Nutrition therapy
  • Hormonal or growth factors (e.g. steroids)
  • Behavioral inhibiting medications
  • Stimulant mediations
  • Neurotransmitter (e.g., SSRIs)

59
Level 2 - Original Trait Interventions
  • Speech Language Therapy
  • Sensory Integration OT
  • Sensory Modulation
  • Motor Planning Therapy
  • Auditory Processing Therapy
  • Processing amelioration
  • Perceptual amelioration

60
Level 3 - Learned Behaviors Interventions
  • Discrete Trial Learning
  • Applied Behavioral Analysis
  • Floor Time
  • Play Therapy
  • Parent Training
  • Child Behavioral Management
  • Language Enhanced Classrooms
  • Resource Rooms

61
Level 4 - Derived Behaviors Intervention
  • Social Skills Training
  • Milieu Environment Therapy
  • Study Skills Training
  • Classroom Modifications
  • One on One Assistants or Shadows
  • Structured 24 hour residential programming

62
Level 4 Derived Behavior Medical Interventions
  • Use of medications to address
  • obsessive/compulsive ritualized behaviors
  • hyperactivity/inattention
  • tics
  • sleep disorders
  • anxiety
  • aggressive or self-injurious behaviors

63
Conclusions drawn from Rule Out Approach
  • Always rule out Biological State dysfunctions
    first
  • Note all relevant Level 1 modifers
  • Identify all relevant Level 2 Original traits and
    their modifers
  • Monitor impact of interventions on all Level 1, 2
    3 traits and behaviors
  • Recognize setbacks may be due to the presence of
    Biological/Physiological issues not identified yet

64
Help Put a Dent in the Epidemic of these Disorders
  • Do not put off referring for a Developmental
    Assessment when early signs occur
  • Do not say Lets wait to see if the child will
    grow out of it or worse Lets wait to see if
    the child will grow into it
  • Refer children immediately when they show even
    the slightest leanings so as to get early
    intervention as quickly as possible

65
RULE OUT MODEL
  • References at
  • http//www.coping.org/intervention/ruleout/content
    .htm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com