Title: Clinical Benefit of Bisphosphonates for Cancer Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease
1Clinical Benefit of Bisphosphonates for Cancer
Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease
- James R. Berenson, MD
- Medical Scientific Director
- Institute for Myeloma Bone Cancer Research
- Los Angeles, California
2Metastatic Bone Disease Scope of the Problem
- Extremely common - gt 500,000 patients in USA
- Myeloma - gt 90
- Breast - two thirds of patients
- Prostate - two thirds of patients
- Lung - one third of patients
- Median survival measured in years, not weeks or
months - Major clinical consequences for patients,
families, and society
3Clinical Consequences of Metastatic Bone
Disease
of patients/yr
- Pathologic fractures 10 - 25
- Spinal cord compression/collapse 3 - 5
- Radiation therapy 15 - 20
- Surgery to bone 5 - 10
- Hypercalcemia 2 - 10
- Bone pain 50
- Use of analgesics 40
- Quality-of-life effects
- Survival
SREs
- SREs Skeletal-related events.
- From PLAC arms of randomized clinical trials
with Aredia or Zometa.
4IV BisphosphonatesMajor Impact in Reducing
Skeletal Complications for Cancer Patients With
Metastatic Bone Disease
with SRE with SRE with SRE SREs per yr SREs per yr SREs per yr
Placebo BP ? Placebo BP ?
Prostate(Saad et al.) 49 Z-38 22 1.5 0.7 47
Breast (Hortobagyi et al.) (Kohno et al.) 64 50 A-51 Z-30 20 40 3.7 1.42 2.4 0.7 35 50
Myeloma (Berenson et al.) 51 A-38 26 2.0 1.0 50
Others(Rosen et al.) 46 Z-39 15 2.7 1.7 37
SRE Skeletal-related event Pbo Placebo BP
Bisphosphonate Z Zometa A Aredia P lt
0.05 Relative decrease
5Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma Efficacy
Summary
Proportionwith SRE, Time to first SRE (median) Mean skeletal morbidity rate Multiple event analysis Hazard ratio
Zometa 4 mg 47 376 1.04 0.841
Aredia 90 mg 51 356 1.39
P value .243 .151 .084 .030
Rosen LS, et al. Cancer. 20039817351744.
Hypercalcemia of malignancy (included as a
skeletal-related event).
6Benefits of IV Bisphosphonates in Metastatic Bone
Disease
- Reduce skeletal complications
- Aredia
- Breast cancer and myeloma with lytic lesions
- Ineffective in prostate cancer
- Not tested in other tumor types
- Zometa
- Breast cancer, myeloma, and prostate cancer
- Tested and effective in other tumor types
- Decrease pain and analgesic use
- Prevent deterioration of quality of life
7ONJ in Myeloma PatientsThe IMBCR Experience
- 6 cases of ONJ
- Range of severity
- 3 patients required intermittent antibiotics
(Aredia Zometa, Zometa only in 2) - remain on
bisphosphonate treatment - 1 patient recently diagnosed with minor temporary
discomfort (Aredia only) - remains on treatment - Largely resolved with clarithromycin PO
- 2 patients (Aredia Zometa, Zometa only)
discontinued bisphosphonate secondary to
significant effect on mastication - Status of myeloma
- 3 in long-term complete remission (auto-PSCT,
VAD, thalidomide) - 1 in near complete remission (on steroids)
- 2 with long-term indolent myeloma requiring no
other therapy - 1 patient with 40 reduction in M-protein for gt 4
yr
8PerspectiveIV Bisphosphonates in Cancer Patients
with Bone Involvement
- Skeletal complications have profound effects on
the lives of patients with metastatic bone
disease - IV bisphosphonate (Zometa and Aredia)
- Reduce bony complications
- Number of events/yr one third to one half
- Percent of patients with events by 15 to 40
- Decrease bone pain, reduce pain meds, and prevent
deterioration in QOL
9PerspectiveIV Bisphosphonates in Cancer Patients
with Bone Involvement
- Patients receiving IV bisphosphonates (Zometa
and Aredia) - Infrequently develop any form of ONJ (0.1 to
2/yr) - Severity varies most patients improve while
continuing bisphosphonate therapy - ONJ risk minor - rarely clinically significant
compared with major problems that frequently
occur without Aredia or Zometa treatment (eg,
fractures, spinal cord compression, radiation
therapy, or surgery)
10IV Bisphosphonates for Patients With Metastatic
Bone DiseaseBenefits vs Risks
Benefits Risks
Fractures Radiotherapy Bone pain
ONJ ? Renal (infrequent)
Humeral fracture in a myeloma patient