Presentation to OCS Planning Conference

1
Operational Contract Support (OCS) and CJCS
Dependence on Contractors Task Force

• Presentation to
  OCS Planning Conference
• 18 February 2009

CAPT(s) Peter Stamatopoulos

Joint Staff J-4, Logistic Services, OCS,
[phone]
1
1
2
Agenda

• OCS Goals
• OCS 101
• Doctrine
• Planning
• JOSCP Project Management
• Way Ahead

3
OCS Goals

• Policy Doctrine
• Total integration of DoD and interagency
  contracted support
• Planning
• Institutionalize OCS planning across all OPLANS
  CONPLANS
• OCS Concept of Operations (CONOPS)
• Capabilities based analysis to drive future
  solutions (JCIDS)
• Personnel Training
• Senior non-contracting officers trained and
  familiarized in OCS prior to deployment
• Organization
• Develop comprehensive solutions to integrate OCS
  and eliminate redundancies (Joint Contingency
  Acquisition Support Office)
• Business Systems
• 100 visibility and accountability of contractors
  in designated contingency operations

4
Policy DoctrineJoint Publication 4-10

• Whos the Customer?
• CCDR
• JTF / Components / JTSCC
• JP 4-10 Outline
• Executive Summary
• Introduction
• Roles and Responsibilities
• Contract Support Integration
• Contractor Management
• Whats New?
• Organized by JCA
• Contracted capabilities the norm
• Emphasizes planning
• Check Lists for Annex W
• Interprets DODI 3020.41
• Defines new terms
• Principles of contracting
• Organizational options
• Contractor Mgt considerations

• Whats Next?
• Emerging Issues
• NDAA 2008/09
• Draft Policies
• DODD 3020.qq
• DODI 3020.pp
• DODI 3020.41 (Revision)
• CJCSM JOPES (Revision)APEX
• DOS MOU (Contracting in Iraq / Afghan)

5
OCS Demand Signal

• As weapons systems have become more complex, and
  the demands on the Armed Forces have grown, there
  has been an ever increasing reliance on
  contractors in the support of the military across
  the range of functions
• Key Points
• In early phases, initial reliance on
• Weapons Systems
• Civil Augmentation Program
• In latter phases, increased dependency on
• Major reconstruction projects

Contractors are used to mitigate risk when
existing force structure is insufficient or not
cost effective to stand up organic support
capability
Weapon Systems
Interpreters
Logistics
Base Camp
Security/Reconstruction
The demand signal for contractors increases as
military operations mature in scope, complexity
and duration
6
Operational Contract SupportCENTCOM Census (FY09
1st QTR)
DoD Contractor Personnel in the USCENTCOM AOR
Total Contractors U.S. Citizens Third Country Nationals Local/Host Country Nationals
USCENTCOM AOR 259,421 52,971 103,096 103,354
Iraq Only 148,050 39,262 70,875 37,913
Afghanistan Only 71,755 5,960 5,232 60,563
Other 39,616 7,749 26,989 4,878
Data does not include other U.S. Government
Agencies/Departments

• Current Contractor Ratio
• Iraq 11
• Afghanistan 12

Personnel breakdown by Type of Service
Contractors currently make up 50 of the total
force in the USCENTCOM Area of Operation
7
What is OCS?

• Operational Contract Support (OCS)
• is the ability to orchestrate and synchronize the
  provision of integrated contract support and
  management of contractor personnel providing that
  support to the joint force in a designated
  operational area

(Ref JP 4-10)

• is a framework for the planning, integration and
  execution of contract support, including the
  management of contractors operating in designated
  contingency operations across the range of
  military operations

Def
8
Joint Capability Area

• Operational Contract Support (OCS) Tier II
• Contract Support Integration (CSI) Tier III
  The ability to synchronize and integrate contract
  support being executed in a designated
  operational area in support of the Joint Force
• Contract Support Integration Plan (CSIP) Annex W
• Contractor Management (CM) Tier III The
  ability to manage and maintain visibility of
  associated contractor personnel and associated
  equipment providing support to the Joint Force in
  a designated operational area
• Contractor Management Plan (CMP) Annex W,
  Appendix 1

Capabilities align with doctrine and the planning
process
9
Who does OCS?

• Contingency Contracting Service Components
• 
  Combat Support Agencies
• 
  Joint Theater Support
  Contracting
  Command (JTSCC)

OCS is a Team Effort!!
10
Who is involved?
Planning
CCDR JTF JTSCC
(e.g. JCC-IA) Agencies Service
Components Planner
Requirement Activity PCO (i.e. KO) ACO (e.g.
DCMA) COR
Where we are concentrating our effort
We have not adequately planned for OCS
11
Planning Refine and Influence the Joint OCS
Planning Process

• Improved Communication
• OCS Planning is not a logistics only issue!
• Expand community to include J1s-J8s, Service
  Components and Agencies
• Institutionalize OCS planning to the same level
  of fidelity as we do organic forces

12
PlanningGuidance For Plans
Policy
Templates
Execution
CJCSM 3122.01A JOPES Manual Vol. 1
Policies, Plans Procedures
CJCSM 3122.03 JOPES Manual
Vol. 2 Plans and Formats
CJCSM 3122.02C JOPES Manual Vol. 3
TPFDD Planning and Execution
Detailed Templates for Loggies
On the way CJCSM 4300.01A Planning Joint
Logistics Support Publication
Evaluate the Plan
OPLANS CONPLANS Base Plan (Para 4) Admin
Logistics (Contracting Guidance)
Planning Considerations to building Annexes and
Appendices Sustainability Feasibility
Assessment
CJCSI 3110.03C Logistics Supplement to the JSCP
Annex W CSIP
Annex E CMP
Other Annexes
Where we are concentrating our effort
13
PlanningPlan Review Status Closing the GAP
Component supporting plans?
CCDRs

• Joint Operational Contract Support Planner
  (JOCSP) initiative
• OSD funded initiative in effect early 2008
• 2 X JOCSP at each GCC and JFCOM (Funded through
  FY10)
• Current JOCSPs are contractors plan to
  transition to military or DOD civilian in future

Must POM for Planners NOW!
14
Joint Operational Contract Support Planners

• Roles Responsibilities 16 tasks including
• Planning, Exercises, Inter-Agency /
  Multinational, TPFDD, OCS Policy Procedures,
  Standards of Service, Retrograde, Best Practices,
  Special Tasks
• Program Management Approach to Planning
• Risks and opportunities are more readily
  identified
• Stakeholders know their roles and
  responsibilities
• Plan impact and changes can be identified (and
  quantified)
• Benefits
• Disciplined, proactive approach to planning,
  monitoring and controlling a complex effort
• Stakeholders remain informed
• Decision Makers can make better informed
  decisions

OCS Planning is Complex Requires Program
Management Approach
15
JOCSP OCS Work Breakdown Structure
OCS Requires Program Management Approach
Starts with a detailed Work Breakdown
Structure
16
JOCSP OCS Work Breakdown Structure
Starts with a detailed Work Breakdown Structure
88 Plans
17
JOCSP OCS Organizational Breakdown Structure
R at the intersection of SOUTHCOM JOCSPs and
6115 indicates responsibility
18
JOCSP PM ApproachSchedule for Analysis of
CONPLAN 6115
22 Annexes Appendices Tabs
Analysis Coordination with J-Dirs,
Supporting CCDRs, Services, Components, CSAs,
Inter-Agency
19

• Way Ahead
• CJCS TF
• Dependence on Contractors in Contingency
  Operations

20
JS J-4 OCS Roadmap
June
January
February
March
April
May
July
August
Data Collection
Validation
Analysis
Assessment
Desired outcome Areas of high reliance on
contractors
Complete Organic vs. Contractor Assessment
Complete JCA assessment
Brief CJCS
Complete validation of JCA alignment
CJCS TF Working Group Kick Off Meeting
Components submit contract data
Data Call
Desired outcome More complete JCAs
UJTLs
Desired outcome Phase II Findings and
Recommendations. Kick Off Phase III
Complete mapping of JCA to UJTL
Complete UJTL assessment
CSIP (Annex W) and CMP Adjudication
Inform Supporting CSIP and CMP Design
Initiate CSIP and CMP Supporting Plan Design
Desired Outcome CSIP and CMP Supporting Plan
Template
OCS Planning Conference
Desired Outcome Regulation and Policy
Recommendations
Regulation and Policy Analysis
Design Repeatable Process
Codify Repeatable Process
TASK 1-2
TASK 3
TASK 4
TASK 5
21
JS J-4 OCS Roadmap
June
July
August
September
October
November
Select a representative Tier III or IV
OPLAN/CONPLAN to serve as a test case to validate
standardized OCS planning methodology and utility
of Annex W template Apply standardized OCS
planning methodology and Annex W templates to the
selected plan in order to identify the potential
scope and estimated magnitude of contractor
support across the range of military capabilities
Apply what we have learned in Iraq to future
Afghanistan operations and most likely/least
likely OPLANs CJCS
Force Structure
Desired outcome Areas of high reliance on
contractors
Complete Organic vs. Contractor Assessment
Brief CJCS
PPBES / JCIDS
TF Phase III
Desired outcome More complete JCAs
UJTLs
Phase II Findings and Recommendations. Kick Off
Phase III
Inform Supporting CSIP and CMP Design
Update CJCSM
Desired Outcome CSIP and CMP Supporting Plan
Template
Inform Policy Doctrine
Desired Outcome Regulation and Policy
Recommendations
TASK 4
TASK 5
22
Questions

• Questions?

23
Back Up
23
23
24
Dependence on Contractors in Contingency
Operations Task Force (Phase II)

• Examine how to plan for and integrate contracted
  support into joint operations
• Evaluate the current range and depth of
  contracted capabilities in Iraq and Afghanistan
  across all Joint Capability Areas

• Guide the development of future force planning

25
Data Call
Linked to slide 12
Data Call

• Collect contract and task order data for
  contractor personnel performance in Iraq and
  Afghanistan, as well as other select countries in
  the CENTCOM AOR (Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Oman,
  Qatar, UAE, and Pakistan)
• Identify scope and magnitude by System Support
  Contracts, External Support Contracts, and
  Theater Support Contracts
• Identify data (best fit) by primary and
  supporting Joint Capability Area (JCA)

FO/GO/SES Oversight Council
Working Group
System
External
Theater
Policy
Service Contracts
ISR
Stryker
LOGCAP
PSC
C4I
Maintenance
Logistics
RSOI
Construction
Transportation
Information Operations
26
Data Sources
Linked to slide 20
Components submit contract data

• CENTCOM CENSUS Data
• QTRLY data spanning FY07-FY08
• Contains System, External and Theater Support
  contracts
• Includes 13 detailed data elements (US, TCN, LN,
  Location, Requiring Activity, Mission,
  Description, K-Duration, K-Number, Company,
  Supporting Unit)
• Does not include contract dollar value
• External Support Contracts
• Services and Agencies Provide
• FY03 through FY08
• System Support Contracts
• Services and Agencies Provide
• FY03 through FY08

CENTCOM CENSUS 07-08
Service Profile
Theater Support
Personnel
Start FY03
27
Linked to slide 12
Data Call, Mapping, Analysis and Assessment
Complete validation of JCA alignment
Phase II
ISR
Stryker
Component Contracts
LOGCAP
PSC
C4I
Maintenance
Logistics
RSOI
Construction
Transportation
Information Operations
Period of Performance / / FTE
System Support Contracts
External Support Contracts
Theater Support Contracts
Categorize by contract type
Map to JCA
JCA
JCA
JCA
Apply findings to Tier III or IV OPLAN
UJTL
UJTL
UJTL
Map to UJTL

• Desired Outcomes
• Various displays of contractor force structure
• Areas of high reliance on contractors
• Contract capabilities by JCAs UJTLs

Where are we most reliant or dependent on
contractors?
28
Logistics JCAs account for 78
Linked to slide 12
Complete JCA assessment
Personnel breakdown by Type of Service
6
29
Definitions

• System Support Contracts
• Contracts awarded by Service acquisition program
  management offices that provide technical
  support, maintenance and, in some cases, repair
  parts for selected military weapon and support
  systems, for example STRYKER, MRAP, F-16, and
  Ship Repair.
• External Support Contracts
• Contracts awarded from contracting organizations
  whose contracting authority does not derive
  directly from the theater support contracting
  Head of Contracting Authority (HCA) or from
  systems support contracting authorities, for
  example LOGCAP, AFCAP, Prime Vendor
• Theater Support Contracts
• Contracts that are awarded by contracting
  officers in the operational area serving under
  the direct authority of the Service component,
  special operations force command, or designated
  joint HCA (JCC-I/A) for the designated
  contingency operation.