Basic Foundations in Clinical Interventions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Basic Foundations in Clinical Interventions

Description:

Process of change that occurs as a result of an individuals experience ... cognitive maps are necessary for learning. Tolman and Honzik (1930) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: carll5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Basic Foundations in Clinical Interventions


1
Basic Foundations in Clinical Interventions
  • CW Lejuez

2
What is learning
  • Process of change that occurs as a result of an
    individuals experience
  • Includes products of learning as well
  • Refer to as History
  • Skinners changed organism

3
  • Early Roots of
  • Learning Theory

4
Earliest Influences 1
  • Julian Offray de la Mettrie (1709-1751)
  • LHomme Machine 1748
  • First metaphor of man as a machine
  • Where does GOD fit in?
  • He doesnt (atheism)
  • GOD can exist outside of human psychology
  • Pursuit of pleasure only justification of life
  • Conservative/religious society in France was not
    happy and even found hostility in Holland

5
Earliest Influences 2
  • Auguste Comte (1798-1857)
  • Founder of Positivism
  • Can only understand the world by avoiding
    metaphysical explanations
  • Law of three stages
  • Theological Stage Supernatural causes
  • Metaphysical Stage Abstract forces (e.g.,
    destiny)
  • Positive Stage Scientific method
  • Includes observation, hypothesis,
    experimentation

6
Earliest Influences 3
  • Vienna Circle (early 1900s)
  • Logical Positivism
  • Added theory to positivism
  • Credited with development of Operationalism
  • Percey Bridgeman
  • Logic of Modern Physics

7
Earliest Influences 4
  • Ivan Sechenov (1829-1905)
  • Russian physiologist
  • Applied methods of physiology to psychology
  • Focused on reflexes
  • As natural science is based on observation,
    psychology must be so as well
  • Defined consciousness as a neural process

8
Earliest Influences 5
  • Ivan Pavlov (1829-1905)
  • Russian physiologist
  • Nobel Prize (1904) for work on digestive
    processes in dogs
  • And the rest is history

9
Thorndike (1874-1949)
  • Learning by trail/error w/ accidental success
  • Successful acts stamped out
  • Successful acts stamped in
  • Law of effect
  • Of several responses made to the same situation,
    those which are accompanied or closely followed
    by satisfaction to the animal will, other things
    being equal, be more firmly connected with the
    situation, so that, when it recurs, they will be
    more likely to recur those which are accompanied
    or closely followed by discomfort to the animal
    will, other things being equal, have their
    connections with that situation weakened, so
    that, when it recurs, they will be less likely to
    occur. The greater the satisfaction or
    discomfort, the greater the strengthening or
    weakening of the bond

10
Watson 1 (1878-1958)
  • Reaction to introspection
  • Data derived from ones own consciousness, or
    inferred from consciousness of others
  • Coined term behaviorism in 1913 paper,
    Psychology as behaviorist views it

11
Watson 2
  • Watsons Definition of behaviorism
  • Purely objective, experimental branch
  • Theoretical goal is prediction and control
  • Recognizes no dividing line between human and
    nonhuman animals
  • Influenced heavily by Pavlov
  • Little Albert

12
Hull (1884-1952)
  • Goal was to establish a mechanistic,
    hypothetico-deductive theory
  • Principle variables in his theory
  • reaction potential SER
  • drive D (mechanism of reinforcement)
  • habit strength SHR
  • stimulus intensity dynamism V
  • incentive K
  • 1952 basic version of his theory
  • SER SHR x D x K x V
  • Hullian theory now mostly of historical interest

13
Tolman 1886-1959
  • Challenged law of effect
  • Cognitive behaviorist
  • intervening variables
  • fit in between environmental events (independent
    variables) and behavior (dependent variables)
  • introduced theorizing to behaviorism
  • i.e., hunger
  • believed animals were purposive (i.e., they had
    goals and intentions)

14
Tolman 2
  • Latent Learning
  • Suggested need for mental representations
  • Reinforcement is not necessary for learning
  • cognitive maps are necessary for learning
  • Tolman and Honzik (1930)
  • R animals performed better than NR aninals
  • But did they learn more
  • No? see figure
  • Alternative explanation

15
(No Transcript)
16
Skinner (1904-1998)
  • Devout dustbowl empiricism
  • Atheoretical
  • Focus on environment-behavior relations
  • Focus on individual whole organism
  • Founder of radical behaviorism
  • Some conceptual fuzziness around private events
    and other mental states
  • Suggests importance of mental events, but the
    manifestation of this is often unclear

17
Early Application
  • Lindsley, Soloman, Skinner (1953)
  • Use of operant conditioning procedures with
    hospitalized psychotic patients
  • Eysenck (1959)
  • Application of pavlovian procedures
  • Lazarus (1958)
  • Application of objective lab procedures to
    therapy
  • Wolpe (1958)
  • Systematic desensitization
  • Countercondition anxiety responses by pairing
    relaxation with fear cues

18
  • So What happened?

19
So What happened?
  • Lack of trained learning theorists in BT
  • Misunderstanding of behavioral approach
  • Therefore, inability to apply basics to more
    complex problems
  • Fuzziness of radical behaviorism in its clinical
    application
  • Movement toward theoretical eclecticism

20
Rise of CBT
  • Cognitive Revolution of the 1960s
  • Mahoney, Beck, Bandura, Ellis, Michenbaum, etc.
  • Doesnt necessarily deny learning principles, but
    requires cognitive mediation for effect
  • Awareness, Attention, Expectancy, Attribution
  • Response to utilization of animal models
  • Use of thought stopping, self-reinforcement, etc.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com