Operations Research Enhanced Supply Chain Management at the US Coast Guard Aircraft Repair and Suppl - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 51
About This Presentation
Title:

Operations Research Enhanced Supply Chain Management at the US Coast Guard Aircraft Repair and Suppl

Description:

Operations Research Enhanced Supply Chain Management ... Cape Cod. 4 HU-25C. 4 HH-60J. Atlantic City 10 HH- 65C. Washington. 1 C-37. 1 C-143. HITRON 8 MH-68A ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:244
Avg rating:5.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: vina9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Operations Research Enhanced Supply Chain Management at the US Coast Guard Aircraft Repair and Suppl


1
Operations Research Enhanced Supply Chain
Management at the US Coast Guard Aircraft Repair
and Supply Center
2
Team Members
  • USCG Team
  • CDR Carl Riedlin
  • LCDR Mike Shirk
  • LCDR Kent Everingham
  • LCDR Gary Polaski
  • Purdue Team
  • Prof. Vinayak Deshpande
  • Prof. Ananth Iyer

3
Cultural Transformation Through
  • USCG ARSC Purdue OR ingrained



4
Route of Flight
  • US Coast Guard Roles Missions
  • Logistics Network
  • Ops Research Purdue/Coast Guard Partnership
  • Four Projects
  • MIDAS, REAP, CRISP and OPT
  • Impact Organizational Transformation

5
(No Transcript)
6
Aviation Facility Location Allocations
Port Angeles 3 HH-65C
Cape Cod 4 HU-25C 4 HH-60J
Traverse City 5 HH-65C
Astoria 3 HH-60J
North Bend 5 HH-65C
Detroit 5 HH-65C
Atlantic City 10 HH- 65C
Humboldt Bay 5 HH-65C
Washington 1 C-37 1 C-143
Sacramento 4 HC-130H
San Francisco 4 HH-65C
Elizabeth City 4 HC-130H 5 MH60-J 1 HC-144A
ATC Mobile 4 HU-25A 7 HH-65C 3 MH-60J

Los Angeles 3 HH-65C

Savannah 5 HH-65C
San Diego 3 MH-60J
Houston- 4 HH65C
HITRON 8 MH-68A
New Orleans- 5 HH-65C

Kodiak 5 HC-130H 4 HH-65C 4 MH-60J
Corpus Christi 3 HU-25C 3 HH-65C
Miami 6 HU-25D 9 HH-65C
Clearwater 6 HC-130H 9 HH-60J
Barbers Point 4 HC-130H 4 HH-65C

Borinquen 4 HH-65C
Sitka 3 HH-60J
HC-130 22 Operational - 5 Support / HU-2517
Operational - 8 Support / HH-60 34 Operational
- 7 Support / HH-65 84 Operational - 11 Support
7
Aircraft Repair and Supply Center (ARSC)
  • One stop shop for all aviation logistics support
  • Depot level maintenance
  • Supply engineering
  • Spare parts inventory management
  • Component repair
  • Information services
  • 60,000 individual parts,
  • Inventory value over 937 million
  • Annual maintenance budget over 154 million for
    over 6000 parts

8
Scheduled Maintenance
Un-Scheduled Failures
ACMS Data
Maintenance Shop
Air Station Repair
AMMIS Data
  • Warehouse
  • - Air Station
  • - ARSC

Item Managers Procurement Specialists
failed parts
Component Repair (Internal)
good parts
Vendors (OGA Commercial)
9
Clear Present Danger
  • Highly complex supply-chain
  • Various groups focused on a specific task
  • Reliability Center Analysis
  • Inventory Replenishment Budgeting
  • In-House Repairs Capacity Management
  • Procurement Best-Value Contracting
  • Need for information collaboration between groups
  • Impending Brain Drain in Federal Govt
  • Item Manager / Procurement Specialists Retirement

10
A Partnership is Formed
  • Purdue a Best Value in Advanced Education
  • Coast Guard officers in MBA Structures programs
    since 1970s
  • Initial contact in 2001 with 2 goals
  • Validate OR capability with ARSC
  • Lead cultural change in face of budget people
    crisis
  • Prof. Deshpande Iyer form a team
  • Exhaustive review of supply-maint business
    processes
  • Concise project definition contracting
    deliverables
  • MIDAS Turning Data into Gold

11
Project 1 MIDAS (June 2002-April 2003)
  • Improving Aircraft Service Parts Demand
    Forecasts and Inventory Management using
    Scheduled Maintenance Data
  • 3 Main Tasks
  • Integrate ACMS maintenance and AMMIS demand data
  • Build Demand Forecast Models
  • Policies for effective inventory management using
    maintenance data

12
MIDAS Methodology and Results
  • Gathered extensive maintenance and demand data on
    41 critical components consisting of 50 of
    budget
  • Created a Linear Programming model to link the
    maintenance data and demand data for these 41
    components

13
Database Match Example
14
ACMS Data
Young Parts
Old Parts
Good parts at Warehouse
Failed parts at Warehouse
L1
IMs
L2
AMMIS Data
failed parts
good parts
re-supply order
Component Re-Supply
15
Part-Age Distribution of Installed Parts
Time Since Overhaul
16
SIGNAL Dependent BASE STOCK
  • SIGNAL each period parts beyond Threshold age
  • Correlate the SIGNAL and Demand over lead time
  • Use the conditional distribution and costs to set
  • BASE STOCK Function(SIGNAL)
  • Evaluate the optimal THRESHOLD
  • Empirical Results showing cost impact on
    Inventory levels
  • Proactive Inventory Management

17
Data Becomes Gold
  • LP tools used to match maintenance records and
    inventory
  • Part Age (accumulated flight hours) information
    improves demand forecast
  • Part Age based triggers for advance orders
  • Empirical results show cost reductions ranging
    from 20 to 70 for over 90 of the parts
    examined
  • The advance orders enable separation of supply
    processes for replenishment and advance orders
    and can be used for budgeting

18
MIDAS Project Organizational Impact
  • Establishment of OR Cell
  • 4 new positions summer interns
  • Expanded budget planning-execution authority
  • Demand forecasting budgeting using MIDAS
  • Partnering with Item Managers
  • Supply Chain Management Business Solution
  • Scalable, repeatable, supportable solution
  • Up-to 100,000 stocking units
  • Data warehouse
  • AMMIS ACMS bridge

19
(No Transcript)
20
Project 2 REAP (June 2003-May 2004)
  • Improving Scheduling of Repairs of Parts using
    Scheduled Maintenance Data
  • Main tasks
  • Understand current repair release approaches
    using empirical data
  • Develop Component Repair Capacity Planning Models
    to choose the optimal repair mix including
    internal vs vendor repair choices.
  • Estimate the impact of adjusting releases on
    performance of the repair shops

21
Components vs TSO
The data shows that as part age increases, the
number of components to be replaced and labor
content increases
22
Role of LP Models
  • The optimization models try to minimize costs
    while maintaining safety stock of parts and
    completing contracted number of part repairs in
    the shop
  • Models capture the impact of shop costs using
    vendor capacity, using overtime, coordinating
    repair releases with IMs etc.

23
REAP Optimization Model
Minimize Sum of in- house repair, vendor repair
and overtime capacity costs
Resource availability constraint
Demands composed of advance and regular orders
Safety stock only needed for regular orders
Budget constraint
Where i is for NIIN and j for shop or resource.
24
REAP Methodology and Key Results
  • Data Analysis to link
  • AMMIS
  • ACMS
  • Extended WO data
  • Link TSO to labor, material data
  • Optimal component repair capacity planning LP
    models
  • Use models to project a 10 savings in repair
    costs

25
REAP Project Organizational Impact
  • Developed 2 bill of material (BOM) lists based on
    TSO (young vs old failures)
  • Linked BOM to extended work order
  • Used BOM to assist with budget builds
  • Shadow price of 6500 per hour for specific
    resources
  • Adjusted resources and skills
  • Release shop repairs to optimally use scarce
    shared repair resources
  • Coordinate IM management
  • Use material usage data to create realistic BOM

26
Upgrade of HH65 Dolphin Helicopter
27
(No Transcript)
28
Restore Unrestricted Ops
  • Restore safety, increase payload and operational
    flexibility
  • Retrofit HH65 with Turbomeca engines
  • Improve gearbox durability upgrade 135 units
  • Urgent requisition - 2 year completion mandate
  • How do we accomplish this?

29
Project 3 CRISP (June 2004-May 2005)
  • CRISP required a model of the impact of
  • Availability of overhaul kits and parts
  • Planned overhaul vs modification
  • Associated spare parts required
  • Overhaul interval
  • Future overhaul
  • Different levels of aircraft operation (C with
    G4, C with G2, switch back and forth, etc.)
  • Resources available

30
States and Transitions
NRFI G2 NRFI G4 In Repair G2 In Repair
G4 RFI G2 RFI G4 G2 on B Aircraft G2 on
C Aircraft G4 on C Aircraft Grounded
B Grounded C In mod-line In PDM line
31
Features of the MIP Model
  • Model possible states of individual aircraft and
    individual components
  • Evolution of configuration over time
  • Impact of overhaul or modification schedule
  • Impact of constraints on level of flexibility
    (B,C-G2,C-G4, switchover)
  • Weighted by upgrade level over horizon to
    maximize aircraft uptime
  • Mixed Integer Program with network substructures

32
Number of Flying Aircraft by Type Over Time
33
Results of the Model
  • Model results highlighted the impact of part
    availability constraints on upgrade process
  • Quantified impact of
  • level of aircraft operation flexibility on
    performance
  • manufacturer suggested mean time to overhaul for
    new components
  • spare parts availability

34
(No Transcript)
35
CRISP Results and Organizational Impact
  • Bottlenecks reduced by productivity changes
  • Dual conversion paths
  • Lean manufacturing
  • Building block for additional analysis
  • Spend plans
  • Fleet sparing
  • Catalyst for a successful on-time conversion

36
Deferred Maintenance Crisis
37
Project 4 OPT (June 2005-Present)
  • Coast Guards Big Iron
  • 300 NM radius
  • essential to cover EEZ
  • Alaska and Caribbean
  • Critical role in massive disaster relief
  • As showcased during Hurricane Katrina
  • ARSC HH60 Product Line
  • PDM corner stone process every 4 yrs
  • Logistics and Engineering Support
  • Impending failure
  • Mission scope creep following 9/11
  • Aging airframe and extensive corrosion
  • Diminishing overhaul throughput
  • Dropped from 9 in 1999 to low of 5 in 2005

38
Impending Disaster
  • The HH-60 deferred maintenance burden on USCG
    reached an all time high of 23.6 Million
  • The Impending Train Wreck Operational Groundings
  • Starting Mar 07
  • 24 of the Coast Guards operational fleet
  • In order to begin a road to recovery, the HH-60
    Product Line needed to rapidly increase its
    throughput

39
Original PDM Line Base Case
40
OPT Project Goals
  • Capture the links between decisions regarding
  • resources
  • inventory
  • repair rules
  • lead times
  • Identify bottlenecks and the benefits of
    implementing improvements
  • Design plans for MH-60T aircraft conversion

41
ARENA Simulation Model
  • Captured three sets of flows in the system
  • Aircraft cycles of field missions and PDM
    overhaul
  • Component flows on flying aircraft, inventory and
    repair
  • Modules (within components) flow on components,
    field failures, inventory and vendor repair
  • Each flow has different criteria
  • Model includes component repair, vendor repair
    lead-times, contracts, priority rules, repair
    triggers, etc.

42
OPT Methodology
  • Closed-loop Queuing and Inventory simulation
    model in ARENA
  • Identified bottleneck processes
  • Hull rework
  • Final Assembly
  • Capture impact of changes on the production line
  • Impact of different rules for triggering module
    repair
  • Impact of improving processing times through lean
    events
  • Impact of inventory positioning (ARSC vs field)
  • Impact of WIP inventory changes
  • Impact of resource level changes

43
Original PDM Line Base Case
9.14
9.64
Assembly stations 3
Hull stations 3
9.14
8.06
6.55
2 Hull Repair VV 2 Assembly 0 hull
inventory 6aircrafts
4 aircrafts
5 aircrafts
9.31
1 hull
CC
9.29
9.33
7 aircrafts
9.29
Module life 500
2 hulls
9.2
8 aircrafts
Module life 0
9.31
9.2
44
OPT Results and Organizational Impact
  • Reduced process cycle time
  • 200 () working days down to an impressive 145
  • Eliminated 5M annual outsourcing initiative
  • Analysis used to drop plans to add 2 hulls at a
    cost of 10 million (low throughput impact)
  • This resulted in an increase in throughput by 80
    and a drop in deferred maintenance burden from
    23.6M to a mere 6.5M

45
Four Projects
Missions
Air-station
CRISP
OPT
Aircraft Type
MIDAS
Upgrade
Repair
ARSC/E-city
Inventory
ARSC Repair
Vendor
REAP
46
Research Impact
  • Each project led to an innovative idea with solid
    OR analysis as summarized in the table

47
At the End of The Day
  • Quantifiable, measurable, tangible benefits
  • MIDAS inventory reduction for critical parts
  • REAP 10 cost avoidance with 200MM budget
  • CRISP - Unrestricted H65 Operations
  • CRISP Capacity constraints highlighted
  • Catalyst for Lean Manufacturing with 1.2MM
    savings
  • CRISP - Redirect 9.9MM for component sparing
  • Gear box, engine control system with long
    lead-time
  • OPT Ended H60 deferred maintenance crisis
  • 80 increase in overhaul throughput

48
Organizational Impactof OR Projects
  • Establishment of an Operations Research cell
  • Several new employees and interns hired
  • Provides critical decision support tools for
    planning repair and maintenance activities
  • Overwhelming increase in requests to analyze
    logistics issues
  • All new projects expected to be grounded with OR
    analysis
  • Supply Chain Management System (SCMS) being
    implemented to leverage information sharing and
    OR applications across the enterprise
  • Future Initiatives Aircraft availability
    simulation

49
Social Impactof OR Projects
  • Total cost savings in excess of 70 million
  • CRISP returned the H-65 aircraft to a safe,
    reliable platform
  • Prevented grounding of 9 HH-60 aircraft which
    would have resulted in loss of 6300 mission
    flight hours
  • Replacing these aircraft would have cost USCG
    270 million
  • Long procurement lead-times and budgetary
    realities would make that infeasible
  • True impact of grounded aircraft would have been
    a drop in mission readiness from 100 to 96 and
    mission execution drop to 4.
  • The social cost would have been our inability to
    respond to natural disasters such as Hurricane
    Katrina
  • 33,000 rescues, 5,000 by the HH-60

50
(No Transcript)
51
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com