Aspects of Collaboration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Aspects of Collaboration

Description:

Activity that involves both interaction and effort to complete a common goal. ... a pilot's role, they become the system's manager while the plane flies itself. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: prei180
Learn more at: http://cecs.wright.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aspects of Collaboration


1
Aspects of Collaboration
  • Srinivas Edala
  • Andrew Snyder

2
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Background
  • Human to Human Personal Issues
  • Human to Human Group Issues
  • Human to Computer Issues
  • Examples
  • References

3
Introduction
  • What is collaboration?
  • Activity that involves both interaction and
    effort to complete a common goal.
  • Can involve humans in groups, humans using
    computer systems, and computers working together.
  • Examples

4
Introduction
  • Why is collaboration important?
  • Multi-disciplinary approaches to product design
    are prevalent.
  • Why is understanding collaboration important?
  • To establish communication rules
  • which will enable ways of seamlessly introducing
    new technology into complex environments.
  • Businesses are looking for these engineering
    design tools.

5
Introduction
  • Systems that network people together include
  • email
  • operating systems
  • world wide web
  • Collaboration environments involve
  • people from multi-disciplines
  • using tools
  • sometimes at great distances

6
Background
  • Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research in
    1970s was a point system
  • try ____, see if it works
  • Theory eventually developed from there
  • Collaboration field is going the same way as HCI
    did, except that it is still in point system
  • no good theory is around yet

7
Human to Human Personal Issues
  • Individual vs. group situational awareness
  • Novice vs. expert issues
  • Imputed knowledge
  • Shared knowledge
  • Cognitive workload (or overhead)

8
Human to Human Group Issues
  • Behavior as a group
  • Are N1 heads better?
  • Unshared information
  • Seasoned vs. ad hoc groups
  • Task type

9
Human to Computer - Issues
  • Salience
  • Group Support Systems (GSS)
  • Distributed engineering
  • Supervisory control example to follow
  • Task-artifact cycle/SA example to follow

10
Supervisory control
  • Supporting Informed Consent in Human-Machine
    Collaboration The Role of Conflict Type, Time
    Pressure, and Display Design
  • by Wesley A. Olson and Nadine B. Sarter
  • As technology changes a pilots role, they become
    the systems manager while the plane flies
    itself.
  • Showed that pilots prefer informed consent over
    the data link, and improper instructions were
    difficult to detect prior to execution.

11
Task-Artifact Cycle/Situation Awareness
  • Exploring the Impact of Advanced Alarms,
    Displays, and Computerized Procedures on Teams by
    Emilie M. Roth and John M. OHara
  • This study examined the impact of introducing
    advanced human-system interfaces (HSI) into an
    ongoing field of practice (nuclear power plant
    control room).
  • Crew structure changed because members worked
    more in parallel
  • They had to consciously inform other crew members
    of their status

12
References
  • Bardram, J. (1999). Designing for the dynamics of
    cooperative work activities, Proceedings of CSCW
    98 ACM, 89-98. 
  • Benbasat, I. and L. H. Lim (1993). The effects
    of group, task, context, and technology variables
    on the usefulness of group support systems A
    meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small
    Group Research 24(4) 430-462.
  • Clark, H. H. and C. R. Marshall (1981). Definite
    reference and mutual knowledge. Elements of a
    Discourse Understanding. B. L. W. A. J. Joshi and
    I. A. Sagg 10-63.
  • Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in
    work teams Toward a new model of group
    development. Academy of Management Journal
    31(1) 9-41.
  • Harvey, C. M. and Koubek, R. J. (submitted).
    Distributed engineering collaboration A
    comprehensive model and results, Ergonomics.
  • Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual
    performance Are N1 heads better than one.
    Psychological Bulletin 91(3) 517-539.
  • Hirokawa, R. (1990). The role of communication
    in group decision-making efficacy. Small Group
    Research 21 190-204.
  • Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E. and K. M.
    O'Connor (1993). Group task performance and
    communication technology A longitudinal study of
    computer-mediated versus face-to-face work
    groups. Small Group Research 24(3) 307-333.
  • Karsenty, L. (1999). Cooperative work and shared
    visual content An empirical study of
    comprehension problems in side-by-side and remote
    help dialogues, Human Computer Interaction, 14,
    283-315.
  • Mandviwalla, M. and Olfman, L, (1994), What Do
    Groups Need? A Proposed Set of Generic Groupware
    Requirements. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human
    Interaction, 1(3) 245-268.
  • Nickerson, R. S. (1999). How We Know-and
    Sometimes Misjudge-What Others Know Imputing
    One's Own Knowledge to Others. Psychological
    Bulletin 125(6) 737-759.
  • Olson, G. M., Olson, J. S., Carter, M. R. and M.
    Storrøsten (1992). Small group design meetings
    An analysis of collaboration. Human-Computer
    Interaction 7 347-374.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com