Title: What the Research Says About Block Scheduling and Foreign Language Instruction
1What the Research Says About Block Scheduling and
Foreign Language Instruction
- Linda M. Wallinger, Ph.D.
- Foreign Language ESL Specialist
- Virginia Department of Education
2Benefits of Block Scheduling to the Total School
Program
- Improved attendance rate
- Improved student grades
- Lower drop out rate
- Higher graduation rate
- Fewer discipline referrals
- Reduced stress
- Increased number of course offerings
- More time
3Benefits of the Block to Foreign Language Classes
- More time
- More opportunities to offer and take advanced
courses because of more class periods - More opportunity to vary instructional strategies
- More opportunity to integrate instructional
technology
4- More time to teach in depth
- More time to work individually with students
- More time to use a variety of assessment
techniques - More time to address various learning styles of
students - More time to plan for instruction
5Challenges of the Block to Foreign Language
Classes
- Less total time during the year
- Maintaining students attention
- Maintaining continuity in instruction
- Helping students catch up on school work after an
absence - Less time for homework practice
6- Less time for assimilation of information
- Preparation for national exams and AP exams
- Scheduling of sequential courses
7Discussion Points
- The only significant difference occurred in the
total time available for instruction. No other
significant differences were found. - There was a wide range for every dependent
variable in the study.
8Total Instructional Hours
9Time Available for Classroom Instruction
- Findings of this study were consistent with
findings of other studies. - Time is not the only variable in learning
- Student aptitude
- Quality of instruction
- Ability to understand
- Perseverance
- Engagement rate
- Success rate
10Total Hours of Expected Out-of-Class Homework
SD 10.367 Min 22.50 Max 67.50
SD 19.35 Min 0.00 Max 78.75
SD 20.15 Min 0.00 Max 90.00
11Total Hours of In-Class Homework
SD 12.90 Min 0.00 Max 37.50
SD 13.23 Min 0.00 Max 45.00
SD 9.31 Min 0.00 Max 22.50
12Expected Homework
- No significant difference among the 3 schedules
for either out-of-class or in-class homework. - Wide range of responses.
- Variety of teacher views on efficacy of homework
and on student willingness to do it.
13Variations in Homework Assignments
- Total amount of expected homework
- Completion of homework
- Kind of homework
- How homework is used in class
14Importance of Homework to Student Achievement
- Two divergent views
- Homework does not contribute significantly to a
students achievement test scores, competency
test scores, or teacher assigned grades. - Increased time spent on homework has a positive
effect on student grades. - Agreement that homework studies are hard to
conduct with a high degree of reliability.
15Listening Test Results - Raw Data
SD 3.42 Min 7.00 Max 19.50
SD 2.72 Min 6.30 Max 14.80
SD 2.16 Min 6.00 Max 15.00
Maximum Possible Score 22.00
16Reading Test Results - Raw Data
SD 3.08 Min 4.00 Max 15.00
SD 1.96 Min 3.30 Max 12.00
SD 2.27 Min .70 Max 11.40
Maximum Possible Score 15.00
17Speaking Test Results - Raw Data
SD 4.34 Min 3.00 Max 17.00
SD 3.40 Min 4.00 Max 18.00
SD 4.53 Min 4.00 Max 22.00
Maximum Possible Score 24.00
18Writing Test Results - Raw Data
SD 6.39 Min 2.00 Max 20.00
SD 3.91 Min 2.00 Max 17.00
SD 4.51 Min 1.00 Max 21.00
Maximum Possible Score 25.00
19Foreign Language Learning
- No significant difference in performance in any
skill by students from any of the scheduling
groups. - Partially reflects results from one other
comparable study by Lapkin, Harley, and Hart
(1997).
20- Two statistical studies related to foreign
languages and the block schedule - Lapkin (1997) - Equal time in all schedules
- 40 minutes of instruction/day for 10 months
- half day instruction/day for 10 weeks
- 80 minutes of instruction/day for 5 months
- Wallinger (1998) - Time not equal in all
schedules - 6-/7-period day
- alternating day
- 4x4 semester block
21Results of the Research
22Considerations in Interpreting the Results
- The end-of-course test
- Created and field-tested by researcher
- Is a proficiency-based test appropriate?
- Does it measure enough discrete elements?
- Are proficiency-based tests being used in the
field? - Where should the scores fall?
23- The teachers
- Are teachers teaching for proficiency (teaching
to the VA SOL)? - Have French I teachers mastered the art of
teaching on the block? - The students
- Did students take the test seriously?
- Was the sample of 9th graders significant?
24- The Content
- Is French I too early for this type of study?
- Are other important aspects of foreign language
teaching and learning being ignored?
25Pearsons Chi Square
- Used to examine the score distributions by
quartile - The chi square test was significant for the
sub-tests of listening and reading, but not for
speaking and writing. - Two possible reasons
- Larger sample in listening and reading may have
produced a more valid result. - Speaking and writing were scored using a rubric
while listening and reading were multiple choice.
26Listening Test - Percentile Distribution - Raw
Data
27Reading Test - Percentile Distribution - Raw Data
28Speaking Test - Percentile Distribution - Raw Data
29Writing Test - Percentile Distribution - Raw Data
30Recommendations for Future Research
- Further exploration of learning variables other
than time as they relate to block scheduling. - A study using a content-based test rather than a
proficiency test. - Additional research on the kinds of homework that
are assigned in foreign language classes and how
the assignments are used.
31- The study of learning loss as it relates to the
various schedules. - A longitudinal study that covered more time
and/or more levels of language study as well as
other languages. - A similar study using a sample that consisted of
students other than 9th graders.
32Block Busters
- Tips for Success with Block Scheduling
33- Be patient.
- Collaborate with colleagues.
- Teach thematically.
- Plan and pace.
- Bore them at the beginning.
- Maintain momentum.
- Reduce, review, relate, and recycle.
- Lecture less.
- Mix up the middle.
- Supply study strategies.
34- Assign homework regularly.
- Consider closure.
- Tailor your tests.
- Reallocate responsibility.
- Conduct a seminar for extra help.
- Cherice Montgomery
- Wichita Southeast High School
- Wichita, KS
- montgomery_at_feist.com
35If you always do what youve always done, youll
always get what you always got!