What the Research Says About Block Scheduling and Foreign Language Instruction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

What the Research Says About Block Scheduling and Foreign Language Instruction

Description:

More opportunities to offer and take advanced courses because ... Partially reflects results from one other comparable study by Lapkin, Harley, and Hart (1997) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: VirginiaDe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What the Research Says About Block Scheduling and Foreign Language Instruction


1
What the Research Says About Block Scheduling and
Foreign Language Instruction
  • Linda M. Wallinger, Ph.D.
  • Foreign Language ESL Specialist
  • Virginia Department of Education

2
Benefits of Block Scheduling to the Total School
Program
  • Improved attendance rate
  • Improved student grades
  • Lower drop out rate
  • Higher graduation rate
  • Fewer discipline referrals
  • Reduced stress
  • Increased number of course offerings
  • More time

3
Benefits of the Block to Foreign Language Classes
  • More time
  • More opportunities to offer and take advanced
    courses because of more class periods
  • More opportunity to vary instructional strategies
  • More opportunity to integrate instructional
    technology

4
  • More time to teach in depth
  • More time to work individually with students
  • More time to use a variety of assessment
    techniques
  • More time to address various learning styles of
    students
  • More time to plan for instruction

5
Challenges of the Block to Foreign Language
Classes
  • Less total time during the year
  • Maintaining students attention
  • Maintaining continuity in instruction
  • Helping students catch up on school work after an
    absence
  • Less time for homework practice

6
  • Less time for assimilation of information
  • Preparation for national exams and AP exams
  • Scheduling of sequential courses

7
Discussion Points
  • The only significant difference occurred in the
    total time available for instruction. No other
    significant differences were found.
  • There was a wide range for every dependent
    variable in the study.

8
Total Instructional Hours
9
Time Available for Classroom Instruction
  • Findings of this study were consistent with
    findings of other studies.
  • Time is not the only variable in learning
  • Student aptitude
  • Quality of instruction
  • Ability to understand
  • Perseverance
  • Engagement rate
  • Success rate

10
Total Hours of Expected Out-of-Class Homework
SD 10.367 Min 22.50 Max 67.50
SD 19.35 Min 0.00 Max 78.75
SD 20.15 Min 0.00 Max 90.00
11
Total Hours of In-Class Homework
SD 12.90 Min 0.00 Max 37.50
SD 13.23 Min 0.00 Max 45.00
SD 9.31 Min 0.00 Max 22.50
12
Expected Homework
  • No significant difference among the 3 schedules
    for either out-of-class or in-class homework.
  • Wide range of responses.
  • Variety of teacher views on efficacy of homework
    and on student willingness to do it.

13
Variations in Homework Assignments
  • Total amount of expected homework
  • Completion of homework
  • Kind of homework
  • How homework is used in class

14
Importance of Homework to Student Achievement
  • Two divergent views
  • Homework does not contribute significantly to a
    students achievement test scores, competency
    test scores, or teacher assigned grades.
  • Increased time spent on homework has a positive
    effect on student grades.
  • Agreement that homework studies are hard to
    conduct with a high degree of reliability.

15
Listening Test Results - Raw Data
SD 3.42 Min 7.00 Max 19.50
SD 2.72 Min 6.30 Max 14.80
SD 2.16 Min 6.00 Max 15.00
Maximum Possible Score 22.00
16
Reading Test Results - Raw Data
SD 3.08 Min 4.00 Max 15.00
SD 1.96 Min 3.30 Max 12.00
SD 2.27 Min .70 Max 11.40
Maximum Possible Score 15.00
17
Speaking Test Results - Raw Data
SD 4.34 Min 3.00 Max 17.00
SD 3.40 Min 4.00 Max 18.00
SD 4.53 Min 4.00 Max 22.00
Maximum Possible Score 24.00
18
Writing Test Results - Raw Data
SD 6.39 Min 2.00 Max 20.00
SD 3.91 Min 2.00 Max 17.00
SD 4.51 Min 1.00 Max 21.00
Maximum Possible Score 25.00
19
Foreign Language Learning
  • No significant difference in performance in any
    skill by students from any of the scheduling
    groups.
  • Partially reflects results from one other
    comparable study by Lapkin, Harley, and Hart
    (1997).

20
  • Two statistical studies related to foreign
    languages and the block schedule
  • Lapkin (1997) - Equal time in all schedules
  • 40 minutes of instruction/day for 10 months
  • half day instruction/day for 10 weeks
  • 80 minutes of instruction/day for 5 months
  • Wallinger (1998) - Time not equal in all
    schedules
  • 6-/7-period day
  • alternating day
  • 4x4 semester block

21
Results of the Research
22
Considerations in Interpreting the Results
  • The end-of-course test
  • Created and field-tested by researcher
  • Is a proficiency-based test appropriate?
  • Does it measure enough discrete elements?
  • Are proficiency-based tests being used in the
    field?
  • Where should the scores fall?

23
  • The teachers
  • Are teachers teaching for proficiency (teaching
    to the VA SOL)?
  • Have French I teachers mastered the art of
    teaching on the block?
  • The students
  • Did students take the test seriously?
  • Was the sample of 9th graders significant?

24
  • The Content
  • Is French I too early for this type of study?
  • Are other important aspects of foreign language
    teaching and learning being ignored?

25
Pearsons Chi Square
  • Used to examine the score distributions by
    quartile
  • The chi square test was significant for the
    sub-tests of listening and reading, but not for
    speaking and writing.
  • Two possible reasons
  • Larger sample in listening and reading may have
    produced a more valid result.
  • Speaking and writing were scored using a rubric
    while listening and reading were multiple choice.

26
Listening Test - Percentile Distribution - Raw
Data
27
Reading Test - Percentile Distribution - Raw Data
28
Speaking Test - Percentile Distribution - Raw Data
29
Writing Test - Percentile Distribution - Raw Data
30
Recommendations for Future Research
  • Further exploration of learning variables other
    than time as they relate to block scheduling.
  • A study using a content-based test rather than a
    proficiency test.
  • Additional research on the kinds of homework that
    are assigned in foreign language classes and how
    the assignments are used.

31
  • The study of learning loss as it relates to the
    various schedules.
  • A longitudinal study that covered more time
    and/or more levels of language study as well as
    other languages.
  • A similar study using a sample that consisted of
    students other than 9th graders.

32
Block Busters
  • Tips for Success with Block Scheduling

33
  • Be patient.
  • Collaborate with colleagues.
  • Teach thematically.
  • Plan and pace.
  • Bore them at the beginning.
  • Maintain momentum.
  • Reduce, review, relate, and recycle.
  • Lecture less.
  • Mix up the middle.
  • Supply study strategies.

34
  • Assign homework regularly.
  • Consider closure.
  • Tailor your tests.
  • Reallocate responsibility.
  • Conduct a seminar for extra help.
  • Cherice Montgomery
  • Wichita Southeast High School
  • Wichita, KS
  • montgomery_at_feist.com

35
If you always do what youve always done, youll
always get what you always got!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com