Nursing,%20Midwifery%20and%20Allied%20Health%20Professions%20Research%20Training%20Scheme%20Training%20Workshop%20May%202004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Nursing,%20Midwifery%20and%20Allied%20Health%20Professions%20Research%20Training%20Scheme%20Training%20Workshop%20May%202004

Description:

Moray 20. NMAHP Research Training: Survey Method, May 2004. 35. Glasgow 150 ... Moray 40. NMAHP Research Training: Survey Method, May 2004. 36. Stirling 60 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:201
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 93
Provided by: paulla3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nursing,%20Midwifery%20and%20Allied%20Health%20Professions%20Research%20Training%20Scheme%20Training%20Workshop%20May%202004


1
Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions
Research Training Scheme Training Workshop May
2004
  • The Survey Method
  • Paul Lambert
  • Applied Social Science, Stirling University
  • 5.5.04, 9-11am

2
Resources for this talk
  • Slides
  • the nature of survey research
  • issues in doing survey research
  • Reading guide
  • Activities sheet
  • introduction to research resources
  • example analysis of a secondary survey dataset

3
The Survey Method
1. The Nature of Social Surveys Defining surveys survey sampling types of surveys history of surveys reactions to them
2. Doing Survey Research Research support sources Constructing data (collecting data secondary data working with variables) Data management and analysis

4
1. The Nature of Social Surveys
1a) Defining surveys
1b) Survey sampling
1c) Types of surveys
1d) History of surveys in the social sciences

5
1a) Surveys The systematic collection of
selected information from all or part of a
population(see Marsh 1982)
6
Surveys are characterised by variable-by-case
matrix
Cases ? ? Variables ? ? Variables ? ? Variables ? ? Variables ? ? Variables ? ? Variables ? ? Variables ? ? Variables ?
1 1 17 1.73 A . . . .
2 1 18 1.85 B . . . .
3 2 17 1.60 C . . . .
4 2 18 1.69 A . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
N
7
  • Cases can be
  • Any distinctive entity
  • Most often, they are individuals (people)
  • Variables are
  • Measures of selected concepts of interest
  • Indicators (our best guess at representing the
    concept)
  • Variable design issues in choosing and
    formulating appropriate variables

8
Example
Cases ? ? Variables ? ? Variables ? ? Variables ? ? Variables ? ? Variables ?
Person Sex Age Height Health
1. Alan 1 17 1.73 A .
2. Bill 1 18 1.85 B .
3. Cath 2 17 1.60 C .
4. Dawn 2 18 1.69 A .
. . . . . .
N
9
The survey size
  • Total number of cases ? survey size (n)
  • A census covers every case in population.
  • Most surveys use samples of cases.
  • Larger survey size
  • ? more reliable sample estimates.

10
Varieties of social surveys
  • Topic choice of variables / cases
  • Scale number of variables / cases
  • Method data collection format
  • Use type of data analysis descriptive vs
    inferential

11
Why study survey research?
  • To undertake surveys
  • If answers research question if attainable
  • Valuable skills
  • To understand / critique other peoples survey
    research based reports
  • Crucial survey evidence is everywhere
  • Dont just ignore / dismiss survey evidence

12
Strengths of surveys (1)
  • Can be representative / large scale
  • Probability theories justify generalisation from
    samples
  • Surveys can handle census or other large sample
    data collections and analysis
  • Parsimonious summary of the relation between
    variables on many cases

13
Strengths of surveys (2)
  • Extensive methods research
  • Eg, tests of reliability and validity - Bryman
    2001 pp70-74

Stability Face validity
Internal reliability Concurrent
Inter-observer consistency Predictive
Inter-observer consistency Construct
Convergent
14
Strengths of surveys (3)
  • Variety of data analysis formats
  • Descriptive, Inferential, multivariate
  • Causal analysis defensible, eg longitudinal
  • Data analysis is falsifiable
  • Report writing skills, careful qualifications

15
Strengths of surveys (4)
  • Accessibility of survey research
  • Most research questions benefit from survey
    investigation
  • Secondary datasets widely freely available
  • Small scale surveys quick to conduct
  • Survey results often convince others

16
Strengths of surveys (5)
  • Surveys are less biased than most other social
    research methods
  • Transparency of sampling methods variable
    construction data analysis
  • Falsifiability
  • Cynicism of receiving audiences..!

17
Examples surveys in health research
  • General purpose and focussed cross-sectional
  • Scottish Health Survey self-reported health and
    lifestyle of 4000 adults
  • Selected population, eg sufferers of condition X
  • Longitudinal follow-up studies
  • Birth cohort studies parental backgrounds and
    childhood health progressions
  • Ageing, status and sense of control (US) 1995
    sample of 3k in 1995, recontact 1.5k in 1998
  • Experimental designs
  • Smokers reactions to treatment programmes

18
1. The Nature of Social Surveys
1a) Defining surveys
1b) Survey sampling
1c) Types of surveys
1d) History of surveys in the social sciences

19
Role of sampling
  • Surveys usually select only a sample of cases -
    aim to be representative of wider population
  • Key idea is inference
  • confidence in our ability to generalise
  • Sampling inference application of statistical
    theories in order to estimate probabilities that
    a sample result is likely to have been
    unrepresentative

20
The normal (Gaussian) curve
21
Theories of sampling methods
  • Sampling and probability theories tell us that
    any particular random sample is most likely to
    have the same properties as the wider population.
    We can then estimate the probability that sample
    results of a particular nature could have arisen
    by chance, rather than because they are the same
    as the (unknown) population result.

22
? If the cases in sample surveys were selected at
random, then can use sampling theories and thus
inference

23
Statistical inference
  • ..causes confusion one of hardest parts of
    survey data analysis to understand..
  • Phrases significance level p-value,
    confidence interval, hypothesis testing, ..
  • Meaning Whether results would probably
    generalise to a larger population
  • (if sample is treated as random)
  • See Refs on reading list (esp Wright 2002)

24
Inferential data analysis
  • Variable-by-case matrix data analysis for
    generalising findings to population
  • Often distinguished from descriptive data
    analysis (results of sample only)
  • Key joint influence of
  • 1) size of sample
  • 2) strength of data pattern
  • in increasing confidence about generalisations

25
  • Doing good inferential analysis is difficult
  • Reliable sampling resources expensive
  • Many early critiques of survey research concerned
    inappropriate inferential analysis
  • Contemporary survey research tends to follow 2
    alternate strategies
  • Large scale, often secondary, rigorous
    inferential methods
  • or
  • Small scale, primary, claims carefully qualified

26
Drawing samples (case selection)
Populn. Cases ? ? Variables ? ? Variables ? ? Variables ? ? Variables ?
1 - - - - -
2 - - - - -
3 - - - - -
4 1 1 17 1.73 A
5 2 1 18 1.85 B
6 - - - - -
7 3 2 17 1.60 C
8 4 2 18 1.69 A
N8 n4
27
Sampling methods
  • Ways of selecting case from population

(i) Random (probabilistic) Generalisable, inferential statistics, fewer applications (ii) Non-random (opportunistic purposive) Harder to generalise, inference contested, more widely used
28
a) Simple Random Sample
  • A statistical method used to choose cases
    randomly (eg random numbers)
  • Every case in population has exactly the same
    chance of being in sample
  • Most data analysis techniques initially designed
    for simple random samples

29
b) Systematic Random Sample
  • Like the Simple RS, select cases from anywhere in
    the whole population
  • An easier selection method choose every (n)th
    person for the sample
  • Danger of periodicity if original population
    order has any structure, ? bias

30
Problems with sample methods selecting from whole
population
  • The random part means its always possible to
    get a population coverage quite different from
    known structures
  • If total population is large or dispersed, then
    coverage of random parts of it is expensive and
    time consuming few surveys use random sampling
    from whole of UK

31
c) Stratified random samples
  • Modifies random sample to ensure intended
    coverage of population groups
  • split sampling frame by stratification factors
  • select random samples within each factor
  • final sample has fixed proportions of each
  • Example select 490 M and 510 F
  • Properties proportionate sample correct
    representations but more expensive complex
    may need weights for analysis

32
d) Multistage cluster samples
  • i) Select clusters of population at random
  • ii) Sample randomly within clusters
  • Eg clusters local authorities in UK
  • With qualifications, may still be treated as
    random for analysis purposes
  • Big reduction in costs if face-to-face contacts
  • ? Most widely favoured sampling method in
    large scale survey collections

33
Example Multistage cluster sample
  • Interest attitudes of Scottish school pupils
  • Resources 400 interviews with pupils

34
Shetlands 2
Highlands 40
Islands 20
Moray 20
Aberdeen 40
Perth 20
Edinburgh 100
Argyll 24
Borders 10
Glasgow 124
35
Moray 40
Stirling 60
Edinburgh 150
Glasgow 150
36
Stirling 60
30 young people at Balfron School and 30 young
people at Stirling High
37
Issues in random sampling
  • Only as good as underlying sampling frame (a good
    one may not be available, or not be as good as we
    think)
  • Data analysis methods need adapting for
    stratified / clustered designs
  • Other survey factors interact with sample
    selection issues, eg poor interviewers may
    discourage certain cases from response

38
ii) Opportunistic sampling
  • Often in social research, sample design is
    opportunistic (purposive)
  • Random sampling is expensive
  • Random sampling is complex
  • Some purported random samples are actually
    purposive anyway (understanding random)

39
a) Quota sampling
  • Fill up quotas of groups of interest
  • Quotas can ensure
  • overall representation (cf systematic)
  • broad topic coverage (eg types of voter)
  • Example market researchers in street telephone
    call centres vetting contacts
  • Biasses issues in how a quota fills up

40
b) Snowball sampling
  • Also focussed enumeration
  • Technique for contacting cases from populations
    rare / difficult to access
  • Ask first obtained contact for suggested further
    contacts
  • ? snowball gathers size
  • Eg smaller ethnic minority groups
  • Problem social networks are non-random!

41
c) Convenience sampling
  • Samples whatever cases from population were
    easiest to reach, eg personal contacts
  • Often no other sampling strategy involved
  • Biasses likely in convenience process
  • Examples most student survey projects are
    convenience..!

42
Random vs Opportunistic
  • Random sampling difficult and expensive mainly
    government funded surveys
  • Much data analysis / inference assumes random
    sample, but not applied to
  • But random sampling is not a panacea...
  • And opportunistic data is often robust

Rule Use survey documentation to report sampling
process and any errors
43
1. The Nature of Social Surveys
1a) Defining surveys
1b) Survey sampling
1c) Types of surveys
1d) History of surveys in the social sciences

44
Varieties of social survey designs
  • Micro-social data
  • Censuss
  • Cross-sectional surveys
  • Longitudinal surveys
  • Cross-nationally comparative surveys
  • Experiments or quasi-experiments
  • Macro-social data
  • Single summary statistics describing outputs
    from survey analyses

45
  • Censuss
  • General overview of whole population
  • Disclosure risk issues
  • Cross-sectional surveys
  • Very widely used format
  • Huge range of topic coverage
  • Often used to study particular or rare
    subpopulations

46
Longitudinal datasets studies involving time
  • Repeated cross-sections
  • Chart changes over time, eg yearly means
  • Panel and cohort samples
  • recontact an initially random sample
  • Learn about changers and causes of actions
  • Problems of attrition
  • Retrospective sample
  • Rely on recall evidence of random selection
  • Problems of selective recall
  • Strengths understand process and causality
  • Problems sampling and attrition complexity

47
Cross-nationally comparative datasets
  • Focussed surveys (IPUMS censuss ISSP World
    Values Survey European Social Survey)
  • Longitudinal studies (LIS ECHP CHER)
  • Many analytical attractions, but issues of
    comparable analysis are complex

48
Experimental / quasi-experimental designs
  • Experiment researcher intervenes in the process
    of study (quasi-experiment observe
    intervention)
  • Dream of the randomised controlled trial
  • Rare in sociology cost ethics more common in
    psychology certain health research fields
  • Consequences
  • Different methods of analysis (see eg Robson 2002
    c5)
  • Less concern over inference / v large samples

49
Simple and complex survey data
  • Simplest variable-by-case matrix has one sample
    of independent cases from 1 period
  • More interesting social science data has more
    complex designs, eg
  • Multiple records per case
  • Relations between cases
  • Experimental matching of designs

50
Working with complex survey data..
  • Advanced tasks in data management
  • File matching
  • Variable transformations and treatments
  • Advanced methods of data analysis
  • Complex findings not easily summarised or
    communicated
  • but it is simplicity of simple survey data that
    many people criticise about SDA

51
1. The Nature of Social Surveys
1a) Defining surveys
1b) Survey sampling
1c) Types of surveys
1d) History of surveys in the social sciences

52
Rise of the survey method..
  • 1920s to 1960s saw vast expansion in survey
    examples
  • Government, commercial, political, academic all
    conducting surveys on own topics
  • Method of choice of social research
  • Eg only empirical method, dominates teaching of
    research methods

53
Fall of the survey method..
  • Early dominance of surveys produces backlash
    1960s onwards (eg Cicourel 1964)
  • Philosophical research epistemology
  • Pragmatic many badly conducted surveys
  • Prejudiced fear of working with statistics
    leads researchers to avoid, ignore or oppose
    surveys
  • Political white male power
  • Populist lies, dammed lies and statistics

54
..Resurgence of survey method
  • Critiques provoke defence
  • Methodological research to avoid simplifying
    mistakes, improve sampling designs, and avoid
    unjustified claims
  • Substantial support for survey research always
    there, eg Government, commerce
  • Funding organisations now try to redress
    over-reaction, encourage survey research teaching
    and activities (eg ESRC)

55
Current state of play
  • Survey and other research methods are largely
    separate entities
  • Pragmatic Involve different people and skills
  • But not methodologically appealing (eg Bryman
    1992 on mixed methods, extract in Seale 2004)
  • Contemporary social science survey research shows
    strong disciplinary separatisms, eg
  • UK sociology tables bivariate US sociology
    regressions Psychology Anova Economics
    regression extensions. (Accusations of
    methodolatry)

56
Importance of studying Surveys
  • Whatever your views on methods, surveys are
    always will be one of most important social
    research tools - they should never be ignored!

57
The Survey Method
1. The Nature of Social Surveys Defining surveys survey sampling types of surveys history of surveys reactions to them
2. Doing Survey Research Research support sources Constructing data (collecting data secondary data working with variables) Data management and analysis

58
2. Doing Survey Research

2a) Research support
2b) Constructing data
2c) Data management and analysis
59
Research support with surveys
  • References Hundreds of textbooks and papers
  • See reading list, esp Buckingham and Saunders
    2004
  • Internet resources, eg ESDS, RMS
  • See activities sheet
  • Learn from prior examples qnre schedules,
    samples,
  • Learning by doing
  • the apprentice model of social survey research
  • workshops and short courses

60
2. Doing Survey Research

2a) Research support
2b) Constructing data
2c) Data management and analysis
61
Data construction issues
  • 2.1a Collecting and entering data
  • 2.1b Accessing secondary data
  • 2.1c Variable operationalisations

62
2b -1 Good practice in survey collection
  • Extensive history of methodological research into
    how to collect data with greater reliability and
    validity
  • - see some egs on reading list (..De Vaus chpts
    7-8 Gilbert chpt 6..)

63
Data collection issues
  • Appropriate sampling strategy (adhered to)
  • Question wording
  • Interviewer skills and contexts
  • Minimise non-contacts / refusals
  • Document data collection assiduously
  • every badly conducted survey makes it harder for
    surveys in the future

64
Questionnaire data entry
  • Codebook devise system to represent variables
    through numeric codes
  • Choices in variable operationalisations and
    categorical groupings
  • Small scale tap values into computer from
    schedule (laborious)
  • Large scale data entry software / specialist
    staff

65
2b-2 Secondary survey data
  • Vast quantity of surveys conducted
  • An efficient step would be to analyse existing
    data (secondary) rather than personally collect
    your own (primary)
  • Data archives collate survey datasets and supply
    them for secondary analysis

66
  • Government funds many large surveys
  • (also EU LAs charities commercial)
  • Often made available freely or at low cost
  • ? An ideal research tool (see ESRC)
  • Quick to access
  • Methodological rigour in sample questionnaire
    design, interview collection
  • Falsifiable others can access also
  • Generalisable larger scale
  • Multivariate

67
Secondary analysis of surveys
  • Makes particular sense when large scale datasets
    are desirable
  • Also often applies to smaller surveys
  • Involves particular issues of data analysis,
    management and interpretation
  • Is a highly marketable skill!

68
Accessing Secondary datasets
  • Internet and computing developments have
    revolutionised delivery of data resources (see
    activities sheet)
  • Three steps to data access
  • Find out survey details / documentation
  • Apply for access from archive or collectors
  • Obtain and analyse the data

69
Some drawbacks
  • Distance from data collection
  • Harder to assess reliability / validity
  • Many variables already pre-coded
  • Cant change / add anything in study
  • Time delays between collection results
  • Data analysis / management complex
  • May be bracketed with survey originators

70
2b-3 Variables in data analysis
  • Variable operationalisation key to surveys
  • Choices - in initial data collection
  • - in data recoding / analytic
    treatment
  • Existing comment / research on many widely used
    variables (eg Burgess 1986)
  • Critiques of survey research most often
    concentrate on variable operationalisations

71
Eg Education and occupation
  • Education
  • Changing levels of education over time
  • Education as proxy for ability, intelligence?
  • Occupation
  • Contested meanings of labour market status
  • Occupational indicators of stratification
  • Occupational gender segregation

72
Variable operationalisations
  • Methods guidelines on appropriate handling
  • Harmonised concepts and questions textbooks
    papers / debates specific issues
  • Choices / approximations always used
  • Research reports and methods appendices must
    explain and justify position taken

73
2. Doing Survey Research

2a) Research support
2b) Constructing data
2c) Data management and analysis
74
Data management and analysis
  • 2c-1 Manipulating variables and cases
  • 2c-2 Mainstream techniques of data analysis
  • 2c-3 Robust data analysis

75
2c-1 Data management
  • ..is core skill in using primary and secondary
    surveys
  • Occupies more time than analysis in most cases
  • Main techniques cover
  • Matching data files
  • Coding / transforming variables
  • Dealing with missing data

76
Data management
  • Software packages SPSS, SAS, STATA, .. with
    wide ( revolutionary) capabilities
  • Good and bad practices
  • Keep logs and records of transformations
  • Follow previous literature for best variable
    treatments
  • Secondary dataset management tends to be
  • More complex ?
  • More error prone ?
  • Subject to external scrutiny ?

77
2c-2 Techniques of data analysis
Ways of summarising the relationship between
variables
  • Good practice
  • Reflects properties of variables
  • Describes output in appropriate context
  • Bad practice
  • Forcing data into style of analysis
  • Attributing false properties to data
  • Over zealous conclusions

78
Three definitions locate nearly all SocSci
techniques of QnDA
  • i Level of measurement of variables
  • ii Number of variables being analysed
  • iii Aims of analysis (descriptive cf
  • inferential)

79
i) Key organising principle Level of measurement
of a variable
  • 4 levels classically (eg Blaikie 200322-7)
  • Nominal (gender ethnicity)
  • Ordinal (exam grades attitudes)
  • Interval (age height)
  • Ratio (some monetary measures)

80
Levels of Measurement
  • Really only 1 distinction is most important to
    analysis opportunities
  • Categorical nominal and ordinal
  • Metric interval and ratio
  • There is also some flexibility in assigning
    levels (eg Blaikie 2003 can usefully treat many
    vars in different forms)

81
ii) Number of variables
  • Univariate Patterns in the distribution of cases
    within one variable (summary stats)
  • Bivariate Relations between patterns in the
    distribution of cases over two variables
    (crosstabs and association measures)
  • Multivariate Relations between patterns in the
    distribution of cases over three of more
    variables (complex crosstabs statistical models)

82
Statistics numerical summary indicators of the
properties of variables
  • Univariate Statistics describe the distribution
    of one variable
  • Bivariate / Multivariate Statistics describe how
    the distribution of two / more variables are
    related

83
iii) Aims of analysis
  • Descriptive and explanatory
  • Summarise patterns in sample / data
  • Use statistical procedures to highlight real
    patterns
  • Examine how some variable patterns effect
    others
  • End in itself for some data (eg census)
  • Inferential
  • Assess the possibility of generalising our
    findings
  • Prominent in sample survey analysis, but needs
    qualifications (eg a random sample)

84
Inference and statistics
  • Key idea of inference is to make a qualified
    estimate of degree of confidence in our ability
    to generalise
  • Sampling inference application of statistical
    theories in order to estimate probabilities that
    a sample result is likely to have been
    unrepresentative

85
Common QnDA techniques by typology (c/m
categorical/metric descriptive / inferential)

Frequency table c Mean, standard deviation m
Cross-tabulation cc Confidence interval m
Chi-square test cc Scatterplot mm
Multiple crosstab 3c Table of means mc
Boxplots mc Anova mc
Logistic regression 2 c,m Multiple regression 2 m,c
86
Example Ginn 2001, p293 in Gilbert
multivariate, categorical, descriptive
multiple cross-tabulation
Men Men Women Women
1987 1993 1987 1993
column percents, adults 20-59 column percents, adults 20-59 column percents, adults 20-59 column percents, adults 20-59
Occup pension 46 40 22 25
APP private pension n/a 13 n/a 9
Work but no pension 25 12 38 27
Self-emp 14 15 5 5
Not employed 15 20 35 34

87
2c-3 Robust Data Analysis
  • Incorporates
  • Use appropriate data analysis for resource
  • Advanced data analysis techniques specifically
    sensitive to survey data
  • Report analysis results appropriately

88
Appropriate data analysis
  • Reflect appropriate levels of measurement
  • Keep categories in defensible forms
  • Think about social theories behind analysis
  • Analysis ought to be multivariate
  • Remember missing data issues

89
Appropriate data analysis
  • The biggest controversy dont misuse inferential
    statistics
  • Strictly should only be for random
  • But can be defended for non-random, with
    appropriate language / qualifications

90
Advanced data analysis..
  • Statistical research to improve accuracy of
    social survey analysis, proposes eg
  • Weighting (more complex than appears)
  • Missing data models
  • Multilevel models
  • Latent variable analysis
  • Selection models
  • Other difficult models

91
Report results appropriately
  • Avoid over-zealous claims
  • Care about term causality
  • Use simpler language, tables and graphs
  • Give methodological details, eg Appendix
  • Many report writers have become very good at this
    hard to accuse of bad practice

92
..the End
1. The Nature of Social Surveys Defining surveys survey sampling types of surveys history of surveys reactions to them
2. Doing Survey Research Research support sources Constructing data (collecting data secondary data working with variables) Data management and analysis
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com