U'S' Army Corps of Engineers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 70
About This Presentation
Title:

U'S' Army Corps of Engineers

Description:

To provide strong protection of the Nation's aquatic environment, ... Myotis sodalis canidae. Indiana Bat Dog. One Corps Serving the Army and the Nation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 71
Provided by: uap6
Category:
Tags: army | corps | engineers

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: U'S' Army Corps of Engineers


1
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
  • Pittsburgh District
  • Regulatory Branch
  • Allen Edris
  • (412) 395-7158
  • allen.r.edris_at_lrp02.usace.army.mil
  • www.lrp.usace.army.mil/

2
Regulatory Program Goals
  • To provide strong protection of the Nation's
    aquatic environment, including wetlands.  
  • To enhance the efficiency of the Corps
    administration of its regulatory program.  
  • To ensure that the Corps provides the regulated
    public with fair and reasonable decisions.

3
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
Regulates discharge of dredged or fill material
into waters of the United States
4
Is this program really such a bear?
5
So What Is a Water of the U.S.?
6
Definition
  • Section 328.3 - Definitions.
  • a. The term "waters of the United States" means

7
Waters of the U.S.
  • 1. All waters which are currently used, or were
    used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in
    interstate or foreign commerce, including all
    waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of
    the tide
  • 2. All interstate waters including interstate
    wetlands

8
Waters of the U.S.
  • 3. All other waters such as intrastate
  • lakes, rivers, streams (including
  • intermittent streams), mudflats,
  • sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie
  • potholes, wet meadows, playa
  • lakes, or natural ponds, the use,
  • degradation or destruction of which
  • could affect interstate or foreign
  • commerce including any such
  • waters

9
Waters of the U.S.
  • Such waters include
  • Which are or could be used by interstate or
    foreign travelers for recreational or other
    purposes or
  • From which fish or shellfish are or could be
    taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
    or
  • Which are used or could be used for industrial
    purpose by industries in interstate commerce

10
Waters of the U.S.
  • 4. All impoundments of waters otherwise defined
    as waters of the United States under the
    definition
  • 5. Tributaries of waters identified in
    paragraphs (a)(1)-(4) of this section
  • 6. The territorial seas

11
Waters of the U.S.
  • 7. Wetlands adjacent to waters (other than waters
    that are themselves wetlands) identified in
    paragraphs (a)(1)-(6) of this section. Waste
    treatment systems, including treatment ponds or
    lagoons designed to meet the requirements of CWA
    (other than cooling ponds as defined in 40 CFR
    123.11(m) which also meet the criteria of this
    definition) are not waters of the United States.

12
Ordinary High Water Mark
  • That line on the shore or stream bank established
    by the fluctuations of water and indicated by
    physical characteristics

13
Ordinary High Water Mark
  • Physical Characteristics include
  • 1. clear natural line impressed on the bank
  • 2. shelving
  • 3. changes in the character of soil

14
Ordinary High Water Mark
  • 4. destruction of terrestrial vegetation the
    presence of litter and debris, or
  • 5. other appropriate means that consider the
    characteristics of the surrounding areas.

15
Stream Types
16
Stream Types
  • Ephemeral flows during and for short duration
    after precipitation events, located above the
    water table year round
  • Intermittent flows during certain times of the
    year , surface and ground water contribution
  • Perennial flows year-round during a normal
    precipitation year, groundwater is primary source
    of hydrology with some surface water contribution

17
Intermittent Stream
18
Is This a Water of the U.S.?
19
Limits of Jurisdiction
  • Non-tidal waters
  • In the absence of adjacent wetlands, the
    jurisdiction extends to the ordinary high water
    mark, or
  • When adjacent wetlands are present, the
    jurisdiction extends beyond the ordinary high
    water mark to the limit of the adjacent wetlands.
  • When the water of the United States consists only
    of wetlands the jurisdiction extends to the limit
    of the wetland.

20
Is This a Water of the U.S.?
21
YES!
  • Captured stream such as those placed in culverts
    or stream enclosures remain waters of the U.S.

22
Changes
  • Permanent changes of the shoreline configuration
    result in similar alterations of the boundaries
    of waters of the United States. Gradual changes
    which are due to natural causes and are
    perceptible only over some period of time
    constitute changes in the bed of a waterway which
    also change the boundaries of the waters of the
    United States.

23
Changes
  • For example, changing sea levels or subsidence of
    land may cause some areas to become waters of the
    United States while siltation or a change in
    drainage may remove an area from waters of the
    United States. Man-made changes may affect the
    limits of waters of the United States

24
Is this a Water of the U.S.?
25
  • Probably
  • Not

26
End of Ordinary High Water Mark
27
End of Ordinary High Water Mark
The stream channel loses definition
28
Stream Mitigation under Section 404
29
Authorization
  • For the Corps to authorize an activity under
    Section 404, the applicant must demonstrate, to
    the satisfaction of the Corps, that the proposed
    project represents the least environmentally
    damaging practicable alternative. 

30
Mitigation Sequencing
  • I. AVOIDANCE
  • Taking all appropriate and practicable measures
    to avoid those adverse aquatic impacts that are
    not necessary requires that to permit a proposed
    project, it must be the least environmentally
    damaging practicable alternative. 

31
Mitigation Sequencing
  • II. MINIMIZATION
  • Taking all appropriate and practicable measures
    to minimize those adverse impacts to the aquatic
    resource that cannot be reasonably avoided.  

32
Mitigation Sequencing
  •  
  • III. COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
  • Implementing appropriate and practicable
    measures to compensate for adverse aquatic
    resource impacts.   

33
Purpose of Compensatory Mitigation
  • To replace aquatic functions unavoidable lost or
    otherwise adversely affected by authorized
    activities

34
Forms of Mitigation
  • Restoration
  • Enhancement
  • Creation
  • Preservation

35
ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
  •  
  • Replacement of
  • 1. Chemical
  • 2. Physical
  • 3. Biological

  FUNCTIONS
  lost or impaired as a result of a
Section 404 authorization
36
Mitigation Begins with Evaluation of Project
Related Effects
Requires understanding of baseline conditions and
predicted effects
37
Consider direct indirectproject effects
38
Regulatory Guidance Letter 02-02
  • The purpose of this document is to provide
    guidance on compensatory mitigation projects
    required to offset unavoidable aquatic resource
    impacts pursuant to Section 404

39
Regulatory Guidance Letter 02-02
  • Focuses On
  • Watershed Approach
  • Functional Assessment
  • Stream Mitigation
  • Definitions of Mitigation
  • Contents of Mitigation Plans

40
Watershed Approach
41
Watershed Approach
  • Considers entire systems and their constituent
    parts. Recognizes that healthy main stem stream
    reaches are only as healthy as the many
    tributaries of which they are composed.
  • - Identifies specific functions lost or impaired
    within watersheds and focuses on replacing those
    functions.

42
Watershed Approach
  • Relies on information and input from other
    federal, tribal, state, and local resource
    management programs.
  • Recognizes the role of zoning, regional planning,
    land use initiatives, and factors of local
    interest.

43
Functional Assessment
44
Functional Assessment
  • Tools used to qualitatively and quantitatively
    identify the nature and extent of anticipated
    adverse impacts associated with a given project,
    in addition to beneficial effects associated with
    mitigation projects.

45
Some Examples
  • The Eastern Kentucky Stream Assessment Protocol
  • West Virginia Stream Assessment Protocol
    (currently being developed)
  • EPAs Rapid Bioassessment Protocol
  • West Virginia Stream Condition Index
  • Water Quality sampling

46
Irrespective of the Numbers Dont Lose Sight of
the Goal
FUNCTIONALREPLACEMENT
47
Stream Mitigation
  • So difficult it can make your hair stand on
    end?

48
The Goal of Mitigation is
49
FUNCTIONALREPLACEMENT
Consequently it is imperative to remember that
small ephemeral and intermittent stream functions
are very different from those of perennial streams
50
Mitigation Plans
  • When preparing stream mitigation plans, it is
    important to document baseline conditions to
    substantiate that particular mitigation elements
    and/or techniques area needed and are appropriate
    for the given situation.

51
Learn to Read the Stream
  • Considerations
  • 1. What are the current conditions of this stream
    telling me?
  • 2. What do comparisons to historic conditions
    tell me?
  • 3. Is the system in transition, or in a state of
    dynamic equilibrium
  • 4. Are impacts affecting the system, and is so,
    in what ways
  • 5. Would reasonably foreseeable future watershed
    changes affect this system, and how?

52
Learn to Read the Stream
  • Considerations
  • 6. Is the stream aggrading or degrading?
  • 7. Is it widening or narrowing?
  • 8. Are banks eroded or bare?
  • 9. Is the associated riparian area vegetated or
    bare?
  • 10. What is the stream type relative to
    entrenchment ratios?

53
Learn to Read the Stream
  • Considerations
  • 11. Does the stream exhibit appropriate sinuosity
    relative to its slope and roughness?
  • 12. Is there sufficient input of course woody
    debris?
  • 13. Is there a particular feature that may be
    acting as grade control?
  • 14. Identify appropriate reference reaches for
    data collection

54
Determine Stream Present Type
Consider Future Stream Type
55
Is the Stream Aggrading or Degrading
56
Baseline Information
  • Water quality sampling

57
Baseline Information
  • Benthic macro-invertebrate sampling

58
Baseline Information
  • Identify any historic impacts or activities

59
Wildlife Functions
  • Endangered Species
  • Currently there are approximately 2,500
    officially listed imperiled and
    endangered species, many of which utilize
    aquatic resources for all or part of
    their life cycle

Indiana Bat Dog
Myotis sodalis canidae
60
Wildlife Functions
  • Maintain and/or enhance integrity of
    the food web

61
Wildlife Functions
  • West Virginia has 34 species of salamanders that
    range in length from 4 inches to 2 feet.  Their
    habitats include to aquatic to semiaquatic
    habitats such as ephemeral and intermittent
    streams, riparian zones, springs, and moist,
    forested hillsides.
  •  

62

A Stream Mitigation Design Should
  • Focus on the functions you are seeking to
    replace,
  • Provide aquatic resource benefits commensurate
    with authorized impacts,
  • Incorporate appropriate channel plan, profile and
    dimension,
  • Consider needs of the watershed,
  • Function as a long term sustainable system,

63

A Stream Mitigation Design Should
  • Consider shear stress and identify areas of
    vulnerability,
  • Appropriately factor for Mannings n, (roughness)
  • Carefully consider and design for the most
    appropriate channel size (bankfull event)
  • To the extent practicable incorporate elements to
    enhance the physical, chemical, and biological
    characteristics of the stream.

64

A Stream Mitigation Design Should
  • Be compatible with other activities in the
    watershed,
  • Wherever possible be sited adjacent to contiguous
    mitigation projects or protected lands,
  • Use of native plants (exclusively)
  • Incorporate overall habitat improvements
  • Overhanging vegetation for shading
  • Snags for wildlife habitat
  • Fingerling escape channels, to allow downstream
    escape for fry trapped in pools during dry times
    of year

65
Definitions of Mitigation
66
Restoration
  • Manipulation of the physical, chemical, or
    biological characteristics of a former or
    substantially degraded wetland, stream or other
    aquatic resources to return natural and/or
    historical functions.

67
Enhancement
  • Manipulation of the physical, chemical, or
    biological characteristics of an aquatic resource
    to heighten, intensify, or improve a specific
    functions or to change the growth stage of
    composition of the vegetation present, and may
    include converting the site to a less destructive
    land use.

68
Creation
  • The establishment of a wetland or other aquatic
    resource where one did not formerly exist.

69
Preservation
  • The legal and physical protection of existing
    ecologically important streams, wetlands and/or
    other aquatic resources for an extended period of
    time, usually in perpetuity.

70
Questions ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com