Introduction to Stratigraphy What is stratigraphy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 76
About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction to Stratigraphy What is stratigraphy

Description:

Introduction to Stratigraphy What is stratigraphy – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1031
Avg rating:5.0/5.0
Slides: 77
Provided by: uta
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction to Stratigraphy What is stratigraphy


1
Introduction to StratigraphyWhat is
stratigraphy?
  • Stratigraphy
  • the study of large-scale vertical and lateral
    relationships between units of sedimentary rock
    that are defined on the basis of lithological or
    physical properties, paleontological
    characteristics, geophysical characteristics,
    geophysical properties, age relationships and
    geographic position and distribution. (i.e., its
    the filing system for the rock record)
  • Stratigraphy is based on Stenos and Huttons
    laws.
  • The fact that rocks were originally laid down in
    a fluidized form was noted by medieval and
    renaissance scientists (e.g. Steno, Da Vinci).
  • Modern sequence stratigraphic concepts stem from
    work of Grabau (1906), Blackwelder (1909),
    Barrell (1917), Wheeler (1958) and Sloss (1963).

2
Formal Schemes(as espoused by the NACSN,
1982)
  • Lithostratigraphy
  • Allostratigraphy
  • Sequence Stratigraphy
  • Genetic Sequence stratigraphy
  • Depositional sequence stratigraphy
  • Biostratigraphy
  • Chronostratigraphy
  • Cyclostratigraphy
  • Magnetostratigraphy
  • Pedostratigraphy
  • Event Stratigraphy
  • Morphostratigraphy

3
Informal Schemes
  • Lithostratigraphy
  • Allostratigraphy
  • Sequence Stratigraphy
  • Genetic Sequence stratigraphy
  • Depositional sequence stratigraphy
  • Biostratigraphy
  • Chronostratigraphy
  • Cyclostratigraphy
  • Magnetostratigraphy
  • Pedostratigraphy
  • Event Stratigraphy
  • Morphostratigraphy

4
(NACSN, 1981)
(Holbrook, 2001)
5
Warning Signs on the Road Ahead
Sequence Vs Seismic
Descriptive Genetic?
Van Wagoner et al. (1988)
6
Quaternary oxygen isotope stages
(Stanley, 2005)
  • Grabau (1906)
  • principles of sedimentary overlap.
  • Showed onlap, offlap relationships in Paleozoic
    strata of North America.

7
Penn. cyclothems
  • Barrell (1917)
  • recognized relationship between time and
    stratigraphy.
  • This figure was driven by early attempts to use
    sedimentation rates to calculate the age of the
    Earth.

(Stanley, 2005)
8
Sloss Sequences
(Stanley, 2005)
Wheelers diagram
9
The Seismic Revolution in subsurface stratigraphy
  • Explosion of subsurface data driven by need to
    fuel WW1 and WW2.
  • Development of Well logs, Cores and Seismic
  • Seismic data was acquired for petroleum
    exploration during latter half of the 20th C.
  • Seismic imaging developed form technology used in
    WW2 to locate submarines.
  • Sub-sea floor images also produced.
  • Several advantages
  • Provided continuous subsurface image of
    sedimentary basin fills.
  • Structure and stratigraphic relationships
    observed in areas not previously accessible.
  • Could compare seismic data from around the world.
  • Scientists at Exxon recognized the stratigraphic
    significance of the seismic tool (Vail et al.,
    1977).
  • New data amenable to analysis using concepts
    developed by Wheeler and others.
  • Developed science of seismic stratigraphy.

10
(No Transcript)
11
Accommodation
Accommodation
12
Lapping Relationships
Parasequences
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
13
Parasequence sets
Parasequences in well logs
(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
14
(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
15
(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
16
Missing In Action?
Type 2 Sequence Boundary?
Shelf-Margin Wedge?
(AGI Data Sheets, Holbrook)
17
Ramp-type Basins
(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
18
Normal Regression
Forced Regression
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
19
Ramp-type Basins
(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
20
Sequence-Stratigraphic Surfaces
(Embry, 2002)
(Embry, 2002)
(Holbrook, AGI data sheets)
21
Contrasting Views on Normal vs. Forced Regression
Hunt and Tucker (1992) sequence boundary
Lowstand Lowstand (Posamentier, et al 1992) Or
Falling Stage (Hunt and Tucker, 1992)
Posamentier, et al., (1992) sequence boundary
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
22
(Embry, 2002)
(Embry, 2002)
(Holbrook, AGI data sheets)
23
Importance of Correlation in Defining Surfaces
(Outcrop)
(Stanley, 2005)
24
Importance of Correlation in Defining Surfaces
(Subsurface)
Sequence Boundaries Correlated in Well logs
mfs in Seismic
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
25
Sequence Boundaries
Spatial Variability in Surfaces
(Holbrook, AGI data sheets)
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
26
Differential Incision of Valleys and Channels and
the continuity of Sequence Boundaries
Cooper Creek Australia
Colville Delta
27
(Holbrook, AGI data sheets)
Hanging-valley Sequence Boundaries
28
Multivalley Surface in
Mesa Rica
(Holbrook, 2001)
29
Regionally Continuous Surfaces
The Lower Mesa Rica Sandstone is an 84-km
Single-Story Channel Sheet
Lower Mesa Rica Sandstone
(Holbrook, et al, 2006)
30
Recognizing Incised Valleys
Terrace architecture in the Trinity River, Gulf
Coastal Plain (Blum, 2006)
31
Terraces in
(Holbrook, 2001)
32
Importance of Channel Stacking
(Holbrook, 2001)
5
2
3
1
33
Importance of Channel Dimension
Some Typical channel depths Lower Mississippi
18m Lower Missouri 7m Middle Rio Grande 3m
34
Incised Valley on 3-D Seismic
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
35
Importance of truncations and facies shifts
36
Valley fill types
Cap of marine Graneros Shale
Fluvial fills
37
Gironde Estuary Model (Posamentier and Allen,
1999)
38
Tidal Ravinement
Courtesy of Brian Willis
39
Sequence Boundaries vs. Settings (Alluvial)
Fluvial-on-Fluvial SBs
40
Sequence Boundaries vs. Settings (Alluvial)
View of cliff, parallel to flow
(Adams and Bhattacharya, 2005)
Castlegate
Blackhawk
BLACKHAWK Laterally continuous 5-8 m-thick
channel-belts encased in floodplain
deposits. CASTLEGATE Amalgamated 4-7 m-thick
channel-belt sandstones
41
Sequence Boundaries across the shelf
42
Interfluvial Sequence Boundaries vs. Parasequence
tops
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
43
Correlative Conformity
(Embry, 2002)
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
44
Regressive Surface of Marine Erosion
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
(Embry, 2002)
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
45
Transgressive Surfaces (TS)
TS
TS
(Lockley et al, 2006)
Colorado River Valley, Texas
TS
TS
Highstand
Falling Stage/ Lowstand
TS
(Blum, 2006)
46
Transgressive Surface of Erosion (TSE)
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
(Holbrook, AGI data sheets)
47
Maximum Flooding Surfaces
(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
48
Maximum Flooding Surfaces
Carbonate zone between fossiliferous marine
shales Condensed Section?
49
Maximum Flooding Surfaces Cautions!
Extended View
Philoid algal mounds in Penn. Fort Worth Basin,
Texas
50
Maximum Flooding Surfaces
(Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
51
Architectural-Element Analysis
(Miall, 1996)
52
Fluvial Architectural Elements
Downstream accretion element
Sandy bed form
Gravel bar element
53
Fluvial Architectural Elements
Overbank fine
Lateral accretion element
54
Primary Architectural Elements
Submarine Fan Architectural Elements
(Posamentier and Kolla, 2003)
55
Submarine Fan Architectural Elements
(Posamentier and Kolla, 2003)
56
AEA The Technique
(Miall, 1996)
(Holbrook, 2001)
57
Fluvial Example
(Holbrook, 2001)
58
Fluvial Example
5
2
3
1
59
Eolian example
60
Eolian example
(Permian Cedar Mesa c.o. Rip Langford)
61
Eolian example
(Permian Cedar Mesa c.o. Rip Langford)
62
Sequence Boundaries and Architectural Hierarchies
Sequence Boundaries
(Holbrook, 2001)
63
Sequence Boundaries vs. Architectural Hierarchies
64
(Holbrook, 2001)
65
(Van Wagoner, et al., 1990)
66
Drapes on Reactivation Surfaces
Drapes on Dune/Ripple Sets
Drapes between Dune Sets (1st)
0 - 2nd - Order Drapes
Drape on Dune Sets (2nd)
Migrating Dune Sets
Drapes on Reactivation Surfaces (0)
(Holbrook and Ikuenobe, 2002)
67
Low- Stage Filling
3rd - 4th-Order Drapes Nested Channel and Bar
Surfaces
(Holbrook and Ikuenobe, 2002)
68
High- Stage Cutting
Channel and Bar Draping
3rd - 4th-Order Drapes Nested Channel and Bar
Surfaces
(Holbrook and Ikuenobe, 2002)
69
3rd - 4th- Order Drapes
(Holbrook and Ikuenobe, 2002)
70
5th - and 6th - Order Surfaces Channel and
Channel-Belt Scours
(Holbrook and Ikuenobe, 2002)
71
Origin, Muddy Sandstone Sheets
Dominance of Basal Channel Fill Under Conditions
of Intensive Reworking and Low Accommodation
Space
(Holbrook and Ikuenobe, 2002)
72
7th - and 8th - Order Surfaces Valley and
Nested-Valley Scours
73
7th - and 8th - Order Surfaces Valley and
Nested-Valley Scours
74
7th - and 8th - Order Surfaces Valley and
Nested-Valley Scours
5
2
3
1
75
Sequence Boundary
9th - Order Surfaces Sequence Boundaries
76
Implications
  • Few surfaces generate sufficiently continuous
    barriers to compartmentalize a reservoir, but
    they can inhibit flow, locally form pocket traps,
    and reduce production from estimated levels.
  • Low-order surfaces impose strike- and
    dip-oriented permeability grains that operates at
    the scale of wells, whereas high-order surfaces
    impose a dip-oriented grain that operates at the
    scale of fields and wells.
  • Only the highest-order surfaces may be traced
    between wells routinely.
  • A general relationship exists between
    sequence-boundary morphology and architecture of
    overlying fluvial sandstone.

(Holbrook and Ikuenobe, 2002)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com