Systemic Anaphylactoid Reactions to Contrast Media During Cardiac Catheterization Procedures - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Systemic Anaphylactoid Reactions to Contrast Media During Cardiac Catheterization Procedures

Description:

Systemic Anaphylactoid Reactions to Contrast Media During Cardiac Catheterization ... Iodine allergy:an oyster without a pearl? Am J Roengenol 1997:169:951-2 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Cli33
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Systemic Anaphylactoid Reactions to Contrast Media During Cardiac Catheterization Procedures


1
Systemic Anaphylactoid Reactions to Contrast
Media During Cardiac Catheterization Procedures
  • Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment
  • Brandon E. Brown, M.D.
  • Department of Internal Medicine

2
Clinical Scenario
  • HPI 65 yo WM with known ASCAD, HTN, DM, and
    dyslipidemia presents with a compelling history
    of USA. He indicates that during his last
    catheterization, ten years ago, he experienced
    anaphylaxis and was given epinephrine.
  • Pmedhx. as above. No history of asthma,
    allergies
  • Meds Atenolol, Atorvastatin, Benazepril, ASA
  • Allergies NKDA
  • PE non-contributory
  • ECG new anterolateral T wave inversions
  • Labs normal initial CK, CK-MB, and troponin I

3
Definition of Terms
  • Anaphylactoid events vs. Anaphylaxis
  • Anaphylaxis an immediate systemic reaction
    caused by rapid, IgE-mediated immune release of
    potent mediators from tissue mast cells and
    peripheral blood basophils
  • Anaphylactoid events immediate systemic
    reactions that mimic anaphylaxis but are not
    caused by IgE-mediated immune responses

4
Incidence
  • Radiocontrast material (RCM)
  • Estimated that 8 million people receive RCM
    annually in U.S.
  • Overall frequency of adverse reactions is 5 to
    8
  • Life-threatening reactions occur less than 0.1
    with older (hyperosmolar) agents
  • Mortality estimated at one in every 75,000
    patients
  • With advent of second generation agents
    (low-osmolar or iso-osmolar agents) incidence of
    adverse reactions 1/5 that of first generation
    agents
  • Neuget AI. Ghatak AT. Miller RL. Anaphylaxis in
    the United States an investigation into its
    epidemiology. Archives of Internal Medicine.
    161(1)15-21, 2001 Jan 8.

5
What RCM do we use in our cardiac catheterization
lab?
  • Optiray (Ioversol)
  • A lower osmolar nonionic monomer
  • Available in various osmolalities (ranging from
    355 to 792) and various levels of iodine content
    (160 to 350)

6
Clinical Presentation and Differential Diagnosis
  • Anaphylactoid reactions clinically
    indistinguishable from anaphylaxis
  • Suspected in any patient with hypotension during
    catheterization
  • Diff. Dx. Includes cardiac and non-cardiac causes
  • Vasovagal reaction bradycardia as opposed to
    typical tachycardia in anaphylactoid rxn
    (however, B-blockers and VVI PMs may blunt this
    response)
  • CVP, SVR, and/or PCWP will be low reflecting
    hypoTN
  • Usually occur within 20 min. of exposure

7
Pathophysiology
  • The substantial reduction in toxicity with
    introduction of low-osmolar agents suggests
    hypertonicity of older agents played a role
  • In vitro data indicates RCM can activate
    basophils and mast cells by an IgE-independent
    mechanism (ie anaphylactoid)
  • RCMs have been shown to activate (directly and
    indirectly) complement, fibrinolytic, and kinin
    systems
  • Several factors argue against an immunologic
    pathogenesis
  • RCM reactions usually occur on first
    administration
  • Relatively dose-independent (test dose not
    helpful)
  • They do not always occur on subsequent exposure
    (estimated only 16)
  • Efforts to raise anti-sera to RCM have confirmed
    its very weak immungenicity (related to chemical
    structure)

8
Pathophysiology (continued)
  • However,
  • Reports of detection of IgE antibodies specific
    for ioxaglate (Hexabrix) in patients repeatedly
    exposed to this RCM
  • Mast cell activation demonstrated in vivo by
    detection of tryptase in serum of patients with
    RCM reactions
  • Report of a patient who experienced a delayed
    hypersensitivity rxn. after second exposure to
    RCM who had previous positive patch testing
  • Mita H, Tadokoro K, Akiyama K. Detection of IgE
    antibody to a radiocontrast medium. Allergy
    1998 531133-40.

9
Prevention
  • Whos at risk?
  • Those with previous RCM anaphylactoid reactions
  • Atopic patients (2X risk)
  • Patients on B-blockers
  • Less common with intra-arterial vs. intravenous
    injection (but reaction more severe)
  • No evidence to support that patients with known
    allergic sensitivity to iodine are at higher
    risk
  • Coakley FV, Pannicck DM. Iodine allergyan
    oyster without a pearl? Am J Roengenol
    1997169951-2
  • Leder R. How well does a history of seafood
    allergy predict the likelihood of an adverse
    reaction to IV contrast material? Am J Roentgenol
    1997906-7.

10
Prevention (continued)
  • What can you do to minimize risk?
  • Determine if study is essential
  • Make certain patient understands risks
  • Ensure proper hydration (consider early
    admission)
  • Use non-ionic, lower osmolar RCM
  • Use a pre-treatment medical regimen proven
  • effective (next slide)

11
Prevention (continued)
  • A Pre-treatment Medical regimen
  • Steroids Prednisone 50mg p.o. 13, 7, and 1 hours
    before the procedure
  • H1 Antihistamines Diphenhydramine 50 mg 1 hour
    before procedure
  • Bronchodilators Ephedrine 25 mg or albuterol 4
    mg p.o. 1 hour prior to procedure
  • H2 Antihistamines?
  • Greenberger PA, Patterson R. The Prevention of
    Immediate Generalized Reactions to Radiocontrast
    Media in High-risk Patients. J Allergy Clin
    Immunol 199187867-872.
  • Marshall GD Jr., Lieberman PL. Comparison of
    three pretreatment protocols to prevent
    anaphylactoid reactions to radiocontrast media.
    Annals of Allergy. 67(1)70-4, 1991 Jul.

12
Treatment
  • Depends on severity of reaction and specific
    clinical manifestation
  • Minor (erythema, pruritis),Moderate (urticaria,
    angioedema, bronchospasm), and Severe (shock,
    respiratory arrest) reactions
  • Pharmacologic Agents
  • Epinephrine for severe rxn. alpha effect
    causes vasoconstriction beta-1 effect causes
    chronotropy and inotropy beta-2 cause
    bronchodilation at cellular level, increases
    cAMP caution in B-blockers dose 0.3 cc of
    11000 dilution Q15 min. to max of 1 cc IV dose
    10ug/min bolus followed by gtt 1-4 ug/min.
  • IV Steroids mechanism unclear-stabilizes cell
    membranes? Prevents biphasic rxn.?
    Hydrocortisone 400 mg IV
  • Antihistamines inactivate unbound histamine
    Diphenhydramine 25-50 mg IV Cimetidine 300 mg
    IV or Ranitidine 50 mg IV
  • IVF necessary for severe reactions NS vs. LR
  • Glucagon 1-4 mg IV (or atropine)

13
Conclusions
  • Relatively uncommon but potentially
    life-threatening
  • Anaphylactoid reaction
  • Pathogenesis in debate
  • Importance of prevention
  • Rapid diagnosis and treatment is essential

14
Additional References
  • Practice parameters for the diagnosis and
    treatment of anaphylaxis, The Journal of Allergy
    and Immunology, volume 96, no. 5, part 2, Nov.
    1995.
  • Allergy. Principles and Practice, fifth edition,
    Middlelton, jr., et al, vol. 2, pp.1079-1092.
  • Optiray 350 package insert, September 2000
  • Goss, et al., Systemic anapohylactoid reactions
    to iodinated contrast media during cardiac
    catheterization procedures guidelines for
    prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Laboratory
    Performance Standards Committee of the Society
    for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.
    Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis.
    34(2)99-104, 1995 Feb.
  • Adkisson, Jr., Pathophysiology of contrast
    media anaphylactoid reactions new perspectives
    on an old problem. (letter, comment) Allergy.
    53(12)1111-1113, 1998 Dec.
  • Bashmore et al., ACC/SCAI Clinical Expert
    Consensus Document On Catheterization Laboratory
    Standards. JACC Vol. 37, No. 8, June
    20012170-2714.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com