Why does human nature keep getting in the way of good health care delivery - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Why does human nature keep getting in the way of good health care delivery

Description:

Breakfast briefing for Australian College of Health Service ... This briefing is ... to have shrunk to pygmy size under the evolutionary ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: jb69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Why does human nature keep getting in the way of good health care delivery


1
Why does human nature keep getting in the way of
good health care delivery?
Breakfast briefing for Australian College of
Health Service Executives WA participants
  • A/Professor Jeffrey Braithwaite
  • Centre for Clinical Governance Research,
    University of New South Wales
  • 7 October 2005

2
To begin
  • This briefing is deliberately controversial
  • I am going to argue that we are evolved for a
    completely different existence from the one we
    have today
  • And that this provides a deep explanation for
    todays problems
  • What do you think of that idea?

3

An evolutionary perspective
  • The find of a new human, Homo floresiensis, on
    the island of Flores in Indonesia, set the
    archaeological world buzzing
  • It lived until 13,000 years ago
  • This is very recent a blink of the geological
    eye

4

An evolutionary perspective
5

An evolutionary perspective
  • Homo floresiensis is thought to have shrunk to
    pygmy size under the evolutionary pressure of
    living on a small island
  • No predators, limited resources

6

An evolutionary perspective
  • Both hobbits as they became known and humans
    are evolved for clear niches in their
    environments
  • We are, fundamentally, hunter-gatherers

7

An evolutionary perspective
  • Humans and hobbits share some common adaptative
    problems
  • Need for oxygen, food, water
  • Protection from the environment
  • To mate and pass on genes
  • Raise offspring to continue the line
  • How good were your own ancestors at this?

8

An evolutionary perspective
  • Humans are selected for solving other problems
    from the Pleistocene
  • This was the last 2.5 million years
  • Some 99 of human history was spent as
    hunter-gatherers
  • Humans are adapted naturally selected for this
    way of life

9

An evolutionary perspective
  • This is millions of years of surviving in lightly
    wooded savannah grasslands
  • In small kin-based groups using stone tool
    technology
  • Originally in Africa, then radiating across the
    world

10

An evolutionary perspective
  • Needs a big brain to process all the social data
  • Benefits
  • Shared risks
  • Groups to rely on when things get tough
  • Downside
  • Lifes more complex
  • Its social and political

11

An evolutionary perspective
  • Social consequences
  • Tribalism us and them
  • Exchanging social, material and intellectual
    resources becomes prominent
  • Social rank hierarchy becomes pronounced
  • Need to mind read understand your mental
    state and others

12

An evolutionary perspective
  • Social brain hypothesis
  • Humans as compared to other primates eg
    chimpanzees and gorillas develop considerable
    capacities to
  • Read behavioural and facial cues
  • Anticipate others
  • Deceive if and when necessary

13

An evolutionary perspective
  • So what were we selected for, 1?
  • Negotiating with others
  • Trading
  • Collaborating with close tribal members
  • Nurturing others
  • Keeping powerful people happy

14

An evolutionary perspective
  • So what were we selected for, 2?
  • Second guessing rivals
  • Identifying rapidly those external others who
    would constitute a threat
  • Protecting our own patch
  • Outwitting and defeating enemies

15

An evolutionary perspective
  • Do you want proof?
  • Look around you, at your neighbours
  • What do you see?

16

An evolutionary perspective
  • So what we are evolved for over millions of
    years to be hunter-gatherers
  • To exploit the environment successfully to
    survive and thrive

17
Human nature in contemporary health settings
  • How are these characteristics displayed in
    contemporary settings?
  • Gaze as an anthropologist in your minds eye
  • What do you see in your workplaces how are
    people behaving back in your hospital, public
    health facility, department, ward, division, unit?

18
Human nature in contemporary health settings
  • People work to earn a living to feed, clothe and
    house themselves and their families ie, to
    survive and thrive
  • They also seek identification and protection via
    organisational and professional groups
  • They value novelty, challenge, and social
    interaction

19
Human nature in contemporary health settings
  • People value careers
  • They do most work socially, which we call
    meetings, case conferences, consultations,
    interaction, relationships and professional
    involvement
  • They also mobilise technology clinical
    equipment, computers, phones but this is very
    recent

20
Human nature in contemporary health settings
  • When this works well it works very well
  • But when it doesnt it really doesnt
  • Its like the girl with the curl
  • Every one of us has experienced both
  • Comments?

21
Human nature in contemporary health settings
  • The upside
  • Through skills and professional competence
    millions of people are attended to in their time
    of illness or health need
  • This is a highly noble pursuit, with many
    satisfied patients and staff

22
Human nature in contemporary health settings
  • The dark side
  • A succession of studies and enquiries have shown
    established systems cause iatrogenic harm to
    hundreds of thousands of patients worldwide
  • Here, we glimpse at behaviours that have evolved
    for our personal or group protection that may not
    lead to an optimal health system

23
Human nature in contemporary health settings
  • Listen to two enquiries
  • Bristol Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom
  • Poor teamwork The teams were not
    multidisciplinary they were profoundly
    hierarchical
  • A sense of them and us and poor
    communication

24
Human nature in contemporary health settings
  • Listen to two enquiries
  • King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth WA
  • The culture was not supportive of staff members
    who were critical
  • Ostracisation was seen as illustratiive of
    the influence and power exercised by a section of
    the medical community
  • Warnings to those who were contemplating
    disloyalty as whistleblowers

25
Tribalism, hierarchies and turf protection
  • What does this mean in evolutionary context?
  • Hunter-gatherer survival is predicated on
    individual alliances, and judicious collaboration
  • And hunter-gatherers have a huge propensity to
    turf-protect and treat badly anyone who threatens

26
Tribalism, hierarchies and turf protection
  • In both the Bristol and the King Edward cases
    whistleblowers were inadvertently left out,
    gossiped about, ostracised and generally
    castigated
  • Note that there is clear survival and group
    bonding value in doing this
  • This does not justify such behaviours but does
    allow us to understand them

27
Tribalism, hierarchies and turf protection
  • Health professionals in these cases and
    everywhere, in fact tend to flock together in
    professional tribes rather than multidisciplinary
    teams
  • Clustering like-with-like, and mistrusting, even
    shunning those who are different or represent a
    threat is a powerfully evolved tendency

28
Tribalism, hierarchies and turf protection
  • It helped Homo sapiens to be so successful as a
    species
  • But tribes and hierarchies tend to close down
    productive interaction say between managers and
    clinicians, within and across professional
    sub-groups, between seniors and juniors and
    between clinicians and patients

29
Tribalism, hierarchies and turf protection
  • So we need culture change
  • Bristol, main report mentions culture 191 times
  • King Edward Enquiry mentions culture 62 times
  • But how difficult is this?
  • Very

30
Tribalism, hierarchies and turf protection
  • Humans have evolved behaviours to protect and
    position themselves over many millennia
  • They are deeply structured into the fabric of
    modern society and its institutions
  • The health system reflects these characteristics

31
Tribalism, hierarchies and turf protection
  • Especially when intimidated or vulnerable, people
    will tend to
  • Default to well-worn behavioural repertoires
  • Regress to a struggle for individual survival
  • Intensify relationships within their primary
    groups and coalitions
  • Organisational culture change is therefore likely
    to be very hard

32
Tribalism, hierarchies and turf protection
  • Taken together, these are indicators of millions
    of years of adaptiveness for personal and small
    group protection at the expense of others
  • Can we alter this fundamental human nature?

33
The evolutionary cleft stick
  • Thus we are in a catch-22, cleft stick situation
  • We may be at the evolutionary point where
  • We are smart enough to design todays health
    system
  • But not smart enough to solve the problems of
    working together that system demands

34
The evolutionary cleft stick
  • Can we change the health system to be less
    hierarchical, less tribal, and more inclusive?
  • Can we learn to work more collaboratively across
    professionalised silos or entrenched hierarchies?
  • Many say yes, but some are more sceptical

35
The evolutionary cleft stick
There are three options
  • Wait for evolution to shape us as a more
    collaborative species
  • Attempt a big bang change to the health system,
    sweeping away unwanted behaviours, posturing,
    poor practices
  • Problem takes too long, no guarantee of success
  • Problem we dont know how to do this, it would
    likely damage the health system, no guarantee of
    success

36
The evolutionary cleft stick
There are three options continued
  • Continue on the present course, ie continuous
    improvement
  • Problem our evolved nature keeps getting in the
    way, no guarantee of success

37
A way forward?
  • The enquiries have made two types of
    recommendations
  • Bottom up systems, collective, culture change
    approach
  • Top down find, punish and discipline approach
  • Neither seems to be the perfect solution, and
    they may conflict if used together

38
A way forward?
  • A final paradox we dont have an obvious answer,
    but it is then that we might start to think about
    the question more clearly
  • This has often happened in human history
  • A calamitous predicament occurs, and people pull
    together to resolve it

39
A way forward?
  • Examples
  • The Battle of Britain, Summer 1940
  • The 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York, 2001
  • The regions tsunami disaster on Boxing day 2004

40
A way forward?
  • Question
  • Could the studies and enquiries showing health
    cares harmful outcomes come to constitute a
    similar crisis?
  • This could galvanise people into action
  • Maybe, maybe not
  • But in the meantime we have a real problem no-one
    knows how to solve

41
A way forward?
  • Finally
  • Even more worrying, all species will one day be
    extinct
  • Perhaps we are destined to go the way of Homo
    floresiensis
  • If we are, then the problem of patient safety
    will pale into insignificance
  • If we are not, how will we address the problem of
    good health delivery?

42
Conclusion, part 1
  • Reference, for further reading
  • Braithwaite J.  Hunter-gatherer human nature and
    health system safety an evolutionary cleft
    stick?  International Journal for Quality in
    Health Care 2005 http//intqhc.oxfordjournals.org
    /cgi/reprint/mzi060?ijkeycmiiRJZwgAzcHJDkeytype
    ref

43
Conclusion, part 2
  • Time for
  • Final comments
  • Arguments
  • Discussion
  • Questions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com