Title: Total Maximum Daily Load Program for North Carolina
1Total Maximum Daily Load Program for North
Carolina
- Michelle Woolfolk
- NC Division of Water Quality
- 2002 NC Environmental Health Safety School,
August 19-20, 2002
Crowders Creek, Catawba River Basin
2What does TMDL stand for?
Total Maximum Daily Load
TMDLs are written plans for attaining and
maintaining water quality standards, in all
seasons, for a specific waterbody and pollutant.
3TMDL Program has 2 parts...
- Part 1. Generation of the impaired waters list
(303(d) List)
Part 2. Development of TMDLs for waters on the
impaired waters list
4Clean Water Act Requirements
- Identify Impaired Waters
- Prioritize Impaired Waters for Management
- EPA must approve/disapprove within 30 days
Meherrin River (Chowan River Basin)
5Listing Requirements
- List due April 1st of every even numbered year
- Consider all existing and readily available data
- Comprehensive lists
- Methodology
- Public participation
6EPA actions in the last year...
- Published 2002 Integrated Reporting Guidance on
November 19, 2001 - 2002 303(d) List due date delayed until October
1, 2002 (Fed Reg)
Cashie River (Roanoke River Basin)
7The Integrated Report
- North Carolina Water Quality Assessment and
Impaired Waters List (2002 Integrated 305(b) and
303(d) Report)
8New guidance combines old reports
Historic 305(b) Water Quality Progress Reports
Historic 303(d) Lists of Impaired Waters
and
Integrated 305(b) and 303(d) Report
9Summary of new reporting guidance
- State assessment methodology is the basis for
listing all waters - EPA list approval based on acceptable methodology
- New listing categories based on attainment of all
uses - Integrated list identifies waters with
insufficient data and information - Provides for probabilistic assessment for waters
with insufficient data and information - New data requested on monitoring schedules and
assessment methodologies for each water - State public notice and review of methodologies
and integrated list
10Assessment Process for Integrated Report
1. Develop assessment and listing methodology
2. Assess uses and assign use support ratings
3. Separate waters into 7 categories
4. Assign priority to impaired waters
5. Develop TMDL schedule
6. Public participation
11Assessment and Listing Methodology
- Existing and readily available data
- Methodology for each basin noticed in basinwide
management plan - Overall and multiple category uses assessed
12Where it all starts.Basinwide Management
- Solicitation of outside data
- Occurs year prior to biological data collection
- 2002 Solicitation Cape Fear and New
- Biological data collections
- Use support ratings
- Incorporates data, information, and best
professional judgement
13Use support categories
- Beginning with 2000 Roanoke Basinwide Management
Plan - Multiple Category Use Support
- Aquatic life/ Secondary recreation
- Fish consumption
- Primary recreation
- Water supply
- Shellfish harvesting
- Other
- Prior to 2000
- Overall use support was assessed.
14Multiple Category Use Support
- Roanoke
- White Oak
- Savannah
- Watauga
- Little Tennessee
- Hiwassee
- Chowan
- Pasquotank
15NC Integrated Report includes
- Descriptions of monitoring programs and
assessment methodologies - Description of integrated list (categories 1
through 7) - TMDL development schedule for next two years
- Status of waters targeted for TMDL development in
2000
162000 303(d) List and 2002 Integrated List
Translator
NC Categories
17Distribution of impaired waters
Based on segments
18Minimum priorities
- Water Supply - high
- Federal endangered or threatened species - high
- State endangered or threatened species - medium
- ORW/HQW - medium
Cape Fear River (Cape Fear River Basin)
19Watershed Assessment and Restoration Project
- Draft reports used to move streams from Category
6 (biologically impaired) to either Category 4c
(impaired by pollution) or 5 (impaired by
pollutant, TMDL needed). - Internal drafts completed for the following six
streams - Clark Creek (Catawba)
- Morgan Mill Creek (French Broad)
- Peter Weaver Creek (French Broad)
- Cullasaja River (L Tennessee)
- Mill Creek, (L Tennessee)
- Toms Creek (Neuse).
20WARP Identified Causes of Impairment
- Hydromodification (flow alteration)
- Unspecified toxicants/ toxicity
- Organic enrichment
- Chlorine
- Unstable substrate/ sedimentation
Swift Creek Tributary (Neuse River Basin)
21TMDL development schedule
- Focus is on
- fecal coliform impaired waters
- piedmont streams (Yadkin, Catawba and Cape Fear
Basins) - NC is allowing Third Party TMDL development
22NCs 2002 Integrated Report
- Currently on the internet at
- http//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdl/general_303(d).ht
m - Listed in two parts
- The Integrated 305(b) and 303(d) Report and
impaired waters list - Database of Categories 1, 2 and 3 (printout not
available)
23Elements of a TMDL
1. Problem identification
2. Target analysis
3. Source assessment
4. Linkage of source and target
5. Determine maximum allowable load
6. Allocation of load/wasteload
7. Public participation
24TMDL Target
- What is the water quality standard?
- Addressing duration and frequency
- Multiple part standards (e.g., fecal coliform)
- Data collected consistently with standard
- At what location was the cause of impairment
determined? - DWQ ambient monitoring location(s)
- Coalition/Basin Association monitoring
25Supporting Information
- Data availability
- Ambient monitoring (DWQ or coalition)
- NPDES instream monitoring
- USGS flow stations
- Special studies (DWQ, discharger, coalition,
USGS, university, other?) - Rarely have all of the data listed above.
26ModelingLinking causes and sources
- Model selection
- Data availability
- Watershed characteristics
- EPA guidance (e.g., Pathogen TMDL Protocol)
- Experience (personally and as a unit)
- Schedule
- Model calibration
- Critical conditions
27Allocation of Load/Wasteload
- Must allocate the allowable load between point
sources (wasteload) and nonpoint sources (load) - Who gets the biggest piece of the pie?
- Equity versus efficiency
Where the rubber hits the road...
28Flowchart for Freshwater TMDL Development
Review existing data, including NPDES,
stormwater, DWQ ambient, other.
Contact local government officials/industryregard
ing TMDL development
Create conceptual model for TMDL
Evaluate potential modeling frameworks for TMDL
29Flowchart for TMDL development, cont
Public notice draft TMDL using web site,
mail-out, and email
Prepare comment responses and finalize TMDL
document
Meet with local stakeholders to discuss results
of TMDL
Submit final TMDL to EPA Region IV
Prepare draft TMDL
30River Basins with TMDL/303(d) Projects
- Cape Fear
- Catawba
- French Broad
- Little Tennessee
- Neuse
- Tar
- Yadkin
31Cape Fear TMDL/303(d) Projects
- Little Troublesome Creek- fecal coliform,
biological impairment - Horsepen Creek- biological impairment
- North Buffalo Creek- fecal coliform
- East Fork Deep River- fecal coliform
- Booker Creek - biological impairment
- Little Creek - biological impairment
- Roberson Creek- nutrients
- Burnt Mill Creek - biological impairment
The Cities of Greensboro and High Point are
cooperating on these TMDLs and/or TMDL related
field studies.
As of December 2001
32Catawba TMDL/303(d) Projects
- Youngs Fork/Coperning Creek - biological
impairment - Sugar, Little Sugar, Irwin, McAlpine Creeks -
fecal coliform bacteria - Clark Creek - fecal coliform bacteria,
biological impairment - Crowders Creek - fecal coliform bacteria
The City of Charlotte developed this Third
Party TMDL. The Town of Maiden, City of Newton
and City of Gastonia assisted with field studies.
As of December 2001
33To summarize
- North Carolina has developed a hybrid 2002
Integrated Report for EPA - As additional studies of biologically impaired
waters are completed, additional TMDLs will be
needed - Modeling staff have committed to developing TMDLs
for fecal coliform bacteria in freshwaters
34Questions?
Thank you for your attention.
Michelle Woolfolk Modeling/TMDL Unit 919-733-5083
ext. 505 michelle.woolfolk_at_ncmail.net
Falls Lake (Neuse River Basin)