The Minnesota PostSecondary Enrollment Options Program: Does Participation in Dual Enrollment Progra - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

The Minnesota PostSecondary Enrollment Options Program: Does Participation in Dual Enrollment Progra

Description:

Admission requirements. Location. Student mix. Faculty qualifications. Course content ... Students' admissions criteria promotes progress through college ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: office183
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Minnesota PostSecondary Enrollment Options Program: Does Participation in Dual Enrollment Progra


1
The Minnesota Post-Secondary Enrollment Options
Program Does Participation in Dual Enrollment
Programs Help High School Students Obtain
Career and Technical Education Majors and Degrees
in College?
  • Annual Meeting
  • Council for The Study of Community Colleges
  • Boston Massachusetts
  • April 9, 2005

Pradeep KotamrajuSystem Director,
PerkinsMinnesota State Colleges and Universities
2
Reforming Public Education in the 1980s and
1990sThe Heightened Imperative for Change
  • Under-preparedness of Students required
  • emphasis on the standards-based education -- core
    academics mathematics, science reading and
    writing
  • An organizing system of assessment,
    credentialing, transfer, and articulation
  • recognized other types of learning, including
    work-based and other contextual experiences
  • not just academic degrees, diplomas, and
    certificates but
  • Growing US Competitive Disadvantage meant
  • educational institution graduates must be capable
    of joining a workforce that meets the emerging
    needs of the 21st economy
  • Outcome-based Accountability directed
  • emphasis on improved learner outcomes by publicly
    funded (P-16) educational institutions

3
1998 Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied
Technology Act(Perkins III)
  • Improving the academic skills of students in
    career and technical students (CTE) by making
    their learning an integral part of high school
    and college curricula
  • Strengthening connections between secondary and
    postsecondary education with Tech Prep as the
    primary incubator for new ideas, strategies and
    methods for promoting high school to college
    transitions
  • Preparing individuals for occupations in demand
    that pay family-supporting wages by requiring the
    concentration and completion of post-secondary
    certificates, diplomas and degrees
  • Using data for decision making to invest in high
    quality local programming to ensure compliance

4
Dual Enrollment Issues
Identified Minnesota Issues
  • Identified National Characteristics
  • Admission requirements
  • Location
  • Student mix
  • Faculty qualifications
  • Course content
  • Method of teaching
  • Credit earning
  • Program intensity
  • Funding
  • State mandates
  • Program Mix
  • Program Finance
  • Transcripting
  • Faculty Credentials

5
Figure 1High School To College TransitionThe
Dual Enrollment Model In Minnesota
6
Post-Secondary Enrollment Options (PSEO)
ProgramMinnesota State Colleges and
Universities Board Policy and Procedures
  • Overview
  • High school students enroll at a college or a
    university and take courses for secondary and
    post-secondary credit
  • College/university courses completed
  • on a college or university campus, at a high
    school, or at another location (PSEO)
  • taught by college faculty
  • College/university course taught
  • on a high school campus by a high school teacher,
    mentored by post-secondary faculty (Concurrent
    Enrollment)

7
Post-Secondary Enrollment Options (PSEO)
ProgramMinnesota State Colleges and
Universities Board Policy and Procedures
  • Expectations of Board
  • Students admissions criteria promotes progress
    through college course work and augments
    continued academic growth consistent with board
    policies and system procedures
  • Student Admission Criteria
  • Meet admissions standards that test ability to
    perform college work
  • High school class rank or score on a nationally
    normed-reference assessment test is at least in
    the upper 50 percent

8
Profiling PSEO Students 2003
  • Overall
  • Male36.7 Female63.3
  • White94.0 Minority 6.0 (known values)
  • 17 Yr-Olds16.5 18 Yr-Olds50.8 19
    Yr-Olds32.71
  • Four-Year University27.6 Two-Year
    College73.4
  • Among all PSEO students, 1.3 (204) leave with a
    post-secondary credential
  • Two-Year Colleges
  • Male39.6 Female60.1
  • White94.0 Minority 6.0 (known values)
  • 17 Yr-Olds16.5 18 Yr-Olds50.6 19
    Yr-Olds32.91
  • Four-Year University
  • Male36.1 Female63.9
  • White94.0 Minority 6.0 (known values)
  • 17 Yr-Olds16.5 18 Yr-Olds51.2 19
    Yr-Olds32.31

1. Known values with 17-Yr Olds includes Ages
14,15,16 and, 19-Yr Olds includes Age 20
9
Research Questions
  • What is the level of the involvement of high
    school students in post-secondary education?
  • To what extent do high school students engage in
    acquiring technical knowledge and skills by
    enrolling in CTE-related courses?
  • Do current post-secondary students with dual
    enrollment program experience improve their
    academic performance and technical skill
    development?

10
Methodology
  • Minnesota high school students with PSEO
    experience between Fall 1999 and Spring 2001.
  • PSEO courses - three groups
  • LAGS ONLY
  • BOTH LAGS and CTE
  • CTE ONLY
  • PSEO students classified as taking one of these
    types of courses.

11
Methodology
  • PSEO GPA calculated for PSEO students.
  • PSEO students and a control group of students
    (those students who did have the PSEO experience)
  • enroll in college in Fall 2002 and are enrolled
    in or graduate anytime during the period Fall
    2002 and Spring 2004.
  • Both student groups take no developmental
    (remedial) courses
  • Both student groups enter with no transfer
    coursework.
  • PSEO students enter as a full-fledged college
    student at the same college in which they took
    their PSEO coursework.

12
Methodology
  • The critical variables of interest
  • college performance data
  • cumulative GPA
  • received degree yes/no
  • student gender
  • 3,639 total students in sample
  • 13 (461) had PSEO experience.

13
Methodology
  • PSEO students and control group students are
    matched to the Perkins Brio data.
  • identify the Perkins status of each student in
    the data used in the analysis.
  • Students within the Perkins database not
    classified as Perkins are further subdivided into
  • those having a degree (Not Perkins Completer) and
  • those yet to receive a degree (No Degree Not
    Perkins).

14
Basic Study Sample Data
  • Of the 3,639 students, nearly 13 percent (461
    students) took PSEO courses while in high school.
  • About 54 of the 461 students received a degree
    with about 46 having no received degree

15
Basic Study Sample Data
  • Gender
  • Of the total students with PSEO experience, men
    make up 43 and women make up 57.
  • Perkins students make up 59 and the remaining
    41 are non-Perkins students.

16
Basic Study Sample Data
  • Received Degree
  • Of those receiving a degree, 52 are Perkins
    students and 48 are non-Perkins
  • Of those having no received degree, one-third are
    non-Perkins and the remaining two-thirds are
    Perkins.

17
Basic Study Sample Data
  • Course Type
  • When distributing the number of students by PSEO
    course type, 45 are students who enrolled
    Liberal Arts and General Studies courses (LAGS
    ONLY).
  • 42 enrolled in both Liberal Arts and General
    Studies courses Career and Technical Education
    (CTE) courses (BOTH LAGS and CTE).
  • The remaining 13 enrolled in CTE ONLY courses.

18
Table 1 Percent Distribution of PSEO Course
Taking by Degree Received and by Gender
Measure of Association between PSEO Course Type
and Degree Received Male- Chi-Square Value 7.6
(Stat. Sig. at 5 Level) Female- Chi-Square
Value 6.7 (Stat. Sig. at 5 Level)
19
Table 2 Percent Distribution of PSEO Course
Taking by Degree Received and by Perkins Status
Measure of Association between PSEO Course Type
and Degree Received No Perkins- Chi-Square
Value 2.4 (Stat. Sig. Not Significant) Yes
Perkins- Chi-Square Value 26.8 (Stat. Sig. at 1
Level)
20
Table 3 Percent Distribution of PSEO Experience
by Degree Received and by Gender
Measure of Association between PSEO Experience
and Degree Received Male- Chi-Square Value 11.3
(Stat. Sig. at 1 Level) Female- Chi-Square
Value 23.2 (Stat. Sig. at 1 Level)
21
Table 4 Percent Distribution of PSEO Experience
by Degree Received and by
Perkins Status
Measure of Association between PSEO Experience
and Degree Received No Perkins- Chi-Square
Value 63.9 (One Percent Level) Yes Perkins-
Chi-Square Value 2.0 (Stat. Sig. Not Significant)
22
Table 5 Average PSEO GPA by PSEO Course Taking
by Gender 2002-2004
23
Table 6 Average College Cumulative GPA by PSEO
Experience and by Perkins Status All Students
2002-2004
24
Table 7 Average College Cumulative GPA by PSEO
Course Taking and by Perkins Status All
Students 2002-2004
25
Study Conclusions
  • GPA
  • Students with the PSEO experience tend to have
    higher mean GPAs than those without the
    experience.
  • differences appear to be early in the students
    college career.
  • early gains dissipate once the student
    concentrates on career and technical education
    and moves closer to receiving a degree.
  • Course Type
  • Taking academic courses exclusively does not by
    itself lead to a higher receiving of degrees .
  • In fact it is lower in this study specifically
    for Perkins students. However
  • these students may have four-year university
    degree as their eventual goal.

26
Study Conclusions
  • Gender
  • It appears that men have a greater likelihood to
    graduate if they took a combination of academic
    and technical courses in the PSEO program.
  • When women took technical courses in their PSEO
    program, they were also more likely to graduate.
  • The gender differences among PSEO course taking
    and subsequent college program choice warrants
    further investigation.

27
Study Conclusions
  • Received Degree
  • In general, a combination of technical and
    academic courses leads to a higher probability of
    graduation than if the PSEO student took either
    exclusively academic or exclusively technical
    courses.
  •  Both Perkins and non-Perkins students who had
    received degrees during the time period under
    consideration appear to be choosing PSEO
    coursework that suits their future college plans.

28
Study Conclusions
  • Received Degree
  • Not having any technical courses during the PSEO
    experience in high school may imply that Perkins
    students are playing catch up once they choose
    a career and technical major in college.
  •  For non-Perkins students, the PSEO experience is
    more likely to lead to a received degree.
  • Perkins students with the PSEO experience appear
    to receive the degree at rates similar to those
    without the experience. However.
  • Among Perkins students with PSEO experience, the
    PSEO course type is strongly associated with
    receiving a degree.

29
Study Conclusions
  • Avenues for Further Research
  • Specific gender differences among PSEO course
    taking and future career and technical education
    program choice
  • Sub-sample of not receiving degrees --asking
    question Why these students failed to receive a
    degree in time despite the PSEO experience and
    the focus on academic coursework.
  • Specific PSEO course taking patterns such as a
    combination of Math and Science.
  • Specific career clusters such as health care
    could shed light more precisely on specific
    course patterns student might follow within the
    PSEO program.

30
Study Conclusions
  • Avenues for Further Research
  •  Head start phenomenon which PSEO students
    encounter and why that head start dissipates as
    the students college career progresses.
  • Varying levels of credit load within the PSEO
    coursework itself and subsequent college credit
    load.
  • examine the impact of credit load patterns,
    separate from GPA.
  • Patterns of entry and exits into the PSEO program
    and the comparative patterns of exit (prior to
    degree completion) between PSEO and non-PSEO
    students and whether the PSEO experience
    minimizes these patterns of exits.

31
Contact Information
  • Pradeep Kotamraju Ph.D.
  • System Director, Perkins Federal Grants
  • Office of the Chancellor
  • Minnesota State Colleges and Universities
  • 500 Wells Fargo Place, 30 E. 7th Street
  • St. Paul MN 55101
  • Tel No 651-282-5569 Cell 612-701-7561
  • Fax 651-296-3214
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com