The DataPASS Partnership: Collaboration, Agreements, and More - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

The DataPASS Partnership: Collaboration, Agreements, and More

Description:

One Collaboration Agreement (for now) Effective partnership activities. Multi-faceted set of collaborations: Some involve all the partners ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: MyronG8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The DataPASS Partnership: Collaboration, Agreements, and More


1
The Data-PASS PartnershipCollaboration,
Agreements,and More
  • Myron Gutmann
  • ICPSR
  • University of Michigan

2
My Story
  • One overall partnership
  • One Collaboration Agreement (for now)
  • Effective partnership activities
  • Multi-faceted set of collaborations
  • Some involve all the partners
  • Others are partner-to-partner and involve subsets
    of the partners
  • Question how to ensure future activities given
    funding and diverse goals

3
The Data-PASS Partnership
  • ICPSR (Michigan)
  • Howard W. Odum Institute for Research in Social
    Science (North Carolina)
  • Roper Center for Public Opinion Research
    (Connecticut)
  • Murray Archive/Institute for Quantitative Social
    Science (Harvard)
  • National Archives and Records Administration (US
    Government)

4
Partnership Goals Overview
  • Shared Collection Development
  • Identification
  • Appraisal
  • Best location for content
  • Ingest processing
  • Shared Technology
  • Common catalog
  • Archive tools
  • Long-term preservation
  • Replication

5
Articles of Collaboration(Concluded fall 05)
  • Membership
  • Management Structure
  • Addition/Withdrawal of Membership
  • Subcontracting
  • Reporting
  • Cost Sharing
  • Funding Accounting Requirements
  • Technology

6
Articles, continued
  • Data Intellectual Rights
  • Transfer Protocols
  • Disputes
  • Term (Duration)
  • Post-Contract Commitments
  • Amendments

7
Now, how it really works
  • Operations Steering Committees function very
    well
  • Lots of informal discussion, with little
    reference to the formal agreement
  • Much all-partner activity discussion
  • Much partner-to-partner collaboration
  • Why?
  • Well-developed field with long-standing contacts
  • Rapid change requires flexible approaches

8
All-Partner Activities Follow Original Outline
  • Collection Development as Core
  • Identification, appraisal, best ingest
  • Gradual progress from past to future
  • Technology investment through Harvards VDC and
    Dataverse
  • Tools
  • Common Catalog
  • Shared replication as critical future activity

9
Partner-to-Partner Ties have Exceeded Expectations
  • Roper NARA USIA Data Project
  • Roper Odum ICPSR work on Private Research
    Organizations
  • Harvard Odum Technology testing partnership
  • Roper ICPSR Joint Poll Processing Activities

10
Challenges for the Future
  • How to sustain the future without Library of
    Congress funding as motive
  • Does everything need to be written?
  • Are we the Three Musketeers ?
  • Is it all for one and one for all all the time?
  • Or do two-way and three-way collaborations arise
    and develop within a broader framework over time?
  • In this context, how do we add partners?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com