Protein Amyloid Aggregation: Numerical Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method Anna Woodard Diego Conc - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Protein Amyloid Aggregation: Numerical Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method Anna Woodard Diego Conc

Description:

How do we build a model? Experiments generate observations ... factors are considered, the equations become very complex with many arbitrary constants ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: haz1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Protein Amyloid Aggregation: Numerical Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method Anna Woodard Diego Conc


1
Protein Amyloid AggregationNumerical Simulation
and the Monte Carlo MethodAnna WoodardDiego
Concha Advisor Dr. Shaohua Xu
2
des
  • The Problem
  • Colloidal Spheres attract despite having a
    positive net charge. Why? How? What can prevent
    it?
  • In vitro experiments are definitive, but time
    consuming and expensive.
  • We need to know how a vast array of variables
    will affect the aggregation process
  • Protein concentration
  • Electrolytes (concentration, valence, etc.)
  • Small molecules and potential drugs
  • Temperature, pH, etc.
  • We cannot test all the possibilities

3
  • We can simulate the process - with a model
  • What is a model?
  • A mathematical description sufficiently detailed
    to predict the response of a real process under a
    range of conditions
  • Simplifying assumptions are unavoidable
  • Why do we need a model?
  • To show that our understanding of the process is
    correct
  • To predict the effects of variations in the
    system
  • How do we build a model?
  • Experiments generate observations
  • Observations are used to form a model
  • The model is used to generate many predictions
  • Some predictions are verified by new experiments

4
  • Models for colloidal interaction
  • DLVO Theory
  • Preceded computers (1950's) closed form
    integration
  • Very successful in predicting colloidal behaviour
  • As more factors are considered, the equations
    become very complex with many arbitrary constants
  • W(D)(64pkTR?8?/?2)e-?D-AR/6D
  • RPhysicists hate arbitrary constants
  • Model should predict experiments, not just depend
    on them

5
  • We used Maple to calculate the forces between
    nucleation units under the DLVO approximation.
  • Neglecting ion shielding of dipoles, the
    attraction produced by only a few peptide bond
    dipoles (10-30 Coulomb-meters.) in each
    nucleation unit would be sufficient to completely
    overcome the energy barrier caused by coulomb
    repulsion Van der Waals forces.
  • Spherical chicken in a vacuum
  • This is only a crude approximation but it
    suggests that even a moderate degree of peptide
    bond alignment would permit linear aggregation.
  • DVLO was not specifically derived to deal with
    charged dipoles.

6
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Name refers to generation of random numbers by a
    roulette wheel
  • Requires only that we can calculate the energy
    for a given state
  • Step 1 Generate a large number of possible
    states at random
  • Step 2 Pick the one with the best value for the
    parameter
  • In this case, the arrangement of ions with the
    lowest total energy will be the stable state
  • Problem with basic Monte Carlo method
    Dimensionality is too high
  • Dimensionality spacial dimensionsnumber of
    molecules
  • With a 1000A box and 100 molecules, sample space
  • 1000(3100) (1 with 303 zeros) total states
  • Cannot evaluate a significant part of the sample
    space!

7
  • Solution Metropolis Algorithm
  • Start with a single arrangement
  • Randomly move one ion/atom
  • If there is a hard-sphere overlap, reject the new
    state
  • Calculate the change in energy based on the
    change in distance to other ions
  • If energy is lower, accept the new state
  • If energy is higher, usually reject, sometimes
    accept
  • a statistically possible random walk thermal
    fluctuation
  • Repeat until energy stops decreasing
  • System now at equilibrium
  • We don't need to know the forces only the
    energy!

8
  • Only two stable patterns of linear aggregation
  • Depend on length and width
  • Spherical or short fat dipoles nose-to-tail
    chain
  • Long, thin dipolar particles side-by-side with
    adjacent poles reversed
  • With some species, short nose-to-tail chains will
    behave like long dipoles and aggregate
    side-by-side with reversed polarity to form
    thicker chains
  • Doesn't happen initially in proteins (due to
    charge?) but multiple-ribbon appearance in some
    cases could indicate multiple chains with
    reversed dipoles
  • Why dont the fibers bend?

-
-



-

-
-

9
Striolo (2002) determined that DVLO was not
accurate for charged dipolar colloids (even with
complex equation that attempts to allow for
dipoles) because of the dipoles' effect on ion
concentrations between the particles
10
  • Do dipolar molecules aggregate?

methane (nonpolar)
methane (strongly dipolar)
11
Effects of Charge and Van Der Walls Forces
12
(No Transcript)
13
  • Outlook Water, ions, etc. . .
  • Simulate aggregation of multiple nucleation units
  • Calculate required dipole for aggregation
  • Ultimately, actual internal macromolecular
    structure

14
This is a complex puzzle - but molecular
modeling is part of the solution Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com