Considering Knowledge as an Organization Resource - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Considering Knowledge as an Organization Resource

Description:

from Frankfurt University; holds honorary. doctorates from American, Belgian, Czech, ... a high degree of organization but it also requires both ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: rsy
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Considering Knowledge as an Organization Resource


1
Considering Knowledge as an Organization Resource
  • To insert your company logo on this slide
  • From the Insert Menu
  • Select Picture
  • Locate your logo file
  • Click OK
  • To resize the logo
  • Click anywhere inside the logo. The boxes that
    appear outside the logo are known as resize
    handles.
  • Use these to resize the object.
  • If you hold down the shift key before using the
    resize handles, you will maintain the proportions
    of the object you wish to resize.

University of Dayton--6 June 06
  • Summer Bartczak, Lt Col, USAF (PhD)
  • Asst. Prof. of Information Resource Mgt.
  • Air Force Institute of Technology

2
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Drucker Pitstop
  • Recap The Coming of the New Organization
  • Discuss ties to Druckers discussion of knowledge
    as a resource in Post-Capitalist Society
  • Discussion of The Knowledge-Creating Company
    (Nonaka Takeuchi)
  • Discussion of Whats Your Strategy for Managing
    Knowledge? (Hansen, et al)
  • Discussion of Building a Learning Organization
    (Garvin)

3
Questions to Contemplate
  • Why is knowledge such an important organization
    resource to consider these days?
  • Why is creating NEW knowledge so essential to
    achieving competitive advantage?
  • What are the basic strategies organizations can
    consider for managing existing/new knowledge?
  • What are the connections between managing
    knowledge (KM) learning organizations?

4
Framing Thought
  • Every few hundred years in Western history there
    occurs a sharp transformation or divide.
    Within a few short decades, society rearranges
    itselfits worldview its basic values its
    social and political structure its arts its key
    institutions. Fifty years later, there is a new
    world. And the people born then cannot even
    imagine the world in which their grandparents
    lived and into which their own parents were born
    (Drucker, 1993).
  • We are currently living through just such a
    transformation. It is driving new organization
    forms, the need for knowledge creation
    organizations that learn, and, generally, the
    evolution of a post-capitalist society...which
    are all the subject of todays discussion.

5
Background Peter F. Drucker
  • Born in Vienna (1909), escaped to the US in
  • 1930s
  • Holds a PhD in Public/International Law
  • from Frankfurt University holds honorary
  • doctorates from American, Belgian, Czech,
  • English, Japanese, Spanish Swiss
  • Universities
  • One of the most influential management
  • consultants of all time
  • Prolific writer40 books on society,
  • politics, economics, and management
  • WAS an active professor at Claremont
  • Graduate University until Fall 05
  • Coined the term knowledge worker

Peter F. Drucker (aka The Man)
6
The Coming of the New Organization (Drucker,
1988)
Recap
7
The Coming of the New Organization (Drucker,
1988)
  • 1988 piece that explores the differences with
    organizations/organization forms of the past
  • Recognizes importance of knowledge but crux of
    the conversation centers around information
  • Looks to hospital, orchestra, university
    organization examples
  • Says the info-based organization will have its
    own mgt. problems
  • Rewards, recognition, opportunities for
    specialists
  • Creating a unified vision
  • Devising a mgt. structure for an org. of task
    forces
  • Ensuring good top mgt. people

8
Post-Capitalist Society(Drucker, 1993)
9
Post-Capitalist Society(Drucker, 1993)
  • Published in 1993
  • Emphasizes that knowledge is an important
    organization resourcenow sidelining the
    traditional factors of production (land, labor,
    capital)
  • Says the meaning of knowledge changed from an
    aspect of being to doing and over time
    transformed Western society to post-capitalist

10
Overview of Major Historical Phases and Changing
View of Knowledge
  • Drucker proposes that the world has undergone
    five major historical phases
  • Pre-Scientific Age
  • Industrial Revolution
  • Productivity Revolution
  • Management Revolution
  • Knowledge Revolution
  • He says the differing views of knowledge (for the
    most part) distinguish one phase from another

11
Overview of Major Historical Phases and Changing
View of Knowledge
12
Overview of Major Historical Phases and Changing
View of Knowledge
  • Pre-Scientific Age
  • (1300-1500)
  • Cities became the center of culture
  • City guilds were dominant social groups
  • Urban universities replace monasteries as
    cultural centers
  • (1500-1700)
  • Gutenbergs invention of printing with movable
    type
  • Protestant Reformation
  • Blossoming of the Renaissance
  • Rediscovery of scientific inquiry
  • Knowledge viewed as philosophy or being
    purpose of knowledge was self-knowledge/self-devel
    opment

13
Overview of Major Historical Phases and Changing
View of Knowledge
  • Industrial Revolution (1700-1900)
  • Watts perfected the steam engine
  • Adam Smith wrote Wealth of Nations
  • Capitalism and communism emerged
  • Capitalists became great powers, overshadowing
    kings and princes
  • Knowledge seen as doing Knowledge applied to
    tools and products

14
Overview of Major Historical Phases and Changing
View of Knowledge
  • Productivity Revolution (1900-1950)
  • Converted the proletarian into middle-class
    w/upper class income
  • Frederick Taylor studies/analyses/engineers work
  • Incredible gains in productivity
  • Capitalists made more money
  • Knowledge applied to work (processes)

15
Overview of Major Historical Phases and Changing
View of Knowledge
  • Management Revolution (1945-1990)
  • Management emerges as a discipline after WWII
  • Being in management meant rank and power
  • Knowledge became seen as an essential resource
  • Knowledge began to be applied to knowledge (i.e.
    managers became responsible for applying their
    knowledge to the management of others with
    knowledge)

16
Overview of Major Historical Phases and Changing
View of Knowledge
  • Knowledge Revolution (1990-20??)
  • Knowledge becomes THE KEY resource
  • Many organizations exist that produce no physical
    product
  • Intellectual capital becomes key issue for orgs.
  • Traditional knowledge considered general
    knowledge now necessarily specialized
  • Knowledge workers recognized
  • Knowledge is applied to cognition/intelligence
  • (i.e. we begin to use knowledge to create new
    knowledge and innovate)
  • Society becomes post-capitalist

17
Some Key Characteristics ofthe Post-Capitalist
Society
  • Economics and Productivity
  • Increasingly, there is less and less return on
    traditional resources the main producers of
    wealth have become information and knowledge
    (information capitalism)
  • The return which a country/business gets on
    knowledge must increasingly be a determining
    factor in its competitiveness
  • Innovation (the application of knowledge to
    knowledge) requires systematic effort and a high
    degree of organizationbut it also requires both
    decentralization and diversity
  • Managements challenge is to make knowledge
    productive

18
Key Characteristics ofOur Post-Capitalist Society
  • So, again, what is the Post-Capitalist Society?
  • A society where land, labor, and capital are no
    longer the key factors of production that allow
    competitive advantage
  • A society no longer controlled by industrial-era
    capitalists such as Rockefeller, Carnegie, etc.
  • A society characterized by a knowledge
    revolution.where knowledge is the key strategic
    resource

19
And Since 1993/Drucker
  • 1994Tom Stewart warns in Fortune article that
    companies should focus less on what they own and
    more on what they know.
  • 1995Paul Romer (Stanford economist) calls
    knowledge the only unlimited resource
  • 1995Nonaka and Takeuchi publish ground-breaking
    study about knowledge creation in Japanese
    companies.
  • 1998Davenport and Prusak publish Working
    Knowledge
  • 2000 and on.
  • Knowledge increasingly recognized as an important
    resource/issue for organizations

20
What do we mean when we talk about knowledge?
  • Two types of knowledge
  • Tacit personal, context-specific, and hard to
    formalize and communicate
  • Explicit codified, transmittable in formal,
    systematic language

21
The KnowledgeCreating Company (Nonaka
Takeuchi, 1991/1995)
22
The KnowledgeCreating Company (Nonaka
Takeuchi, 1991/1995)
  • Focus is on managing the creation of NEW
    knowledge
  • More about tacit than explicit knowledge
  • Companies arent info processing machines they
    are living organisms

23
The KnowledgeCreating Company (Nonaka
Takeuchi, 1991/1995)
  • The Knowledge Spiral
  • Tacit knowledge To
    Explicit knowledge

Socialization Externalization (articulation)
Internalization Combination
Tacit knowledge
Explicit knowledge
24
The KnowledgeCreating Company (Nonaka
Takeuchi, 1991/1995)
  • Interaction/exchange between tacit explicit
    knowledge is especially important
  • Facilitate new knowledge creation with metaphors,
    analogies, and models
  • Implications for organization design include
    redundancy, managing chaos through a sense of
    purpose/vision, requisite variety

25
Whats Your Strategy for Managing
Knowledge?(Hansen, Nohria, Tierney, 1999)

26
Whats Your Strategy for Managing
Knowledge?(Hansen, Nohria, Tierney, 1999)
  • Why should we care about managing knowledge
    (tacit explicit)?
  • Again
  • Knowledge is an organization asset/resource just
    like any other
  • Knowledge may be the product itself
  • Knowledge is a key to competitive
  • advantage

27
Strategies for Managing Knowledge
  • Codification Strategy
  • Personalization Strategy

28
Strategies for Managing Knowledge
  • Codification Strategy
  • Focuses on ways to codify (i.e. put into
    text-based form), store, and reuse knowledge
  • Uses a people-to-documents approach
  • Knowledge is extracted from people, made
    independent of them, and then reused by others

29
Strategies for Managing Knowledge
  • Personalization Strategy
  • Focuses on dialogue between individuals not
    objects in a database
  • Uses a people-to-people approach
  • Uncodifiable knowledge is transferred by
    brainstorming and one-on-one conversations

30
Choosing the Strategy Thats Right for You
  • Consider.
  • How you create value for customers
  • How you turn a profit
  • How you manage people

31
Choosing the Strategy Thats Right for You
  • Consider.
  • How you create value for customers
  • Deal with similar problems over and over?
  • Re-use plans, briefs, ideas, software code,
    problem solutions?
  • Or
  • Deal with one-of-a-kind problems that dont have
    clear solutions?
  • Create highly customized solutions?

32
Choosing the Strategy Thats Right for You
  • Consider.
  • How you turn a profit
  • Employ economics of re-use codified knowledge
    can be used over and over again at a low cost by
    many people?
  • Or
  • Employ expert economics where clients are
    offered advice that is rich in tacit knowledge
    slow, expensive, and requires lots of expertise?

33
Choosing the Strategy Thats Right for You
  • Consider.
  • How you manage people (hire and train)
  • Hire inexperienced personnel and train them to do
    routine tasks?
  • Or
  • Hire experienced personnel for their expertise,
    creativity, communication skills, and analytical
    thinking skills?

34
Choosing the Strategy Thats Right for You
  • Straddling both strategies risky
  • Pick a primary strategy80/20 mix
  • Dont try to excel at bothyou may fail

35
Building a Learning Organization (Garvin, 1993)
36
Building a Learning Organization (Garvin, 1993)
  • Before people/companies can improve, they must
    first learn
  • Look beyond rhetoric, pie the sky philosophies
    to fundamentals
  • Three key issues that must be addressed before a
    company can become a learning organization
  • 1. Meaning
  • 2. Management
  • 3. Measurement

37
Building a Learning Organization (Garvin, 1993)
  • MEANING
  • What is a learning organization?
  • What is the connection between knowledge
    management (or managing knowledge) and a learning
    organization?

38
Building a Learning Organization(Garvin, 1993)
  • A learning organization is an organization
    skilled at creating, acquiring, and transferring
    knowledge, and at modifying its behavior to
    reflect new knowledge and insights
  • Many other definitions exist!

39
Building a Learning Organization (Garvin, 1993)
  • MANAGEMENT
  • Building Blocks
  • Systematic problem solving
  • Experimentation
  • Learning from past experiences
  • Learning from others
  • Transferring knowledge

40
Building a Learning Organization (Garvin, 1993)
  • MEASUREMENT
  • If you cant measure it, you cant manage it!
  • Learning/experience curves
  • Surveys
  • Questionnaires
  • Direct observation

41
Building a Learning Organization (Garvin, 1993)
  • How to
  • Foster an environment conducive to learning
  • Give time
  • Give skills
  • Open boundaries

42
Questions to ContemplateWrapping Up
  • Why is knowledge such an important organization
    resource to consider these days?
  • Why is creating NEW knowledge so essential to
    achieving competitive advantage?
  • What are the basic strategies you can consider
    for managing existing/new knowledge?
  • What are the connections between managing
    knowledge (KM) learning organizations?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com