Seven Reasons Why Drug Use Is More Serious Today - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Seven Reasons Why Drug Use Is More Serious Today

Description:

Downing Street Strategy Unit Report by John Birt ' ... Downing Street Strategy Unit Report by John Birt. Seven Reasons Why Drug Use ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: mfri4
Category:
Tags: drug | more | reasons | serious | seven | today | use

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Seven Reasons Why Drug Use Is More Serious Today


1
Adolescent Addiction Course Thursday 8th March
2007 Drug Policy
Martin Frisher Department of Medicines
Management Keele University Harplands Hospital
2
Topics
  • Development of Drug Policy
  • UK Governments Drugs Policy
  • Effectiveness of Current Policy
  • Alternatives to Current Policy
  • Addiction Research and Evidence Based Medicine
  • US War on Drugs

3
UK Governments Drug Strategy
  • Preventing drugs misuse
  • Reducing the availability of drugs
  • Reducing drug use and drug-related offending
    through treatment and support
  • Reducing drug-related crime
  • http//www.drugs.gov.uk/publication-search/drug-st
    rategy/strategy-facts-booklet

4
UK Governments Drug Strategy
  • 1.5 billion annual Government spending on
    tackling drugs
  • 10,034 people employed as drug professionals up
    40 since March 2002
  • 96 of secondary and 80 of primary schools have
    developed drug education policies
  • 2.5 weeks average treatment waiting time, which
    is down by three quarters since 2002

5
Downing Street Strategy Unit Report by John Birt
  • Current government strategy is having only a
    limited impact in reducing that harm because it
    has failed to "grip" these users, and while
    nearly half are arrested each year, few enter
    treatment as a result.
  • For those that do, the treatment regime has not
    coped well with the formidable difficulty of
    treating chaotic and constantly relapsing problem
    drug users
  • http//image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/doc
    uments/2006/02/08/Drugs.pdf

6
Downing Street Strategy Unit Report by John Birt
  • The efforts of the police to interrupt the supply
    of drugs into Britain have been ineffective and
    has had little or no impact on reducing harms.

http//image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/doc
uments/2006/02/08/Drugs.pdf
7
Downing Street Strategy Unit Report by John Birt
  • Ministers have not yet admitted that there is
    little point to official efforts at intercepting
    the supply of illegal drugs into the country, but
    they have adopted Birt's recommended cover that
    drugs should be seized and proclaimed whenever
    possible.

http//image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/doc
uments/2006/02/08/Drugs.pdf
8
Downing Street Strategy Unit Report by John Birt
  • Birt says intervention should focus on reducing
    harm by driving users and dealers into compulsory
    registration and treatment.
  • This is a powerful argument when considering that
    for every 1 spent on treatment and education, 3
    is spent on law enforcement.

http//image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/doc
uments/2006/02/08/Drugs.pdf
9
Birt offers quick fix to drugs problem
  • Danny Kushlick, director of drug charity
    Transform, describes this as "cynical in the
    extreme, given that the report acknowledges
    seizures are having little or no impact on
    reducing harm".
  • He goes on "This is exactly what happened with
    the recent Home Office propaganda blitz to
    persuade us that the drug strategy is working."
  • http//society.guardian.co.uk/drugsandalcohol/sto
    ry/0,,1709559,00.html

10
Birt offers quick fix to drugs problem
  • The coercive elements of Birt's approach - making
    the illicit use of heroin a criminal offence so
    the police can identify, arrest and drive the
    users into treatment - were rejected by
    ministers.
  • http//society.guardian.co.uk/drugsandalcohol/stor
    y/0,,1709559,00.html

11
Birt offers quick fix to drugs problem
  • But what of his extension of heroin prescribing?
    The National Treatment Agency has launched some
    limited trials for chronic heroin users to gather
    evidence on its impact.

http//society.guardian.co.uk/drugsandalcohol/stor
y/0,,1709559,00.html
12
Downing Street Strategy Unit Report by John Birt
  • But Birt wanted to go much further, arguing that
    it is better to provide heroin freely to the
    260,000 who have a serious habit than allow them
    to commit crime to buy it - even at a cost of
    15,000 a year per patient. It would also
    undermine the illegal drugs trade.
  • One big obstacle appears to be the reluctance of
    GPs to have heroin addicts in their waiting
    rooms. If so, then dedicated safe injection rooms
    could be the answer.

13
Seven Reasons Why Drug Use Is More Serious Today
  • Drug use endangers the future of a society by
    harming its youth and potentially destroying the
    lives of many young men and women
  • Drug use and especially drug dealing is becoming
    a major factor in the growth of crime rates among
    the young.
  • Seven in ten drug users work full-time and this
    increases the possibility of serious accidents
    caused by workers.

Drugs and Society (8th Edition, 2005) by Glen
Hanson, Peter J. Venturelli, Annette E.
Fleckenstein
14
Seven Reasons Why Drug Use Is More Serious Today
  • Since the 1960s drug use is more widespread.
  • Drugs are much more potent than they were years
    ago.
  • Crack and other manufactured newer drugs offer
    potent effects at low cost.
  • Illicit drug use remains extremely popular.
    Their sale is a multibillion dollar a year
    business, with major influence on many national
    economies.

Drugs and Society (8th Edition, 2005) by Glen
Hanson, Peter J. Venturelli, Annette E.
Fleckenstein
15
Updated Strategy 2002
  • The Updated Strategy arose from a review
    conducted by the Home Affairs Select Committee,
    which found that while the Governments drug
    policy covered the right areas, a stronger
    emphasis was needed on preventing and stopping
    problematic drug use, reducing the harms from
    drug misuse and on developing more focused and
    measurable targets.

16
Drug Laws and Deterrence
  • If a person abuses a drug, should he or she be
    treated as a criminal or as a sick person
    inflicted with a disease?

Drugs and Society (8th Edition, 2005) by Glen
Hanson, Peter J. Venturelli, Annette E.
Fleckenstein
17
Drug Laws and Deterrence
  • Are the laws and associated penalties effective
    deterrents against drug use or abuse, and how is
    effectiveness determined?

Drugs and Society (8th Edition, 2005) by Glen
Hanson, Peter J. Venturelli, Annette E.
Fleckenstein
18
Strategies for Preventing Drug Abuse
  • Supply reduction
  • Using drug laws to control the manufacturing and
    distribution of classified drugs
  • Demand reduction strategy
  • Aims to reduce the actual demand for drugs by
    working mainly with youth and teaching them to
    resist drugs

Drugs and Society (8th Edition, 2005) by Glen
Hanson, Peter J. Venturelli, Annette E.
Fleckenstein
19
Strategies for Preventing Drug Abuse
  • Inoculation
  • Aims to protect drug users by teaching them
    responsibility and explaining the effects of
    drugs on bodily and mental functioning.

Drugs and Society (8th Edition, 2005) by Glen
Hanson, Peter J. Venturelli, Annette E.
Fleckenstein
20
Drug Legalization Debate
  • Violence and crime would decrease/increase?
  • Profits associated with illegal trade would
    decrease/increase?
  • Law enforcement costs would decrease/increase?
  • Addiction would decrease/increase?

Drugs and Society (8th Edition, 2005) by Glen
Hanson, Peter J. Venturelli, Annette E.
Fleckenstein
21
Drug Legalization Debate
  • Societal/health costs would decrease/increase?
  • Consumption would increase/decrease?

Drugs and Society (8th Edition, 2005) by Glen
Hanson, Peter J. Venturelli, Annette E.
Fleckenstein
22
Areas of Compromise?
  • Selective legalization?
  • Control through prescription or special outlets?
  • Discretionary enforcement of drug laws?

Drugs and Society (8th Edition, 2005) by Glen
Hanson, Peter J. Venturelli, Annette E.
Fleckenstein
23
Levels of Drug Prevention
  • Level oneprimary prevention.
  • Primary prevention programs refer to the very
    broad range of activities aimed at reducing the
    risk of drug use among non-users and assuring
    continued nonuse. Often targeted to at-risk
    neighborhoods/ communities and families.

Drugs and Society (8th Edition, 2005) by Glen
Hanson, Peter J. Venturelli, Annette E.
Fleckenstein
24
Level 1
  • Intrapersonal factors
  • Affective education, values clarification,
    personal and social skills development
    (assertiveness and refusal skills), drug
    information and education
  • Small group factors
  • Peer mentoring, conflict resolution, curriculum
    infusion, clarification of peer norms,
    alternatives, strengthening families
  • Systems level
  • Strengthening school-family links,
    school-community links, and community support
    systems, media advocacy efforts, reduce alcohol
    marketing

Drugs and Society (8th Edition, 2005) by Glen
Hanson, Peter J. Venturelli, Annette E.
Fleckenstein
25
Level twosecondary prevention
  • Assessment strategies identification of abuse
    subgroups and individual diagnoses
  • Early intervention coupled with sanctions
  • Teacher--parent team approach
  • Developing healthy alternative youth culture
  • Use of recovering role models

Drugs and Society (8th Edition, 2005) by Glen
Hanson, Peter J. Venturelli, Annette E.
Fleckenstein
26
Levels of Drug Prevention
  • Level threetertiary prevention.
  • Tertiary prevention is intervention at an
    advanced state of drug use/abuse. Very similar to
    drug abuse treatment.

Drugs and Society (8th Edition, 2005) by Glen
Hanson, Peter J. Venturelli, Annette E.
Fleckenstein
27
The Importance of Considering the Audience
and Approach
  • Realize That Audiences Differ with Regard to Drug
    Use
  • Early experimenters of drugs
  • Non-problem drug usersthose who abuse drugs on
    occasion, mostly for recreation purposes
  • Non-detected, committed, or secret users- those
    who abuse drugs and have no interest in stopping
  • Problem users
  • Former users

28
Assessing the Success of Prevention Efforts
  • It is difficult to measure the effects of
    prevention efforts after separating out the
    validity of the approach, the method and staff
    implemented in presentation, and broad cultural
    drug use patterns.

29
Can Addiction Research Be Trusted?
  • Research must be critically examined and
    interpreted for particular clinical needs and
    patient benefits.
  • Just because something appears in print does
    not mean it is worthwhile or valid.

30
Addiction Research
  • Research directly or indirectly affects the
    practice of addiction medicine on a daily
    basis.
  • There is an urgent need for good science to
    overcome stigma, prejudice, and
    misunderstanding.

Trepanation once was a scientific cure
formental illness.
31
What is EBAM?Evidence-Based Addiction Medicine
  • The use of current best evidence in making
    decisions about the care of patients.
  • Involves combining clinical expertise with
    valid research on a topic of concern.
  • Differentiates between practices based on
    sound evidence versus those founded more on 1)
    tradition, 2) outdated beliefs, or 3) junk
    science.

32
Interpreting Research
  • Interpretation is a matter of perception.
  • Not everyone sees a research study in the
    same way.
  • Becoming a more critical consumer of research
    is essential.

33
Problems with Medical Research
  • Surveys of research have found
  • On average, half or more of journal articles
    contain errors from missing data to major
    design flaws.
  • Roughly, up to 2/3 of article abstracts may
    contain data that is either inconsistent with or
    missing from the main body of the article.
  • In one investigation, 80 of systematic reviews
    meta-analyses examined had serious flaws.

34
U.S. War on Drugs
  • Began in the early 70s, went into high gear in
    the early 80s
  • Annual government spending
  • 1969 - 65,000,000
  • 1982 - 1,650,000,000
  • 2001 over 19,000,000,000

35
U.S. War on Drugs
  • Number of people arrested on drug-related
    charges each year
  • 1968 - 200,000
  • 2001 over 1.5 million

36
The War on Drugs
  • zero-tolerance policy
  • D.A.R.E - The Drug Abuse Resistance Education
    program
  • mandatory sentencing, less and later parole
  • greatly increased police enforcement
  • more prisons and prisoners
  • random drug testing, increased surveillance, new
    seizure and forfeiture laws

37
D.A.R.E.
  • From Dont You D.A.R.E, by Stephen Glass ( The
    New Republic, March 3, 1997)
  • . . . study after study has shown that dare does
    not seem to work. The studies have found that
    students who go through the program are just as
    likely to use drugs as those who dont . . . Why
    isnt the case against dare better known? . . .
    For the past five years, dare has used tactics
    ranging from bullying journalists to
    manipulating the facts to mounting campaigns in
    order to intimidate government officials and stop
    news organizations, researchers and parents form
    criticizing the program . . . dare has become so
    well-known for the hardball tactics it employs to
    shut down its critics that drug researchers and
    journalists have a word for those hushed -- they
    say theyve been Dared.

38
ACLU Paper 19 - Against Drug Prohibition
  • More and more ordinary people, elected
    officials, newspaper columnists, economists,
    doctors, judges and even the Surgeon General of
    the United States are concluding that the effects
    of our drug control policy are at least as
    harmful as the effects of drugs themselves . .
    .The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
    opposes criminal prohibition of drugs. Not only
    is prohibition a proven failure as a drug control
    strategy, but it subjects otherwise law-abiding
    citizens to arrest, prosecution and imprisonment
    for what they do in private.
  • Source http// turnpike.net/-jnr/acludrug.htm

39
More ACLU Arguments
  • And just as most of the 1920s violence was
    not committed by people who were drunk, most of
    the drug-related violence today is not committed
    by people who are high on drugs.
  • A 1989 government study of all 193
    cocaine-related homicides in New York City
    found that 87 percent grew out of rivalries and
    disagreements related to doing business in an
    illegal market. In only one case was the
    perpetrator actually under the influence of
    cocaine.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com