Title: Promoting employment through welfare reform lessons from the past, prospects for the future
1Promoting employment through welfare reform
lessons from the past, prospects for the future
- The Downing Lecture
- Alan Duncan
- University of Nottingham
- Institute for Fiscal Studies
- Melbourne Institute
2Introduction and motivation
- National policy decisions are increasingly
informed by international experiences and policy
structures - fiscal, welfare, family and labour policy,
education, pensions etc.. - What lessons can be drawn from these
experiences? - Does a consensus emerge from international
experiences of welfare reform? - Can welfare policy be effectively transferred
across institutions? - How is the process of policy transfer
characterised? - What role is there for welfare policy in
promoting employment? -
3Plan of lecture
- a short history of welfare reform
- concentrate on the detail of reform in US, UK and
Australia - draw out some themes common to recent welfare
reforms elsewhere among OECD countries - welfare policy ideas
- where do they come from? How do they evolve?
- international policy coordination and policy
transfer - policy ideas are shared, imported, adapted, or
transferred across countries - the global laboratory
- Case study Working Families Tax Credit in the UK
4Plan of lecture
- key ideas and themes in welfare reform
- active labour market policies
- mutual obligation and conditionality of support
- promoting employment through tax credits
- an emerging consensus?
- simplification
- modularity
- transparency
- coherency
5Plan of lecture
- where now for welfare policy in Australia?
- lessons for Australia
- lessons from Australia
- prospects for the future
- a missing pillar in Australian welfare support??
- potential for an employment tax credit (ETC) in
Australia - how might it be implemented?
- what effect on employment?
- a route to greater coherency?
- a route to further simplification?
6Three pillars of welfare reform
- In October 1997, the incoming Labour Government
committed to the following policy objectives - to support families, to make work pay and to
tackle child poverty - These broad objectives informed many of the
subsequent welfare and labour market reforms of
the new government - the Working Families Tax Credit
- Jobseekers Allowance
- the New Deals (for lone parents, young
unemployed, disabled) - Childcare Tax Credit
7Three pillars of welfare reform
- Similar themes are replicated in policy
statements throughout the developed world, with
three over-riding objectives - to provide support for low-income families
- to tackle child poverty
- to promote employment
- eg. ANTS (2000) in Australia
- eg. TRA (1986) and PRWORA (1996) in the US
8The third pillar of welfare reform
- How to promote employment through welfare
reform? - What lessons emerge from recent welfare reforms
around the world? - Can one draw common themes from international
experience? - Can policy effectively be transferred across
national institutions? - Case studies 1) the EITC system in the US
- 2) the WFTC system in the UK
9Case study tax credits and welfare policy
- Significant changes in UK welfare policy since
1997 - employment- and demographic contingent benefits
(WFTC) - welfare-to-work programs (NewStart, JSA, Job
Clubs, New Deals) - Child Support Agency
- Many policy ideas were borrowed from
experiences elsewhere - From the United States EITC, workfare, New
Deal, Child Support (CSES) - From Australia JET, Child Support scheme,
Working Nation -
10Welfare support in the US
- Key features of the current system
- support for low-income households (TANF, Food
Stamps) - assistance with childcare costs (Childcare
subsidies) - earnings-conditional credits (EITC)
- mutual obligation (time limitation, mandatory job
search) - set alongside state minimum wages
- Key characteristics
- systematic shift in caseload and cost from TANF
(previously AFDC) to EITC - TANF caseload halved through tight targetting and
strong obligation on welfare recipients to secure
employment - criticisms that TANF infringes individual
freedoms and citizenships
11The US Earned Income Tax Credit (1975-)some
comparative structure
- EITC is a refundable tax credit delivering
financial support to low-income working
households - Structure designed to promote employment
incentives - Credit phased in at a proportion of earned income
to some maximum - Credit phased out beyond some threshold income
- Current system differentiated by family type
- Creates three ranges phase-in, plateau,
phase-out - No minimum hours requirement
- How is EITC received?
- delivered as a refund by IRS through the annual
tax return
12Earned Income Tax Credit (after OBRA93)
13Earned Income Tax Credit development over time,
2 or more children
14Integration of EITC in the US tax systemFlorida
TANF structure
15Welfare support in the UK
- Key features of the current system
- support for low-income households (Income
Support, Jobseekers Allow) - assistance with childcare costs (Childcare Tax
Credit) - earnings-conditional credits (Working Families
Tax Credit) - mutual obligation (New Deal, mandatory for some,
Social Contract,) - national minimum wages
- Key characteristics
- a change in emphasis, from unconditional income
support to policies promoting employment - part of an ongoing development towards a coherent
and modular structure of welfare support - WFTC development borrowed much from US experience
of EITC
16Welfare support in the UKsome history
Attitudes have changed the early view The
1944 Beveridge Report barely discusses the
problem of poverty among working households. In
this, it is very much a product of the particular
time at which it was written for Beveridge it
was axiomatic that anyone in employment had
resources sufficient to support a wife and one
child, Dilnot, Kay and Morris (1984,
p.23).
17Welfare support in the UKsome history
Attitudes have changed the early view The
1944 Beveridge Report barely discusses the
problem of poverty among working households. In
this, it is very much a product of the particular
time at which it was written for Beveridge it
was axiomatic that anyone in employment had
resources sufficient to support a wife and one
child, Dilnot, Kay and Morris (1984,
p.23).
18Welfare support in the UKsome history
Attitudes have changed the current view
..the Governments attack on worklessness
tackles the barriers to work faced by workless
households, including low skills, fears about the
time lag between benefits and wages, the perverse
incentives which discourage people from moving
from benefits to work and the lack of affordable
childcare A New Contract for Welfare -
DSS(1999, p.3).
19Welfare support in the UKsome history
Attitudes have changed the current view
..the Governments attack on worklessness
tackles the barriers to work faced by workless
households, including low skills, fears about the
time lag between benefits and wages, the perverse
incentives which discourage people from moving
from benefits to work and the lack of affordable
childcare A New Contract for Welfare -
DSS(1999, p.3).
20In-Work Benefits in the UKsome details
- Family Income Supplement (1971)
- the first explicit employment-contingent benefit
in the United Kingdom - available only to working families with children
- Family Credit (1988)
- aimed to improve work incentives relative to FIS
- More generous, assessed on net rather than gross
income, eliminating high METRs - Reforms to Family Credit (1992-1995)
- minimum eligibility criterion reduced from 24 to
16 hours (1992) - 10 extra once FC recipient worked 30 hours or
more (1995) - 60 childcare expenditure disregard in Family
Credit (1995)
21Family Income Supplement (1971)
22Family Credit (1992)
23The UK tax and transfer systemApril 1997
(uprated to 2000)
24The Working Families Tax Credit (1999)some
structure
- WFTC represents a new tax-credit based system
for delivering financial support to low-income
working households - differs from Family Credit in a number of
respects - increased credits for adults
- increased credits for children
- increase in threshold for maximum entitlement
(applicable amount) - reduction in credit withdrawal taper (70 to 55)
- a new childcare credit (70 of actual childcare
costs, up to max of 150) - also
- delivered through the tax code rather than via
the Benefits Agency - income taken into account in the assessment of
housing and local tax benefits
25Working Families Tax Credit (1999)basic credit
26Working Families Tax Credit (1999)basic credit
27Working Families Tax Credit (1999)basic credit
28Working Families Tax Credit (1999)basic credit
29Working Families Tax Credit (1999)basic credit
30Integration of WFTC in the UK tax systemApril
2000
31Effective income gain from WFTC receiptApril 2000
32WFTC where did the idea come from?
- Although welfare policy is still dominated by
national priorities and values, it is nonetheless
true that domestic policy is informed by
international experience - globalisation of policy ideas
- increasing use of evidence-based policy
initiatives - international agencies to facilitate policy
transfer - What evidence is there regarding the effects and
outcomes of the transfer of welfare policy? - has it led to good policy?
- are there circumstances under which policy
convergence doesnt work? - Case study US-UK welfare reform
33Policy Transfer
- Policy transfer reflects a situation whereby
-
- .. knowledge about policies, administrative
arrangements, institutions and ideas in one
political setting is used in the development of
policies, administrative arrangements,
institutions and ideas in another setting - Dolowitz and Marsh (2000, p.5 )
-
34The Working Families Tax Credit
- a case of policy transfer?
- I have therefore also asked Martin Taylor to
consider at an early stage the advantages of
introducing a new in-work tax credit for low-paid
workers. It would draw upon the successful
experience of the American earned income tax
credit, which helps reduce in-work poverty, and
now helps 19 million lower-paid workers in
America. - Rt Hon Gordon Brown MP (Chancellor), Budget
Speech, 2nd July 1997 -
35Time-line of welfare reform in UK US
US
UK
36Time-line of welfare reform in UK US
US
UK
37Time-line of welfare reform in UK US
US
UK
pilot study announced to extend FC-type system to
childless households
38Issues in the move to tax credits in the UK
- policy transfer has been voluntary
- transfer pre-conditioned on common values
ideologies in UK and US - policy transfer has been partial
- Lessons have been drawn from US experience
- WFTC retains payment structure of FC rather than
imported from EITC - WFTC preserves the concept of independent
taxation - policy transfer has been adaptive
- WFTC delivered monthly through the tax code
rather than annually as refund
39Lesson-drawing and policy transfer
- lesson-drawing
- In America, the EITC is known for its
administrative complexity, its weakness as an
incentive provider and its proneness to fraud--it
is the most fraud-prone benefit in the United
States. . It would be a tragedy if, on top
of its other problems, that problem were to
afflict the WFTC as well. -
- Mr David Davis (MP for Haltemprice and Howden),
16th February 2000. -
40Lesson-drawing and policy transfer
- lesson-drawing
- In America, the EITC is known for its
administrative complexity, its weakness as an
incentive provider and its proneness to fraud--it
is the most fraud-prone benefit in the United
States. . It would be a tragedy if, on top
of its other problems, that problem were to
afflict the WFTC as well. -
- Mr David Davis (MP for Haltemprice and Howden),
16th February 2000. -
41adaptation in the transfer of policy
- policy adaptation
- the United Kingdom proposals were developed
to be aligned with the pre-existing in-work
benefit system rather than the tax credit system
in the United States. For example, eligibility
for the EITC was originally checked
retrospectively, in line with the policy on tax
measures. The IRS now verifies eligibility before
payment. Such a process is built into the UK
proposals because they are based on existing
structures for in-work benefits. -
- Mr David Davis (MP for Haltemprice and Howden),
23rd March 1998. -
42reverse policy transfer
- the transatlantic policy transfer loop
- The Working Families Tax Credit combines the
best features of the UK's Family Credit and the
US's Earned Income Tax Credit. The most
impressive feature of this plan is that it
achieves the advantages of paying benefits
through the tax system without losing the many
desirable features of Family Credit, and without
sacrificing the simplicity of the UK tax system.
. Initial indications are that the Labour
government has taken a good programme and made it
better. - Jeffrey Liebman (Harvard), 17rd March 1998.
-
43reverse policy transfer
- the transatlantic policy transfer loop
- The Working Families Tax Credit combines the
best features of the UK's Family Credit and the
US's Earned Income Tax Credit. The most
impressive feature of this plan is that it
achieves the advantages of paying benefits
through the tax system without losing the many
desirable features of Family Credit, and without
sacrificing the simplicity of the UK tax system.
. Initial indications are that the Labour
government has taken a good programme and made it
better. - Jeffrey Liebman (Harvard), 17rd March 1998.
-
44Welfare policy transfer in the UK
- So, has the policy transfer from the US led to
good policy in the UK? - generally, YES
- simulation and evaluation evidence of improved
employment incentives - Administration delivery is working well
- Has provided key to harmonise other forms of
assistance through tax credits - Future developments planned, through the
separation of tax - credit instruments to target specific objectives
- Integrated child credit
- employment tax credit
- disablement tax credit
- childcare tax credit
-
45a global laboratory
- policy transfer extends beyond any bilateral
axis - UK policy is increasingly informed by experiences
in Canada, Australia and OECD countries - Social Security Select Committee took evidence
from welfare reforms in Australia, France,
Belgium, Canada,. - governments around the world have access to
evaluation studies and social experiments in a
global laboratory of welfare reform -
46An emerging consensus?
- Do we see any patterns or common themes in
welfare reform around the world? - in specific measures to promote employment?
- in the general structure of welfare reform?
-
-
47An emerging consensus?
- Do we see any patterns or common themes in
welfare reform around the world? - in specific measures to promote employment?
- in the general structure of welfare reform?
-
-
48An emerging consensus?
- Do we see any patterns or common themes in
welfare reform around the world? - in specific measures to promote employment?
- in the general structure of welfare reform?
- Specific programs to promote employment
- active labour market programs
- mutual obligation and conditionality of welfare
support - targetted employment-contingent payments
-
49An emerging consensus?
- Do we see any patterns or common themes in
welfare reform around the world? - in specific measures to promote employment?
- in the general structure of welfare reform?
-
-
50An emerging consensus?
- Do we see any patterns or common themes in
welfare reform around the world? - in specific measures to promote employment?
- in the general structure of welfare reform?
- General patterns in tax and welfare reform
- simplification of income support delivery
- clarity of aims and policy objectives
- coherency of tax and welfare systems
- modularity in structure of income support
-
51Active labour market programs
- Many such programs exist
- New Deal, Job Clubs in the UK
- New Deal and Enterprise Zones in US
- JET and Working Nation programs in Australia
- ALMP in Sweden, France, Poland...
- Key concerns
- difficult to evaluate the success of active
labour market programs - most evaluation evidence indicates that New Deal
programs are expensive - (eg.) NDLP in the UK - 20 additional jobs
gained at a cost of 20,000 (Aus50,000) per job
52Mutual obligation
- Not a new concept
- in 16th Century England, the death penalty was
introduced for those able but unwilling to work - Under the Thatcher administration, an emphasis
was placed on individual responsibilities for
finding employment (on your bike, Sir Norman
Tebbitt) - Blair emphasises rights and responsibilities,
and the social contract. - JSA is
conditioned on mandatory participation in New
Deal programs - In the US, mutual obligation is more stringent
- mandatory job search, time limitations on
welfare - Key challenges
- framing mutual obligation policies with due
concern for vulnerable groups - providing effective programs of job creation and
training.
53Employment-contingent credits and payments
- Employment tax credits and in-work benefits are
featuring more and more in modern welfare systems
around the world - - Canada (SSP), US (EITC), UK (WFTC), Belgium
(IWB), France (EC), Ireland (FIS).. - some are contingent on earned income alone (US,
France) - some include hours as well as earnings
contingencies (UK, Canada) - most are seen as efficient and effective in the
delivery of work incentives - most are now delivered as tax credits rather than
welfare payments - most run in tandem with minimum wage policies
- Key issues
- provide a route (but not the only route) to
coherency - provide a route to modularity in income support
payments
54Common themes in welfare policy reform
- Many tax systems are the product of incremental
or piecemeal reform. In many cases, the
resulting structure suffers from - a complexity in structure, with perverse
employment incentives, inefficiencies,
inconsistent EMTR patterns, incoherency of
instruments with which to target policy
objectives - Current patterns of welfare reform are moving
towards more - coherent structures of welfare support
- (eg). Employment tax credits in the UK, (eg.)
ANTS (2000) in Australia - What are the characteristics of a coherent tax
and welfare system? - separation of policy
instruments and objectives - - simplification of payment structure
- - modularity of welfare support
55Employment tax credits in the UKa move towards
coherency?
- WFTC targets payments on working families with
children - difficult separately to target the three pillars
of welfare reform - no separate employment tax credit for families
without children - New proposal
- Separate the WFTC into an Employment Tax Credit
and an Integrated Child Credit. - Implications? - a clear separation of
policy instruments and objectives - - a move towards coherency
- - the potential to build additional modules of
support onto the existing credit structure
56Employment tax credits in the UKa move towards
coherency?
57Employment tax credits in the UKa move towards
coherency?
58The ANTS (2000) reform in Australiaa move
towards coherency?
- In many respects, YES
- a simplification of twelve payments to families
children to three separate policy instruments - the system is transparent and coherent in its
family and child support measures - the post-2000 system in Australia is in many
respects an ornament to modern welfare policy - A missing pillar?
- Currently, there exists no separate policy
instrument designed specifically to promote
employment. - Introducing an employment tax credit has formed a
central part of the ongoing welfare reform debate
in Australia? - Five Economists plan,
the Reference Group on Welfare Reform
59Employment tax credits in Australiaprospects for
the future?
- what scope is there for an Employment Tax Credit
in Australia? - Lambert (2000) proposed an extension to the
existing FTB payment structure, similar in
structure to the US EITC - Duncan (2002) found the ETC to increase
employment among lone parent households by around
5 - Dawkins (2002) flagged up the possibility for
additional modular credits to sit alongside the
ETC - The debate continues...