Preconception - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 57
About This Presentation
Title:

Preconception

Description:

Preconception Care Marketing Tools. Reproductive Life Plan Toolkit ... How might incorporation of an annual preconception health care appointment impact: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: nurs89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Preconception


1
Preconception Early Prenatal Care Examining
Evidence Based Practice Strategies for KS MLC
Project
  • Ginger Breedlove PhD, CNM, ARNP, FACNM
  • Assistant Professor, KU School of Nursing
  • Nurse Midwifery Education Program Director

2
What is this all about?
3
Improving lives of women children in Kansas
  • Birth rates for 15-19 year olds 2005/2006
  • 41.4/1,000 and 42.0/1,000 respectively
  • Birth rate for unmarried women ages 15-44 at all
    time high in U.S. 50.6
  • In Kansas rate is 35 (all races)
  • Number and percentage of preterm births in Kansas
    in 2006
  • 4,824 and11.8 respectively
  • NVSR, Vol 57, (7), January 7, 2009

4
Objectives
  • Discuss Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Best
    Practice Models
  • Describe exemplary models of PNC in U.S.
  • Define access outcomes issues
  • Explore challenges
  • Enhance concept development

5
Adequacy of Prenatal Care (PNC) in KS - 2007
  • Kansas reported 39,055 live births met
    definition of PNC
  • 77 received adequate or better
  • 23 received less than adequate
  • Of this subset 16 received Inadequate PNC
  • Kansas counties with highest percentage of
    Inadequate Prenatal Care (IPNC)
  • Scott, Seward, Hamilton, average 38
  • Significant clustering of IPNC in lower southwest
    KS counties
  • Southeastern counties rate of IPNC
  • Cherokee 31
  • Other surrounding counties range 9 28
  • Jefferson Shawnee counties rate of IPNC were
    11 and 14 respectively
  • Urban county with largest index of IPNC
    Wyandotte, 29
  • KS APNC Utilization Index, 2007, CHES/KDHE
    publication, http//www.kdheks.gov/ches/

6
(No Transcript)
7
IPNC Percentage to People (2007)
  • Kansas overall rate was 6,351 pregnant women
  • Jefferson Shawnee counties 360 women
  • Lower 8 counties in Southeast KS 230 women
  • Wyandotte county 748 women

8
U.S. Trends in PNC
9
PNC by Race/Origin in U.S.
10
Young women in their teens are by far the most
likely to receive late or no prenatal care
11
Providers of PNC in KS
  • OB/GYNs
  • Family Medicine
  • ARNPs
  • CNMs
  • WHNPs
  • FNPs
  • Physician Assistants
  • Professional (lay) midwives
  • Indigenous midwives
  • Is it just a provider shortage issue? Discussion

12
Benefits of PNC
  • Early and ongoing PNC can improve pregnancy
    outcomes by
  • Assessing health risks
  • Providing health care advice
  • Assisting in supportive services
  • Managing chronic and pregnancy-related health
    conditions
  • NVSR, Vol 57, (7), January 7, 2009

13
What is EBM/EBP?
  • Evidence based medicine is a systematic approach
    to clinical problem solving which allows the
    integration of the best available research
    evidence with clinical expertise and patient
    values.
  • (Sackett DL, Strauss SE, Richardson WS, et
    al. Evidence-based medicine how to practice and
    teach EBM. London Churchill-Livingstone, 2000)

14
An example in KS
  • Hunter Health Clinic, Wichita
  • Comanzando Bien prenatal care program with focus
    on Spanish speaking pregnant women diagnosed with
    Gestational Diabetes
  • Funded by the KS Chapter MOD and other agencies
  • Other EBP examples in Kansas?

15
Five Step Model of Evidence-Based Practice
  • Convert information needs into answerable
    questions
  • Track down with maximum efficiency the best
    evidence with which to answer them
  • Critically appraise that evidence for its
    validity and usefulness for your desired outcome
  • Apply the results of this appraisal to your
    practice/project
  • Evaluate your performance

16
Create your Question
  • How would you describe a group of patients you
    are interested in OR a particular problem of
    interest?
  • What are the most important characteristics of
    the population?
  • This may include the primary topic, or
    co-existing conditions.
  • Consider how gender, age, race, payer status,
    religion, SES or other variables influence the
    desired outcome.

17
Determine an intervention, prognostic factor or
exposure
  • Which main intervention is most relevant?
  • What do you want to do for the patient? Improve
    access? Improve outcomes? Provide minimal
    services?
  • What factors may influence the outcome?
  • Co-existing problems?
  • Is there an influencing exposure delaying care?
  • Substance abuse, others

18
Comparisons of Interest
  • What is the main alternative to compare with the
    intervention?
  • Are you trying to decide between two outcomes
  • an outcome with no intervention vs. usual care
  • or two pilot interventions
  • or between multi-site outcomes
  • Your clinical question does not always need a
    specific comparison.

19
Outcomes
  • What can you hope to accomplish, measure, improve
    or affect?
  • What are you trying to do for the patient?
  • Relieve
  • Reduce
  • Improve

20
So a question might be
  • In pregnant patients with no insurance, is
    access to care through coordinated, regionalized
    services among LPHDs effective in reducing the
    rate of late entry into prenatal care?
  • See worksheet FSU College of Medicine Library
  • Question building

21
What are AMCHP Best Practice Models? (2004)
  • AMCHP defines best practices" as a continuum of
    practices, programs and policies ranging from
    promising to evidence-based to science-based.
  • A best practice could focus on the health of
    women, adolescents, young children, families, or
    children with special health care needs.
  • It could address mental health, data and
    assessment, financing, program integration,
    workforce development, emergency preparedness,
    family involvement, or a public health issue.

22
Resources for MCH Best Practices
  • MCH national database are materials published in
    2000 or later that are program practices
    evaluated to be effective, or best practices, in
    a variety of topics, including community
    programs, women's health, infant health, and
    others.
  • http//www.mchlibrary.info/action.lasso?-database
    Biblio-layoutWeb-response/databases/BibLists/b
    ib_effective.html-MaxRecordsall-DoScriptauto_s
    earch_effective-search
  • Sakala, C. Corry, M. P. Evidence-based
    maternity care What it is and what it can
    achieve. New York, NY Milbank Memorial Fund,
    2008,128 pp.
  • http//www.milbank.org/reports/0809MaternityCare/0
    809MaternityCare.html

23
MCH Preconception and PregnancyKnowledge Path
(April 2008)
  • Maternal and Child Health Library at Georgetown
    University
  • It offers a selection of current, high-quality
    resources that analyze perinatal health
    statistics, describe effective prenatal care
    programs, and report on research aimed at
    improving access to and quality of prenatal care
    and improving perinatal health outcomes.
  • A separate section lists consumer health
    resources.
  • Includes section of resources on specific aspects
    of preconception and pregnancy childbirth,
    depression, drug and alcohol use, environmental
    concerns, fertility and infertility, nutrition,
    oral health, and tobacco use.
  • http//www.mchlibrary.info/

24
Searching the Academic Literature
  • There are literally millions of published
    reports, journal articles, correspondence and
    studies available to clinicians.
  • Choosing the best resource to search is an
    important decision.
  • Large search engines will give you access to the
    primary literature.
  • CINNAHL, PubMed, OVID, MEDLINE
  • The Cochrane Library database provides access to
    systematic reviews which help summarize the
    results from a number of studies.

25
How to do an effective search
  • If you are not familiar with searching PubMed,
    you may want to use the PubMed tutorial at
    http//www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/pubmed_tutorial/m1001.h
    tml
  • If you are not familiar with searching MEDLINE in
    OVID, you may want to use the OVID tutorial at
    http//www.mclibrary.duke.edu/training/ovid
  • You can even try GOOGLE SCHOLAR as a search
    engine

26
EBP Tools Hierarchy of rigor
27
Guideline Recommendation and Evidence Grading
(GREG)
  • Evidence grade
  • I (High) the described effect is plausible,
    precisely quantified and not vulnerable to bias
  • II (Intermediate) the described effect is
    plausible but is not quantified precisely or may
    be vulnerable to bias
  • III (Low) concerns about plausibility or
    vulnerability to bias severely limit the value of
    the effect being described and quantified
  • Recommendation grade
  • A (Recommendation) there is robust evidence to
    recommend a pattern of care
  • B (Provisional recommendation) on balance of
    evidence, a pattern of care is recommended with
    caution
  • C (Consensus opinion) evidence being inadequate,
    a pattern of care is recommended by consensus

28
Common reporting terms
  • Confidence Intervals are calculated on the
    results of the data to show the strength or
    weakness of the evidence.
  • A 95 CI range means that if you were to repeat
    the same clinical trial a hundred times you can
    be 95 sure that the data would fall within the
    calculated range.
  • Odds Ratio describes the odds of an experimental
    patient suffering an adverse event relative to a
    control patient.

29
and Definitions
  • p Value refers to the probability that any
    particular outcome would have arisen by chance.
  • The smaller the p value the less likely the data
    was by chance.
  • Standard scientific practice, usually deems a p
    value of less than 1 in 20 (expressed as p.05)
    as "statistically significant"
  • The smaller the p value the higher the
    significance.
  • A p value of p.01 (less than 1 in 100) is
    considered "statistically highly significant"
  • Relative Risk is the risk of developing a disease
    in the exposed group divided by the risk of
    developing the disease in the unexposed group.

30
Article on PNC
  • Early Access to Prenatal Care Implications for
    Racial Disparity in Perinatal Mortality
  • Sub-analysis from large prospective RCT examining
    first and second trimester risk of Downs and
    NTDs
  • Conclusions Racial disparities exist in
    perinatal outcomes despite early access and entry
    to PNC
  • Healy, Malone, Sullivan, et.al. (2006) Obstetrics
    Gynecology, 107 (3), 625-31.

31
Exemplary Models of PNC
  • What are the characteristics of PNC believed to
    be of value for providers and consumers?
  • Discussion

32
LA, California
  • Developed a Comprehensive Perinatal Collaborative
    Program in LA County
  • Integrated a referral for perinatal services into
    the 2-1-1 system and serve as a main referral
    agency for entry into PNC
  • Promote risk appropriate perinatal care in early
    pregnancy and beyond for seamless integration of
    services
  • Developed Speakers Bureau
  • Preconception Care Marketing Tools
  • Reproductive Life Plan Toolkit
  • Pregnancy and Family Friendly Workplace Policies
    Brief

33
Indiana Perinatal Network (IPN)
  • Indiana Access
  • A Community Based Research Training Project
    designed to improve access to services for
    low-income pregnant women and children.

34
IPN Background
  • In 2002, after competing with more than 70 cities
    throughout the nation, Indianapolis was one of
    four chosen to participate in a community-based
    research project, known nationally as Friendly
    Access, and locally as Indiana Access.
  • This community-based research project is governed
    by the principle that the way in which people are
    treated plays a role in whether they access and
    continue to participate in primary and preventive
    health services, including prenatal care.
  • Based on the Disney Model for Customer Service

35
Indiana Access Key Findings
  • Handout from Indiana Perinatal Network Consumer
    Survey
  • How does that impact what we do and might need to
    change in Kansas?
  • Discussion

36
Arizona Perinatal Health Initiative on early PNC
  • A crucial step to improving prenatal care
    utilization is the identification of pregnant
    women early in the pregnancy (i.e. before
    conception or within the first trimester).
  • Outreach efforts are also crucial to assure that
    pregnant women receive consistent prenatal care.
  • Identification and outreach activities work
    hand-in hand.
  • For example, identifying high-risk pregnancies
    and providing outreach activities to assure
    consistent prenatal care utilization among
    high-risk pregnancies will result in better birth
    outcomes.

37
Arizona activities increase early access to PNC
  • Funded 15 high priority health departments.
  • LCHDs provide activities including pregnancy
    testing, community education, clinical services,
    information and referral
  • County develops goals depending on needs
    identified by community members, service
    providers, and medical community
  • Interventions include
  • CHWs
  • Baby Arizona, a public/private partnership
  • Public awareness campaign
  • Focus on early and consistent PNC
  • http//www.azdhs.gov/phs/owch/cpbg.htm

38
Resources from a non-profit, Public/private
collaborative
  • Additional models of exemplary MCH practice

39
Center for Health Care Inc. (CHCS) Strategies
  • Improving the quality and cost-effectiveness of
    publicly financed health care
  • Nonprofit health policy resource center dedicated
    to improving the quality and cost effectiveness
    of health care services for low-income
    populations and people with chronic illnesses and
    disabilities.
  • CHCS works directly with states and federal
    agencies, health plans, and providers to develop
    innovative programs that better serve people with
    complex and high-cost health care needs.

40
CHCS Toward Improving Birth Outcomes A BCAP
Toolkit
  • Toolkit provides a step-by-step, practical
    approach for improving birth outcomes among
    Medicaid and SCHIP enrollees.
  • It includes a simple process improvement model to
    consistently follow including
  • strategies for identification, stratification,
    outreach, and intervention, including case
    studies and communications tactics for creating
    change
  • http//www.chcs.org/publications3960/publications_
    show.htm?doc_id212947

41
(No Transcript)
42
Access
  • What are some provider and service-related
    issues, barriers, and variables related to EARLY
    access to prenatal care?

43
What about maternal characteristics?
  • Marital Status
  • For each maternal age group, unmarried status
    increase risk for LBW babies
  • Father acknowledging his child early in
    pregnancy
  • Adolescent Pregnancy
  • Increased risk for PTB, LBW, and infants die in
    first 12 months
  • Socioeconomic Status
  • Increases risk suboptimal outcome, particularly
    with PTB
  • Substance Abuse
  • Virtually EVERY illicit recreational drug
    associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes
  • Stress
  • Amount of education
  • Culture and Tradition
  • Pregnancy Wantedness
  • Interpregnancy Interval Highest Rate Late Entry
    PNC

44
Association of Preconception Care and Early PNC
  • 2006 Article by Liu and Li (China)
  • How might incorporation of an annual
    preconception health care appointment impact
  • Services
  • Billing
  • Staff
  • Educational Resources
  • Reduction of poor perinatal outcomes
  • Earlier entry into PNC
  • MOD Preconception Screening (See Tool)

45
Trust for Americas Health Healthy Women,
Healthy Babies
  • An ISSUE BRIEF, June 2008
  • The leading document on improving outcomes
    through incorporation of universal preconception
    care
  • ITS BEEN DONE A CERTAIN WAY FOR 40 YEARS.
    EVERY WOMAN IS SUPPOSE TO SEEK CARE DURING THE
    FIRST 3 MONTHS OF PREGNANCY. WHAT WE HAVE
    LEARNED IS THAT THIS IS GOOD -- BUT ITS NOT GOOD
    ENOUGH!
  • Magda Peck ScD, CityMatch
  • http//healthyamericans.org/reports/files/BirthOu
    tcomesLong0608.pdf

46
Factors Influencing Outcomes!
47
Outcome Measures Common Concerns
  • Where do you find reliable measures?
  • What is a comparable benchmark?
  • How long should it take?
  • What if I cant replicate the same interventions?
  • It might cost more than the accessible funds
    available.
  • The stakeholders might not be interested.
  • We dont have enough human resources to conduct
    the project.

48
Creating Process/Outcome Measures
  • Seek usefulness, not perfection.
  • Use small or repeated samples.
  • Measure over specified time and over a wide range
    of conditions.
  • Include quantitative and qualitative measures

49
PNC Determinants Outcomes
  • Goals of 90 percent have been set both for care
    beginning in the first trimester of pregnancy and
    for early and adequate prenatal care, as part of
    the Healthy People 2010 program.
  • No goal has been set for reducing late or no
    prenatal care.

50
Are outcomes just about Entry/Access of PNC?
  • Preconception and Family Planning
  • Scope of services
  • Provider collaborative
  • Awareness campaign
  • Educational and supportive services
  • Community engagement and business partners

51
Challenges ahead
52
Expecting Trouble The Myth of Prenatal Care in
America (2000)
  • by Thomas Strong, MD, MFM University of Arizona
  • What is ADEQUATE PNC?

53
Obvious challenges
  • Time
  • Money
  • Human and Nonhuman Resources
  • Geographic Distance
  • Required Partnerships
  • Issue and Outcome Measures
  • Provider types services
  • Population demographics

54
not so obvious challenges
  • Leader/Follower styles
  • Authority line
  • Hidden Influencers
  • Priority setting
  • Commitment
  • Consensus
  • Collegiality
  • Common end GOAL

55
Comments from Rural KS
  • I am from a small town in rural KS which has
    a huge population of people without insurance. I
    recently worked at a hospital where women
    frequently came in to labor with no prenatal care
    whatsoever. This was because they could not
    afford insurance. Some had no complications, but
    many had complications that could have been
    prevented. Many just needed medications and could
    not afford them. How can this be happening to
    women and babies in America? This is a HUGE
    problem that needs to be addressed and changed.
  • Masters student in NRSG 835 Spring, 2009 online
    Primary Care of Women Course, KUMC/KUSON

56
Next Steps
  • State the problem or outcome and construct your
    clinical question(s)
  • Determine the main interventions are you
    considering
  • Reflect on Greatest Impact -- Percentages and
    People
  • Investigate evidence based intervention, exposure
    or actions addressing your defined
    question/outcomes
  • Implement and monitor your intervention
  • Evaluate your outcomes
  • Consider comparison data

57
Discussion and Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com