WISE USE (Hardly) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

WISE USE (Hardly)

Description:

There is nothing new about extremism in American environmental politics ... When water was taken from the Sacramento River to save salmon, it endangered her ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: JohnK131
Category:
Tags: use | wise | hardly

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WISE USE (Hardly)


1
WISE USE (Hardly)
  • The Right Wing Campaign
  • For the Environment

2
(No Transcript)
3
Wise Use Defined
  • Term adopted from a motto by Gifford Pinchot
    the first chief of the U.S. Forest Service during
    the Progressive Era
  • Conservation is the Wise Use of Resources
  • Thus, the term wise use is a synonym for
    conservation
  • The current anti-environmental moment holds
    Pinchot as just another bureaucrat who believed
    conservation had to come through government
    control of resources

4
The Property Basis
5
Interlocking Groups
6
Their Tactics
  • They seize on emotional local issues, send in
    their professional rabble-rousers to fire up the
    folks, and then disappear into the darkness. They
    pack public hearings and bully those who oppose
    them. Their lifestyle is mean, ugly, and
    divisive Hugh McCabe

7
Underlying Principles
  • Unlimited economic growth is possible and
    beneficial.
  • Most serious problems can be solved by
    technology.
  • Environmental and social problems can be
    mitigated by a market economy with some state
    intervention

8
The Goal
  • "Our goal is to destroy, to eradicate the
    environmental movement. We want to be able to
    exploit the environment for private gain,
    absolutely. And we want people to understand that
    this is a noble goal."

9
The Three Basis Messages
  • Conspiracy
  • Mainstream
  • Vanguard

10
Conspiracy
11
Analysis Conspiracy Message
12
Mainstream Message
13
Analysis of the Message
  • The mainstream message is Wise Use dogma packaged
    for popular consumption
  • It is Wise Use with a moderate face, carefully
    calculated to appeal to the broadest possible
    audience
  • A prime example of the moderate message is a
    recent statement of the Wise Use Movement's core
    principles

14
Wise Use Core Principles
  • Man and nature can live together in productive
    harmony
  • Human values, culture and tradition are more
    important than other living creatures
  • Economic activity should not be damaged to
    protect nature. Nature can be properly protected
    by wise management of economic activity
  • Nature can be properly protected by wise
    management of economic activity

15
Vanguard Message
16
Analysis Vanguard Message
  • The vanguard message is the central precept of
    the movement's national organizers. In the early
    stages of the development of the Wise Use
    Movement, it occupied center stage and was used
    to organize an elite group of "true believers"
    under the Wise Use tent. The vanguard message is
    still used to keep the core right wingers within
    the movement, and it reflects the true philosophy
    of the movement's national leaders.

17
Unique Movement?
18
Unique Movement
  • There is nothing new about extremism in American
    environmental politics
  • Many organizations, under the leadership of
    people such as James Watt, advocate the
    exploitation of public lands
  • These organization were typically Midwest or
    West small in number and loud in voice
  • What is new is the success that the
    anti-environmental movement has had in
    popularizing their message

19
The Propaganda
20
Propaganda?
  • Steve Nelson of Burnt Ranch, California. Nelson
    is a rancher who owns property adjacent to a
    National Forest. Nelson learned that the Forest
    Service was resurveying his area because
    topographical maps of the area were incorrect.
    When the survey was completed, the Forest Service
    claimed Nelson's property and that of two of his
    neighbors, were in the National Forest. The
    government promptly served Nelson with an
    eviction notice and put a sign on his front lawn
    reading "Property of the National Forest
    Service."

21
Propaganda Property
22
Propaganda - Ranchers
  • Sue Sutton of California. Sue Sutton is a farmer
    in California. When water was taken from the
    Sacramento River to save salmon, it endangered
    her farm. She said on ABC News "Are we going to
    sacrifice human beings for a fish or a bird or a
    snake or a rat? We need to ask ourselves that
    question."

23
The Common Theme
24
The Real Environment Groups
  • "True-Blue Greens (11 percent) are the committed
    environmentalists. They are convinced that
    individual actions can make a difference in
    protecting the environment. They believe that
    economic development should not take precedence
    over environmental protection. They also express
    strong support for all kinds of pro-environmental
    regulations, regardless of extra cost or
    inconvenience.

25
Environmentalists The Sprouts
  • The Sprouts (26 percent) represent the key swing
    group in a movement toward a green consumer
    society. On the one hand, Sprouts are concerned
    about the environment and support many regulatory
    measures, although to a lesser degree than the
    True-Blues and the Greenbacks. But on the other
    hand, they do not believe strongly that
    individuals can do a lot about environmental
    problems, they are also less certain about which
    side to take when confronted with the trade-off
    between protecting the environment and
    encouraging economic development.

26
And the Grousers
27
Largest Group -Your Basic Browns
  • Basic Browns (28 percent) are characterized by
    the virtual absence of any pro-environmental
    activities. But unlike the Grousers, the Basic
    Browns do not rationalize their behavior or point
    to the alleged shortcomings of other people...the
    indifference of the Basic Browns is further
    evident in their lack of support for government
    regulation. This group has the least exposure to
    information about the environment, from whatever
    source. It is little surprise then, that most
    Browns admit they are confused about what is good
    and what is bad for the environment.

28
And, Of Course, The Undecided
  • Roper reports that 11 percent of those surveyed
  • A. Expressed no preference or opinion
  • B Did not know what the environment is, or
  • Did not care

29
Profile True/Blue Greens
  • "...a higher socioeconomic status than other
    Americans. They are well-educated (50 percent
    college educated) and have the highest median
    household income (32,100) of the five groups.
    There are more executives and professionals among
    them than among any other group. They are also
    more cosmopolitan, being concentrated in large
    urban markets. Interestingly, the oldest median
    age (44 years) and the highest percentages of
    women and of part-time workers are also found
    among the True-Blue Greens. Regionally, the
    True-Blue Greens are more likely to be from the
    Northeast

30
Profile The Greens and Sprouts
  • Median high to higher socio-economic status
  • Well educated generally university degrees
  • Many executives and professionals
  • More cosmopolitan generally concentrated in
    urban areas
  • Highest percent of women of any environmental
    group
  • Most concentrated in the Northeast

31
Profile The Browns
32
Off Limits Wilderness Area
33
Exxon Valdez
  • How dare you city-bred, upper middle class
    assholes, with all your high education, put these
    decent people into economic peril

34
The 1997 Roper Study on the Environment
35
The Price We Pay
  • More dramatically, 38 percent of the least
    wealthy Americans, but only 21 percent of the
    most affluent, feel environmental degradation is
    the price we have to pay for progress."

36
Household Incomes
  • Over a third of Americans who have annual
    household incomes of less than 24,000 (36
    percent) feel economic security must come before
    environmental concerns can be addressed, compared
    to only a quarter of those earning at least
    50,000 per year (24 percent).

37
We Must Use Natural Resources in a Wise Way to
Survive
  • If environmentalism were to acknowledge our
    necessary use of the earth, its ideology would
    lose its meaning. To recognize the legitimacy of
    the human use of the earth would be to accept the
    unavoidable environmental damage that is the
    price of our survival. Once that price is
    acceptable, the moral framework of
    environmentalist ideology becomes irrelevant and
    the issues become technical and economic

38
The Growing Political Message of Wise Use and the
Browns
  • Environmentalists tend to be catastrophists,
    believing that any human use of the earth is
    "damage" and massive human use of the earth is "a
    catastrophe." An environmentalist motto is "We
    all live downstream," the viewpoint of helpless
    or vengeful victims
  • Environmentalists tend to be catastrophists,
    believing that any human use of the earth is
    "damage" and massive human use of the earth is "a
    catastrophe." An environmentalist motto is "We
    all live downstream," the viewpoint of helpless
    or vengeful victims

39
We learn about the world through trial and error
  • The universe did not come with a set of
    instructions, nor did our minds.
  • We cannot see the future. Thus, the only way we
    humans can learn about our surroundings is
    through trial and error.
  • Environmental ideology fetishizes nature to the
    point that eco-activists will not permit others
    to make errors with the environment, dead-ending
    in no trials and no learning
  • The point of learning is to find better ways to
    use the earth, not to prevent all use of the
    earth. The ideal is productive harmony between
    man and nature, a concept formalized in the
    National Environmental Policy Act.

40
Mans Reworking of the Earth is Problematic and
Benevolent
Of the ideas behind wise use, this is the most
oracular. Humanity is itself revolutionary and
problematic. Problems are our milieu. Danger is
our forte. We win some, we lose some. We don't
give up. Humanity may ultimately prove to be a
force of nature forwarding some cosmic teleology
of which we are yet unaware. Or not. Humanity may
be the universe awakening and becoming conscious
of itself. Or not. Our reworking of the earth may
be of the utmost evolutionary benevolence and
importance. Or not. The only way to see the
future is to be there.
41
Some Other Organizations
  • The Blue Ribbon Coalition Working for
    unrestricted motorized access across American
    public lands
  • The Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise
    Wise Use umbrella groupThe American Lands
    Association Defending property rights at the
    cost of public rights
  • Heritage Foundation Think tank for ultra
    right-wing issuesMountain Legal States
    Foundation Law firm defending wise-use property
    rights

42
And A Couple More Groups
  • The National Center for Public Policy Research
    Wise use conservative free market foundation
  • American Forest Paper Association National
    group representing paper products industry
  • Alliance for America Largest umbrella group in
    wise use movement

43
Conclusions
  • I am reminded of a short story entitled Those
    Who Walk Away From Omelas
  • Who are the true environmentalists?
  • Are environmentalist elite radicals?
  • Are most anti-environmental movements associated
    with rural people?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com