The Challenges for LSR Rebecca L' Malay Director, Advocacy and Development Cooperation, Philippine R - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

The Challenges for LSR Rebecca L' Malay Director, Advocacy and Development Cooperation, Philippine R

Description:

X of the 1987 Constitution states that 'legislative bodies of local governments ... communities, differently-abled persons, senior citizens, victims of calamities ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Owne782
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Challenges for LSR Rebecca L' Malay Director, Advocacy and Development Cooperation, Philippine R


1
The Challenges for LSRRebecca L. MalayDirector,
Advocacy and Development Cooperation,Philippine
Rural Reconstruction MovementSecretary General,
Consortium on Electoral Reform
  • Legal bases
  • Salient Features
  • Issues

2
The Legal Bases for LSR
  • Section 9, Art. X of the 1987 Constitution states
    that legislative bodies of local governments
    shall have sectoral representation as may be
    prescribed by law.

3
Legal Bases for the LSR
  • Section 41( c) of R.A. No. 7160 or the LGC, on
    the other hand, states that there shall be one
    (1) sectoral representative from the women, one
    (1) from the workers, and one (1) from any of the
    following sectors the urban poor, indigenous
    cultural communities, disabled persons, or any
    other sector as may be determined by the
    sanggunian concerned within ninety (90) days
    prior to the holding of the next local elections
    as may be provided for by law. It also states
    that COMELEC shall promulgate the rules and
    regulations to effectively provide for the
    election of such sectoral representatives.

4
Legal Bases for the LSR
  • In 1995, Congress enacted R.A. No. 7887, which
    instituted certain electoral reforms. The last
    par. of Sec. 1 thereof states that the COMELEC
    shall promulgate rules and regulations to
    effectively implement the provisions of law which
    may hereafter be enacted providing for the
    election of sectoral representatives.

5
Salient Features of the Bill
  • Election of (3) sectoral representatives each in
    the Sangguniang Panlalawigan, Sangguniang Bayan
    and Sangguniang Panlungsod
  • One (1) from the women sector
  • one (1) from the workers and

6
  • one (1) from any of the following sectors
    indigenous cultural communities,
    differently-abled persons, senior citizens,
    victims of calamities and disasters, children and
    urban poor, or any other sector as may be
    determined by the sanggunian concerned not later
    than one (1) year prior to the holding of the
    next local elections Provided that, such third
    sector shall likewise belong to the marginalized
    sectors of society

7
Salient features of the Bill
  • In cases of provinces, cities and municipalities
    with more than one district, sectoral
    representatives shall be elected at large.
  • The third sector already determined by the
    sanggunian shall remain in force unless the
    sanggunian concerned determines a new sector. In
    the event that the sanggunian fails to determine
    the third sector in the first sectoral elections,
    the third sector shall be contested by any of the
    other sectors enumerated in this section.

8
Salient Features of the Bill
  • (b) the first election will be on the second
    Monday of May 2007 and every three years
    thereafter
  • (c) requirement of registration of sectoral
    organizations/coalitions to qualify in
    elections
  • (d) qualifications of sectoral nominees

9
Salient Features of the Bill
  • (e) forfeiture of seat by any elected sectoral
    representative who changes his organizational
    affiliation during his term of office and
  • (f) conduct of voters education.

10
The Challenges against the LSR
  • Apparent lack of interest by the Senate
  • This bill has been passed by the 12th Congress
    but it continued to be unheard in the Senate.
  • There were proponents of this bill in the Senate
    (Pangilinan, Sotto, De Castro, Legarda, Ejercito)
    but even after concerted lobby efforts by CSOs,
    the bill was not scheduled for hearing

11
Festering issues in the advocacy for LSR
  • The Cost of LSR
  • Php 1,643,600,000 for 5,607 positions
  • A study done by the Local Governance Policy Forum
    in 2002 showed that based on 2000 data, LGUs are
    still very much dependent on the IRA as a main
    source of their income.
  • About 63 of the total income of all LGUs is
    derived from IRA, taxes, 21.8, 14.3 non tax
    revenues and the rest from share in the national
    wealth, 0.7

12
Festering issues
  • With the current fiscal crisis, government will
    be reluctant to pay for the cost of electing LSR
  • As it is, the proposed withholding of the IRA is
    estimated to save the government around Php 40
    billion
  • However, the IRA cuts as a deficit relief measure
    should not be an excuse not to have local
    sectoral representatives

13
Prospects
  • Hopes in the 13th Congress
  • The bill has been re-filed by De Guzman, AKBAYAN
  • No author has yet been identified in the Senate
    but CSOs will continue to lobby Sens.
    Pangilinan,Ejercito who were the bills authors
    in the last senate

14
Who wins?
  • Participatory local governance
  • More people will find their voices heard
  • Adequate representation will result to greater
    benefits to sectors in their own territories
  • Government is closer to the people and is made to
    respond immediately to peoples needs
  • Promotes broader autonomy
  • Development of new local leaders

15
Who loses?
  • Selfish political interests local traditional,
    patronage-based politics
  • Incompetent local leaders
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com