Title: The Role of Dietary Interventions and Dietary Supplements in Breast Cancer Management
1The Role of Dietary Interventions and Dietary
Supplements in Breast Cancer Management
- Cynthia Thomson, PhD, RD
- Associate Professor
- Nutritional Sciences,
- Public Health,
- and Medicine
- University of Arizona
- cthomson_at_u.arizona.edu
2Over 10.5M cancer survivors Comprise 3-4 of
U.S. population
Data source 2005 Submission. U.S. estimated
prevalence counts were estimated by applying U.S.
populations to SEER 9 and historical Connecticut
Limited Duration Prevalence proportions and
adjusted to represent complete prevalence.
Populations from January 2003 were based on the
average of 2002 and 2003 population estimates
from the U.S. Bureau of the Census
3ESTIMATED OF PERSONS ALIVE DIAGNOSED W/CANCER
BY SITE
Data source 2005 Submission. U.S. estimated
prevalence counts were estimated by applying U.S.
populations to SEER 9 and historical Connecticut
Limited Duration Prevalence proportions and
adjusted to represent complete prevalence.
Populations from January 2003 were based on the
average of 2002 and 2003 population estimates
from the U.S. Bureau of the Census
4AT RISK LIFESTYLE MODULATION OF BREAST CANCER
RISK
- New York Breast Cancer Study
- Lifetime risk among female BRCA mutation
carriers 82 - Delayed onset among probands was demonstrated
for - Physically active during adolescence
- Healthy weight at menstruation onset
- Healthy weight at age 21
- Implies lifestyle can modify risk in at-risk
subjects
King, MC et al, Science, vol 302, pp. 643- 646,
October, 2003
5WEIGHT AND BREAST CANCER KEY ISSUES
- Higher BMI associated with increased risk of
breast cancer after menopause - Higher BMI in childhood, pre-menopausal
associated with decreased risk - Weight change over adulthood
- Weight gain of 21 kg over adult life has been
associated with an almost 75 increase in risk
for developing breast cancer - Inconsistent weight and risk of recurrent
disease
6WEIGHT GAIN DURING TREATMENT
- Women who gain weight during treatment have
reduced long term survival - Less of an issue with current treatment
- Unique weight gain significant gain in body fat
and loss of lean mass (sarcopenia) - Change from baseline may be most significant
factor - Evidence of reduced REE (metabolism) during
treatment - Interventions focused on diet and physical
activity have proven successful to prevent weight
gain - If exercise is included
- Best with regular RD counseling (face-to-face)
7BODY COMPOSITION CHANGE AFTER DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST
CANCER
Adjuvant Chemotherapy (CT) vs. Radiation (XRT)
alone
Fat Mass CT
Lean Mass XRT
Fat Mass XRT
Lean Mass CT
Baseline
6 Months
12 Months
Demark-Wahnefried W et al. J Clin Oncol. 192381,
2001
8PROPOSED MODEL TO EXPLAIN WEIGHT GAIN IN BREAST
CANCER
Chemotherapy
? Ovarian Function
? Physical Activity
? Muscle Mass
? Metabolic Rate
? Energy Needs
Weight Gain
Stable Energy Intake
Harvie et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat.83201,
2004.
9TOTAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY BEFORE AND AFTER BREAST
CANCER DIAGNOSIS
Hours/week
Age in Years
10Total Physical Activity Before and After Breast
Cancer Diagnosis by Treatment
Hours/week
Age in Years
11Why weight control and physical activity?
- Reduced levels of circulating hormones
- Reduced levels of insulin and insulin-like growth
factors - Reduced levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines
(immune cells) - May improve bioavailability of drugs to treat
disease (Tamoxifen, AIs, Chemo, etc) - Improved psychosocial well being / QOL
12Low Fat Diet Physical Activity as Regulators
of Insulin
OBESE INDIVIDUAL HIGH Fasting Insulin LOW Fasting
Ghrelin BLUNTED feedback response to meal
consumption resulting in satiety HIGH
Adiposity UNSTABLE Glucose/Insulin
Regulation HIGHER Estradiol, IGF-1, Insulin levels
High Risk Breast Cancer Recurrence
LEAN INDIVIDUAL LOW Fasting Insulin HIGH Fasting
Ghrelin INTACT feedback response LOW
Adiposity STABLE Glucose/Insulin Regulation LOWER
Estradiol, IGF-1, Insulin levels
45 of BrstCaSurvivors w/BMI gt 25 undiagnosed
metabolic syndrome
Low Risk Breast Cancer Recurrence
Impact of Dietary Intervention on Breast Cancer
Promoters
13METABOLIC SYNDROME IN BREAST CANCER SURVIVORS
- Study Mean (SD) (n42)
- Fasting glucose (mg/dl)
98.7 (12.9)OGTT at 2hrs (N23)
119.0 (32.4)Insulin
(uU/ml)
16.1 (13.2)Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c,
) 6.0 (0.53) - Triglycerides (TG, mg/dl)
129.4 (55.72)Total cholesterol (mg/dl)
199.9 (33.69)HDL
cholesterol (mg/dl)
57.7 (17.46)LDL cholesterol (mg/dl)
116.4 (28.60) - C-reactive protein (hsCRP, mg/L)
5.12 (5.31)Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
129.9 (18.13)Diastolic blood pressure
(mmHg) 79.1 (11.45) - Metabolic SyndromeNCEP ATP III revised criteria
23 (53.5)TG/HDL
12 (27.9)
14Change in Weight with Change in Diet
JAMA 2006 295 39-49
15Prevention of Frailty in Breast Cancer Survivors
- Goal Determine if muscle health physical
function can be improved w/weight bearing
exercise - Intervention
- Group based flexibility, balance, and muscle
strength training 2 days per week at UMC Health
and Wellness Center - Home based aerobic training 3-5 days per week
- Who Is Eligible?
- Overweight breast cancer survivors with early
stage disease - Post-menopausal
- Currently inactive or minimally active
- Those not currently on weight loss diet
- Willing to perform moderate exercise most days of
the week for 8 weeks - Willing to come to UMC Health and Wellness Center
2 days per week - Contact Jennifer W. Bea, PhD at 520-626-0912 or
jwright_at_azcc.arizona.edu
16 Womens Intervention Nutrition Study (WINS)
- HYPOTHESIS
- Dietary fat reduction will reduce the
incidence of recurrence and increase survival for
women treated for early stage breast cancer.
17WINS TRIAL DESIGN
Dietary Intervention (n975) to reduce fat intake
- Women 48-79 yrs
- Early breast cancer
- Primary surgery /- R
- Systemic therapy
- Dietary fat intake gt 20 of
calories -
Randomization 6040 within 365 days from 1o
surgery n2437
Control (n1462)
Recruitment 1994-2001 Median follow-up 60 months
18WINS Inclusion Criteria
- Women 48 to 79 years of age
- Histologically confirmed, resected, unilateral
invasive breast cancer - Lymph nodes examined
- Acceptable adjuvant systemic therapy
- Dietary fat intake gt 20 of calories
- Able to accept either randomization
- Provide informed consent
19WINS Fat Gram Intake by Treatment Group
300 kcals fat/d of 1850 total kcals
Significantly different by T test from control
and baseline, plt0.0001
20WINS Relapse Free Survival
Diet Control HR, 95 CI
P-value 96/975 181/1462 0.76,
0.60-0.98 0.034
PATIENTS ()
Absolute difference 1
3
3
3
4
7
YEARS
Diet 975 949 907
807 647 490 342
201 96 Control 1462
1416 1352 1197 965
756 529 326 151
From adjusted Cox proportional hazards model
including stratification factors, ER status,
tumor size, and surgery (mastectomy/lumpectomy),
p value 0.067 by unadjusted log rank
test Chlebowski, Blackburn, Elashoff, et al Proc
Amer Soc Clin Oncol 2410, 2005
21WINS Relapse Rate Curve for ER
WINS RFS In ER Positive
Diet Control HR, 95 CI
P-value 68/770 122/1189 0.85, 0.63-1.14
0.277
PATIENTS ()
Control ------ Diet _____
Absolute difference 1
2
1
2
2
YEARS
Diet 770 753 725
641 512 385 265
156 71 Control 1189 1165
1122 995 802 613
440 271 125
P-value from adjusted Cox proportional hazard
model Chlebowski, Blackburn, Elashoff, et al
Proc Amer Soc Clin Oncol 2410, 2005
22WINS RFS In ER Negative
Diet Control HR, 95 CI P-value 28/205
59/273 0.58,0.37-0.91 0.018
Control ------ Diet _____
PATIENTS ()
Absolute difference6
6
8
11
11
YEARS
Diet 205 196 182
166 135 105 77
45 25 Control
273 205 230 203
163 133 88 55
26
P-value from adjusted Cox proportional hazard
model
Chlebowski, Blackburn, Elashoff, et al Proc Amer
Soc Clin Oncol 2410, 2005
23 Plant Foods and Breast Cancer Recurrence
24Oxidant Stress?
Inflammation
Milner JA. J Nutr 20041342492S.
25WHEL Diet
Healthy cancer prevention diet
One of the diets was more intensive than the
other.
Women who enrolled in the study were randomly
assigned to one of two healthy cancer prevention
diets
NCI-Based Diet
Healthy cancer prevention diet
26WHEL Study CONSORT Flow Diagram
Pierce JP et al JAMA 2007 298(3)
27DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE WHEL COHORT
28CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE WHEL COHORT
29(No Transcript)
30DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL BY INTERVENTION ARM
STAGE AT DIAGNOSIS
Solid line Comparison Dashed line WHEL
31OVERALL SURVIVAL BY INTERVENTION ARM STAGE AT
DIAGNOSIS
Solid line Comparison Dashed line WHEL
32CAROTENOIDS AND RECURRENCE-FREE SURVIVAL COHORT
STUDY
- Subjects assigned to the control group in the
Womens Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study
women in that group did not change their diets in
response to study participation - 1,551 women followed for a median of 7 years
- Early-stage (Stage I, II or IIIA) breast cancer,
who were within four years post-diagnosis at
randomization (between 3/1995 and 11/2000), and
had completed initial treatments - 205 women had a breast cancer recurrence or a new
primary breast cancer before July 31, 2004 that
was medically confirmed by mid-November 2004
33Cox Proportional Hazards Model Breast Cancer
Endpoint
Controlled for age at diagnosis, clinical
center, plasma cholesterol, BMI, tumor hormone
receptor status, and adjuvant chemotherapy.
34Does the WHEL diet Modulate Biomarkers of
Oxidative Stress?
- Sub-study of 204 WHEL study participants
- 24 urine analyzed for
- 8-Epi-prostaglandin-F-2a8-hydroxy-2-deoyguano
sine - Results
- Low baseline oxidative stressTrend toward
reduction by treatment group (non-significant)8
EPG 8 OHdG inversely associated w/ vitamin E
intake8-EPG positively associated with BMI
polyunsaturated fatIncreased 8OHdG w/ increase
arachidonic acid intake higher BMI
Thomson CA, Guiliano AR, Shaw J et al Nutr Cancer
200551(2)146-54
35BREAST CANCER DIETARY BIOMARKERS AS PREDICTORS
OF DISEASE RECURRENCE
- 317 cases
- median of 8 years post-diagnosis
- Increased risk of recurrence associated with
highest (vs. lowest) tertile of plasma
lipoperoxide (RR 2.1, 95 CI 1.1, 4.0) - and alpha-tocopherol (RR 1.7, 95 CI 1.0, 3.0)
concentrations - (Saintot et al. Int J Cancer 200297574)
36BASELINE ESTROGENS (IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN) AND
RECURRENCE NESTED CASE CONTROL ANALYSIS
- Estradiol pg/ml HR - 1.51
- Free E2 HR pg/ml HR - 1.36
- Bioavailable E2 pg/ml HR - 1.41
- Significant reduction associated with increase in
dietary fiber intake - Reductions in estrogen also shown with dietary
fat reduction when habitual diet is high in fat
(gt 40 total energy)
Rock CL, CEBP, 2008 Rock CL, J Clin Oncol, 2004
37Effect of WHEL Diet Intervention on Serum
Estrogen-related Hormones
Rock CL, Flatt S and Thomson CA et al. J Clin
Oncol 2004
38Indole-3-carbinol chemoprotective actions
- Anti-estrogenic effect
- Inhibit growth of ER human breast cancer cells
- Enhanced effect of Tamoxifen (Cover et al, 1999)
- Stimulate apoptosis of ER- human breast cancer
cells - Reduced adduct formation
- Induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest
- Anti-proliferation
- Up-regulation of tumor suppressor gene PTEN and
adhesion molecule E-cadherin - Anti-angiogenesis
39CRUCIFEROUS VEGETABLES, TAM AND BREAST CANCER
RECURRENCE
Unpublished data from WHEL study population,
Thomson CA, 2008
40DIETARY SUPPLEMENT USE AMONG BREAST CANCER
SURVIVORS
- Norm not exception (gt 80 of patients)
- Used to treat symptoms and to reduce perceived
risk of recurrence - Use greatest among physically active, nl BMI,
non-smokers, low fat diet, higher education - Polysupplementation more common in those with
metastatic disease, fatigue, cancer-related pain - 50 of patients on chemotherapy
- Report higher QOL
- Bardia et al. J Supportive Oncol, 2007 Politi et
al. Supportive Care Ca, 2006 Velicer C and
Ulirch, J Clin Oncol, 2008
41Evidence? Or lack thereof?
- Limited well-designed studies no conclusive
evidence to date - Symptoms
- Ginger nausea
- Melatonin sleep
- Black cohosh, soy hot flashes
- Alpha-lipoic acid neurotoxicity
- Coenzyme Q-10 - cardiotoxicity
- Secondary prevention
- Antioxidants
- Fish oil
- Turmeric
42VITAMIN D SUPPLEMENTATION AND RESPONSE TO AI
REASON FOR CONCERN?
- Aromatase inhibitors widely used to treat ER
disease - AI inhibits estrogen biosynthesis via inhibition
of P450 aromatase, encoded by CYP19 gene - AIs lead to bone loss
- Many breast cancer survivors advised to take
vitamin D for bone health - Vitamin D stimulates CYP19 transcription and
aromatase activity
Letter to editor Dizdar, The Breast, 2008
43Folate vs Folic Acid
- Dietary intake food fortification
- Fortification increased folic acid intake by
approx. 200 µg/day - Dietary sources folate
- Multivitamin use and fortified cereals primary
sources of exposure - Alcohol use effect modification
- Risk promoting of etoh can be reduced if diet is
sufficient in folate - Gene-diet interactions
- DHFR 19-bp deletion polymorphism high folic
acid may increase risk
44ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Mentors David Alberts Cheryl
Ritenbaugh Anna Guiliano John
Pierce Collaborators Cheryl Rock
Bette Caan Patty Thompson Alison
Stopeck Iman Hakim Emily Ho
Funding NCI K07 Award Pierce RO1 Susan G.
Komen Atkins Foundation
Staff /Students Emily Nardi Julie West
Jennifer Wright Bea Letitia McCune Nicole
Stendell-Hollis Jessie Miller Amy Butalla
45Questions?