Transportation Task Force Preliminary Report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Transportation Task Force Preliminary Report

Description:

... saving measures for our transportation system and the best delivery schedule. ... With such a large increase what are you planning to buy? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: mikeandthe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transportation Task Force Preliminary Report


1
Transportation Task ForcePreliminary Report
  • April 9, 2008

Task Force Officers Chairperson Vicki Bell Vice
Chairperson Keith Jackson Secretary Theresa
Millay
2
Transportation Task Force
  • Purpose To analyze the OCPS Transportation
    Department to see if there are any additional
    recommended cost savings. The committee will
    make recommendations to the School Board.
    Pursuant to the Florida Constitution and Florida
    law, the School Board will make the final
    decisions regarding any recommendations.
  • This purpose includes
  • Recommending the most ideal start times for
    elementary, middle and high school students by
    working and reworking models for the school
    transportation system. Ideas would be generated
    and researched by the TTF with the cooperation of
    the Transportation Department.
  • Review of current transportation schedules to
    determine if there are any recommended changes
    for efficiencies.
  • Review of transportation staffing levels to
    determine if there are any recommended changes
    for efficiencies.
  • Review of transportation purchasing practices to
    determine if there are any recommended changes
    for efficiencies.
  • Review of transportation maintenance practices
    including but not limited to location of bus
    compounds to determine if there are any
    recommended changes for efficiencies.

3
Transportation Task Force
  • Timeline for assignment Three months (February
    4 May 1) first report due by March 31st
    regarding any efficiencies for the coming school
    year that would impact the number of drivers
    needed.
  • Membership
  • Each board member will appoint two to three
    volunteers whom they feel would be most helpful
    on such a committee. The task force will be
    diverse.
  • Meeting Logistics
  • To start the task force will meet weekly at a
    location, time and day of the week agreed upon by
    the committee.
  • First meeting will be an organizational meeting
    on Wednesday February 4, 630 800 p.m. at the
    ELC, Conference Room A. The group will get
    acquainted, appoint a co-chairman, and appoint a
    secretary to take minutes.
  • The task force will organize tours of the Hanging
    Moss facility and other bus depot centers to
    better understand current operations.
  • Subcommittees from this group may be set up to
    work on different areas of the county and
    different aspects of the transportation service.

4
Transportation Task Force
  • Work Product
  • A report will be completed recommending the
    greatest cost saving measures for our
    transportation system and the best delivery
    schedule. This report will be presented to the
    school board within four months. The first
    presentation and recommendation will be given on
    March 31st concerning the schedule and the number
    of bus drivers needed.
  • Should the committee make any significant
    schedule or delivery change recommendation(s),
    the School Board will require public engagement
    and analysis during the 2009-2010 school year
    prior to its consideration of the
    recommendation(s).
  • The committees work shall be subject to the
    Government in the Sunshine and Florida Public
    Records laws. Should the committee have
    recommendations regarding this authorizing
    document, then the committee should provide said
    recommendations via the committees chairperson
    to the School Board for its consideration.
  • The committee will conclude its work with a final
    report no later than May 1, 2009 and will be
    dissolved effective May 2, 2009.
  • Staff Liaisons
  • Arby Creech, Transportation Director
  • Roland Moore, ICTS Sr Executive Director

5
Transportation Task Force
  • Members
  • District 1 Joie Cadle District 3 Rick
    Roach
  • Larry Kahn Jon Christensen
  • Dawn Lincoln Rick Dembrowski
  • Kit Pepper Robert Prater
  • District 2 Daryl Flynn District 4 Vicki
    Bell
  • Linda Harrell-Biggar Greg Bagby
  • Allen Murphy Matt Falconer
  • Evelyn Rivera Theresa Millay

6
Transportation Task Force
  • Members
  • District 5 Kathleen Gordon District 6 Nancy
    Robinson
  • Lecia Knighton John Freeman
  • Wanda Payton Susan Gratch
  • Sheldon Watson Jeff Hardebeck
  • District 7 Christine Moore Administrative
    Support
  • Thomas Allen Arby Creach - Transportation
  • Phil Burguire Roland Moore - IT
  • Keith Jackson

7
Transportation Task Force
Recommendation 1 (3-16-09)
  • Background
  • OCPS must comply with state and federal mandates
    regarding transportation of students with special
    needs or circumstances. Examples include
    students with special health and physical needs,
    students with behavior or emotional problems, and
    even students who are homeless, just to mention a
    few. This results in a large percentage of the
    OCPS transportation budget being used for small
    percentage of students, due to the extra costs
    involved. While it appears that the decisions
    regarding the welfare and well-being of the
    student are being handled professionally and
    correctly, there appears to be a need to add a
    layer of accountability and financial review for
    the decisions that are being made.

8
Transportation Task Force
Recommendation 1
  • OCPS create and appoint an ongoing citizen
    committee for the purposes of reviewing decisions
    regarding providing children with special
    transportation arrangements.
  • The charter of the committee would be to deliver
    oversight and a heightened awareness of
    accountability, providing the district with
    feedback regarding adherence to policies and
    mandates. It is recommended that the appointed
    citizens have some professional experience
    (counseling, teaching, business, health care,
    legal, etc.) that they will contribute in their
    voluntary capacity as committee members for two
    year appointments. The cases should all be
    reviewed without divulging actual names of
    children involved. The cases selected for review
    would be based on the most expensive instances of
    additional transportation expense. The
    administrator in charge of the OCPS
    Transportation Department should also have the
    authority to refer specific cases for review.

9
Transportation Task Force
Recommendation 1 (continued)
  • OCPS assign a social worker, either full or
    part-time as needed, to the Transportation
    Department, for the purposes of working with
    school-based social workers, to ensure that
    special case transportation needs are being
    provided in the most efficient, safe and
    economical manner.
  • The documentation should include an assessment of
    savings with supporting documentation, on a
    case-by-case basis, to ensure the cost of the
    social worker position is be covered.

10
Transportation Task Force
Recommendation 2 (3-16-08)
  • Background
  • OCPS Transportation Department staff members have
    stated that the ability to hire a larger number
    of temporary employees as drivers would produce a
    savings. Drivers with annual contracts cost more
    and reduce the flexibility that Transportation
    management needs to handle uncertain financial
    times and fluctuating enrollments. The staff has
    stated one of the problems is that the labor pool
    is very small for people qualified and willing to
    work part-time as a bus driver.

11
Transportation Task Force
Recommendation 2 (3-16-08)
  • Recommendation
  • Ask the Florida Legislature to EXCLUDE part-time
    earnings paid by public school systems from
    impacting someones unemployment benefits.
    Basically, it would allow people on unemployment
    to work PART TIME as a substitute, crossing
    guard, bus driver, etc. without the risk of
    losing their unemployment.

12
Transportation Task Force
Recommendation 2 (3-16-08)
  • Recommendation
  • Benefits to schools It will expand the labor
    pool in these areas to include more qualified
    people. It will also enable more part-time
    (i.e., non-contract people) in the bus driver
    area at a time when the uncertainty of hiring
    needs make commitments to contract employees
    unemployment that there might be additional work
    available at the school districts, then if should
    provide a steady stream of applicants without the
    expense of advertising. There are 63,000 people
    in Orange County currently on unemployment, many
    of whom would bring valuable skills
    (technological skills, current CDL) to the
    positions of substitutes and bus drivers.
  • Benefits to individuals A mini-stimulus
    package, enabling people to increase their
    earnings while waiting for other full-time
    employment to become available.
  • Cost NOTHING
  • Savings OCPS would save money by employing
    persons on a temporary basis. expensive. Also,
    if the unemployment offices will simply inform
    those people on

13
Transportation Task Force
Recommendation 3 (3-16-08)
  • Background
  • OCPS Transportation staff members state that
    deadhead miles (buses driving solely to secure
    fuel rather than transport students) add an
    approximate 1.6 million dollar annual cost to
    the Transportation Department budget. These
    miles result from lack of strategically located
    fueling compounds. The cost of creating the
    stations can be covered by capital funds, as
    opposed to operating funds, which are more
    available at this time, possibly through federal
    stimulus money.

14
Transportation Task Force
Recommendation 3 (3-16-08)
  • Recommendation
  • Finalize efforts to secure three fueling stations
    with bus parking West Orange, Apopka and East
    Orange (Columbia is currently underway). Request
    both the OCPS Superintendent and the School Board
    members make this a priority, in anticipation of
    having three strategically placed stations in
    operation for the start of the 2009-2010 school
    year. Options include self-contained fuel units
    that are placed on concrete pads, a
    public/private partnership with an existing fuel
    source. (Please reference Case Study entitled
    Business Case for Refueling at Remote Locations,
    OCPS Transportation Department)

15
Transportation Task Force
Recommendation 4 (3-16-08)
  • Background
  • State tax on diesel fuel is currently 2.98 per
    gallon. OCPS uses approximately 2.7 million
    gallons of diesel fuel per year. By using
    non-taxed red diesel fuel, OCPS could save
    approximately 1 million dollars.
  • Recommendation
  • Request OCPS petition the Florida Legislature to
    exempt public school transportation from state
    sales tax on fuel. If passed, this will enable
    OCPS to use red diesel and save approximately
    .30 per gallon of fuel and approximately one
    million dollars annually.

16
Transportation Task Force
Recommendation 10 (3-25-09)
  • Background
  • OCPS must comply with state and federal mandates
    regarding transportation of students with special
    needs or circumstances. In addition to that,
    there are a number of elective programs that the
    OCPS supports or provides, which are not state or
    federally mandated. It is recognized that these
    programs may be beneficial to the overall social
    welfare of the community however, given the
    budgetary constraints that the OCPS is facing, it
    may not be practical to continue to providing
    transportation services for optional programs.

17
Transportation Task Force
Recommendation
  • It is recommended that the OCPS eliminate
    transportation services for the following
    programs, unless or until other funding
    opportunities are available to the OCPS
  • EXCEL Program (approximate annual savings of
    527,000)
  • MSPA Program (approximate annual savings of
    321,000)
  • School to Work Program (approximate annual
    savings of 435,000)
  • Acceleration Academy Program (approximate annual
    savings of 219,000)
  • Magnet Program (approximate annual savings of
    1,600,000). It is recognized that this
    elimination may already be in progress.
  • Tech Center Shuttles (approximate annual savings
    of 405,000)
  • Academic Shuttles (approximate annual savings of
    113,000)
  • 9th Grade Center Shuttles (approximate annual
    savings of 32,000)
  • Shorten Days (approximate annual savings of
    81,000)
  • (It is noted that the approximate savings are
    based upon current expenditures which can vary
    year to year.)

18
Transportation Task Force
  • As part of this recommendation, it is further
    requested that the Transportation department
    and/or other OCPS staff review and identify
    potential alternatives for students affected by
    these transportation cuts, including but not
    limited to
  • Identifying public transportation alternatives
    that may be available
  • Identification of potential for web or on-line
    opportunities to eliminate the need for actual
    transport to access the program
  • Initiate discussions and provide forum for
    individual users to coordinate among one another
    to share rides and/or usage of privately
    delivered transportation services.

19
Transportation Task Force
Recommendation 10 (3-25-09)
  • Background
  • OCPS must comply with state and federal mandates
    regarding transportation of students with special
    needs or circumstances. Based upon data provided
    by the OCPS Transportation Department, the most
    expensive mandatory programs transportation
    services include the ESE and Alternative
    Education programs. Approximately 24 million
    annually is expended between these two programs,
    serving approximately 525 routes daily. That is
    a cost of over 45,000 per route per year. On
    the surface, it appears that a more economical
    alternative might be considered to serve these
    students.

20
Transportation Task Force
Recommendation
  • Appoint a task force to review and identify
    potential options to continue to meet the intent
    of the mandates at a more reasonable cost to the
    OCPS, including, but not limited to items such as
    the following
  • Privatization of services and/or use of
    recognized and qualified providers
  • May include bussing and/or support staff
    necessary on the bus
  • Home schooling and/or review of other
    opportunities for education not requiring or
    reducing transportation services (on-line, home
    visits, partial at-home and partial at-school
    programs to reduce transportation needs in any
    given week, etc.)
  • Request parents provide the support and/or
    necessary medically trained staff on their
    childs bus ride, in lieu of the OCPS providing.
  • Identification of potential revisions to
    state/federal mandates to release some of the
    more difficult provisions of the bill or statue
    language (i.e., eliminate the need for the OCPS
    to provide medically trained staff on the bus
    with the student and make it the parents
    responsibility)
  • Negotiated payment or credit system to individual
    families to obtain their own transportation
    (could get a lot for 45,000 per year).

21
Transportation Task Force
Request 1 (3-25-09)
  • Background
  • In reviewing the 2007-08 budget document supplied
    by the OCPS Transportation department, and
    comparing this to the OCPS 2008-09 Transportation
    budget, there is a documented increase to the
    08-09 Transportation Department budget of
    2,059,479.00. While the budget reflects a
    reduction in driver wages of 1,268,059.00, is
    also reflects an increase of 2,059,479.00 in
    other areas. Please refer to attached
    spreadsheet for budget line items that reflect an
    increase.

22
Transporatation Task Force
23
Transportation Task Force
24
Transportation Task Force
Request 1 (3-25-09)
  • Background
  • While the overall Transportation budget in
    2007-08 was 55, 550, 564.00, the 2008-09
    Transportation budget provided to this committee
    is 56, 241, 784.00, an increase of 1.2 percent.
    This number does not include an additional
    increase of 9,361,287.00 (see attached document
    entitled Total Operating Expenditures by
    Function). All total, these numbers would
    indicate an 18 percent increase over 2007-08
    budget.
  • In fairness, approximately 8,000,000.00 was due
    to increased fuel allocations based on the price
    of fuel last summer. However, in a time when
    every department was charged by the OCPS School
    Board to reduce costs by 7 percent, the
    documented increases in the 2008-09
    Transportation budget without the fuel, in no way
    reflect an effort by the Transportation
    Department to reduce the budget.

25
Transportation Task Force
Request 1 (3-25-09)
  • Background
  • In identifying the individual line items that
    were increased, see attached Transportation
    Budget Comparison and List of Questions. As a
    member of the OCPS Transportation Task Force, I
    sent this list of questions and supporting
    documentation to the OCPS Transportation
    Department. In response, I received no answers
    to explain the increase of 2,059, 479.00.
    Instead, I received a document reflecting where
    the Transportation Department is year-to-date and
    a statement stating where the department would be
    at the end of the year. The new documents that
    the Transportation Department provided reflect a
    projected savings of over 3,000,000.00.
  • As a member of the TTF, I feel I have a
    responsibility to be provided and provide
    accurate information. To date, I have received
    no explanation for the increase in budget line
    items, even after providing these documents to
    the COO of OCPS. While a savings of
    3,000,000.00 would be admirable, providing the
    new information provided by the transportation
    department is accurate, it does not account for
    the increase of 2,059,479.00. The savings to
    OCPS accounting for the increase would reflect a
    savings of only 940,521.00.

26
Transportation Task Force
Request 1 (3-25-09)
  • Background
  • In addition, the OCPS 2008-09 Budget Reduction
    Report dated November 11, 2008 supplied by the
    district to the OCPS School Board shows a budget
    reduction target of 3.8 million dollars or 7
    percent. (See attached page from that document.)
    The document shows a reduction in travel of
    75,000.00, when a year to year comparison of the
    budget reflects an increase in travel of
    56,722.00. The document shows a reduction in
    consultants of 50,000.00, when a year-to-year
    comparison of the budget reflects an increase in
    consultants of 75,000.00. The document shows a
    reduction in repair parts of 150,000.00, when a
    year-to-year comparison of the budget reflects an
    increase of 306,634.00. The same document also
    shows a reduction in FFE (Furniture, Fixtures
    and Equipment) of 100,000.00, the year-to-year
    comparison of the budget reflects an increase in
    FFE of 323,950.00.
  • The simple concept I am documenting is that OCPS
    cannot provide documentation reflecting they
    inflated their 2008-09 budget by 2,059,000.00,
    then claim savings of 375,000.00 in these same
    areas. These four areas were increased by
    762,306.00.
  • Please refer to the document entitled Total
    Operating Expenditures by Function. The overall
    OCPS budget increased from 2007-08 to 2008-09 by
    70,000,000.00, in a time when the stakeholders
    were told OCPS had to cut 70,000,000.00.

27
Transportation Task Force
Recommendation
  • It is the request of this task force that the
    OCPS Transportation Department and the OCPS
    Finance and Audit Department provide full and
    complete Financial Statements to include all
    budget review documents for the 2008-2009 budget
    and all supporting documentation for increases in
    budgetary items over 2007-2008, balance sheets
    and financial statements to be included.
  • It is the request of the Transportation Task
    Force that in light of the above documented
    savings discrepancies, the OCPS School Board
    revisit all claimed savings deemed by the OCPS
    District in all departments to date.
  • It is the request of the TTF that all this data
    be received by the committee no later than end of
    business day, Tuesday, April 14, 2009. Please
    have School Board Services make copies for each
    TTF member.

28
Transportation Task Force
  • Attached is a review of the budgets for 07-08 and
    08-09. The TTF needs answers to the following
    questions
  • Why is Other Support Personnel increased by
    228,512.00. Who did you hire, how many, and for
    what positions? What benefit are these positions
    to the transportation dept?
  • Why is Professional and Technical Services
    increased over 100? What is the justification
    for this. Where and on what are these dollars
    being spent?
  • Why did In County Travel increase 100? What is
    the justification for this and to what are these
    dollars being spent?
  • Why also did Out of County Travel also increase
    33? What is the justification for this?
  • Repairs and Maintenance went up 73. What is
    causing you to budget such a large increase in
    one year? Justify the increase as last year you
    did not go over budget.
  • Rentals went up 36 or 87,000 dollars. Please
    explain what Transportation is renting and why
    the big increase.
  • Other Purchased Services went up 58 or 131,000
    dollars. Explain the increase in these
    expenditures.
  • Diesel fuel was dropped 2. Explain why this was
    with the outlook for fuel pricing at the time the
    budget was made.

29
Transportation Task Force
  • Questions continued
  • Oil and Grease went up 23 or 81,000 dollars.
    Again, why the increase when fuel was not
    increased?
  • Tires and Tubes went up 29. Again same thing.
    What is the thought process here?
  • Capitalized Furniture went up 226. What is OCPS
    Transportation planning to buy here?
  • Non Capitalized Furniture went up 301. Same
    question. Did OCPS Transportation refurbish all
    the offices? There is over 444,000 dollars here
    in this category and Capitalized furniture.
  • Capitalized Computer Hardware went up 554 or
    152.880 dollars. What are you purchasing?
    Replacement or new system?
  • Capitalized Software increased from 7360 dollars
    to 166,820 dollars. With such a large increase
    what are you planning to buy? What system are
    you buying and what is the benefit of it?
  • Dues and Fees went up 40 or 109,611. Why?
  • The overall budget increased 9 in
    Transportation. Decreased 4 in
    Transportation services and overall for the whole
    dept the budget increased 1 over the previous
    year. This as all departments were being asked
    to cut 7.
  • Is there a review process for budgets before they
    are finalized? We need to see the supporting
    detail for passing this budget.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com