Overall detector performance Working Group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 4
About This Presentation
Title:

Overall detector performance Working Group

Description:

This is an electronic transcription of the presented as an introduction to ... Status of what exists (enlarge the vision e.g. CMS, Belle VTX algo. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 5
Provided by: lpccle
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Overall detector performance Working Group


1
Overall detector performance Working Group
This is an electronic transcription of the slide
presented as an introduction to the discussion
2
Overall detector performance WG
  • Very Short Term Priorities
  • Common language

Reconstruction data model included in the
general/common framework coordinated by
simulation people i.e. Ties Behnke Franck Gaede
Next month Before end of 02
  • Collect the existent developments
  • Make them public available
  • Fill the missing holes
  • Welcome new comers
  • Go ahead to Amsterdam

involving different sub-detectors e.g. Tracking,
EFLOW, Flavor ID
First Intermediate meeting Early beginning of
January 03 MINI-WORKSHOP
Following data model presc. and feed back to
Franck al.
Full list of items on Web page
3
A preliminary list of items we may discuss during
this Mini-Workshop
  • Reconstruction data model (improvements, feed
    back to simulation people)
  • Status of what exists (enlarge the vision e.g.
    CMS, Belle VTX algo. As commented during this
    session)
  • How to make them public available if not yet
    (time scale, effort needed, performances,
    contents, algorithms involved, detector based on,
    )
  • How to move to a or a various event
    reconstruction packages merging tracking
    reconstruction w/ eflow reconstruction
    clusters, include ID flavor (missing pieces,
    foreseen improvements, effort needed, what one
    side need from other sub-detectors, e.g. hits
    information from back track interaction not
    coming from IP, as commented during this session)
  • What are the benchmark processes we want to exam
    at first priority (Which key numbers)
  • How we intent to perform the comparisons and
    share the work.
  • Comparisons to test the various sub-detectors
    options, test the sub-detectors parameters in a
    whole detector context e.g. numbers of layers,
    pad size, VTX techno, added options, TPC
    geometry, Quad position,

4
  • Anyway, have a look on
  • Overall detector performance WG Web page on
    ECFA-DESY Site
  • http//alephwww.cern.ch/gaypas/ECFADESY/frontpage
    .html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com