I95 Corridor Coalition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

I95 Corridor Coalition

Description:

Southbound train cars run through the VACIS machine at Rouses Point, slowing operations ... New Passenger Rail Corridors & Commuter Services ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: patty66
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: I95 Corridor Coalition


1
I-95 Corridor Coalition
  • MAROps, NEROps, SEROps
  • Lessons for Multi-State Rail Corridors
  • AASHTO
  • Standing Committee on Rail
  • August 30, 2005

2
Todays Agenda
  • I-95 Corridor Coalition Overview
  • Project Spotlights
  • Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations (MAROps) Study
  • Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study
  • Southeast Rail Operations (SEROps) Study

3
I-95 Corridor CoalitionOverview
  • The Coalition is
  • A partnership of transportation agencies, law
    enforcement agencies, toll authorities, and
    related organizations
  • A forum for identifying and addressing regional
    transportation issues
  • A successful model for interagency cooperation
    and coordination since the early 1990s

4
I-95 Corridor Coalition Overview
  • 16 states 2 provinces
  • 3.6 trillion Gross Regional Product (equivalent
    to 3rd largest economy in the world)
  • 37 percent of U.S. population 33 percent of
    jobs only 10 percent of total U.S. landmass
  • 565 million long-distance passenger trips
  • 5.3 billion tons of freight shipments

5
I-95 Corridor Coalition Mission, Vision, and
Goals
  • Vision
  • The transportation network in the corridor will
    be safe, efficient, seamless, intermodal and will
    support economic growth in an environmentally
    responsive manner.
  • Mission
  • We work together to improve multimodal
    transportation services in the region through
    information sharing and coordinated management
    and operations.
  • Goals
  • Improve Mobility..Time
  • Improve Safety.... Lives
  • Improve Economic Vitality and Competitiveness..


6
I-95 Corridor Coalition Organizational Structure
7
I-95 Corridor Coalition Key Regional Issues and
Focus Areas
  • Congestion
  • Long-distance travel
  • Mobility in rural areas
  • Freight movement
  • Emergency response and security

8
I-95 Corridor Coalition Key Guiding Principles
  • Achieve greater efficiency and mobility through
    coordinated deployments and information sharing
  • Leverage resources by investing in projects and
    activities of its members and other organizations
  • Serve as a neutral forum and honest broker

9
I-95 Corridor Coalition Evolving Geography
Then
and Now
10
I-95 Corridor Coalition Evolving Focus
  • Then
  • Study and testing of coordinated ITS deployments
    along highway systems
  • Now
  • Improving mobility of people and goods across all
    modes
  • Multimodal focus encourages a systems-level view
    of transportation

11
Todays Agenda
  • I-95 Corridor Coalition Overview
  • Project Spotlights
  • Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations (MAROps) Study
  • Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study
  • Southeast Rail Operations (SEROps) Study

12
Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations (MAROps) Study
  • Driven by five states three railroads and the
    Coalition
  • Examined the transportation system in the
    Mid-Atlantic Region to identify major network
    chokepoints, focusing on North-South movements

13
MAROps Vision
  • Improve rail capacity and operations at the
    system level
  • North-south corridors through all five states
  • Shared benefits for passengers and freight
  • Focus on eliminating key chokepoints
  • Obsolete bridges tunnels
  • Mainline capacity, connections, height/weight
    restrictions
  • Congested passenger stations, freight terminals,
    grade crossings
  • Impediments to information sharing

14
MAROps Program
  • 6.2 billion in improvements jointly developed by
    study participants
  • 2.4 billion near-term lt 5 years
  • Immediate construction and project planning
  • 1.9 billion medium-term program 5 to 10 years
  • Major projects
  • 1.9 billion long-term program 10 to 20 years
  • System growth expansion

15
MAROps Short-Term Program- North End
16
MAROps Short-Term Program- South End
17
MAROps Benefits
  • Allows for higher speeds, increased capacity, and
    enhanced safety/emergency response for Amtrak,
    particularly on the Northeast Corridor
  • Supports the continued growth and vitality of the
    regions commuter rail systems
  • Allows the freight railroads to more effectively
    compete in the marketplace
  • Provides better connections between the regions
    seaports and the national doublestack rail
    freight network
  • Generates public benefits in the form of reduced
    highway congestion, enhanced emergency access,
    and additional jobs

18
MAROps II Study
  • Detail the benefits of the MAROps program to show
    benefits accruing to individual states,
    rail/highway corridors, industry sectors, and
    perhaps major metropolitan areas
  • Develop and demonstrate transferable methods of
    assessing the public benefits of public-private
    partnerships in financing rail improvements
  • Sustain interest in the rail improvement program
    and encourage other states and railroads in the
    Coalition region to examine and address regional
    rail needs

19
Todays Agenda
  • I-95 Corridor Coalition Overview
  • Project Spotlights
  • Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations (MAROps) Study
  • Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study
  • Southeast Rail Operations (SEROps) Study

20
Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study
  • Sponsored by New York and Maine DOTs funded by
    the Coalition
  • Objective is to lay the groundwork for the
    development of a regional rail improvement
    program in the Northeast (NY, CT, RI, MA, VT, NH,
    ME) by
  • Describing trends, issues, and policies that
    affect rail transportation in the region and
  • Providing a neutral forum through which regional
    rail stakeholders can work together to identify
    and address regional issues

21
NEROps Approach
  • Modeled on the MAROps Study, but modified to
    reflect key regional characteristics
  • Geographic range
  • Regional and shortline operations
  • Intercity and commuter operations
  • Cross-border operations
  • Number of stakeholders

22
NEROps Broader Geographic Scope
  • Movements into and out of NEROps region extend
    well beyond I-95 corridor
  • Important to engage stakeholders within the
    entire region

23
NEROps Regional Shortline Operations More
Significant
  • 43 regional and shortline railroads in the region
  • Many areas within the region do not have direct
    Class I access

24
NEROps Intercity and Commuter Operations More
Significant
  • Over 750,000 riders per day on regions key
    commuter lines (Metro-North, Long Island RR, and
    MBTA)
  • Amtrak serves an additional 20,000 riders per day
    in the region

25
NEROps Cross-Border Movements More Significant
  • 263,000 cross-border freight rail cars in 2003
  • 71,000 annual cross-border passenger movements

26
NEROps More Regional Stakeholders
  • Ports
  • Handled over 200 million tons/4 million TEUs
  • Ports of NY/NJ Boston Quonset-Davisville
    Portland particularly affected by rail access and
    clearance issues
  • Transportation Planning Agencies
  • 7 state DOTs
  • 41 MPOs
  • Quebec Ministry of Transport
  • Economic Development Agencies

27
NEROpsAnticipated Outcomes
  • Regional profile designed to describe the rail
    environment in the Northeast and its relationship
    to other regions
  • Transportation profile
  • Socioeconomic Industry profile
  • Public Policy profile
  • Initial identification of key regional
    chokepoints
  • Physical
  • Operational
  • Institutional
  • Continued dialogue among the regional
    stakeholders

28
NEROps Initial Chokepoints- Physical
  • Historic tunnel with low clearance
  • Affects operations of three railroads
  • Impacts flows of between Montreal, New York, and
    Southern New England

29
NEROps Initial Chokepoints- Physical
  • Massachusetts markets would be best served by a
    single intermodal facility, but is not

30
NEROps Initial Chokepoints- Operational
  • Lack of doublestack clearance causes Boston-bound
    doublestack traffic to head first to DeWitt Yard,
    then to Boston

31
NEROps Initial Chokepoints- Operational
  • Southbound train cars run through the VACIS
    machine at Rouses Point, slowing operations
  • Lack of sidings in area complicates operations
    when further inspection required

32
NEROps Initial Chokepoints- Institutional
  • Neighborhood and environmental issues
  • Little tolerance by track-side communities for
    enhanced rail operations or rail capacity
    improvements
  • In much of NEROps region, cities and towns hold
    sway over local land use decisions
  • Homeland security issues
  • Increasing insurance rates make it difficult for
    smaller railroads to handle hazardous materials

33
NEROps Next Steps
  • Working with Steering Committee and Stakeholders
    to develop consensus on definition, location,
    type, impacts of regional chokepoints
  • Steering Committee and Stakeholders meeting
    scheduled for September 13, 2005 in Manchester,
    NH
  • Study completion expected in January 2006

34
Todays Agenda
  • I-95 Corridor Coalition Overview
  • Project Spotlights
  • Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations (MAROps) Study
  • Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study
  • Southeast Rail Operations (SEROps) Study

35
Southeast Rail Operations (SEROps) Study
  • Objective is to complete the rail picture in the
    Coalition region by identifying and describing
    key rail issues, activities, and initiatives in
    the Southeastern states (NC, SC, GA, FL)
  • Help identify choke points and institutional
    issues in the Southeast and how they impact
    states and the I-95 Corridor

36
SEROps Approach
  • Modeled on the NEROps approach, but modified to
    reflect key regional characteristics
  • Population growth
  • Changing shipper logistics patterns
  • Development of new passenger rail corridors and
    commuter services

37
SEROpsPopulation Growth
  • Southeast region growing rapidly
  • By 2030, 3 SEROps states (FL, NC, GA) will be
    included within the top 10 most populated states

38
SEROpsChanging Shipper Logistics Patterns
  • Capacity and congestion issues at many
    load-center ports are causing some large shippers
    to make better use of Southeastern ports
  • North Carolina Ports 20 growth (total tonnage)
    37 growth in container traffic 2003-2004
  • Savannah 25 growth (total tonnage) 21 growth
    in containers
  • Brunswick (GA) 25 growth in auto/machinery
    traffic
  • Charleston 4 growth in containers
  • Florida Ports 2.6 million TEUs in 2002/2003
    projected to be 3.6 million by 2007/2008

39
SEROpsNew Passenger Rail Corridors Commuter
Services
  • Population growth in the region is driving
    interest to develop new passenger rail corridors
    and commuter services
  • Southeast High Speed Rail Corridor through SE
    states
  • Commuter rail between Atlanta, Macon, and
    Charlotte
  • Rail connections from Atlanta to Chattanooga

40
SEROps Potential Issues and Chokepoints
  • Grade-Crossings
  • More than 25,000 within the SEROps region
  • Passenger and freight access to fast-growing
    areas
  • Fast growing areas (in terms of population and
    industry) require efficient passenger and freight
    rail access
  • Port-rail connectivity
  • Port growth driving interest in enhancing use of
    on or near-dock rail services

41
SEROps Next Steps
  • Scope of work under development
  • Outreach underway to develop a steering committee
    of state DOT reps from North Carolina, South
    Carolina, Georgia, Florida and Virginia

42
I-95 Corridor Coalition
  • MAROps, NEROps, SEROps
  • Lessons for Multi-State Rail Corridors
  • AASHTO
  • Standing Committee on Rail
  • August 30, 2005
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com