Systems Science Methodologies To Protect and Improve Public Health Patricia L' Mabry, Ph'D' G' Steph - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 64
About This Presentation
Title:

Systems Science Methodologies To Protect and Improve Public Health Patricia L' Mabry, Ph'D' G' Steph

Description:

Need to make best use of limited resources, evaluate trade offs ... Physical Activity & Weight Loss Interventions. Adding Up the Costs. 0. Quick two interventions: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:447
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: ban765
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Systems Science Methodologies To Protect and Improve Public Health Patricia L' Mabry, Ph'D' G' Steph


1
Systems Science Methodologies To Protect and
Improve Public Health Patricia L. Mabry,
Ph.D.G. Stephane Philogene, Ph.D.Office of
Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
National Institutes of Healthhttp//obssr.od.ni
h.gov
2
Presentation Overview
  • Introduction
  • NIH Overview
  • OBSSR Overview
  • OBSSRs New Vision
  • Strategic Interests
  • NIH Big Data
  • Surveys of the Future
  • Community Health Laboratories
  • System Science at NIH
  • What is System Science?
  • Examples
  • Relevant FOAs

3
(No Transcript)
4
NIHs Mission is...
...science in pursuit of fundamental knowledge
about the nature and behavior of living systems
and the application of that knowledge to extend
healthy life and reduce the burdens of illness
and disability.
5
NIHs Goals are to...
1. Foster fundamental creative discoveries,
innovative research strategies, and their
applications as a basis to advance significantly
the Nation's capacity to protect and improve
health
6
NIHs Goals are to...
  • Develop, maintain, and renew scientific human and
    physical resources that will assure the Nation's
    capability to prevent disease and

7
NIHs Goals are to...
  • Expand the knowledge base in medical and
    associated e.g. behavioral social sciences in
    order to enhance the Nation's economic well-being
    and ensure a continued high return on the public
    investment in research.

8
National Institutes of Health Overview
  • 27 Institutes and Centers (ICs)
  • 29 billion in FY2008
  • 80 goes to grants and contracts supporting
    extramural research

9
Total NIH Budget Authority FY 200829 Billion
Training 3 870 Million
Research Project Grants 53 15.370 Billion
10
Whats an OBSSR
11
National Institutes of Health
12
OBSSR Mission
  • Increase scope of and support for Behavioral and
    Social Sciences Research (BSSR).
  • Inform NIH leadership and community about BSSR.
  • Represent NIH to BSSR community.
  • Disseminate BSSR information to NIH and the
    public.

13
NIH Funding for Behavioral Social SciencesFY
2006 Estimates Total 3.03 billion
14
A New Vision at OBSSR
  • Vision To mobilize the biomedical, behavioral,
    and social science research communities as
    partners in interdisciplinary research to solve
    the most pressing health challenges faced by our
    society.
  • Necessary Steps
  • Conduct interdisciplinary science
  • Capitalize on new discoveries and new tools
  • Informatics
  • Computer technology
  • Genetics
  • Build partnerships to solve problems whose scope
    overwhelms single
  • research paradigms

15
Scope of the Science
Outside the skin
Under the skin
zz
16
A New Vision at OBSSR
  • Programmatic Directions to Achieve the Vision
  • Trans-/inter-disciplinary science
  • Next generation, basic science
  • Problem-based, outcomes oriented
  • strengthen the science of dissemination
  • Systems science for population impact

17
The S Curve of Science
Search for Unifying Theories
Rise of Partial Theories Interventions on real
complex systems
Data explosion Growing Understanding Of Subsystems
Reductionist Phase
Empirical Observations
From Qualitative to Quantitative
From Large to Small scales ( and back)
About 150 years
18
NIH BIG Data Initiative
  • Trans-NIH Collaboration
  • Activities Information Collection on NIH and
    other Federal agency activities involving BIG
    Data
  • Goal Identify opportunities for
    trans/inter-disciplinary collaborations between
    BSSR, engineers and informatics experts to
    enhance population health research efforts

19
NIH BIG Data PROMIS
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information
    System (PROMIS) - aims to revolutionize the way
    patient-reported outcome tools are selected and
    employed in clinical research and practice
    evaluation.
  • It will also establish a national resource for
    accurate and efficient measurement of
    patient-reported symptoms and other health
    outcomes in clinical practice.

20
NIH BIG Data GEI
  • Two main components of the Gene, Environment and
    Health Initiative
  • The Genetics Program is a pipeline for analyzing
    genetic variation in groups of patients with
    specific illnesses
  • The Exposure Biology Program is an environmental
    technology development program to produce and
    validate new methods for monitoring environmental
    exposures that affect health

21
NIH BIG Data PhenX
  • PhenX a three year project to prioritize
    Phenotype and eXposure measures for Genome-wide
    Association Studies (GWAS) and thereby contribute
    to the integration of genetics and
    epidemiological research
  • Consensus measures for GWAS will have a direct
    impact on biomedical research and ultimately on
    public health. The goal is to maximize the
    benefits of future research by having comparable
    measures so that studies can be integrated
  • Recommended measures will be vetted with the
    research community through a Web-based PhenX
    Survey and other appropriate mechanisms

22
NIH BIG Data Initiative
  • Trans-NIH Collaboration
  • Activities Information Collection on NIH and
    other Federal agency activities involving BIG
    Data
  • Goal Identify opportunities for
    trans/inter-disciplinary collaborations between
    BSSR, engineers and informatics experts to
    enhance population health research efforts
  • Some examples of the kind of ventures that could
    benefit from a BSSR/engineering partnership

23
NIH BIG Data Surveys of the Future
  • NERD (Norms Evolving in Response to Dilemmas) a
    web-based survey instrument that is designed to
    bridge the gap between perceived and actual
    public opinion, which traditional surveys and
    focus groups are unable to capture
  • Smarter Surveys (SurveyGizmo) Make surveys
    respond to user input show just the right
    questions or send an automatically triggered
    email auto-responder
  • Handheld Devices/Smart Phones handheld
    computers for collecting survey data
  • Computer audio-recorded interviewing (CARI) a
    laptop computer application developed for audio
    recording of field interviews. Provides the means
    for assessing the authenticity and quality of the
    field interview, including the behavior for the
    field interviewer during the interview and the
    reactions of the respondent to survey questions

24
NIH BIG Data Community Health Labs
  • Technological advances allows for the development
    of integrated data and application grids that
    facilitate multi-level, interdisciplinary
    research (e.g., CaBig)
  • We need community health laboratories that
    would provide integrated data resources for
    research on community health
  • Each community data grid would unite local data
    on social, economic, institutional and physical
    environments population characteristics,
    behaviors and health, health services (including
    medical records), and, where possible,
    genetic/genomic and other biological data
  • These data, and applications developed for their
    use, would provide the infrastructure for a
    transformation of research on the interaction of
    environmental, behavioral, and biological
    processes in producing health and disease within
    local contexts and provide the basis for
    identifying new, scientifically grounded,
    strategies for improving community health.

25
The New Vision Partnership
26
(No Transcript)
27
What is Systems Science at NIH?
  • Systems Science approaches appreciate the
    complexity, context, dynamic nature, and emergent
    phenomena associated with the problem under
    study
  • Systems Science methodologies include
  • Computational/mathematical modeling
  • Agent-based modeling
  • Dynamic modeling
  • Network Analysis
  • Related Terms
  • Complexity science
  • Complex adaptive systems
  • Non-linear dynamics
  • Chaos

28
Why is NIH embracing Systems Science?
  • Other approaches alone have not solved
    intractable health problems
  • Health problems are embedded in dynamically
    complex systems
  • Need to make best use of limited resources,
    evaluate trade offs
  • Computers have the computational power to do what
    humans cannot
  • keep track of large numbers of variables
  • including their synergistic, cumulative and
    compounding effects, and
  • delayed effects/changes over time
  • System science methodologies used successfully in
    other fields tried true

29
What are the benefits of systems science?
  • Heuristic to better understand problems (e.g.,
    underlying dynamics)
  • Hypothesis Generation new hypotheses and/or
    narrow the list of existing hypotheses prior to
    empirical studies
  • Knowledge Synthesis synthesize existing
    knowledge for meaningful interpretation
  • Expose Gaps in Knowlege about a problem
  • Prediction to aid in preparing for the future
  • Intervention Testing in a virtual environment
    saves time and money can do things that are
    impossible or unethical in the real world and
    exposes unintended consequences.

30
Understanding the Whole System
  • Simulation Modeling and Experimentation
  • Pandemic flu
  • Tobacco use
  • Obesity, Diabetes
  • Health inequalities
  • Non-health factors
  • Chronic disease
  • Health care delivery
  • Stress, mental illness, worksites, policy.

31
EXAMPLES
32
DIABETESSystem Dynamics Modeling
33
Diabetes Model Diabetes Burden is Driven by
Population Flows
Developing
d
Jones AP, Homer JB, Murphy DL, Essien JDK,
Milstein B, Seville DA. Understanding diabetes
population dynamics through simulation modeling
and experimentation. American Journal of Public
Health 200696(3)488-494.
34
Diabetes Burden is Driven by Population Flows
Developing
d
Inflow
Outflow
35
What-if Simulations
Start with the base case or status quo no
improvements in diabetes management or
prediabetes management after 2006
People with Diabetes per Thousand Adults
Monthly Unhealthy Days from Diabetes per Thou
150
500
Base
450
125
Base
400
100
350
75
300
50
250
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36
Diabetes What if we Managed Prediabetes AND
Reduced Obesity?
People with Diabetes per Thousand Adults
Monthly Unhealthy Days from Diabetes per Thou
150
500
Base
450
Base
PreD mgmt
125
PreD mgmt
400
PreD Ob 25
PreD Ob 25
100
350
PreD Ob 18
75
PreD Ob 18
300
50
250
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
The more you reduce obesity, the sooner you stop
the growth in diabetesand the more you bring it
down
Same with the burden of diabetes
37
Cardiovascular DiseaseSystem Dynamics Modeling
38
Simulating the Dynamics of Cardiovascular
Health and Related Risk FactorsWork in
Progress
This work was funded by the CDCs Division for
Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention and by the
National Institutes of Healths Office of
Behavioral and Social Science Research. The work
was done in collaboration with the Health and
Human Services Department of Austin/Travis
County, Texas, and with Integrated Care
Collaboration of Central Texas. The external
contractors are Sustainability Institute and RTI
International.
39
Cardiovascular Disease and Risks Remain Among
the Leading Causes of Death
Fraction of total deaths in 2005
US CDC/National Center for Health Statistics,
Vol. 56, No.10, April 2008 TX TX Dept. of
State Health Services Preliminary Vital
Statistics Table 16
40
Purpose of the Cardiovascular Risk Model
  • How do local conditions affect multiple risk
    factors for CVD, and how do those risks affect
    population health status and costs over time?
  • How do different local interventions affect
    cardiovascular health and related expenditures in
    the short- and long-term?
  • How might local health leaders better balance
    their policy efforts given limited resources?

The CDC has partnered with the Austin (Travis
County), Texas, Dept. of Health and Human
Services. The model is calibrated to represent
the overall US, but is informed by the
experience and data of the Austin team, which
has been supported by the CDCs STEPS program
since 2004.
Homer J, Milstein B, Wile K, Pratibhu P, Farris
R, Orenstein D. Modeling the local dynamics of
cardiovascular health risk factors, context, and
capacity. Preventing Chronic Disease 20085(2).
Available at http//www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2008/ap
r/07_0230.htm
41
Direct Risk Factors
42
Indirect Risk Factors
43
Tobacco and Air Quality Interventions
44
Air Quality Interventions
45
Health Care Interventions
46
Interventions Affecting Stress
47
Healthy Diet Interventions
48
Physical Activity Weight Loss Interventions
49
Adding Up the Costs
50
Interventions for immediate and longer term
effects
Deaths from CVD per Capita
  • Quick two interventions
  • Increase Primary Care Quality from
    54 to 75
  • Cut Air Pollution by half
  • Long three interventions
  • Increase Social Marketing Against Tobacco from 0
    to 100 of maximum.
  • Increase Tobacco Tax and Sales Restrictions from
    50 to 100
  • Increase Access to Physical Activity from 70 to
    100
  • These five interventions provide
  • 77 of cost reduction achieved by 15
    interventions, and
  • 57 of mortality reduction

4
Base Case
Quick two
Beneficial 15
2
Quick two Long three
If all risk factors 0
0
2040
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
Complication Management Costs per Capita
3,000
Quick two
Base Case
Quick two Long three
1,000
Beneficial 15
Average annual cost savings of 350 per
capita For Quick 2 Long 3
0
If all risk factors 0
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
51
Tobacco EpidemicMarkov Modeling
52
Purpose of the Tobacco Control Model
  • Are the national goals (HP 2010) goals for
    smoking prevalence realistic and
  • achievable?
  • What is a realistic estimate of how long would
    it take to get to the HP 2010
  • goals?
  • What if
  • - we could increase quit attempts
  • - we could improve treatment effectiveness
  • - we could increase the percent of people who
    use evidence based
  • treatments when they make a quit
    attempt

53
One-shot Model - "What if we could increase...?"
Quit Attempts
Status Quo 17.9
HP 2010 Goal 12
60 of smokers make quit attempt 2020 prev
14.6
Levy, Abrams Mabry, 2007
80 smokers make quit attempt 2020 prev 12.3
54
Two-shot Model - "What if we could increase...?"
Quit Attempts Use of Evidence Based Tx
Status Quo 17.9
HP 2010 Goal 12
2017
Double the smokers who use evidence based tx
2020 prev 16.0
QA 80 2X EB tx 2020 prev 10.7
Levy, Abrams Mabry, 2007
55
3-Shot Model - "What if we could increase...?"
Quit Attempts, E-B Tx, Long-term Abstinence
Status Quo 17.9
2013
HP 2010 Goal 12
2011
50 of quitters achieve long term abstinence
2020 prev 14.6
100 of quitters achieve LTA 2020 prev 12.3
3-shot - QA 80 2X EB tx LTA 50 2020 prev
8.1
3-shot - QA 80 2X EB tx LTA 100 2020 prev
6.6
56
Obesity EpidemicMicrosimulation Modeling
57
Foresight Obesity Model http//www.foresight.gov.u
k/obesity/obesity_final/14.pdf
58
What is the state of the science at NIH?
  • Interest in systems science (SS) is growing
    rapidly at NIH
  • Systems biology is further along than SS in the
    behavioral and social sciences.
  • SS is being used to study infectious disease
    transmission (e.g., HIV, flu, smallpox, SARS).
  • Less SS is being done in chronic
    disease/behavioral and social determinants of
    health these areas are ripe for SS
  • Any area of health and disease is applicable for
    NIH funding
  • Specific areas that NIH is targeting for SS
    include obesity, tobacco control, heart disease,
    substance abuse/addiction, demography and
    population health, and health disparities

59
Examples of NIH Modeling Initiatives
  • Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling
    Network (CISNET) http//cisnet.cancer.gov/about/
  • Interagency Modeling and Analysis Group (IMAG)
    http//www.imagwiki.org/mediawiki
    http//grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-08
    -023.htm
  • Models of Infectious Disease Agent Study (MIDAS)
    http//www.nigms.nih.gov/Initiatives/MIDAS
  • NIH Guide To Grants And Contracts
    http//grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/index.html
  • To Subscribe to the NIH Guide LISTSERV, send an
    e-mail to listserv_at_list.nih.gov with the
    following text in the message body (not the
    "Subject" line) subscribe NIHTOC-L your name

60
Grant Funded Systems Science and BSSR at NIH
  • Joshua Epstein, Directors Pioneer Award, NIGMS,
    OBSSR, 2008.  Project Title  Behavioral
    Epidemiology Applications of Agent-Based
    Modeling to Infectious Disease.
  • David Lounsbury, R03, NIDA, 2008.  Project Title
     Dynamics Modeling as a Tool for Disseminating
    the PHS Tobacco Treatment Guideline
  • David T. Levy, U01, NCI, 2002-2010. CISNET.
    Project Title A Simulation of Tobacco Policy,
    Smoking and Lung Cancer.
  • Linda Collins Daniel Rivera, R21, 2007-2010.
     NIH Roadmap. Dynamical System /Related
    Engineering Approach /Improving Behavioral
    Intervention
  • Daniel Rivera, K25, NIDA, OBSSR. Control
    Engineering Approaches to Adaptive Interventions
    in Drug Abuse Prevention.
  • PAR-08-224 Awards pending.
  • RFA-HD-08-023 (R01), Innovative Computational and
    Statistical Methodologies for the Design and
    Analysis of Multilevel Studies on Childhood
    Obesity (R01). Awards pending.

61
What are the grant options?
  • NIH has a variety of mechanisms to address most
    any stage of the scientific development cycle
  • R03 small grant, in general 100K for two years
  • R21 - Exploratory/Developmental 275K Direct
    cost for a two year period
  • R01 up to 500K per year for up to 5 years
  • Training and career development awards are also
    encouraged http//grants.nih.gov/training
  • Refer to http//grants.nih.gov/grants/oer.htm for
    detailed funding info
  • American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and
    NIH http//www.nih.gov/about/director/02252009stat
    ement_arra.htm

62
Open Funding Opportunity Announcements at NIH in
Systems Science
  • PAR-08-224 Using Systems Science Methodologies to
    Protect and Improve Population Health (R21).  
  • PAR-08-212, -213, -214 Methodology and
    Measurement in the Behavioral and Social Sciences
    (R01, R21, R03).  
  • RFA-07-079, -080  Behavioral and Social Science
    Research on Understanding and Reducing Health
    Disparities (R01, R21)  
  • PAR-08-023 Predictive Multiscale Models of the
    Physiome in Health and Disease (R01). 
  • To stay apprised of new Funding Opportunity
    Announcements, join the Behavioral and Social
    Science-Systems Science Listserv. Send email to
    Patty Mabry mabryp_at_od.nih.gov to join.

63
Systems Science Activities
  • 2007 Symposia Series on Systems Science Health
    PODCAST VIDEOCAST
  • 2009 Training Institute on systems science
  • Develop opportunities for cross fertilization
    - Linking AAAI attendees and other systems
    scientists with health investigators to
    collaborate on NIH applications
  • Use the conference grant mechanism (R13/U13) to
    establish connections across fields
  • Stay tuned to the BSSR Systems Science Listserv
    for future opportunities to connect and
    collaborate - send email to mabryp_at_od.nih.gov

64
For more information
  • Patty Mabry, Ph.D.mabryp_at_od.nih.gov
  • Stephane Philogene, Ph.D.
  • philoges_at_od.nih.gov Office of Behavioral and
    Social Sciences Research
  • (OBSSR) National Institutes of
    Healthhttp//obssr.od.nih.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com