Biomass resources and bioenergy technologies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Biomass resources and bioenergy technologies

Description:

20% of cattle heads in 20 years, at least 10 Mha grassland could be used for ... and compressing as biomethan in cars, buses. The development of biogas depends ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:185
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: Mas668
Learn more at: http://www.eufores.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Biomass resources and bioenergy technologies


1
Biomass resources and bioenergy technologies
from potentials to investment
Heinz Kopetz, European Biomass Association
AEBIOM Budapest, 17 November 2008 Eufores
2
Structure
  • Resources
  • Efficiency
  • Technologies
  • Investment opportunities
  • Conclusions and recommondations

3
Main criteria for energy policy
  • Basic criteria for EU energy policy
  • Environment, reduction GHG
  • Security of supply
  • Competitiveness
  • Additional criteria for bioenergy policy
  • Food security
  • Sufficient supply of wood industry

4
The role of biomass
  • Biomass ist the most important of RES, covering
    2/3 of all RES.

Final energy from all renewables and from biomass
Source Eurostat, EREC, AEBIOM.
5
The importance of government policy
  • Government policy is decisive for the quantity of
    final energy you get from a given quantity of
    primary energy.
  • 220 Mtoe biomass are necessary to reach in the
    20 target of the Directive in the year 2020
  • A policy focused on biofuels and electricity
    might deliver 145 Mtoe final energy,
  • whereas a policy concentrated on efficient
    conversion and heat might provide 195 Mtoe
    final energy.
  • ,

Primary energy
Final energy
losses
Source AEBIOM.
6
Eurostat Statistics
Balance sheets 2006
Primary biomass89 025 ktoe
Input to electricity and CHP27 312 ktoe
Bioelectricity7 731 ktoe89 908 GWh
Electric efficiency 28,3 Global efficiency
50
Input to DH3 538 ktoe
Derived heat7 686 ktoe
Biomass for households and services35 005 ktoe
Biomass for industry17 298 ktoe
Biofuels5 375 ktoe
Defining the target as a percentage of the final
energy favours the heat market very much !
7
The efficient use of biomass in 2020
  • AEBIOM targets (Mtoe)

2005 2020
Total primary biomass 82 220
Final heat 57,5 147,5
electricity 6,9 17,2
biofuels 3,1 30,0
total final energy from biomass 67,5 194,7
Source AEBIOM.
8
Final energy from Renewables in EU 27
in 2005 and 2020
20
25 Mt pellets1 of RES
8,5
50 Mt pellets7 of RES
Strong government policies are necessary to
develop bioenergy in an efficient way! Pellets
will play a significant role!
Source AEBIOM, Eurostat.
9
Is there enough biomass to reach these targets?
  • Biomass from forests
  • Additional demand for wood (material use and
    energy) until 2020 380 Mm³ wood!
  • Where can these 380 Mm³ wood come from until
    2020?
  • from existing forests by better mobilization?
  • from new short rotation coppices?
  • from imports from abroad?

10
Is there enough biomass to reach these targets?
  • Biomass from agriculture
  • Utilized agric. Land (UAA) in EU 27 160 Mha
  • 100 Mh arable land
  • 50 Mha permanent grassland
  • 10 Mha permanent crops (wine, apple, olive
    etc.)
  • Necessary arable land per capita for sufficient
    food supply 0,16 ha for 495 M population 80 Mha
  • therefore about 20 Mha arable land can be used
    for energy and industry
  • The demand for grassland is declining
  • -20 of cattle heads in 20 years, at least 10 Mha
    grassland could be used for energy and industry
    supply!
  • Summary at least 25 Mha land are available for
    dedicated energy crops, in addition byproducts
    from agriculture such as straw or manure!

11
How to use this land to optimize bioenergy
production?
  • Scenario by AEBIOM Oct.2008
  • 8 Mha for solid biomass as short rotation
    forests, miscanthus, new energy crops for heat
    and electricity and maybe second generation
    fuels.
  • 14 Mha land for biofuels first generation and 3
    Mha for biogas.
  • The 8 Mha short rotation forests could produce
    250 Mm³ wood annually, the 14 Mha agricultural
    crops could deliver raw material for 21 Mtoe
    biofuels first generation, additional 5Mtoe
    biofuels as biomethan and electricity and heat!

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
How to use this land to optimize bioenergy
production?
use Mha Energy Mtoe
biogas 3 12 16,0 20
short rotation 8 32 41,6 53
biofuels 14 56 21,0 27
Total 25 100 78,6 100
  • Scenario by AEBIOM Oct. 2008

Source AEBIOM.
15
The double harvest producing first generation
fuels
  • 100.000ha arable land for biofuels in Europe
    delivers
  • In the case of ethanol
  • gt240.000m³ ethanol 130.000 t gasoline and
  • gt180.000 t protein feed (DDGS) 60.000ha soja
  • In the case of biodiesel
  • gt 120.000t biodiesel 100.000 t diesel and
  • gt 170.000t rape cake as protein feed 60.000 ha
    soja beans abroad!
  • Conclusion if we use unused land (set aside,
    fallowed land) we produce energy and improve the
    food supply!

16
The utilization of the European harvest of cereals
Average harvest 285 Mt for food 50
Mt for energy (2007) 4,2 Mt
Source ebio.
17
An example biofuels and the cereal market
  • Big variations in the cereal harvest 60 Mt from
    year to year.
  • Average demand for food 50 Mt
  • In the past 10 set aside and yet surplus
    production of 12 and annual export between 10
    and 30 Mt cereals.
  • Use for ethanol production in 2007
  • 4,2 Mt cereal 0,5 Mha

Source Eurostat.

18
An example biofuels and the cereal market
  • Big variations in the cereal harvest 60 Mt from
    year to year.
  • Average demand for food 50 Mt
  • In the past 10 set aside and yet surplus
    production of 12 and annual export between 10
    and 30 Mt cereals.
  • Use for ethanol production in 2007
  • 4,2 Mt cereal 0,5 Mha
  • Conclusion the high food prices in 2007/08 were
    not caused by the European ethanol production but
    by the declining harvest from 2004 to 2007.

4,5
5
3
Source Eurostat.
The important question How to combine biofuel
production with the variations of the harvest on
a European and a global scale? Because the
alternative to biofuels is overproductiven or set
aside land!
19
First answers
  • 1. Where can these 380 Mm³ wood come from until
    2020?
  • from existing forests by better
    mobilization?....100Mm³
  • From new short rotation coppices?.................
    .240Mm³
  • From imports from abroad?.........................
    .... 40Mm³
  • 2. Do we have enough potential to provide 220Mtoe
    biomass for 2020?
  • Yes, about 200 Mtoe from the EU27 and 20 Mtoe
    from abroad (pellets, biofuels)
  • Yet
  • - the abandoned land has to be used,
  • - no obstacles to use parts of the permanent
    grassland for bioenergy
  • - incentives to plant short rotation forests
  • - incentives for biogas plants
  • - priority for biofuels from Europe

20
AEBIOM targets for bioenergy, Mtoe
  • 2004 EU25 Scenario 2020 EU27

Source AEBIOM.
21
Structure
  • Resources
  • Efficiency
  • Technologies
  • Investment opportunities
  • Conclusions targets, directive, political
    framework, opportunities

22
The need for a better efficiency
  • Europe needs to develop an efficient energy
    system to cope with the future problems.
  • Efficiency concerns the conversion process and
    the end-use.
  • The biggest losses in efficiency occur in the
    conversion from primary energy to electricity
    without using the heat. These losses are higher
    as all contributions of RES.
  • The target setting in final energy and not in
    primary energy will draw the attention to this
    issue, especially in setting up the national
    action plans, where you have to decide where to
    use the available biomass.
  • An example

23
Contribution of biomass to final energy
Example Given 100.000 m³ wood (719 TJ)
Primary energy
Final energy
Source AEBIOM.
24
Contribution of biomass to final energy
  • Biomass 2006 primary energy losses final
    energy, EU27, in Mtoe.
  • Efficiency electricity 27,7 heat 18,0 total
    45,7.

Source Eurostat.
25
Further conclusions
  • In the directive there is an efficiency for
    combustion from 70 for industry and 85
    residential heating proposed.
  • There also should be a minimum of 60 for
    electricity from biomass for new plants.
  • Why not using the same threshhold for fossil
    fuels?
  • If we really want to improve the efficiency of
    the energy system, all new electricity plants
    be the energy carrier fossil or biomass should
    be cogeneration plants with a minimum efficiency
    of 60, also in the case of cofiring!

26
Structure
  • Resources
  • Efficiency
  • Technologies
  • Investment opportunities
  • Conclusions targets, directive, political
    framework, opportunities

27
Technologies I biomass to heat
  • Technologies for efficient combustion of biomass
    are available for all sizes from 20 kW up to 100
    MW pellets boilers, pellet stoves, log wood
    boilers, chip boilers, wood waste boilers.
  • The raw material can be fire wood, saw mill
    chips, wood chips, pellets, bark, straw, other
    by-products from the forest and wood industry.

28
Technologies II biomass to electricity
  • Biomass for electricity should only be used in
    cogeneration units
  • New technologies coming to the market
  • Stirling engine combined with pellet boiler for
    familiy houses
  • Wood gasification in small scale for small
    district heating
  • Well proven technologies
  • The ORC process starting from 400 kW el upwards
  • Small steam turbines starting from 1 MW el
  • Traditional bigger solutions using the steam
    process
  • Biogas in combination with a gas engine

29
Technologies III biofuels, biogas
  • Ethanol by fermentation
  • Biodiesel by esterification
  • Biomethan by cleaning the biogas
  • 2nd generation fuels using different technologies
    (cellulose to sugar, wood to gas and to liquids
    Fischer Tropsch, pyrolisis)
  • 2nd generation fuels would have a low
    efficiency, if the produced heat cannot be used,
    therefore biorefieneries, that produce fuels,
    heat and electricity, pellets or pulp would be
    the best place to produce these fuels.

30
Structure
  • Resources
  • Efficiency
  • Technologies
  • Investment opportunities
  • Conclusions targets, directive, political
    framework, opportunities

31
Investment opportunities Individual heating
  • Individual heating an important sector, main
    interest pellets, main obstacle lack of capital.
    A Change from oil or gas heating systems to
    pellets costs 12.000 to 16.000 .
  • Given a region with a population of 10 M people
    and the target to change 20.000 units per year
    you need 300 M capital. That can come partly
    from private households partly from government
    support.
  • Experience shows you need financial support
    programs for private househoulds in this example
    100 M per year!
  • With such a program you create investment
    opportunities in the production of pellets
    boilers, of pellets and 1000s new jobs to install
    the new systems, you reduce 150.000t C0² every
    year cumulative and save around 40MEuro for
    certificates, 35M Euro consumer expenditures as
    compared to using oil or gas!

32
Investment opportunities Heat for Industry and
district heating
  • Biomass for heat in industry plays already an
    important role and offers new interesting
    opportunities given the high priced of gas and
    oil
  • District heating (DH) is a necessity to get to
    efficient combined heat and power solutions. It
    is a pity that these systems are dismantled
    partly in Central Europe. In the future, DH with
    biomass will be much cheaper than natural gas or
    oil, therefore a strong push for DH heating with
    biomass is necessary!
  • You need financial programs
  • for the modernization of existing DH plants and
    for new ones,
  • for the switch from fossil fuels to biomass
  • also a financial support of private houses to
    connect to DH grids proved to be very succesful.
  • The advantages concerning C0² reduction, improved
    security, savings for consumers are the same as
    mentioned for individual heating.

33
Example District heating with biomass in Austria
34
Economic effects of rural district heating An
example of an Austrian Village
  • Size 420 KW heat (for 20 family houses)
  • Sold heat/year 610.000 kWh
  • Combustible 1080 m³ wood chips
  • Investment 280.000 Euro
  • Financed by
  • 1 customer fee for connection grid 70 000
  • Support rural development prog. 85 000
  • Own capital and bank credit 125 000
  • Total 280 000

35
Village heated with heating oil
36
Village heated with local district heating plant
based on biomass
37
Investment opportunities cogeneration Electricity
heat
  • Electricity comes
  • from wood, byproducts of the wood and forest
    industry, straw and
  • from biogas.
  • Two preconditions
  • Satisfying feed in tariffs
  • Concept to use the heat to reach an efficieny of
    at least 60. In many cases heat driven
    CHP-plants.
  • Many countries offer good opportunities!

38
Investment opportunities Biogas
  • Biogas offers the chance to use feedstock for
    energy like waste, manure, that are without
    competition and offer a additional raw material
    base on the basis of energy crops it uses the
    whole plant for energy and delivers high yields
    per hectar.
  • It is a typical decentralised technology for
    rather smaller units 0,2 2MW
  • .
  • The use can be
  • electricity and heat
  • feed in gas pipelines after cleaning
  • After cleaning and compressing as biomethan in
    cars, buses.
  • The development of biogas depends
  • upon the government policies such as
  • feed in tariffs
  • access to gas grid
  • programs for biomethan as fuels for cars

39
Investment opportunities Liquid fuels
  • Ethanol
  • Biodiesel
  • 2nd generation fuels
  • Biogas
  • In the future biodiesel from algae

40
Structure
  • Resources
  • Efficiency
  • Technologies
  • Investment opportunities
  • Conclusions targets, directive, political
    framework, opportunities

41
Conclusions and summary
  • The political framework conditions are decisive
    for the rapid development of bioenergy feed
    in-tariffs, financial support programs, no
    obstacles by the administration.
  • Sufficient biomass potential in Europe, but is
    has to be developed
  • mobilization of wood, incentives for new SRF,
    use of permanent grassland for energy
    production, training
  • 2) The dilemma of food versus fuel can be solved
  • yet more attention to the questions
  • How can we better take into account the annual
    variations of the harvest?
  • How can we avoid that biofuels consumption in
    Europe based on imported biofuels causes food
    shortage in the producing countries?
  • 3) More attention to biogas as efficient energy
    chain using a technology offered by nature
    the most efficient 2nd generation fuel
  • feed in tariffs, grid access, investment
    support, policy for biomethan as transport fuel

42
Conclusions and summary
  • 4) The transformation of the heating sector from
    fossil to renewable (biomass, solar thermal)
    offers huge opportunities.
  • Needed are financial support programs for
    individuals, for construction, modernisation of
    District Heating (DH) for the switch from fossil
    to biomass in DH.
  • 5) Electricity from biomass in combination with
    the use of the produced heat in industry,
    buildings or via district heating,
  • support by feed in tariffs, minimum efficient
    rule of 60, only CHP units be they small or big.

43
The positive effects of bioenergy
  • Huge reduction of GHG emissions
  • Reduction of fossil imports by 150 to 200 Mtoe
  • Savings by less demand for C0² certificates
  • Considerable savings for consumer using biomass
    as heat
  • New jobs in many parts of the economy
  • Improved rural development
  • Improved security of supply

44
Thank you for your attentionHeinz
Kopetzinfo_at_aebiom.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com