Space Elevator 2006

1
Space Elevator 2006
February 21, 2006 for Canadian Space Society

• Our climbers name is Jack and were
• building a better beamstalk

2
Space Elevator Basics
3
The SE in Literature

• Artsutanov, Y. 1960. V Kosmos na Elektrovoze,
  Komsomolskaya Pravda, (contents described in Lvov
  1967 Science 158946).
• Isaacs, J.D., Vine, A.C., Bradner, H., and
  Bachus, G.E. 1966. Satellite Elongation into a
  true Sky-Hook. Science 151682.
• Pearson, J. 1975. The Orbital tower a spacecraft
  launcher using the Earths rotational energy.
  Acta Astronautica 2785.
• Clarke, A.C. 1979. The Space Elevator Thought
  Experiment, or Key to the Universe. Adv. Earth
  Oriented Appl. Science Techn. 139.

4
The Space Elevator in Science Fiction
5
From SciFi to NASA

• Capture an asteroid and bring into Earth orbit
• Mine the asteroid for carbon and extrude 10m
  diameter cable
• Asteroid becomes counterweight
• Maglev transport system
• Tall tower base
• Large system
• 300 years to never...
• From Smitherman, 1999

6
Proposed System Overview

• First elevator 20 ton capacity (13 ton payload)
• Constructed with existing or near-term technology
• Cost (US10B) and schedule (15 years)
• Operating costs of US250/kg to any Earth orbit,
  moon, Mars, Venus, Asteroids

7
Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs)

• Carbon nanotubes measured at 200 GPa (54xKevlar)
• Sufficient to build the elevator
• Mitsui(Japan) 120 ton/yr CNT production,
  US100/kg
• Sufficient to build the first elevator
• CNT composite fibers 3-5 CNTs, 3 GPa, 5 km
  length
• Not strong enough yet but a viable plan is in
  place to get there (Carbon Designs, Inc.)

5km continuous 1 CNT composite fiber
8
Deployment Overview
9
Ribbon Design

• The final ribbon is one-meter wide and composed
  of parallel high-strength fibers
• Interconnects maintain structure and allow the
  ribbon to survive small impacts
• Initial, low-strength ribbon segments have been
  built and tested

10
Initial Spacecraft

• Deployment spacecraft built with current
  technology
• Photovoltaic arrays receive power from Earth
• An MPD electric propulsion moves the spacecraft
  up to high Earth orbit
• Four 20-ton components are launched on
  conventional rockets and assembled

11
Climbers

• Climbers built with current satellite technology
• Drive system built with DC electric motors
• Photovoltaic array (GaAs or Si) receives power
  from Earth
• 7-ton climbers carry 13-ton payloads
• Climbers ascend at 200 km/hr
• 8 day trip from Earth to geosynchronous altitude

12
Power Beaming

• Power is sent to deployment spacecraft and
  climbers by laser
• Solid-state disk laser produces kWs of power and
  being developed for MWatts
• Mirror is the same design as conventional
  astronomical telescopes (Hobby-Eberly, Keck)

13
Anchor

• Anchor station is a mobile, ocean-going platform
  identical to ones used in oil drilling
• Anchor is located in eastern equatorial pacific,
  weather and mobility are primary factors

14
Challenges

• Induced oscillations 7 hour natural frequency
  couples poorly with moon and sun, active damping
  with anchor
• Atomic oxygen lt25 micron Nickel coating between
  60 and 800 km (LDEF)
• Malfunctioning climbers up to 3000 km reel in
  the cable, above 2600 km send up an empty climber
  to retrieve the first
• Lightning, wind, clouds avoid through proper
  anchor location selection
• Meteors ribbon design allows for 200 year
  probability-based life
• LEO objects active avoidance requires movement
  every 14 hours on average to avoid debris down to
  1 cm
• Damaged or severed ribbons collatoral damage is
  minimal due to mass and distribution

15
Technical Budget
Component Cost Estimate (US) Launch costs to
GEO 1.0B Ribbon production 400M Spacecraft 500M
Climbers 370M Power beaming stations
1.5B Anchor station 600M Tracking facility
500M Other 430M Contingency (30) 1.6B TO
TAL 6.9B Costs are based on operational
systems or detailed engineering
studies. Additional expenses will be incurred on
legal and regulatory issues. Total construction
should be around US10B. Recommend construction
of a second system for redundancy US3B
16
SE Operating Budget
Annual Operating Budget per year in
USM Climbers 0.2 - 2 each Tracking
system 10 Anchor station 10 Administration 10 Anc
hor maintenance 5 Laser maintenance 20 Other 30 T
OTAL (50 launches) 135 This is US250/kg
operating costs to any destination.
17
Advantages

• Low operations costs - US250/kg to LEO, GEO,
  Moon, Mars, Venus or the asteroid belts
• No payload envelope restrictions
• No launch vibrations
• Safe access to space - no explosive propellants
  or dangerous launch or re-entry forces
• Easily expandable to large systems or multiple
  systems
• Easily implemented at many solar system locations

18
Global Attention

• Have briefed Congress, NASA HQ, NASA MSFC, AFRL,
  NSA, NRO, DARPA, FCC, FAA, and satellite
  insurance companies. Invited talks at
  Harvard/Smithsonian CfA, APL, GSFC, Berkeley,
  National Space Society, SPIE, Space and Robotics
  2002, ISU, etc.

• Held the three Space Elevator Conferences. One
  session at Space and Robotics 2002, two sessions
  at the IAC meeting in Oct., 2004, and Space
  Exploration 2005 are focusing solely on our work.
  
• ESA, Japan, Canada and Australia have expressed
  interests in being involved.
• Reported positively in New York Times, Washington
  Post, Discover, Wired, Seattle Times, Space.com,
  Canadian National Post, Ad Astra, Science News,
  Maxim, Esquire, etc.
• Globally over 1000 media spots including live
  interviews on CNN, Fox News, and BBC.

19
Next Steps

• Material development efforts are underway by
  private industry
• Space elevator climber competition will
  demonstrate basic concept
• Engineering development centers in the U.S.,
  Spain and Netherlands are under development
• Technical conferences continuing
• Greater public awareness
• Increased financial support being sought

20
Summary

• The space elevator is a revolutionary
  Earth-to-space transportation system that will
  enable space exploration
• Design, deployment and operational scenarios for
  the first space elevator have been put together.
  Potential challenges have been laid out and
  solutions developed.
• Development of the space elevator requires an
  investment in materials and engineering but is
  achievable in the near future with a reasonable
  investment and development plan.

21
The Space Elevator

• Slides courtesy of Dr. Brad Edwards
• Book available at Amazon.ca

22
NASA Centennial Challenges

• Prize money provided by NASA
• Beamed energy competition 1 of 5 design
  challenges
• Competition operated by Spaceward Foundation
• www.elevator2010.com

23
NASA Centennial Challenges

• Challenges get harder
• 2005 climber only
• 2006 climber beamed energy source
• Minimum speed 1 m/s
• climber weight 10 - 25 kg
• NO BATTERY POWER!

Courtesy of Spaceward
24
Contest Details

• 2005 contest
• Nobody won!
• Best performers were UBC, USASK
• Strongest tether side contest almost won
• 2006 contest
• Total purse 200,000USD
• Over 40 teams registered

25
Goal Requirements

• Given 25 kg climber, send 50 kg into space
• 67 payload mass ratio
• Compare to 10 for typical rocket launch
• At min. speed of 1 m/s, require
• Power F v 75 10 N /kg 1 m / s
• Power 750 W

26
QFD Analysis

• Quality Function Deployment
• Matches whats against hows
• Top whats (design drivers)
• Scalability to space
• Commercial-off-the-shelf, cost-effective parts
• Ease of repair / serviceability
• Top hows (critical technologies)
• Mechanical brakes
• Rectenna
• Heat sink

27
Beam Energy Technologies

• Solar power not efficient enough (up to 25
  efficient)
• Laser power too expensive dangerous
• Microwaves just right
• Up to 80 efficient
• Proven past technology

28
Microwave Beam Power

• First flight of a helicopter
• William Brown (Raytheon 1964)
• SHARP project
• UTIAS/CRC collaboration 1980-1992
• Prototype achieved flight _at_ 20 km altitude
• NASA studies of solar power harvesting (SPS)

29
Solution requires

• 2 x 6 kW microwave generators (2.4 GHz)
• Transmitting antenna
• 4 m diameter parabolic dish
• waveguide
• Collector rectenna (rectifying antenna)
• Dual polarized array (x- and y-plane)
• Must be manufactured

30
Schematic
Ground
Collector Rectenna
x y
Antenna
2.4 GHz beam
Climber Drive system
2 x 6kW Microwave generators
31
Safety Issues

• Mechanical brakes on climber
• Microwave Radiation
• Safe radius marked by detectors
• Absorbing material on crane
• Shrouding on collector

32
Collector Subsystem

• Patented design from CRC (Adrian Alden)
• Rectifying bridge (Schottky diodes)
• Array of parallel serial antennas
• Dual-plane polarization

Courtesy of CRC, Ottawa
33
Climber Subsystem

• Friction wheel system
• DC motor drive control
• Composite structure
• Maintains collector 90 deg orientation

34
What we need

• Facility
• storage, manufacturing and assembly area
• open testing site nearby
• Tools, equipment
• power supply, large dish, scopes, power tools
• Absorber material, detector
• Solar panels (in hybrid design)
• People (technical, publicity, documentary)

35
Punkworks Design

• Contact us
• Allen Atamer
• 647-892-6477
• allen.atamer_at_punkworks.ca