PUBLIC HEALTH IN AFRICA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

PUBLIC HEALTH IN AFRICA

Description:

More advance is made in the last 50 years than in 500 years before the 20th Century ... AFRICA STILL ASKS DR MAHLER'S QUESTIONS OF 1978, ALMA-ATA ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: dell72
Category:
Tags: africa | health | public | mahler

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PUBLIC HEALTH IN AFRICA


1
PUBLIC HEALTH IN AFRICA
  • THE CONTEXT, THE GAIN THE LOSS AND THE WAY
    FORWARD
  • (PH ability of HH, Community, State System to
    take care of own health meet daily needs and
    challenges env., lifestyle, livelihood)

2
THE CONTEXTTHE STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT (GLOBAL)
  • More advance is made in the last 50 years than in
    500 years before the 20th Century
  • Public health interventions and socioeconomic
    development reduced mortality and raised life
    expectancy
  • But disparity widened, with a third of the global
    population wallowing in absolute poverty
  • We still lose more than 11 million children to
    preventable diseases
  • The absolute number of illiterate women is rising
  • Those favored by trends insulated from reality as
    they take decisions others consequences

3
THE CONTEXT THE STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT (AFRICA)
  • If the 1960s were characterized by the great hope
    of seeing an irreversible process of development
    launched throughout Africa, the present age is
    one of disillusionment
  • Development has broken down, its theory is in
    crisis, its ideology the subject of doubt
  • Agreement on failure of devt. in Africa is sadly
    universal

4
THE CONTEXT THE STATUS OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
  • In Africa
  • Basic human development indicators are declining
    since early 80s
  • Except a few countries the figure on population
    with access to basic social services has been
    static or sluggish at best, complicated by
    transition(rapid growth)
  • Africa carries more than its fair share the
    global pervasive poverty, disease and death with
    appalling gap
  • 1.2 billion without adequate shelter,
    overcrowded, no access to safe water, sanitation,
    recreation, safety cannot meet PH needs (who is
    responsible to ensure PH for ALL)

5
THE CONTEXT THE STATUS OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
  • Attenuation of human capital base
  • The labor force participation is going down with
    growing population to feed, aggravated by
    decimation and/or diversion of productive force
    by HIV/AIDS and conflicts
  • Rising school dropouts
  • Brain drain, both internal and external by green
    pastures
  • Inappropriate tooling of human resource
    Training for export

6
THE CONTEXT THE STATUS OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
7
THE CONTEXT THE STATUS OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
  • Man-made and/or natural disasters degradation
    of the environment
  • Draught and famine
  • Overuse of agrochemicals
  • Squandering of resources leading to conflicts
  • Africa as a dumping ground (sometimes guised as
    donations)
  • Corruption and looting

8
THE CONTEXT THE STATUS OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
  • Unjust World Order
  • Unbalanced global trade
  • Imposed reforms, restructuring and adjustment
  • Debt burden (relentless and huge servicing)

9
THE CONTEXT THE STATUS OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT

THE VICIOUS CYCLE

TRAPPED HOUSEHOLDS

ILL HEALTH
POVERTY
10
FACTORS DETERMINING PUBLIC HEALTH INTERVENTION
11
PH THEGAINS (limited)
  • Reduced child and maternal mortality
  • Increased coverage
  • Increased allocation of resources for health
  • Growing recognition the health-development
    interplay

12
PHTHEGAINS (limited)
  • Affordable public health inventions
  • Enhanced integration of health actors
  • Patchy spots of excellence observed

13
PHTHE LOSSES
  • Worsening situation among the poorest (The
    neglected pool)
  • Millions still die from preventables
  • Poor preparedness for emerging scenario leading
    to reversal of gains

14
PH WHY LOSSES (4Ps)
  • The People viewed as
  • Vulnerable, powerless, sick, at risk (The
    needs-focused approach) instead of partners and
    resources
  • The Problem conceived as
  • Disease, malnutrition, poor sanitation instead of
    poverty, inequity, ignorance and marginalization

15
PH THE DISTORTIONS
  • The Main Package (service)
  • Drugs, vaccination, latrine, health talk (neglect
    of the social context) instead of income and food
    security, equity in access to services and
    empowerment
  • The Professional mainly shaped to
  • Give, prescribe, inject, educate, help, save, ask
    instead of facilitate, mobilize, dialogue,
    partner, feedback to people.

16
PH THE DISTORTIONS
  • Capacity limited to
  • Skills and knowledge instead of Ability,
    Resource, Authority and Responsibility

17
PH PACKAGE TO INCLUDE
  • Increased productivity
  • Increased education performance
  • Fairer/accountable global and national systems
  • Increased savings and investments (human, social,
    economic, environmental)
  • Planned Human Capital more investment in fewer
    children
  • Greater (redistributive) equity, social and
    political trust and stability
  • Greater social capital, greater accountability,
    greater effectiveness and equity
  • Investment in health will reduce deaths, lower
    population growth and provide 6 fold economic
    return by the year 2015. USD 66 billion new
    investment by the yea 2015 will save 8 millions
    lives per year.
  • Reduce differentials (social status, capacity,
    exposure, outcome and consequences)

18
PH THE WAY FORWARD THE WORKING TOOLS
  • CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

DIFFERENTIAL VULNERABILITY
INCOME, CULTURE, ENVIRONMENT, GENDER, EDUCATION,
POLICY, RACE, AGE, DISABILITY
SOCIAL STRATIFICATION
ACHIEVEMENTS AND MIX IN ABILITY, AUTHORITY,
RESPONSIBILITY AND RESOURCE
DIFFERENTIAL CAPACITY
RISK/PROBABILITY OF EXPOSURE TO HIV/AIDS DUE TO
ONE'S RELATIVE SOCIAL CONTEXT
DIFFERENTIAL EXPOSURE
SOCIAL AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES RESULTING FROM
EXPOSURE DEPENDING ON RELATIVE VULNERABILITY OR
CAPACITY
DIFFERENTIAL CONSEQUENCES
19
PH THE WAY FORWARD THE WORKING TOOLS

PRIVATE SECTORS NGOs
Poverty
PUBLIC SERVICE
TRAINING INSTITUTIONS
TRAPPED Households
Ill health
COMMUNITY
FRAMEWORK FOR PARTNERSHIP
20
The Spiral of Continuous Dialogue
  • Instructions
  • Delete sample document icon and replace with
    working document icons as follows
  • Create document in Word.
  • Return to PowerPoint.
  • From Insert Menu, select Object
  • Click Create from File
  • Locate File name in File box
  • Make sure Display as Icon is checked.
  • Click OK
  • Select icon
  • From Slide Show Menu, Select Action Settings.
  • Click Object Action and select Edit
  • Click OK



ASSESSMENT-2

ACTION MONITORING


ASSESSMENT-1
ACTION
PLANNING

ANALYSIS

DECISION
REFLECTION
Fig.1 The Dialogue Spiral
Fig.2 One cycle of the Spiral with
Stages
21
Steps in Organised Dialogue
  • STEP 1 Listen and learn about their priority
    concerns and gaps and how they are affected by
    them/it. (WHAT ARE THE CONCERNS AND CURRENT,
    often hidden, ALTERNATIVES)
  • STEP 2 Listen and learn about their current
    practices to solve / cope with the problem/s,
    gaps etc (WHY THE CURRENT SITUATION / CURRENT
    ACTION / BEHAVIOUR)
  • STEP 3 Listen and learn about their preferred
    future situation and suggested actions to
    achieve it (HOW CAN THE PREFERRED FUTURE BE
    ACHIEVED), give input including the recommended
    practice (if not yet mentioned or summarise from
    their contributions).
  • STEP 4 Select together with them the most
    effective, feasible, appropriate options, (WHICH
    OPTIONS ARE BEST), based on existing capacity
    and opportunities. Summarise agreement and
    reflect on possible results if implemented (this
    provides a basis for commitment as well as
    monitoring and evaluation)
  • STEP 5 Plan action, including monitoring and
    evaluation (WHEN DO WE TAKE ACTION AND WHO IS
    RESPONSIBLE)
  • STEP 6 Follow up, assess implementation of the
    joint action plan, based on information (note
    modifications, compliance or rejection),
    feedback, celebrate results and re- plan, making
    necessary adjustments.

22
Framework for PH Assessment
  • 1. Structures and institutions for participatory
    action (micro to macro) Capacity,
    representative-ness, inclusiveness, transparency
    and accountability
  • 2. Participatory program management Stakeholder
    involvement in program processes and decisions
    such as situation analysis, planning, action,
    monitoring and evaluation
  • 3. Management information system Design and
    selection of measurable indicators, data
    collection, analysis, recording, reporting and
    local consumption
  • 4. Human resource development and management
    re-orienting, and retooling, training,
    supervision, motivation and control to mainstream
    participatory approaches.
  • 5. Participatory resource mobilization and
    management Mobilization, allocation, expenditure
    tracking to enhance transparency, accountability
    and efficacy.
  • 6. Comprehensive communication strategy
    Comprehensiveness of the message, appropriateness
    and diversity of the channels, demystifying
    content and language to fit the audience, and the
    interactive-ness of the communication process
    including documentation, dissemination and
    feedback.
  • 7. The minimum public service package Service
    package definition, its effectiveness, policy
    relevance, accessibility and affordability.
  • 8. Sustainable linkages and partnerships Nature
    of linkage, partner capacity, relevance and
    effectiveness of partner investment,
    sustainability of either the linkage or the
    investment.

23
CAPACITY BUILDING FOR SUSTAINABLE SERVICE
ABILITY
DONOR/STATE-DRIVEN TRANSITIONAL SERVICE
DELIVERY CAPACITY BUILDING
AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY/HOUSEHOLD CAPACITY
RESPONSIBILITY
RESOURCE
EFFECTIVE SUPPLY
FROM NEED TO EFFECTIVE DEMAND
REGULATED MARKET
24
AFRICA STILL ASKS DR MAHLERS QUESTIONS OF 1978,
ALMA-ATA
  • Are we ready
  • To address the gap between the haves and the
    have-nots?
  • For partnership-participatory and intersectoral
    action?
  • For equitable and just health?
  • To make preferential allocation of resources to
    the marginalized?
  • Put people at the center of our action, to
    recognize them for their capacities and
    contributions as partners and not for their
    needs?
  • To introduce radical but relevant structural
    changes in our systems?
  • To fight political and technical battle to
    overcome social, economic and professional
    obstacles to PHC?
  • To mobilize global solidarity for Health For
    All?

25
AFRICA STILL ASKS DR MAHLERS QUESTIONS OF 1978,
ALMA-ATA
  • To mobilize global solidarity for Health For
    All?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com