Intellectual Property Enhancing Corporate Monopoly and Bioserfdom - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Intellectual Property Enhancing Corporate Monopoly and Bioserfdom

Description:

In 1985 the US patent and trademark office ruled that plants could qualify under ... In 1987 the US patent and trademark office ruled that animals are also patentable. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: ctbe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intellectual Property Enhancing Corporate Monopoly and Bioserfdom


1
Intellectual PropertyEnhancing Corporate
Monopoly and Bioserfdom
  • Natalie, Chelsie, Stephen, Lordell

2
Intellectual Property
  • Refers to a group of laws
  • Patents
  • Plants Breeders rights
  • Copy right
  • Trade Marks
  • Trade secrets
  • Intended to protect inventors and artists from
    losing control over their ideas

3
The evolution of Intellectual Property is U.S.
Agriculture
  • In the past, farmers were the primary breeders of
    new plant varieties in the U.S.
  • The Plant Patent Act of 1930 was created to
    reward developers of new plants, but excluded
    food crops because food was considered too
    precious to give up to monopolies.
  • The seed industry lobbied for Congress to pass
    the Plant Variety Protection Act (PVPA) in 1970
    that rewarded the developers of new important
    vegetable varieties.
  • The PVPA did give an exemption that allowed
    farmers to use these new varieties in
    experiments, allowed them to sell small amounts
    of seed to other farmers, and allowed them to
    reuse seeds from their harvests without paying a
    royalty.
  • But in 1994 the PVPA was amended, and this
    eliminated the exemption for farmers when it came
    to the use and distribution of intellectually
    created seeds.

4
Control of Biotechnology
  • In the 1980s the US patent laws were redefined
    for exclusive monopoly control of all biological
    products and processes.
  • Thereby with the arrival of genetic engineering,
    it did not take long to redefine what is
    considered human inventions and legally
    patentable.

5
Control of Biotechnology cont.
  • US government took giant steps to accommodate
    corporate desires to patent life in a decade, for
    example
  • In the 1980s the US supreme court ruled that
    genetically engineered microorganisms are
    patentable.
  • In 1985 the US patent and trademark office ruled
    that plants could qualify under the stronger
    utility patent laws.
  • In 1987 the US patent and trademark office ruled
    that animals are also patentable.

6
Control of Biotechnology cont.
  • As a result of these desires
  • Virtually every single living organism in the US
    became subject matters including human genetic
    materials.
  • This is why intellectual property has been a
    major factor in the growth and consolidation of
    the US biotechnology industry.

7
Biotech Industry Braces for Supreme Court Case
  • Pioneer (now owned by DuPont) sued Belmond-based
    Farm Advantage in 1998, claiming the company had
    no right to buy Pioneer seed and then resell it.
    Technically, the Supreme Court is being asked to
    decide whether sexually reproduced plants are
    patentable subject matter under U.S. law.
  • the company holds a patent on the germplasm that
    makes this corn genetically different from other
    corn varieties or hybrids although it was not
    genetically modified.
  • The Farm Advantage owner took the company to
    court arguing congress never intended to make
    plants part of the patent system
  • the fact that the Supreme Court has chosen to
    hear the case is cause for concern in the biotech
    industry, since the main reason the court hears a
    case is either because it wants to change the law
    or reconsider it.

8
The Gene Giants
  • The power of exclusive monopoly patent gives
    companies the legal right to determine who gets
    access to proprietary science and at what price.
  • The top ten seed companies control 1/3 of 24.7
    billion dollars in commercial seed market,
    however corporate share is much higher in
    specific seed sectors and for certain crops.
  • The patented seed is the ideal delivery system
    for a package of proprietary technologies for
    gene inputs.

9
Gene Giants Cont.
  • Forty percent of U.S. vegetable seeds come from a
    single source. The top 5 veggie companies
    control 75 of the global vegetable seed market.
  • 73 of the corn seed market is controlled by
    DuPont and Monsanto.
  • Four companies control 47 of the soybean seed
    market. 25 of this is farmers saved, not newly
    purchased.
  • So, exclusive monopoly patents are giving a
    steadily shrinking number of corporate Gene
    Giants unprecedented control over the biological
    basis for commercial agriculture.

10
Bioserfdom
  • Large companies attempting to dictate how farmers
    will farm under what conditions.
  • Food production is being taken out of the hands
    of independent farmers.
  • Under US patent law, it is illegal to save patent
    seeds and reuse them.
  • 1.4 billion people depend on farm saved seeds as
    their primary seed source.
  • With patent laws, the communities risk losing
    control of their farming systems and becoming
    dependant on outside sources.
  • Large companies require its customers to sign a
    gene licensing agreement.

11
Concentration of U.S. agricultural biotechnology
patent awards among top 10 patent holders,
1976-2000 including adjustment for mergers and
acquisition, 1988-2002

12
Intellectual Property
  • Intellectual property is the oil of the 21st
    century. Look at the richest men a hundred years
    ago they all made their money extracting natural
    resources or moving them around. All todays
    richest men have made their money out of
    intellectual property.
  • -Mark Getty
  • The future of agriculture depends on the
    promotion and protection of the farmers
    inalienable right to save and exchange seed. If
    we are to reclaim agriculture, we must resist
    monopoly control of life

13
  • Questions
  • Or
  • Comments

14
References
  • Shand, Hope J. Intellectual Property Enhancing
    Corporate Monopoly and Bioserfdom. Fatal
    Harvest The Tragedy of Industrial Agriculture.
    Ed. Andrew Kimbrell. Foundation for Deep Ecology,
    2002. 321-325.
  • www.USDA.com
  • www.biotech-info.net
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com