Title: Volitional Incapacity due to mental disease as an independent basis of exculpation
1Volitional Incapacity due to mental disease as an
independent basis of exculpation
2Rejection of the volitional prong of the ALI Test
- 1. Appreciation of wrongfulness formula is
sufficiently broad to take into account the
morally significant effects of severe mental
disorder. - 2. Any independent volitional inquiry involves a
significant risk of moral mistakes.
3Limits of scientific understanding
- Science has not yielded clinical tools for
calibrating impairments of behavior controls. - No objective basis for distinguishing between
offenders who were undeterrable and those who
were merely undeterred, between the impulse that
was irresistible and the impulse not resisted or
between substantial impairment or capacity and
some lesser impairment.
4Tests for conforming behavior to the requirements
of law
- Irresistible impulse test
- Test is combined with vague or broad
interpretations of the term mental disease. - It is the mixing of two imprecise notions that
can often result in unstructured expert
speculation regarding the psychological causes of
criminal behavior
5Volitional Disorders
- Internal motivations involving arousal and
reduction of tension are required for these
diagnoses. - Coexistence of cognitive intactness with
irrational conduct that characterized criminal
behavior. - An involuntary quality to the behavior
- Crime forms the principle evidence of the disease
6Types of criminal behavior
- Lack of apparent motive
- Lack of accomplices and escape plan
- Relief by the defendant directly after the
criminal behavior, such as exhibitionism,
killing, etc. - Alleged victims are randomly chosen, anyone at
hand
7Policeman at the elbow test
- To assess an ability to refrain
- Test is not dispositive
- Time distortion, I.e. use current vantage point
- If defendant believed the police were evil, test
invalid - Abortive homicidal suicide plan (if to kill self
then no sense to have police test)
8Assessment of ability to refrain
- Test ability to defer vs. refrainwaited an hour
until police car left the scene - Ability to refrain due to mental illness vs.
intoxication. (schizophrenic drunk kills spouse
and paramour in bed was it intoxication, rage,
schizophrenia)
9Types of Suspect Disorders
- Impulse control disorders, such as, pyromania,
kleptomania and pathological gambling. - Personality disorders
- Psycho-active substance addiction
10Impulse Control Disorders
- The failure to resist an impulse, drive, or
temptation to perform an act that his harmful to
the person or to others - Rule out common or rational motives for the
problem behavior, - fire setting not done for monetary gain or to
conceal other criminality, to express anger or
vengeance, or to improve ones living
circumstances. - Kleptomania only if the stolen objects are not
needed for personal use or their monetary value
and the stealing is not committed to express
anger or vengeance. - Behaviors cannot be better explained by conduct
disorder, a manic episode or antisocial
personality disorder
11Pathological Gambling Disorder
- Person must gamble in order to achieve the
desired excitement and must be restless or
irritable when attempting to cut down or stop
gambling or gamble as a way of relieving a
dysphonic mood such as feelings of helplessness
guilt, anxiety, or depression - The subject experience of the gambler is that of
being obsessive compulsive tendencies, I.e. being
preoccupied with gambling, and repeated
unsuccessful attempts to control, cut back or
stop gambling. - Rule out manic behavior
12Addictive Personality
- Given the co-morbidity of volitional disorders
with alcohol abuse or dependence, is there a
general addictive personality construct?
13Special exclusion of substance addiction some
volition
- Fingarete and Hasse concluded that a person who
chronically abuses alcohol is one who for any of
a variety of other reasons, often rooted in his
past or current patterns of life, has
increasingly used drinking as a way of adapting
to his life problems. Even though the impulse to
drink is intense, the addicts life is so very
distressing and so very difficult, both
physically and mentally, that he or she is likely
to seek help entirely on his own initiative or
with the aide of special encouragement.
Therefore, addiction should not support a defense
of volitional impairment. The threat of criminal
sanction may be a factor in controlling such
drinking as is likely to lead to criminal
offenses.
14How about sexual disorders should they be
excluded as volitional disorders
- Exhibitionism
- Pedophilia
- Erotomania
- Paraphilia disorders
- How about eating disorders should they be
excluded as volitional disorders.