Title: Human Capital Allocation, Technological Innovation and Sustainable Growth of the Chinese Economy
1Human Capital Allocation, Technological
Innovation and Sustainable Growth of the Chinese
Economy
- Professor Weiying Zhang
- Guanghua School of Management
- Peking University
- 24 April, 2006
- Stern School, NYU
2Facts
- Chinas economic growth has been astonishingly
successful in the past 26 years - Average annual growth rate is 9.4
- The total GDP in 2004 is tenfold of that in 1978
- Per capita GDP growth rate is 8.1
- Real per capita GDP of 2004 is more than
sevenfold of 1978.
3Source 2005 China Statistical Yearbook
4Source 2005 China Statistical Yearbook
5Questions
- Two Questions
- What is the main driving force for the high
growth? - Could the high growth be sustained in future?
- I provide a simple framework to address the
issues.
6Allocative Efficiency and Productive Efficiency
- Two sources of growth allocative efficiency and
productive efficiency - Allocative Efficiency production factors move
from low productivity-low value sectors to high
productivity-high value sectors price must be
right - Productive Efficiency Increase in productivity
through technological innovation incentive for
innovation must be right.
7Good 2
A
B
C
Good 1
8Shift in the Sources
- The high growth in the past 26 years has been
mainly driven by improvement in allocative
efficiency, particularly reallocation of human
capital - The potential of allocative efficiency is
diminishing probably for another 10 years - Sustainability of growth in future much depends
on improvement in productive efficiency, that is,
technological innovation.
9Allocation of Human Capital
- Allocation of human capital is more important
than stock of human capital! - Talents and entrepreneurship can be used in
different sectors (Baumol, 1990 Murphy, Shleifer
and Vishny, 1994) - What do most talented people do? Particularly,
government or business? - Economic development is determined by ability of
businesspeople.
10Types of Talents Allocation
high
entrepreneurs
bureaucrats
bureaucrats
middle
entrepreneurs
bureaucrats
workers
entrepreneurs
workers
low
workers
Type II Latin America
Type I Traditional China
Type II Developed countries
11Reallocation of Human Capital
- In the history, China had open government and
closed businesses - Businessmen were ranked lowest in society.
- Talented people went to government through
imperial examinations - Change from best students go to government to
best students go to business
12Three waves
- 1980s entrepreneurial peasants began
entrepreneurial activities TVEs development - 1990s government officials and scholars went
into business (xia hai), triggered by June 4th
Event - Around 2000, internet bubble attracted both
overseas returned scholars and domestically best
educated people to start-ups. - From rent-seeking to value-creation
13Where Do PKU Undergraduates Go?
SourcePeking Universitys Career Service Office
14Education Levels of Chinese Managers
Sources(1) Chinese Entrepreneur Survey System
(2) Reform Institute of China
(1985 Survey)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22Other reallocation factors
- Labor mobility from peasants to workers
- Industrial sector restructuring
- Regional trade and division of labor
- International trade
- Foreign investments
23Variation of Capital Productivities across
provinces
Source Gong Liutang and Xie Danyang (2004)
24Variation of Labor Productivities across Provinces
Source Gong Liutang and Xie Danyang (2004)
25How Big Potential of allocative efficiency is
- Still, but diminishing
- Business is still not free entrepreneurs feel
uncertain Immigrant movement is a signal - Catch-up is easier (through imitation) further
advancing is more difficult - Labor cost China/USA labor productivity is 1/6
labor wage is 1/42 so, labor cost is 1/7 - But the labor cost advantage is diminishing very
fast high skilled labor markets are more
globalized.
26Source 2005 China Statistical Yearbook
27Challenges
- Sources of growth must shift from allocative
efficiency to productive efficiency - This depends on technological innovation, RD
investments - Chinese enterprises not much technology
accumulation, low absorbability, low RD
investments and low incentives for innovation - Chinese entrepreneurs are good at imitation, but
bad at innovation.
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31Source 2005 China Statistical Yearbook on
Science and Technology
32Source 2005 China Statistical Yearbook on
Science and Technology
33Percentages of Advertising and RD in Revenue
with Firm Sizes in Manufacturing (2001-2003)
34Percentage of Advertising and RD in Revenue
With Firm Ages in Manufacturing (2001-2003)
35 Advertising and RD Expenditure in
Pharmaceutical Industry (2003)
USA 10.5 (1997)
36Communication, Computers and Other Electronic
Equipments
Note 13 of RD to Revenue in US Computers
37Source 2004 China Statistical Yearbook.
38 Percentage of Firms with
at least 1 patent in ZGC Science Park
year
Source PKU e-Business Center, 2005
39Consequences
- Since Chinese firms have no core technologies,
entry barriers are very low, and price
competition is very intensified! - Thus, low market concentration ratios
- Low profit margin.
40Source 2005 China E/I Industry Statistical
Yearbook
41(No Transcript)
42Past is not a good guide for future
- Human capital reallocation has driven the high
economic growth in the past 26 years! - China faces new challenges!
- Economic growth cannot be sustained without
significant progress in technological innovation!
43Institutional Changes Needed
- Property rights protection and in particular IPP
are fundamental for innovation - It determines horizon of business people
- It direct directions of innovation (Petra Moser
2005,AER) - Industry integration is needed for innovation
- Deregulation and competition policy
- Education system
44Cont
- Anti-corruption
- Business norms
- For a successful transformation, China must
continue to address institutional problems,
particularly legal system rule of law.
45Thank you!