Title: Enabling Flexible Distributed Learning FDL at Oxford Brookes University
1Enabling Flexible Distributed Learning (FDL) at
Oxford Brookes University
- George Roberts
- Development Director
- Off-campus e-Learning
- Oxford Brookes University
- Scottish QAA Seminar
- 06/12/2004
2Beyond Flexibility Enabling Flexible Distributed
Learning
- 1) Background
- Personal
- Policy
- 2) Strategic Definitions Flexibility
- Agenda(s)
- 3) Brookes context
- Institutions and structures
- Values
- Criteria
- Examples
- 4) Frameworks, Standards, Quality
- Pedagogical Pragmatism
3Life before and around Brookes
- Education
- 1968 - DEC PDP8 FORTRAN
- 1972 - BA (English Lit)
- 1986 - MPhil (Historical Comparative
Linguistics) - 2001 - MA (Education w/Open and Distance
Education) - 2004 - PhD study at U of Southampton
- The extent to which beliefs (ideologies) about
learning and teaching are embedded in the
artefacts of learning technology - Work Related
- 1987 PEP Preparatory Education Project
- 1988 ACE adult community continuing education
tutor - 1989 College of Petroleum and Energy Studies
- 2000 Brookes
- 2003 Open University
- ALT
- Writing
4Role at Brookes
- Identify opportunities for off-campus e-learning
development - Undertake research on e-learning nationally and
internationally - Advise SMT on
- potential and actual partnerships in e-learning
- feasibility of specific off-campus developments
- resource requirements to underpin off-campus
developments - Establish and maintain strategic relationships
with actual and potential partners - Stimulate internal development of e-learning for
external use and application - Advise and work with
- academic staff preparing and delivering off
campus e-learning - admin staff on adaptation of systems to support
off-campus e-learning - Facilitate sharing and dissemination of best
practice across boundaries - Ensure off-campus and on-campus developments are
complementary and co-ordinated
5Policy the Big Picture
- Globalisation
- Liberalisation
- Participation
- Innovation
- the Code is based on the key principlethat
collaborative and FDL provision,wherever and
however organised,should widen learning
opportunities - Education and training policy replaces industrial
policy as the means by which governments seek to
make regions economically competitive
6Whats happening, then? Chips with e-verything
- e-Society ICT is becoming
- Everywhere Ubiquitous
- Background Ambient
- Personal Adaptive and Aware
- Fast High-speed
- Mobile Wireless (wifi and telephony)
- Merging Convergent (TV, radio,
learning, work, leisure) - Multi/multiple media All Connected, Always on
7A 21st century education system
Learners Empowered
Flexible Provision
Professional Workforce
Better Value for Learners
Creativity Innovation
Objectives of Current DfES Strategies Raising
Standards Improving quality Removing
Barriers Preparing for employment skills
Widening Participation early years Primary
Secondary 14-19 Skills
Post-16 HE
Contributions from e-Learning Personalised
support, Online communities, Flexible
Study Virtual Environments, Individualised Study,
Collaborative Learning, Tools for Innovation,
Quality at Scale
Strategic Actions Leading Sustainable e-Learning,
Supporting pedagogical innovation, Staff
development, Unifying Learner support, Aligning
assessment, Building a better market, Assuring
tech and quality standards
8Widening participation
- Widening participation policies are focused in
two conflicting directions - emancipatory and empowering for the individual
stimulate the growth of autonomous,
entrepreneurial, IT-literate, multi-skilled
individuals capable of creating and taking
advantage of the opportunities inherent in a post
fordist economy - ensuring a supply of appropriately skilled
workers for industry create a compliant
low-expectation labour force inured to the
demands of flexibilisation in order to attract
inward investment not on the basis of high skills
available but on the basis of low costs
9Covert Curricula
- The less obvious--but more important
curriculum--is the covert curriculum, which is
composed of the skills and characteristics the
student develops as a result of successfully
completing the overt curriculum. (Appleby) - http//www.psichi.org/pubs/articles/article_59.asp
- Industrial era
- Overt
- 3 Rs reading, riting and rithmatic
- Covert
- punctuality, subordination, repetition
- Postmodern era
- Overt
- flexibility, community, personalisation
- Covert
- piecework, normalisation, surveillance
- see Roberts (2004) http//www.shef.ac.uk/nlc2004/P
roceedings/Individual_Papers/Roberts.htm
10Quick discussion
11Learning Technology Affordances
- Flexibility with respect to time
- Time shifting
- Flexibility with respect to place
- Location shifting
- Flexibility with respect to sequence
- Tutor directed learning
- Student directed learning
- Enhanced communication
- Distributed collaboration
- Access to resources
- Simulations
12Strategic definitions
- Flexible Distributed Learning
- Code of practice for the assurance of academic
quality and standards in higher education,
Section 2 Collaborative provision and flexible
and distributed learning (including e-learning) -
September 2004 - http//www.qaa.ac.uk/public/COP/cprovis/contents.
htm - The term 'e-learning' will be used here to refer
to modes of learning that are ICT-based - Flexible and distributed learning (FDL) denotes
educational provision leading to an award, or to
specific credit toward an award, of an awarding
institution delivered and/or supported and/or
assessed through means which generally do not
require the student to attend particular classes
or events at particular times and particular
locations.
13DfES e-Learning Consultation
- Broad and inclusive
- If someone is learning in a way that uses
information and communication technologies ICTs,
they are using e-learning playing an
interactive game, collaborating using the
Internet, watching an animated diagram,
taking a driving theory test online - it all
counts as e-learning. - (DfES Consultation, Towards a Unified e-Learning
Strategy, July 2003)
14Axes of Flexible Learning
15Blended learning
- The variety of approaches represented by FDL in
the UK and elsewhere is now considerable,and
embraces a continuum of pedagogical
opportunities. - 3-C matrix
- collocationlow/high (face-to-face vs. distance
learning) - collaborationlow/high (individualised vs.
collaborative learning) - computerisationlow/high (e-learning vs.
traditional print and communication technologies)
16Blended learning 3-C
hi collocation hi collaboration
traditional laboratory lo computerisation
hi collocation whiteboards in
classrooms hi collaboration virtual field
trips hi computerisation
lo collocation CACL, online forums hi
collaboration Learning to teach online hi
computerisation
hi collocation lo collaboration video link
lecture hi computerisation
lo collocation lo collaboration traditional
OU DL lo computerisation
lo collocation lo collaboration CBT
training hi computerisation
17Techniques
- Large class teaching
- Personal response systems
- Prior reading fewer plenary lectures
- Formative assessment
- CAA
- Simulations
- Distrubuted (online) discussion forums
- Work-based learning
- International / distributed cohorts
- Multi-professional learning
- Collaborative working
- Reflective learning
- Blogging
- ePDP/ ePortfolio
18VLE/MLE
http//www.jisc.ac.uk/mle/reps/briefings/bp1.html
19Thinking Outside the Slots
- More or less off-campus more or less most of the
time http//www.brookes.ac.uk/research/odl/taocp_
home.html - and/or Semester Calendar
- and/or Room slotting
- and/or Modular degree
- BUT Systems issues embed certain (traditional?)
practices - Workload planning
- unit of academic resource expressed as ratio
of time in classroom time in preparation - Resource allocation model
- DL does not use Library Learning Resources
- but.. Learning Resources also Computer
Services (VLE, eJournals, etc)
20Flexibility Multiple Learning and Teaching Styles
- Contingent
- Inherent
- Relative
- Political
21Contingent Flexibility
- Organised
- Managed
- Funded
- Directed
- Accredited
- Bureaucratised
- Wired Infrastructure
- Wired-in, connected
- Networked
22Inherent Flexibility
- Latent
- Potential Kinetic
- Emergent Evolutionary
- Located in domains
- Disciplined
- Sectored
- Nationalised
- Symbolic Capital
- Personal, Social, Cultural
- Experienced, Phenomenal
- Prior Learning
- Cognitive
- Modelled Theorised
- Taught Learned
23Relative Flexibility
- zero sum
- worth asking if an increased flexibility in one
part of a system will result in decreased
flexibility (inflexibility) in another - digital/analogue particle/wave
- granular (objectified)
- modular / linear
- lifelong continuing
- genetic/mimetic
- inherited
- preventable/unstoppable
- recreational/re-creational
24Political Flexibility
- Work-related
- Valued (high/low)
- Classified (Property)
- Controlled
- Democratic or not
- Pragmatic
- Global
- Shapable
- Standardised
- Assured
- Necessary?
One of the cavaliers, those Bonny Princes,
said If I have freedom in my love and in my
heart am free,then Angels who dwell in heaven
aboveshall know no such liberty.
25Brookes Context
- 16,000 students (12,000 fte)
- 1,600 DL (all part time 0.4 fte)
- More or less off campus more or less most of the
time - Outside UMP, semester calendar and slotting
system - Increasingly Blended
- Funding
- Self
- Employer
- TTA/NHS
- Other
- Full price
- Financial models problematic
- Economics embeds practice RAM PWP
26Archaeology
- Modular Programme
- RBL
- IT Term (the Hypothetical)
- LTTF
- Brookes Virtual
- Brookes Online
- e-Learning at Brookes
Mists of time
Today
27Institutional Structure
Partners
Board of Governors
Students Union
Academic Development including C4eL
New Project-Based Management Approach
Executive Board
Academic Board
Schools
Schools
Schools
Learning and Teaching Committee
Research Committee
Resources and Planning Committee
Directorates
Directorates
Directorates
Directorates
Undergraduate Forum
e-Learning Forum
Postgraduate Forum
Widening Participation
CPD Forum
28Networks and Critical Distance
Vice Chancellor
Deputy Vice Chancellor
Deputy Vice Chancellor
Pro Vice Chancellor
Pro Vice Chancellor
Registrar
29Networks of Influence Flexibility Inherent
- Structure
- Leadership
- Responsibility
- Budgets
- Authority
- All derive from institutional utility based on
knowledge, experience and information. - Chaos model of management allows individuals to
gain influence on the basis of charisma and
hermeneutic approaches.
30Institutional Structure Networks
Centres for e-Learning?
University
School
Department
Admin Support
Polity
Social
31Institutional Structure
Institutional Structure Networks
Partners
Board of Governors
Students Union
Academic Development including C4eL
New Project-Based Management Approach
Executive Board
Academic Board
Schools
Schools
Schools
Learning and Teaching Committee
Research Committee
Resources and Planning Committee
Directorates
Directorates
Directorates
Directorates
Undergraduate Forum
e-Learning Forum
Postgraduate Forum
Widening Participation
CPD Forum
32Why e-Learning? (Brookes e-L Strategy
2002-04)
- to encourage active learning in all domains
- to support and develop independent, reflective
learners - to maintain high levels of support and guidance
to a diversity of learners - to develop key transferable skills
- IT, teamwork, self-management, learning, problem
solving and communications
33University e-Learning Strategy 2002 - 03
- 1. Provide a Managed Learning Environment
- 2. Personal computer ownership and
connectivity for all - 3. Library development and support
- 4. Develop and provide of learner support
resources - 5. School support for the development of
e-learning - 6. Stimulate e-learning and provide a
University framework for development of
e-learning - 7. Create Centre for Higher Education e-Learning
Development
34Centre for e-Learning
- support for the achievement of the Academic Plan
- leadership in all aspects of learning technology
guide the Universitys vision of the future for
e-learning - ensure that the e-learning strategy is coherent,
focussed and in-line with national policy
recommendations - determine central e-learning strategy and take
responsibility for cross-University decisions
relating to e-learning - steer and advise on the balance between
innovative developments in e-learning and
practical applications support for e-learning - co-ordinate, conduct and disseminate research
into e-learning and commission, or undertake as
appropriate, research and development projects in
e-learning - co-ordinate and steer ongoing staff development
and evaluation of the impact of e-Learning on the
University community
35E-Learning at Brookes
aims to apply Learning Technology to the
provision of flexible, active, collaborative and
professionally authentic learning
with these underpinning values
E-Learning at Brookes values innovation,
enterprise, equality, scholarship and social
responsibility
and 5 key projects
Improving and expanding environments for
elearning
Researching and evaluating elearning
Supporting elearning through curriculum design
and development
Developing, enabling and valuing eLearning
practitioners
Widening participation and creating effective
elearning partnerships
36Good learning
- based on
- reciprocity
- authenticity
- credibility
- independent of the mode of engagement
37Good teaching
- sets ground rules
- provides alternative modes of participation
- exemplifies models of engagement
- gives access to the experience of the instructor
- (cf. Brookfield 2001, Jones 1999)
- independent of the mode of engagement
38Good practice
- encourage student-tutor contact
- encourage student-student co-operation
- encourage active learning
- give prompt feedback
- emphasise time on task
- have and communicate high expectations
- respect diverse talents and ways of learning
- independent of the mode of engagement
39Good design
- Permeability multiple pathways
- Variety multiple learning teaching
styles/preferences - Legibility multiple literacies, modes and
systems of meaning - Robustness
- Visual appropriateness
- Richness complexity at scale
- Personalisation
- independent of the mode of engagement
40Modes of Engagement
Mode 1 baseline admin and support
Mode 2 Blended Learning
Mode 3 FDL
41Approaches in the Schools
42Quality Reflections Frameworks Standards
- Process/outcomes
- Frameworks
- Standards Standardisation
- Beliefs
43FDL Precepts
- Overall, the revision may be characterised as
moving from the 'process-based' style of the
earlier version to a more 'outcome-based'
approach. - The focus now is on ends rather than means.
Institutions will see that the basics remain in
the content of the revised version but will, it
is hoped, appreciate the flexibility now offered
by the greater attention to outcomes. - Flexibility has become an epi-phenomenon, part of
the meta-curriculum
44Learning Technology Support Architecture
Embedded in systems architectures
(source IEEE LTSA)
45Source Bill Olivier, CETIS, 2003-04
46 and, Conditioned by beliefs
- positivism knowledge is out there,
categorical - objective-led (behaviourist) pedagogies of
external motivations such as enquiry-based
learning, physical simulation and experiment - social perspective knowledge emergent,
constructed - dominant approaches are exploratory learning and
constructivism - tacit communitarianism common-sense
normalisation - knowledge engineering, and computational
approaches such as organisational learning and
intelligent systems - new critical cognitive disconnect in LT
practice - project and problem-based learning, applied and
action research are characteristic
47Final thought
- Flexibility is not an end in itself
- Contingent
- Inherent
- Relative
- Political
- Questions/Comments/Discussion
48George Roberts Development Director, Off-campus
E-learning Oxford Brookes University groberts_at_bro
okes.ac.uk 44 (0) 1865 484871 44 (0) 7711
698465 http//www.brookes.ac.uk/virtual/ http//ww
w.alt.ac.uk/altc2004/