Statins: The New Silver Bullet - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 69
About This Presentation
Title:

Statins: The New Silver Bullet

Description:

Bandolier. Pre-1987: epidemiological studies ... Bandolier. Large meta-analysis showed no link between statin use and fatal or non-fatal cancer. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:111
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 70
Provided by: usa9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Statins: The New Silver Bullet


1
Statins The New Silver Bullet?
  • Timothy Huber, MD
  • 1st CIVDIV
  • Oroville, CA
  • EBM Presentation

2
Fool or Magician?
3
Disclaimer
  • Off-label use talk commencing here.

4
Learning Objectives
  • First, briefly explore physiological basis of
    current research.
  • Second and Third
  • Explore current areas of research.
  • Give the current evidence for future indications
    for statins.

5
What do statins do?
  • Beneficial changes to lipid profiles.
  • Lower LDL
  • Raise HDL
  • Some lowering of TG.
  • Affect other serum and cell markers.

6
Current Indications
  • Primary MI Prevention
  • AFCAPS/TexCAPS (not sig gt65 y.o.)
  • WOSCOPS
  • ASCOT
  • Primary MI Prevention in DM
  • CARDS

7
Current Indications
  • Secondary MI prevention
  • 4S, CARE, AVERT, MIRACL, LIPID, HPS, GREACE,
    Reigger et al.
  • Risk reduction CV events in perioperative period
    of cardiac revascularization procedures.

8
Current Indications
  • Stroke prevention in patients with CAD and/or DM
  • Primary and Secondary Cerebrovascular Events
  • 4S, LIPID, CARE, CARDS
  • Cholesterol Level Reduction in Familial
    Hypercholesterolemia Syndromes

9
What About 1st Strokes?
  • No current indication for primary stroke
    prevention.
  • Unless DM or pre-existing CAD present.
  • SPARCL clinical phase wrapped up late 2005.
  • High Chol and no clinically evident CAD.
  • Using atorvastatin.
  • Anticipate preliminary results late 2006.

10
Why look elsewhere?
  • Because statins change more serum and cell
    markers than just various types of lipids.
  • Do changes in these markers have a physiological
    effect?
  • Are these effects clinically relevant?

11
Why look elsewhere?
  • Drug companies want to extend their patents.
  • Doing the right thing for the patient.

12
Selected Non-Lipid Biological Markers Affected by
Statins
  • Interleukins 1b, 6, 8, 10
  • P-Selectin
  • MHC-II Interferon-g
  • Leukocyte Function Antigen 1
  • C-reactive protein
  • Tumor Necrosis Factor-A
  • ICAM-1
  • VCAM-1
  • NO

13
Statins Reduce Sytemic Inflammation
  • CRP Marker and Player
  • Monocyte recruitment
  • Monocyte uptake of LDL
  • Complement activation
  • Increases ICAM/VCAM
  • TNF-A
  • Increases CRP
  • Neutrophil aggregation
  • Interleukin stimulation
  • PGE2 stimulation
  • Induces release of CRH
  • Increases insulin resistance.

14
Statins Reduce Local Regulators
  • ICAM-1 / VCAM-1 Adhesion Molecules
  • when expressed, increase the number of monocytes
    able to stick to an area
  • Statins reduce ICAM, no effect on VCAM.
  • Nitric Oxide Local Vasodilator
  • Statins upregulate expression of NO synthetase
  • Preservation of proper endothelial function
  • Addl reduction in oxidative stresses

15
Statins Reduce Other Markers
  • Leukocyte Function Antigen (LFA-1)
  • Tcell activator
  • Interferon-g
  • MHC-II regulator
  • Inflammatory Interleukins
  • 1b,6, 8, 10
  • P-selectin
  • Chemotaxis
  • Endothelial constrictor.

16
ENOUGH BASIC SCIENCE!!
  • Right?

17
Well not really.
18
Statins and DementiaSparks, Sabbagh, et al.,
Arch Neurol 5/05.
  • Pilot intent-to-treat, proof of concept RCT
  • 40 mg bid atorvastatin vs. placebo
  • 98 pts with MMSE 12-28 at intake
  • 11 comparison, followed 1 year q3months
  • Patients given and followed with neuropsych
    exams.
  • 46 completed study

19
Statins and DementiaSparks, Sabbagh, et al.,
Arch Neurol May 05.
  • Primary Outcomes measured
  • D Alzheimer's Disease Assessment
    Scale-cognitive subscale.
  • Significant difference only _at_ 6 mo. (p0.003)
  • No difference at 3, 9, 12 mo.
  • Clinical Global Impression of Change Scale scores
  • Trend approaches significance at 9 mo (p0.07)

20
Statins and DementiaSparks, Sabbagh, et al.,
Arch Neurol May 05
  • Secondary Outcomes
  • MMSE outcome NS
  • GDS significant difference (p0.04)
  • Neuropsychiatric Inventory Scale NS
  • Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities
    of Daily Living Inventory NS

21
Statins and DementiaSparks, Sabbagh, et al.,
Arch Neurol May 05
  • Conclusion As a pilot proof-of concept study,
    significant differences were not expected, but
    benefits identified tend to support the trials
    rationale.
  • Small, limited, called for more research.

22
Statins and Dementia FPIN Suchecki, et al.,
JFP, JUN 2005
  • 3 observational studies suggested protective
    effect.
  • Methodological problems
  • Selection bias
  • 2 RCTs
  • PROSPER and the
  • 5804 pts
  • Pravastatin
  • Heart Protection Study,
  • gt20,000 patients
  • HPS simvastatin
  • No delay or prevention.

23
Statins and Dementia CLASP
  • Cholesterol Lowering Agent to Slow Progression
    (CLASP) of Alzheimer's Disease Study
  • 400 pts, RCT using simvastatin
  • Following 2 arms for 18 months.
  • Ended Dec 2005 no preliminary results.

24
Statins and Dementia ACCORD-MIND
  • Sub-group of the ACCORD study Action to Control
    Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
  • Memory IN Diabetes
  • Est. 2800 pts of the ACCORD trial followed for
    FOUR years.

25
Statins and Dementia ACCORD-MIND
  • Primary Outcomes measured
  • Glycemic control
  • rate of decline in memory and executive function
  • MRI measured cerebral atrophy
  • Secondary Outcomes looking at same in the HTN
    and Lipid arms.
  • Anticipate end of study April 2009.

26
(No Transcript)
27
Statins and Glaucoma McGwinn, Arch Ophthal, 2004.
  • Asked Are lipid-lowering medications associated
    with Open-Angle Glaucoma
  • Matched Case control study
  • 50 y/o veterans with new dx of Glaucoma
  • 10 age-matched controls per patient.
  • Examined VA database records for
  • Cholesterol lowering medications
  • Co-morbid conditions

28
Glaucoma McGwinn, Results
  • More protection if
  • gt 24 months using statin
  • OR 0.60 95 CI 0.39-0.92, p 0.04
  • Glaucoma Statin AND a co-morbidity
  • Cardiovascular disease present
  • OR, 0.63 95 CI, 0.42-0.97
  • Lipid metabolism disorder present
  • OR, 0.63 95 CI, 0.41-0.99
  • NO Cerebrovascular disease present
  • OR, 0.76 95 CI, 0.58-0.99

29
Glaucoma McGwinn, Results
  • BUT
  • Protective association also observed with
    nonstatin cholesterol-lowering agents
  • OR 0.59 95 CI 0.37-0.97

30
Age-Related Macular Degeneration
  • Van Leuwen, BMJ, 2003.
  • A population based cohort study of 4822 people
    aged 55 years and more.
  • Two follow up examinations were performed at
  • mean intervals of 2 and 6.5 years.  
  • 457 patients used cholesterol lowering drugs for
    one or more days.

31
AMD- van Leeuwen
  • 419 cases of incident age related maculopathy
    were observed.
  • Use of cholesterol lowering drugs at any time was
    not associated with the incidence of age related
    maculopathy (Hazard Ratio 1.0 (95 confidence
    interval 0.7 to 1.5)).

32
AMD van Leeuwen
  • Cumulative exposure to statins
  • lt 1 mo
  • 1-12 mo
  • gt1y
  • No protective effect on the risk of ARMD.
  • More adjustments then made for
  • BMI - tobacco
  • HTN - PVD
  • Re-adjustment did not change the association.

33
AMD van Leeuwen , Results
34
AMD van Leeuwen
  • Same results when team performed the same
    analysis with progression of age related
    maculopathy as the outcome variable.
  • Final conclusions
  • No association between statins and AMD
  • No protective effect found

35
AMD
  • Smeeth, et al, B J Ophth, 2005
  • A case control study of age related macular
    degeneration and use of statins.
  • The primary outcome was the odds ratio for the
    association between exposure to statins and AMD.
  • United Kingdom General Practice Research
    Database.
  • 18 007 people with diagnosed AMD
  • 86 169 controls
  • Matched for age, sex, and general practice.

36
AMD Smeeth, Results
  • Crude Odds Ratio for the association between any
    recorded exposure to statins and AMD was 1.32
    (95 CI 1.17 to 1.48)
  • Reduced to OR of 0.93 (95 CI 0.81 to 1.07,
    p 0.33) after adjustment.
  • No evidence of risk varying by dose, duration, or
    type of individual statins.
  • Short and Medium Term no long term (gt3y) looks
    done.

37
Statins and Osteoporosis
  • Meta-analysis by Bauer, et al. Arch Int Med 2004
  • looked at several classic prospective studies
  • Study of Osteoporotic Fractures
  • Fracture Intervention Trial
  • Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study
  • Rotterdam Study
  • AND
  • 8 other observational studies
  • AND
  • 2 clinical trials

38
Osteoporosis Bauer, Meta-Analysis
  • 4 Prospective Studies
  • In statin users, relative hazards (RH) showed
  • fewer hip fractures
  • 0.19-0.62
  • Fewer non-spine fractures
  • 0.49-0.95
  • 8 Observational Studies.
  • In statin users, summary odds ratio (OR) showed
  • hip fracture 0.43 (95 CI, 0.25-0.75)
  • Non-spine fracture 0.69 (95 CI, 0.55-0.88).

39
Bauer, Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
  • Clinical trial results did not support a
    protective effect from osteoporosis with statin
    use 4S and LIPID trials.
  • Hip fracture
  • summary OR, 0.87 95 CI, 0.48-1.58
  • Non-spine fracture
  • summary OR, 1.02 95 CI, 0.83-1.26

40
(No Transcript)
41
In Autoimmune Diseases, Statins
  • In vitro and in vivo (animals and humans)
  • Inhibit T cell activation
  • Direct inhibition of LFA-1, preventing T cell
    activation.
  • Increases Interferon-gamma, preventing
    upregulation of MCH-II genes.
  • Reduce ability of WBCs to aggregate
  • Reduced expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1
  • Impair inflammatory response
  • Reduce CRP, Interleukins, TNF-alpha, COX, PGE2.

42
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - APPLE
  • Atherosclerotic Prevention in Pediatric Lupus
    Erythematosis
  • 5 year study comparing atorvastatin vs placebo.
  • Looking at 280 pediatric patients (10-19 y/o).
  • Primarily looking at atherosclerosis
  • Secondary endpoint lupus progression.

43
Lupus Erythematosus - LAPS
  • Lupus Atherosclerosis Prevention Study
  • Primarily looking at atherosclerosis using
    atorvastatin 40 mg vs placebo.
  • Secondary looking at lupus progression on statin
  • Secondary looking at effect on Bone Mineral
    Density
  • Completed, data analysis not completed.

44
Rheumatoid Arthritis - TARA
  • Trial of Atorvastatin in Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • 116 patients, balanced arms with no significant
    differences in age, disease severity, meds,
    comorbidities.
  • randomized to 40 mg atorvastatin vs. placebo
  • followed 6 months

45
Rheumatoid Arthritis TARA results with plt0.05
  • Mean DAS28 score - 0.5U in statin group
  • ESR 5mm/hr lower from baseline in statin group
  • Swollen joint count 2.7 lower w/statin
  • Lower IL-6, fibrinogen, LDL, TG in statin group
  • No increase is side effects cf. to placebo.

46
Rheumatoid Arthritis TARA conclusions
  • Atorvastatin effective in reducing inflammatory
    markers and articular signs in patients with
    active RA despite DMARD therapy.
  • Called for larger studies.

47
Statins Multiple Sclerosis
  • Atorvastatin slowed and reversed autoimmune
    encephalitis in mice.
  • Youssef, et al, Nature, 2004.

48
Multiple Sclerosis in Humans
  • Vollmer, et al., May 2004, Lancet
  • 45 patients with remitting-relapsing MS and at
    least 1 MRI-identifiable lesion.
  • All given 80mg Simvastatin for 6 months.
  • No placebo arm.
  • MRIs done at 0, 4, 5, and 6 months 2 blinded
    reviewers.
  • 28 patients completed the study.

49
Multiple Sclerosis Vollmer, et al.
  • Mean number of lesions decreased by 44
  • Mean volume of lesions decreased by 41
  • No change in relapse rates or disability scores.

50
Lung Transplant
  • NIH-funded retrospective study, 1995 - 2000
  • 200 allograft recipients
  • 39 received statins (4 different types)
  • 161 used as controls
  • Followed for a mean of 3.0 years (/- 1.9)

51
Lung Transplant Study Parameters
  • Death pre-screened against CAD.
  • Acute Graft Rejection
  • Obliterative Bronchiolitis Chronic Rejection
  • Immunosuppressant use
  • long term and boost

52
Lung Transplant Study Results over 6 years
  • NS Ns15

53
Lung Transplants - Results
  • Lower doses of immunosuppressants in statin group
  • Tacrolimus p0.002
  • Cyclosporine p0.02
  • Prednisone plt0.001
  • Fewer number of steroid pulses plt0.001

54
Lung Transplants - Conclusions
  • Early use of statins following transplant
  • Protects against acute graft rejection.
  • Protects against obliterative bronchiolitis and
    chronic rejection.
  • Prevents deaths independent of atherosclerotic
    disease.
  • Permits lower doses of immunosuppressants.
  • Reduces need for boost therapies.

55
Renal Tranplants
  • Renal Transplant
  • Simvastatin worked in rats. Viera, et al, Aug
    2005
  • But Fluvastatin didnt work in humans. Holdaas,
    et al, 2001.

56
Statins and Cancer Bandolier
  • Pre-1987 epidemiological studies
  • an association between low cholesterol levels and
    increased incidence of cancer of the
    gastrointestinal tract.
  • Fears of Lipid-lowering agent could increase the
    incidence of gastrointestinal cancers.
  • 1987 Statins come on the market.
  • Now, multiple studies suggest the opposite.

57
Statins and Cancer Bandolier
  • 2 case control studies looking at breast and
    prostate ca.
  • gt10,000 pt
  • Different statins
  • Failed to demonstrate a clear association with
    statin use.
  • L Blais et al. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl
    coenzyme A reductase inhibitors and the risk of
    cancer a nested case-control study. Arch Intern
    Med 2000 160 2363-8.
  • PF Coogan et al. Statin use and the risk of
    breast and prostate cancer. Epidemiology 2002 13
    262-7.

58
Statins and Cancer Bandolier
  • Large meta-analysis showed no link between statin
    use and fatal or non-fatal cancer.
  • 5 studies
  • gt30,000 pts
  • LM Bjerre, J LeLorier. Do statins cause cancer? A
    meta-analysis of large randomized clinical
    trials. Am J Med 2001 110 716-23.

59
Bandolier results Non fatal CA
  • Include nonmelanoma skin ca
  • 2 trials
  • CARE, LIPID
  • 13173 pts
  • Statin events/total
  • 374/6593
  • Placebo events
  • 374/6580
  • RR 1.00 (0.87-1.15)
  • Exclude nonmelanoma skin ca
  • 3 trials
  • 4S, WOSCOPS, HPS
  • 31575 pts
  • Statin events
  • 583/15792
  • Placebo events
  • 576/15781
  • RR 1.01 (0.90-1.13)

60
Bandolier Fatal Cancers
  • Include nonmelanoma skin ca
  • 2 trials
  • CARE, LIPID
  • 13173
  • Statin events/total
  • 177/6593
  • Placebo events/total
  • 186/6580
  • RR 0.95 (0.78-1.16)
  • Exclude nonmelanoma skin ca
  • 3 trials
  • 4S, WOSCOPS, HPS
  • 31575
  • Statin events/total
  • 436/15792
  • Placebo events/total
  • 429/15783
  • RR 1.02 (0.89-1.16)

61
Bandolier All Cancers
  • Include nonmelanoma skin ca
  • 4 studies
  • CARE, LIPID AFCAPS, HPS
  • 40314 pts
  • Statin events/total
  • 2110/20166
  • Placebo events/total
  • 2067/20148
  • RR 1.02 (0.96-1.08)
  • Exclude nonmelanoma skin ca
  • 4 studies
  • 4S, WOSCOPS, HPS AFCAPS
  • 38198 pts
  • Statin event/total
  • 1271/19114
  • Placebo event/total
  • 1264/19084
  • RR1.00 (0.93-1.08)

62
Melanoma
  • Cochrane Skin Group currently putting together a
    protocol to systematically review the literature.
  • 2 large RCTs showed significantly fewer melanomas
  • Primary outcomes of studies was looking at 2 CAD
    prevention.
  • Lovastatin, Gemfibrozil
  • Rubins, NEJM 1999341410-8
  • Downs, JAMA 19982791615-22

63
Colon CA - Dynamed
  • Poynter, et al., N Engl J Med. May 2005.
  • Case control study, 1953 pts with 2015 controls
  • Structured interview and verification of statin
    use with prescription fill/refill reviews
  • Statin use for at least five years (vs. the
    nonuse of statins) significantly reduced relative
    risk of colorectal cancer
  • Odds Ratio 0.50, 0.40 - 0.63

64
Colon Cancer - Dynamed
  • Statins do not affect incidence of cancer or
    cancer death (level 1 likely reliable evidence)
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of 26
    randomized trials with 86,936 participants, trial
    durations ranged from 1.9 years to 10.4 years
  • No significant effect on incidence of colon
    cancer in meta-analysis of 4 trials with 27,972
    patients
  • Reference - JAMA 2006 Jan 4295(1)74

65
Prostate Cancer
  • Shannon et al, Am J Epi, Aug 2005
  • Oregon VA system Case control study
  • 100 bx proven prostate ca
  • 202 matched controlsP
  • Examined statin use via pharmacy records
  • Reduction in prostate cancer risk
  • Odds Ratio 0.38, 0.21 - 0.69)
  • Association ONLY with with Gleason scores of 7 or
    higher
  • Odds Ratio 0.24, 0.11 - 0.53)

66
Summary
  • There is a clear physiological and
    pharmacological basis for investigation of
    statins for uses other than lipid control.
  • There are multiple studies focusing on a variety
    of diseases that are either just concluded or
    ongoing.
  • Statins show early promise in osteoporosis and a
    variety of autoimmune and neoplastic diseases.

67
Questions?
68
References
  • Pepys MB, Hirschfield GM. C-reactive protein and
    atherothrombosis. Ital Heart J. 20012196.
  • Torzewski M, Rist C, Mortensen RF, et al.
    C-reactive protein in the arterial intima role
    of C-reactive protein receptor-dependent monocyte
    recruitment in atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb
    Vasc Biol .2000202094.
  • Holm, T, et al. Effect of Pravastatin on Plasma
    Markers of Inflammation and Peripheral
    Endothelial Function in Male Heart Transplant
    Recipients Am J Card Vol. 87 MARCH 15, 2001
  • Kobashigawa J Statins in Solid Organ
    Transplantation Is There an Immunosuppressive
    Effect? American Journal of Transplantation
    Volume 4, Number 7, July 2004, pp. 1013-1018(6)
  • Johnson, B, et al. STATIN USE IS ASSOCIATED WITH
    IMPROVED FUNCTION AND SURVIVAL OF LUNG
    ALLOGRAFTS AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published
    on February 13, 2003
  • Vieira M, Mantovani J, et al. Simvastatin
    attenuates renal inflammation, tubular
    transdifferentiation and interstitial fibrosis in
    rats with unilateral ureteral obstruction
    Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Volume
    20, Number 8, August 2005, pp. 1582-1591(10)
    Oxford University Press
  • Hallvard Holdaas, et al. Effect of fluvastatin
    on acute renal allograft rejection A randomized
    multicenter trial Kidney International Volume
    60 (5)Page 1990  - November 2001
    doi10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00010.x
  • Ora Shovman, et al. Anti-inflammatory and
    immunomodulatory properties of statins.
    Department of Medicine B Sheba Medical Center,
    Tel Hashomer and Sackler Faculty ofMedicine
    Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel 2003 from
    http//www.rheuma21st.com.
  • http//www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00120887
    Lupus Atherosclerosis Prevention Study, Johns
    Hopkins University Alliance for Lupus Research
    Clinical Trials.gov IdentifierNCT00120887
  • http//www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00065806?
    order1 Atherosclerosis Prevention in Pediatric
    Lupus Erythematosus (APPLE) Verified by National
    Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and
    Skin Diseases (NIAMS) September 2005 Sponsored
    by National Institute of Arthritis and
    Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00065806

69
References
  • Lancet. 2004 Jun 19363(9426)2015-21. Trial of
    Atorvastatin in Rheumatoid Arthritis (TARA)
    double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled
    trial. McCarey DW, McInnes IB, Madhok R, Hampson
    R, Scherbakov O, Ford I, Capell HA, Sattar N
  • Youssef S, Stuve O, Patarroyo JC, Ruiz PJ,
    Radosevich JL, Hur EM, Bravo M, Mitchell DJ,
    Sobel RA, Steinman L, Zamvil SS. "The HMG-CoA
    reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, promotes a Th2
    bias and reverses paralysis in central nervous
    system autoimmune disease." Nature, November 7,
    2002 vol. 420, pp. 78-84.
  • Bauer DC, Mundy GR, et al. Use of statins and
    fracture results of 4 prospective studies and
    cumulative meta-analysis of observational studies
    and controlled trials Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jan
    26164(2)146-52.
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology
    2005891171-1175 doi10.1136/bjo.2004.064477 A
    case control study of age related macular
    degeneration and use of statins L Smeeth1, C
    Cook1, U Chakravarthy2, R Hubbard3 and A E
    Fletcher1
  • Cholesterol lowering drugs and the risk of age
    related maculopathy prospective cohort study
    with cumulative exposure measurement R van
    Leeuwen, J R Vingerling, A Hofman, P T V M de
    Jong and B H Ch Stricker BMJ 2003326255-256
  • AAO poster presentation Oct 2005 Reduced Risk of
    Progression of Exudative Age Related Macular
    Degeneration with Statin Use. Gregory R. Nettune
    MPH1, Joseph L. Fitzwater BS1, Robert W. Haley
    MD3, Albert O. Edwards MD Ph.D.1,2,4 UTSW
    Medical Center and the 4Institute for Retina
    Research, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas,
    Dallas, TX
  • Statins and Other Cholesterol-Lowering
    Medications and the Presence of GlaucomaGerald
    McGwin, Jr, MS, PhD Sandre McNeal, MPH Cynthia
    Owsley, MSPH, PhD Christopher Girkin, MD David
    Epstein, MD Paul P. Lee, MD, JD Arch
    Ophthalmol. 2004122822-826.
  • Suchecki, et al, Do statins delay or prevent
    onset of Alzheimers Dementia? JFP 2005.
  • http//www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/cardiac/st
    atcanc.html
  • http//www.dynamicmedical.com/dynamed.nsf?opendata
    base
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com