Caries Immunology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Caries Immunology

Description:

Designing an anticaries vaccine. whole bacteria vs targetted virulence factors ... protection against smooth surface caries (buccal, proximal), but not pits and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1705
Avg rating:5.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: axw5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Caries Immunology


1
Caries Immunology
  • Dr. Aaron Weinberg DMD, PhD
  • Department of Biological Sciences
  • CASE School of Dental Medicine

2
Outline of Lecture
  • Caries Immunology
  • Background
  • Caries and sIgA
  • Mutans streptococci
  • Streptococcus mutans
  • Designing an anticaries vaccine
  • whole bacteria vs targetted virulence factors
  • Active and passive immunization
  • MAb
  • Chimeric MAb
  • CDR-grafted MAb
  • Xenomic mice

3
Background
  • Billions of spent per year in U.S. on treating
    dental caries
  • Surgeon Generals report on oral health states
    that caries is a major health problem in U.S.
  • Fluoridation has reduced caries by ½ in children
    5-17 yo
  • National anticaries strategy
  • To combat the microbial agent
  • To increase tooth resistance
  • To modify diet
  • To deliver anticaries measures to the public
  • To combat the microbial agent
  • Clark, 1924 (Brit. J. Exp. Pathol) isolated S.
    mutans was first to implicate this bacterium to
    DCs. Was met with resistance.
  • McClure and Hewitt, 1946 (J. Dent. Res.) used
    penicillin, rats and Lactobacillus acidophilus to
    show bacterial association with DCs.
  • Orland et al, 1954 (J. Dent. Res.) used
    gnotobiotic rats to prove that cariogenic diet
    alone is not enough to induce DCs i.e.,
    bacteria!

4
Background contd
  • By mid-1960s, after various epidemiological and
    etiological studies, S. mutans re-emerged as
    prime candidate for antimicrobial attack.
  • Tomasi et al, 1965 (J Exp Med) IgA found to be
    important immunological agent in saliva.
  • ? dental vaccination approaches targeting a
    specific pathogen (S. mutans) and manipulating a
    specific humoral immune system (sIgA).

5
Natural development of sIgA
  • At birth no sIgA in saliva
  • Predentate infants (16-28 wks)
  • Detected against 1st wave of strep. organisms
    S. mitis, S. salivarius (Smith and Taubman, 1992)
  • These organisms initially colonize mucosal
    surfaces
  • No Abs to S. mutans detected
  • Dentate children
  • Tooth eruption brings 2nd wave of strep.
    organisms S. sanguis, S. mutans
  • Antibodies (Abs) against S. mutans observed in 1
    yr old children
  • Abs against serotype specific carbohydrate,
    protein I/II, glucosyltransferase, glucans,
    teichoic acids
  • w/i 10 yrs the child has IgA levels comparable to
    an adult (adult parotid saliva contains 30-160
    ?g/ml IgA)

6
Caries and sIgA
  • Early correlation studies
  • Ørstavik, Brandtzaeg, 1975 low titers of parotid
    sIgA corresponds with increase in dental caries
  • IgA deficiency
  • Afflicts 11000 people and is associated with
    dental caries
  • Subjects suffer from chronic rhinitis and
    sinusitis leads to habitual mouth breathing use
    of sucrose containing medicinal syrups poor oral
    hygiene during acute infection bottle feeding to
    help with sleep
  • ? difficult to control these studies
  • but, in group with compensatory high anti-S.
    mutans IgM titers in saliva, caries activity was
    significantly lower (McGhee, Michalek, 1981)
  • sIgA against S. mutans
  • Parotid sIgA recognizes all major serogroups of
    S. mutans
  • PsIgA against surface Ag I/II blocks S. mutans
    adhesion to saliva coated hydroxyapatite
    (Hajishenagallis et al, 1992)
  • ?suggests a mechanism of protection that exists
    and/or could be exploited
  • Serum antibodies (SAs) and caries resistance
  • Conflicting reports overall, SAs from gingival
    crevice may confer modest degree of protection to
    tooth in cervical area and none in coronal
    portion.

7
sIgA
8
Specific immunity against DCs
  • Caries correlated with sIgA titers and serum
    IgM to S. mutans.
  • Elevation in titer is due to exposure
  • Are these antibodies protective??
  • Association between sIgA antibodies and
    resistance to dental infection by S. mutans has
    still to be convincingly demonstrated.

9
Naturally induced immunity vs artificially
induced hyperimmunization
  • N.I.I. (passive) results in increased titers to a
    wide spectrum of Ags of an organism may not be
    protective.
  • Hyperimmunization (vaccination) results in
    elevation of Ab to therapeutic/ preventative
    levels of an organism
  • Aim of vaccine to reduce of pathogen and/or to
    interfere with its metabolic activity
  • Criteria for effective hyperimmunization
  • Identify the bad guy
  • Identify the best target in the bad guy
  • Identify which component of the immune system
    should be targeted?
  • Is there evidence that hyperimmunization will
    work?

10
Criteria for cariogenicity
  • An organism must exhibit tropism for teeth
  • An organism must be acidogenic
  • An organism must be aciduric
  • An organism must utilize refined sugar
    (sucrose) (Newbrun, 1983)

11
Lactic acid bacteria as prime suspects
  • Heterogenous family of bacteria
  • Some good, some bad
  • All ferment sugars and form lactic acid as end
    product
  • Lactic acid is less volatile than other acids and
    chelates calcium, facilitating demineralization
    of enamel
  • All form extracellular glucose polymers (glucans)
    from sucrose via GTF (glucosyltransferase)

12
Mutans streptococci
  • Group of strep species most closely associated
    with caries of smooth surfaces, pits, fissures
  • 6 serotypes of ms that are associated with man
  • S. mutans serotype C, predominant group
    associated with enamel surfaces 80-87 of cases
    in U.S.
  • Swedish kids smooth surface caries, 36 presence
    of serotype c, 54 serotype d/g

13
Targeted immune systems for hyperimmunization
  • Cellular immune mechanisms not targeted
  • Cells have difficulty functioning in the mouth
  • Most bacterial infections handled by secretory
    immunity (sIgA) or antibody (IgG)-complement-neut
    rophil axis
  • sIgA and crevicular (serum gingival)
    IgG-IgM-IgA systems are targeted.

14
Evidence that an anti-caries vaccine could work
  • Studies in the 70s showed protection in animals
    using hyperimmunization
  • Ex hyperimmunized rats fed a cariogenic diet led
    to protection against smooth surface caries
    (buccal, proximal), but not pits and fissures
    (sulcal) (Michalek et al, 1976)
  • ? Results suggest that protection is, at best,
    location dependent. Sulcal protection requires
    additional protection i.e., sealants



15
Whole S. mutans cells wont work as the immunogen
  • Why?
  • S. mutans has antigens that cross-react with
    heart muscle cardiolipin (diphosphatidyl
    glycerol) phospholipid found in mytochondrial
    membrane
  • Although patient death is one form of caries
    control, this strategy wont work! (morbid humor)

16
Alternative means of vaccination
  • Purification of candidate antigens and use of a
    subunit vaccine
  • Using recombinant DNA methods to place virulence
    factors from cariogenic bugs into a
    noncariogenic, non-cross-reactive bug.
  • Candidate antigens selected, based on bugs
    pathogenic activities.

17
Glucans
  • Sticky stuff cariogenic bugs use for adherence
  • Tree-like homopolymers of glucose featuring
    gazillions of branches
  • 2 types
  • Water-soluble glucans
  • Rich in ?-1-6 linkages (dextran)
  • glucosyltransferase-s (GTF-S)
  • Water-insoluble glucans
  • Rich in ?-1-3 linkages (mutan)
  • glucosyltransferase-I (GTF-I)
  • Antibodies impeding GTF function are protective
    in animals

18
(No Transcript)
19
Glucan function
  • Plaque accumulation
  • Molecular sieves
  • Retain water
  • Act as secondary attachment apparatus for bugs
  • Strengthen attachment of producing organism to
    tooth
  • ? enables producing organism to control
    microenvironment
  • ?-dextran antibodies proposed as possible target
    to confer caries protection

20
Adhesins
  • Surface protein antigens
  • SA I/II, B, P1 in S. mutans 185-210 kD
  • SpaA in S. sobrinus 160-180 kD
  • Are predominant proteins on surface of bugs 35
    of all surface proteins.
  • Immunologically related to dextranase
  • fuzzy coat by EM
  • Function
  • Adhere to tooth in absence of sucrose
  • Mutants lacking SA I/II, lack fuzzy coat, bind
    poorly to exptal pellicle (Harrington and
    Russell, 1993)
  • ?-surface protein antibodies protective in
    monkeys
  • antibodies against saliva binding region of SA
    I/II prevent colonization of S. mutans on mice
    teeth (Huang et al, 2001)

21
Dextranases
  • 160-175 kD enzymes
  • Break down polymers of glucose in ?-1-6 linkages
    to modify glucan product of GTF
  • May permit extracellular glucans to serve as
    energy stores
  • May function in sucrose-independent adherence
    (via SPA-related epitope)
  • Mutants lacking dextranase and SpaA (S. sobrinus)
    are avirulent

22
Serotype-defining carbohydrate antigens
  • Complex carbohydrate heteropolymers w/ galactose,
    glucose
  • 8 serotypes of mutans streptococci
  • designated a-h
  • Serotypes c, e, f (S. mutans) d, g, h (S.
    sobrinus) important in humans.
  • Aside from antibody specificity, these structures
    bind GTF to cell surface
  • ? proposed as targets for a caries vaccine
  • Abs against serotype-carbohydrate Ags are
    protective and prevent binding of GTF to cell

23
Lipoteichoic acids
  • Amphipathic molecules on surface of Gram-positive
    bugs
  • Analogous to LPS of Gram-negative bugs
  • Anionic, attract cationic ions for stabilization
  • May be involved in adherence
  • Strong inducers of inflammation TLR2 vs TLR4 for
    LPS
  • Consist of linear polymers of polyribitol or
    polyglycerol phosphate groups the carbohydrate
    backbone is covalently bound to lipid of
    cytoplasmic membrane
  • Not a good antigen candidate epitopes could
    cross-react with host tissue antigens heart
    antigens.

24
Gram positive cell envelope
25
Active anticaries immunization
  • The heart cross-reactivity issue using whole
    attenuated bugs may be a false concern
  • If vaccine is administered orally to stimulate
    sIgA rather than IgG ? using enteric
    pathway
  • IgA is more beneficial by immune elimination at
    mucosal surfaces
  • Eliciting systemic IgA causes binding to antigen
    and preventing complement fixation

Peroral vaccination (po) - po
immunization by S. mutans elevates sIgA Abs
(Gregory, Filler, 1987) - humans given
gelatin-capsules of killed S. mutans whole bugs,
10d -
sIgA against GTF and SA I/II found in all cases
- reduction in S. mutans from dental plaque
Not addressed (1) if this improved the
caries situation, (2) if harmful serum IgG Abs
against LTA were found

26
Active anticaries immunization contd
  • Subunit vaccination
  • Parts of purified bacterial antigens
  • Synthetic peptides
  • Chemically synthesizing a piece of a large
    protein
  • Ex Targeting an active domain of GTF
    (structure-function studies)
  • peptide from glucan binding domain of GTF
  • Abs against this domain inhibit GTF 30 not
    good.
  • peptide from an amino-terminal sequence
  • Abs against this domain are 80 inhibitory

27
Molecular genetics and the enteric pathway
introducing antigen genes in harmless enteric
bacteria these bacteria proliferate in gut,
exhibiting greater staying power than gelatin
capsules w/antigen currently under
investigation is this microbe totally
harmless??? some plasmid vectors used have
genes that encode antibiotic resistance
28
Gingival swabs and local pathway
  • swabbing gingiva elicits immune response
  • Ex. 3800 dalton low mol wt component of S.
    mutans, swabbed on monkey gingiva elicits IgG
    in crevicular fluid
  • and sIgA in saliva (Lehner et al, 1986)
  • - How is there sIgA?
  • - some antigen must be ingested
  • Therapeutically, this method may be useful
  • - swabbing administered only 10 times/yr
    resulted in
  • in S. mutans and in caries

29
Liposomes
  • artificial membrane vesicles containing
    aqueous-phase solutes inside or intramembranous
    molecules w/i the membranes
  • act as adjuvants
  • S. mutans Ags (GTF) in dessicated liposomes fed
    to humans (Childers et al, 1994)
  • - salivary IgA2 against GTF
  • - ? dehydrated liposomes may be useful in
    generating specific salivary immunity against
    target Ags in oral cavity

30
Adjuvants
  • increase immunogenicity of peptide antigens
  • traditional ones are toxic (Freunds mineral
    oils)
  • liposomes offer attractive alternative
  • cholera toxin (Mike Russells group in U of
    Alabama)
  • - most promising adjuvant to stimulate mucosal
    sIgA
  • - after 1 boost, persistenly high titers of sIgA
    (Hajishengalis et al, 1996)
  • - dimer toxic CTA-subunit and nontoxic
    CTB-subunit
  • - adjuvant activity found to reside in CTB
  • - replaced the CTA-subunit with Ag (SA I/II)
    from S. mutans, constructed an enteric bacterial
    clone in avirulent Salmonella typhimurium
    expressing SA I/II-CTA2/CTB
  • - sIgA titers to SA I/II obtained (Harokopakis
    et al, 1997)

31
Fluoride as adjuvant
  • Ingested fluoride found to be potent adjuvant
    of mucosal immunity in rats (Butler et al, 1990)
  • intragastric NaF causes size and
    cellularity Payers patches, mesenteric lymph
    nodes, number plasma cells secreting IgG, IgA
    to Ags concurrently administered in water
  • elevated CD4 T cells in the lymphoid tissues
  • Not known how fluoride amplifies mucosal
    immunity to ingested bacteria
  • argues in favor of fluride administration as
    part of caries vaccine program

32
Passive anticaries immunizationAbs passively
administered
  • Maternal immunization
  • Oral immunization of pregnant rats
  • Milk from immunized mothers confers protection to
    weanlings
  • Xenogeneic immunization
  • Cows immunized against
  • cariogenic bacteria have
  • anticariogenic Abs in cows milk
  • IgG1, major secreted Ab isotype
  • S. mutans and caries scores
  • reduced in gnotobiotic mice
  • (Michalek et al, 1987)
  • Whats the problem in this
  • expt?

33
Passive anticaries immunization contd
  • Bovine whey IgG1, as mouthrinse, interferes
    with glucan formation and S. mutans adherence
    (Loimaranta et al, 1997)
  • Bovine whey from cows immunized w/ S. mutans
    fusion protein SAI/II fused w/glucan-binding
    domain of GTF-I prevented recolonization of S.
    mutans in 8 volunteers (Shimazaka, et al 2001)
  • Chicken eggs
  • New frontier for passive anticaries immunization
  • Michelik (U. Alabama) looking at potential
    therapeutic capacity of egg in mouthrinse
  • Rocky Balboa has volunteered and is eating dozens
    of raw chicken eggs!!!

34
Passive anticaries immunization contd
  • Monoclonal antibodies (MAb)
  • Single specificity produced by cells from a
    single B-cell clone
  • Mostly derived from mice (i.e., xenogeneic)
  • Fusion of mouse plasma cell and myeloma cell
    results in hybridoma Ab capacity of plasma
    cell and proliferative property of myeloma cell
  • In tissue culture, hybridomas generate unlimited
    amount of MAb
  • Diagnostic tools for
  • Assessing immunocompetence
  • Identifying infectious agents
  • Monitor concentrations of hormones and
    chemotherapeutic agents in plasma
  • - Also used as immunosuppressive agents

35
Chimeric MAb
  • Limiting therapeutic factor, xenogeneic, leading
    to rejection
  • Genetic engineering fusing Fab with human Fc
  • C region confers function to Ab, giving chimeric
    MAb functional attributes
  • Ex. cMAb having an IgG1 isotype C region is
    effective in C activation and Ab dependent
    cell-mediated cytotoxicity
  • cMAb of IgA subclass exhibits anti-inflammatory
    effects

36
CDR-grafted MAb
Complementarity-defining region (CDR) Areas
of Ab that bind to Ag Variable region of Ig
contains 3-4 hypervariable regions and
intervening framework regions these are the
CDR CDR-MAb contains rodent hypervariable
sequences, human framework sequences and human
constant regions Used in organ transplant
immune suppression (CD3, CD4, IL-2 recpetor)
rheumatoid arthritis (CD4, CDw52), Crohns
disease (CD4), systemic vasculitis (CDw52),
leukemia and lymphomas (CDw52, IL-2 receptor),
septic shock (TNF?), neoplasm (Lewis-Y,hEGFR2),vir
al infection (HIV, herpes simplex)
37
Xenomic mice
  • Allogeneic Ab therapy developed against a
    xenogeneic background
  • xenomic mice, genetically engineered to make
    human immunoglobulins
  • Advantage, theoretically, one strain of mice
    can make polyclonal human Abs against a host of
    antigenic challenges, circumventing need to form
    new hybridomas against new antigens providing
    polyclonal specificity can have functional
    advantage over MAb

38
Root surface caries
  • Actinomyces viscosus, A. naeuslundii, a.
    odontolyticus, A. eriksonii, Rothia dentocariosa
  • Given the gingival localization of these
    lesions, complement-IgG-neutrophil axis is more
    important
  • Suggestive evidence
  • Neutropenia (Mishkin et al, 1976 Pemu et al,
    1996)
  • RSC is not a problem in children mostly in
    elderly
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com