Experience of Transforming Educational Provision of Children with Special Educational Needs in Centr - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Experience of Transforming Educational Provision of Children with Special Educational Needs in Centr

Description:

Increased capitation grants for children with disabilities, learning difficulty ... Capitation grants according to the school type (special class versus special ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: csnyiy
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Experience of Transforming Educational Provision of Children with Special Educational Needs in Centr


1
Experience of Transforming Educational Provision
of Children with Special Educational Needs in
Central European Countries
  • Prof. Dr. Yvonne Csányi
  • ELTE University
  • Bárczi Faculty of Special Education
  • Budapest, Hungary
  • 2006

2
Students withSpecial Educational Needs (SEN)
  • From deficits within the children
  • ?
  • to education that supports the children
  • Those with special educational needs are
    defined by being provided with additional
    resources to support their access to the
    curriculum.

3
Additional Resources
  • Personnel resources
  • - more
    favourable teacher/student ratio,
  • - additional teachers,
    assist ants,
  • - training
    programmes for teachers
  • Material resources
  • - aids, equipments
  • - barrier free schools
  • - specialized teaching
    materials

4
THE PAST
  • Regular and special education
  • as two separate systems
  • Segregation
  • Knowledge, facilites, expertis
  • concentrated in special (boarding) schools.

5
From Segregation to Integration
  • Driving forces - internationally
  • Normalization
  • Equal civic rights
  • Antipsychiatric movement
  • Evaluation of special schools results
  • Integration projects
  • Parents movements
  • Early intervention
  • The influence of the European Union

6
THE PRESENCE AND THE FUTURE
  • One system with different alternatives
  • Special school
  • Local integration
  • Social integration
  • Functional integration
  • part time or full
    time
  • Reversed integration

  • /Spontaneous integration/

7
INTEGRATION ? INCLUSION (assimilation)
(accomodation)
  • Traditional methods
  • Organisation whole class teaching
  • Achievement orientation
  • Problem within the child
  • Special teacher should cope with all problems
  • The class teacher is the
  • only accepting person
  • New methods individualiza-tion, differentiation
  • New structures groups, pairs, co-operative
    learning
  • Development of abilities
  • Problem in the environment
  • The responsibilities are shared with the teachers
  • Changed school policy (whole staff)

8
The UN Standard Rules on the Equalisation of
Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities (1993)
  • Countries should recognise the principle of equal
    primary, secondary and tertiary educational
    opportunities for children, youth and adults with
    disabilities in integrated settings.
  • Special attention should be given to very young
    and pre-school disabled children.
  • In order to implement inclusive education states
    should allow for a flexible curriculum as well as
    additions and adaptations, on-going teacher
    training and support of teachers, provide quality
    materials.
  • Communities should develop local resources to
    provide this education.

9
UNESCOS 1994 Salamanca StatementCall upon all
Governments to..
  • give the highest policy and budgetary priority to
    improve
  • education services so that all children could
    be included, regardless of differences or
    difficulties.
  • adopt as a matter of law the principle of
    inclusive education and enrol all children in
    ordinary schools unless there are compelling
    reasons for doing otherwise.
  • put greater effort into pre-school strategies as
    well as vocational strategies of inclusive
    education.
  • ensure that both initial and in-service teacher
    training address the provision of inclusive
    education.

10
OECDCERI (Centre of Educational Research and
Innovation)
  • Research, projects serving reforms
  • Constant comparison of statistical data
    (publications)
  • National and cross-country indicators
  • CERI SEN/DDD Committee (33 countries)
  • The cross-country definition of SEN
  • - students with disabilities
  • - students with learning difficulties
  • - disadvantaged students

11
The European Agency for Development in Special
Needs Educationn
  • 25 member countries (Cz, H, S. R., P. !)
  • central topic inclusion
  • Data gathering
  • Dissemination (WEB, books, articles)
  • Exchange program
  • International conferences

12
Percentage of SEN Students in Segregated
Settings (2000)
13
Changes of the Law in Hungary
  • First step 1978 - support for children with law
    vision
  • From 1981 ungoing research projects
  • 1991 Hungarian acceptance of the 1989 UN Decret
    of the Rights of Children
  • 1993 Act on Public Education
  • Students may attend special or regular
    schools
  • 1998 Act on the Right of Persons with
    Disabilities
  • 2002 Act on Equal Rights in Higher Education
  • 2002 Roma integration programs
  • 2003 Introduction of the concept of SEN
  • 2006 Severe and multihandicapped students in
    spec. schools

14
The starting points Czech Republic
  • Segregation has a long tradition
  • 1989 the start of integration policy (equal
    opportunities for disabled children)
  • 1993 the right of children to education
  • 1998 first official document on integration
  • (National Plan of Providing Equal
    Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities)
  • 2005 introduction of the concept of SEN

15
The starting points Poland
  • 1991 Act on School Education (special education
    as integral part of the school system)
  • 1993 ordinance of the Minister of
  • Education principles of integration
  • 1999 reform of school education

16
The Concept of SEN
  • HUNGARY
  • All types of disabilities
  • CZECH REP.
  • Disabilities - chronic illness - young
    delinquents
  • POLAND
  • Disabilities - chronic illness - drug addicts -
  • deviant behaviour, social maladjustment

17
THE ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
  • Psychological - educational advice committees
  • The role of parents
  • Revised assessment

18
THE TYPES OF INTEGRATION
  • Hungary
  • Local - Social - Functional (full time)
  • Inclusion rare
  • Czech Rep., Slovak Rep., Poland
  • Local - Functional (part time and full time)
  • Reversed integration possible in all special
    schools (Czech Rep.)

19
THE NUMBER OF FULL TIME INTEGRATED STUDENTS
20

21
School types with integrated SEN students in
Hungary (2003/2004)
22
Integration and additional resources in Hungary
(1)
  • Increased capitation grants for children with
    disabilities, learning difficulty or social
    disadvantage following the child and not the
    school type
  • Flexible class sizes (a SEN students equals 2 or
    3)
  • Remedial teaching (10-50 of the total hours of
    teaching/week) provided by special teachers
  • Correctional lessons by support or regular
    teacher
  • Barrier free school buildings the latest by 2010
  • Exemption from attending certain lessons, instead
    individual plan
  • Exemption from formative assessment in certain
    subjects
  • Written assessments instead of marks (until grade
    4)
  • Individual progress max. until grade 4.

23
Integration and additional resources in Hungary
(2)
  • Exemption from formative assessment in certain
    subjects
  • Modified examinations (duration, mode, use of
    equipment)
  • The change of certain subjects at the final
    examination (secondary school)
  • 15 additional capital grant for SEN students in
    higher education
  • Remedial educational programs in vocational
    schools for students who have not completed the
    public school

24
Integration and additional resources in the Czech
Rep.
  • Capitation grants according to the school type
    (special class versus special school)
  • Funding of fully integrated students is tied to
    the actual need and less than the amount in
    special schools
  • Social disadvantage is not considered in funding
    -
  • consequence additional resources available
    only in special schools

25
Integration and additional resources
  • The Slovak Rep. the normative formula
    varies according to the level of disability
  • Poland
  • - the grants are different according to the
    type of
  • the disability
  • - additional amount if the student has been
  • integrated

26
Curriculum (Hungary)
  • One common curriculum
  • The necessary shift
  • from lexical knowledge
  • to skills that are developed
  • Guidelines for students with special needs

27
The new challenge for special schools
  • The special school as resource centre
  • with a multifunctional offering
  • - Teaching in a reduced number of special
    classes
  • - Group of mobile teachers support service
  • - Pool of special teaching materials and
    teaching
  • aids
  • - Information, guidance for parents
  • - Courses for regular teachers
  • - Early intervention

28
The possible obstacles
  • Integration policy is not part of the Education
    Act
  • The dual system of regular and special education
  • The traditional thinking of teachers and their
    prejudices
  • School buildings are not barrier free
  • Teacher training unprepared regular teachers
  • Limited resources (support service !)
  • Missing support teachers
  • High class sizes
  • Funds concentrating on special schools
  • Curriculum
  • Parents are not supportive
  • The lack of early intervention

29
CONCLUSIONS
  • Clear policy statement on inclusion as part of
    the total educational system
  • Pilot projects
  • Mobilization of funds (capital grants following
    the students)
  • Organization of support services
  • Accessible curriculum
  • Teacher training
  • Discussions, planning
  • Information (parents, society)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com