QUALITATIVE RESEARCH SOCIAL METHODS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH SOCIAL METHODS

Description:

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH SOCIAL METHODS SC20062 Leah Wild Week Four WEEK FOUR-OVERVIEW Sampling in qualitative projects Fieldwork issues in qualitative projects Case ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:631
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: ZeldaL9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: QUALITATIVE RESEARCH SOCIAL METHODS


1
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH SOCIAL METHODS
  • SC20062
  • Leah Wild
  • Week Four

2
WEEK FOUR-OVERVIEW
  • Sampling in qualitative projects
  • Fieldwork issues in qualitative projects
  • Case study New-Age Travellers
  • Group work

3
REASONS FOR SAMPLING
  • Complete coverage not possible
  • Complete coverage is not advantageous
  • Less demanding, quick results
  • More economical
  • More detailed information

4
SAMPLING
  • Quantitative sampling aims at representativeness
  • Qualitative sampling aims at information-rich
    cases
  • Be realistic and practical
  • Upper and lower limits
  • For assignment 3/4 per group
  • Dissertation 5-10
  • Need range and diversity
  • Link to research aim

5
QUALITATIVE SAMPLING
  • Is directed
  • typical cases
  • a sample that is flexible in size and type or
    subjects
  • not towards statistical or random sampling
  • purposive sampling
  • theoretical sampling
  • Choose a case in terms of your theory
  • Choose deviant cases
  • Change the size of your sample

6
VALIDITY RELIABILITY
  • Validation
  • Cumulative
  • Communicative
  • Argumentative
  • Ecological
  • Reliability

7
FINDING INTERVIEWEES
  • Pick a realistic site
  • Using lists of name and addresses
  • Screening questionnaire
  • Networking/snowballing
  • Selecting from a captive audience
  • Involvement of gatekeepers

8
FIELDWORK ISSUES
  • Recruitment
  • Incentives
  • Where to interview
  • Home
  • Work
  • Where comfortable
  • Reflective methods

9
CASE STUDY New Age Travellers Identity and
Community.
  • The nature of contact between groups is varied
    and complex.
  • Generational differences.
  • Geographically dispersed.
  • Differing views on
  • The influence of politics in motivations to
    travel
  • How community is shaped and maintained.
  • Overall aim of the research to determine how
    Travellers construct their identities and a sense
    of home and belonging.

10
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
  • To find out what motivated individuals to become
    Travellers.
  • To explore the ascribed identities of
    Travellers.
  • To explore the impact of ascribed identity of the
    formulation of collective identity?
  • To examine concepts of Risk and otherness in
    relation to collective identity.
  • Where do Travellers get notions of home and
    belonging from?

11
RESEARCH METHODS
  • Pilot questionnaire (participant led approach)
  • Questionnaire.
  • In-depth interviews
  • 14 individual interviews (France, Spain, UK)
  • 2 Group Interviews.
  • participant observation
  • Focus Groups to discuss literature.
  • Allowing myself to be interviewed by an informant.

12
Reflexivity 1
  • Personal reflexivity
  • Reflexivity requires an awareness of the
    researcher's contribution to the construction of
    meanings throughout the research process, and an
    acknowledgment of the impossibility of remaining
    'outside of' one's subject matter while
    conducting research. Reflexivity then, urges us
    "to explore the ways in which a researcher's
    involvement with a particular study influences,
    acts upon and informs such research."
    (Nightingale and Cromby, 1999 28).
  • Epistemological reflexivity
  • epistemological reflexivity encourages us to
    reflect upon the assumptions (about the world,
    about knowledge) that we have made in the course
    of the research, and it helps us to think about
    the implications of such assumptions for the
    research and its findings. Willig, (2001 32)

13
Reflexivity 2
  • Bourdieu reflexive practice to free intellectuals
    from 'their illusions
  • Harold Garfinkel (1967) actions and can only be
    fully understood from within the context that
    they were produced.
  • 'truth' and validity contingent on both time and
    space
  • Referential reflexivity the study of the
    relations between the person who engages in the
    research and the persons or groups who are the
    focus of that research.( May 1998)
  • Worsley (1997) communities have their own
    ontological structures the researcher runs the
    risk of imposing ontological structures from
    their own already dominant culture.
  • Issues of Power.

14
Subjectivity, Reflexivity and Ethics.
  • Qualitative inquiry as subjective.
  • Locating the self in ones research
  • Epistemological questions
  • Ontological Questions.
  • Questioning relations between researcher and
    researched
  • Research as one interpretation among many.
  • The issue of authorial authority.
  • making the methodologies and the use I make of
    them more transparent and accountable.
  • Linking this to ethics.

15
OTHER METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES TO CONSIDER.
  • Gatekeeper bias
  • Participant led research.
  • Honesty in interviews
  • Data collection
  • Data analysis.
  • Insider or Outsider and the question of
    epistemological privilege.
  • Researching a sensitive topic
  • The issue of harm
  • What do with contentious data.
  • Writing culture the issue of representation and
    misrepresentation.

16
KEY FINDINGS FROM MY OWN RESEARCH
  • Common representations of Travellers in media
    highly negative.
  • In academic discourse hero and victim
    dichotomy.
  • Travellers react in unexpected ways to negative
    stereotyping.
  • Otherness a structuring principle through which
    travellers formulate their own identities.
  • Outsider status used to consolidate a sense of
    home and community.

17
KEY ISSUES ARISING IN RELATION TO REFLEXIVITY IN
MY RESEARCH.
  • Research always autobiographical.
  • Own interests impossible to remove from the
    process and practice of research
  • Claims to epistemological privilege hugely
    problematic
  • Costs as well as benefits in conducting insider
    research.
  • Reflexive engagement can be paralysing, need
    for strategies to overcome this.
  • Research always a collective endeavour between
    researcher and researched
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com