Transformation of the Rural Cooperative Sector in Poland. Its contribution towards sustainable development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Transformation of the Rural Cooperative Sector in Poland. Its contribution towards sustainable development

Description:

Transformation of the Rural Cooperative Sector in Poland. Its contribution towards sustainable development Ilona Banaszak Environmental and Resource Economics II – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: IlonaBa1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transformation of the Rural Cooperative Sector in Poland. Its contribution towards sustainable development


1
Transformation of the Rural Cooperative Sector in
Poland. Its contribution towards sustainable
development
  • Ilona Banaszak
  • Environmental and Resource Economics II

2
Purpose of the presentation
  • To discuss
  • History of rural cooperatives in Poland.
    Influence of ideology on economic and social
    life, how changing ideology has been influening
    attitudes towards cooperatives
  • To which extend the cooperative movement may help
    to achieve the path of sustainable development by
    polish rural areas

3
Theoretical background (1)Sustainable
development
  • Sustainable development is the management
    and conservation of the natural resource base,
    and the orientation of technological and
    institutional change in such a manner as to
    ensure the attainment and continued satisfaction
    of human needs for present and future
    generations. Such sustainable development (in the
    agriculture, forestry and fishery sectors)
    conserves land, preserves water, plant and animal
    genetic resources, in environmentally
    non-degrading, technically appropriate,
    economically viable and socially acceptable
  • (FAO 1994)

4
Theoretical background (2)6 dimensions of
sustainability in agriculture and horticulture
  • Ethic dimension
  • Ecological dimension
  • Global dimension
  • Retinity dimension
  • Economic dimension securing commercial viability
    of farms, improving on-farm employment
    opportunities, being responsible for food
    security and food quality, contributing to gross
    national product
  • Social dimension developing the rural social
    capital, stimulating participation of the rural
    population, improving the living and working
    conditions of the rural population, developing
    social infrastructure and social security
    services (Hagedorn 2004).

5
Theoretical background (3) Social capital
  • Mutual trust and how effectively people work
    together, e.g. transaction costs are lowered
    because informal self-enforcement of contracts
    can take place without third party enforcement
    since agents can save monitoring and transaction
    costs, social capital may also be regarded as a
    new production factor alongside the traditional
    ones of human and physical capital
  • (Coleman 1988)
  • Social capital can be measured by (1) membership
    in voluntary organisations (e.g. a cooperative),
    (2) trust, (3) civic participation (Paldam 2000,
    Chloupkova et al. 2003).

6
Theoretical background (4)Cooperatives
  • Cooperative movement aiming in achieving certain
    economic goals by less powerful (/poor) economic
    groups, based on cooperation and reciprocal aid
  • Cooperation must be conscious, voluntary and
    based mainly on resources of the associated
    self-aid and self organisation principles
    (Brzozowski 1998)
  • Cooperative main form of the cooperative
    movement
  • Cooperative autonomous union of people who
    voluntary join together in order to fulfil
    certain economic, cultural and social needs by
    establishment of a common and democratically
    govern enterprise (ibid.)

7
Cooperatives and sustainable development
  • Cooperative movement aims in improving economic
    and social situation of underprivileged social
    groups
  • Participation in cooperatives strengths social
    capital
  • Cooperatives may contribute towards more rational
    using of means of production (e.g. shared
    machinery) and more rational production methods
    (e.g. diffusion of knowledge), creation of on-
    and off-farm employment, development of the
    whole local community

8
Rural cooperatives in Polandbefore the 1st
world war
  • 1816 1st coop, established by a nobleman and
    politician S. Staszic for peasants Hrubieszów
    Agricultural Association of Mutual Help in
    Misfortune on a part of land offered by Staszic
    joint farming a fund from income and taxes spent
    on help for members, schools, scholarships
  • In the part under Prussia and Austrian regime
    from 1860s agricultural and trade, dairy,
    savings and loans coops mainly to support Polish
    peasants oppressed by the authorities.

9
Rural cooperatives in Poland Between the Wars
1918 - 1939
  • Cooperative movement propagated by F. Stefczyk
    he aimed in gaining by peasants profits taken by
    middlemen, industrialisation of agricultural
    production, higher profitability of farms
  • The most frequent saving-credit cooperatives
    simple forms, acting within parishes and based on
    trust between creditors and borrowers
  • Other forms
  • agricultural-trade coops (rather big, associating
    rich peasants)
  • dairy coops (organising purchase of milk, eggs,
    also simple processing of milk and butter
    production, exporting to the Western Europe)
  • consumer coops (usually based on one shop within
    a village providing basic products)
  • Retreat from 1935-1936 as a result of the
    international crisis
  • In 1937 11 of the inhabitants of Poland
    (including also minorities) were members of
    cooperatives

10
Number of cooperatives and their members in 1937
Coops type No. of coops No. of members (thous.)
Loan 5 517 1 515
Dairy 1 408 543
Consumer 1 808 366
Agricultural-consumer 2 973 353
Agricultural-trade 410 22
Housing 252 58
Other 496 76
Total 12 860 2 933
11
Rural cooperatives in Poland After the 2nd
World War
  • First coops voluntary formed to govern and farm
    former German holdings (in 1948 91 such coops
    with 2 300 member)
  • Reactivated coops connected with non-communistic
    part of the peasant movement or politically
    neutral
  • From Dec. 1944 efforts of the authorities to
    subordinate the cooperative movement

12
Rural cooperatives in Poland After 1948
communism
  • Abolition of most of voluntary, not subordinated
    to the states control cooperatives (e.g. in
    dairy, gardening and credits)
  • Political, administration and economic pressure
    on farmers to joint cooperatives
  • Cooperatives subjected to the state introduction
    of control mechanisms, centralised and
    bureaucratised planning
  • Due to strong resistance of farmers and not
    sufficient financial incentives in 1955
    cooperatives associated only 10 of the
    agricultural land and 8 of peasant families

13
Rural cooperatives in Poland After 1956
destalinisation
  • In 1956 after the destalinisation and
    neglecting Stalinist ideology, mass abandonment
    of cooperatives by peasants 85 of cooperatives
    split, also these functioning well
  • As the result of the process of democratisation
    and decentralisation some local reactivation of
    dairy, gardening and saving-consumer cooperatives
    and rural cooperatives based on providing
    equipment for farmers nevertheless still under
    the states control

14
1960 - 1989
  • New forms of cooperation introduced, e.g. a
    collective farm associated with a few individual
    farms, in 70s around 200 such cooperatives,
    nevertheless, most of them collapsed till 1980
  • In 70s and 80s the state more and more intervened
    in cooperatives production and decision making
  • Number of cooperatives was slightly increasing,
    but no. of members decreasing (in 1985 8 382
    rural coops, 7 000 urban)

15
Polish rural cooperative movement 1988
16
Rural cooperatives in Poland After 1989 -
transformation
  • In 1989 the cooperative sector associated several
    millions of people, was rather good economically
    developed controlled but in a privileged
    position (legal aid, better access to the means
    of production, financial support, etc.)
  • Due to transformation the situation of the sector
    changed for the worse
  • - in contradiction to the Constitution
    functioning of unions of cooperatives was
    abolished, their assets were sold below the
    value
  • subventions, funds and other aid was stopped
  • inspecting the cooperatives by the state stopped,
    cultural, training, publishing activities of
    cooperatives abolished
  • taxes even higher that for the private sector
  • opening the market for foreign agricultural and
    other goods
  • neglecting achievements of the cooperatives also
    neglecting economic and social benefits that may
    be achieved by cooperatives

17
Cooperatives in 90s
  • Share of cooperative sector decline
    dramatically
  • From 9.5 share in GDP in 1989 to 2.4 share in
    1994
  • From 12.8 share in employment in 1989 to 4.8 in
    1994 and to 3.5 in 1996

18
Rural cooperatives in Poland Presence
  • Come back of the idea of cooperatives, new form
    e.g. agricultural producer groups promoted by
    the government seen as a chance for Polish
    agriculture
  • Till presence reluctance and aversion of farmers
    towards cooperatives.

19
Conclusions
  • Before the 2nd WW the cooperative organisations
    grew up bottom-up as local and regional peasants
    movement against economic threats from other
    social classes or foreign powers
  • They strengthened economic and social power of
    peasants A substantial level of social capital
    on rural areas was achieved
  • These networks, social capital and trust
    destroyed by socialism obligatory
    participation, state intervention, central
    planning
  • Nevertheless, the cooperative sector was present
    and active in some areas before 1989 (e.g. dairy,
    agriculture machinery)
  • Transformation denied these achievements,
    annihilated the cooperative movement
    Double disaster
  • Now how to build a bridge between pre-socialism
    practise and presence?

20
Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com