Title: Transformation of the Rural Cooperative Sector in Poland. Its contribution towards sustainable development
1Transformation of the Rural Cooperative Sector in
Poland. Its contribution towards sustainable
development
- Ilona Banaszak
- Environmental and Resource Economics II
2Purpose of the presentation
- To discuss
- History of rural cooperatives in Poland.
Influence of ideology on economic and social
life, how changing ideology has been influening
attitudes towards cooperatives - To which extend the cooperative movement may help
to achieve the path of sustainable development by
polish rural areas
3Theoretical background (1)Sustainable
development
- Sustainable development is the management
and conservation of the natural resource base,
and the orientation of technological and
institutional change in such a manner as to
ensure the attainment and continued satisfaction
of human needs for present and future
generations. Such sustainable development (in the
agriculture, forestry and fishery sectors)
conserves land, preserves water, plant and animal
genetic resources, in environmentally
non-degrading, technically appropriate,
economically viable and socially acceptable - (FAO 1994)
4Theoretical background (2)6 dimensions of
sustainability in agriculture and horticulture
- Ethic dimension
- Ecological dimension
- Global dimension
- Retinity dimension
- Economic dimension securing commercial viability
of farms, improving on-farm employment
opportunities, being responsible for food
security and food quality, contributing to gross
national product - Social dimension developing the rural social
capital, stimulating participation of the rural
population, improving the living and working
conditions of the rural population, developing
social infrastructure and social security
services (Hagedorn 2004).
5Theoretical background (3) Social capital
- Mutual trust and how effectively people work
together, e.g. transaction costs are lowered
because informal self-enforcement of contracts
can take place without third party enforcement
since agents can save monitoring and transaction
costs, social capital may also be regarded as a
new production factor alongside the traditional
ones of human and physical capital - (Coleman 1988)
- Social capital can be measured by (1) membership
in voluntary organisations (e.g. a cooperative),
(2) trust, (3) civic participation (Paldam 2000,
Chloupkova et al. 2003).
6Theoretical background (4)Cooperatives
- Cooperative movement aiming in achieving certain
economic goals by less powerful (/poor) economic
groups, based on cooperation and reciprocal aid - Cooperation must be conscious, voluntary and
based mainly on resources of the associated
self-aid and self organisation principles
(Brzozowski 1998) -
- Cooperative main form of the cooperative
movement - Cooperative autonomous union of people who
voluntary join together in order to fulfil
certain economic, cultural and social needs by
establishment of a common and democratically
govern enterprise (ibid.)
7Cooperatives and sustainable development
- Cooperative movement aims in improving economic
and social situation of underprivileged social
groups -
- Participation in cooperatives strengths social
capital - Cooperatives may contribute towards more rational
using of means of production (e.g. shared
machinery) and more rational production methods
(e.g. diffusion of knowledge), creation of on-
and off-farm employment, development of the
whole local community
8Rural cooperatives in Polandbefore the 1st
world war
- 1816 1st coop, established by a nobleman and
politician S. Staszic for peasants Hrubieszów
Agricultural Association of Mutual Help in
Misfortune on a part of land offered by Staszic
joint farming a fund from income and taxes spent
on help for members, schools, scholarships - In the part under Prussia and Austrian regime
from 1860s agricultural and trade, dairy,
savings and loans coops mainly to support Polish
peasants oppressed by the authorities.
9Rural cooperatives in Poland Between the Wars
1918 - 1939
- Cooperative movement propagated by F. Stefczyk
he aimed in gaining by peasants profits taken by
middlemen, industrialisation of agricultural
production, higher profitability of farms - The most frequent saving-credit cooperatives
simple forms, acting within parishes and based on
trust between creditors and borrowers - Other forms
- agricultural-trade coops (rather big, associating
rich peasants) - dairy coops (organising purchase of milk, eggs,
also simple processing of milk and butter
production, exporting to the Western Europe) - consumer coops (usually based on one shop within
a village providing basic products) - Retreat from 1935-1936 as a result of the
international crisis - In 1937 11 of the inhabitants of Poland
(including also minorities) were members of
cooperatives -
10Number of cooperatives and their members in 1937
Coops type No. of coops No. of members (thous.)
Loan 5 517 1 515
Dairy 1 408 543
Consumer 1 808 366
Agricultural-consumer 2 973 353
Agricultural-trade 410 22
Housing 252 58
Other 496 76
Total 12 860 2 933
11Rural cooperatives in Poland After the 2nd
World War
- First coops voluntary formed to govern and farm
former German holdings (in 1948 91 such coops
with 2 300 member) - Reactivated coops connected with non-communistic
part of the peasant movement or politically
neutral - From Dec. 1944 efforts of the authorities to
subordinate the cooperative movement
12Rural cooperatives in Poland After 1948
communism
- Abolition of most of voluntary, not subordinated
to the states control cooperatives (e.g. in
dairy, gardening and credits) - Political, administration and economic pressure
on farmers to joint cooperatives - Cooperatives subjected to the state introduction
of control mechanisms, centralised and
bureaucratised planning - Due to strong resistance of farmers and not
sufficient financial incentives in 1955
cooperatives associated only 10 of the
agricultural land and 8 of peasant families
13Rural cooperatives in Poland After 1956
destalinisation
- In 1956 after the destalinisation and
neglecting Stalinist ideology, mass abandonment
of cooperatives by peasants 85 of cooperatives
split, also these functioning well - As the result of the process of democratisation
and decentralisation some local reactivation of
dairy, gardening and saving-consumer cooperatives
and rural cooperatives based on providing
equipment for farmers nevertheless still under
the states control
141960 - 1989
- New forms of cooperation introduced, e.g. a
collective farm associated with a few individual
farms, in 70s around 200 such cooperatives,
nevertheless, most of them collapsed till 1980 - In 70s and 80s the state more and more intervened
in cooperatives production and decision making -
- Number of cooperatives was slightly increasing,
but no. of members decreasing (in 1985 8 382
rural coops, 7 000 urban)
15Polish rural cooperative movement 1988
16Rural cooperatives in Poland After 1989 -
transformation
- In 1989 the cooperative sector associated several
millions of people, was rather good economically
developed controlled but in a privileged
position (legal aid, better access to the means
of production, financial support, etc.) - Due to transformation the situation of the sector
changed for the worse - - in contradiction to the Constitution
functioning of unions of cooperatives was
abolished, their assets were sold below the
value - subventions, funds and other aid was stopped
- inspecting the cooperatives by the state stopped,
cultural, training, publishing activities of
cooperatives abolished - taxes even higher that for the private sector
- opening the market for foreign agricultural and
other goods - neglecting achievements of the cooperatives also
neglecting economic and social benefits that may
be achieved by cooperatives
17Cooperatives in 90s
- Share of cooperative sector decline
dramatically - From 9.5 share in GDP in 1989 to 2.4 share in
1994 - From 12.8 share in employment in 1989 to 4.8 in
1994 and to 3.5 in 1996
18Rural cooperatives in Poland Presence
- Come back of the idea of cooperatives, new form
e.g. agricultural producer groups promoted by
the government seen as a chance for Polish
agriculture - Till presence reluctance and aversion of farmers
towards cooperatives.
19Conclusions
- Before the 2nd WW the cooperative organisations
grew up bottom-up as local and regional peasants
movement against economic threats from other
social classes or foreign powers - They strengthened economic and social power of
peasants A substantial level of social capital
on rural areas was achieved - These networks, social capital and trust
destroyed by socialism obligatory
participation, state intervention, central
planning - Nevertheless, the cooperative sector was present
and active in some areas before 1989 (e.g. dairy,
agriculture machinery) - Transformation denied these achievements,
annihilated the cooperative movement
Double disaster - Now how to build a bridge between pre-socialism
practise and presence?
20Thank you!